SALT Caucus Republicans seethe at $10K cap in Senate's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states are seething at the Senate's proposal to keep the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap at $10,000, setting the stage for a showdown over one of the thorniest aspects of the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.'
Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee set off a frenzy Monday afternoon when they released text for their part of the GOP megabill, which lowered the SALT deduction cap from $40,000 — the product of tenuous negotiations between House moderates and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) — to $10,000, matching the cap in current law.
Senate Republicans have said that the number in the text is merely a placeholder to continue negotiations across the Capitol. But House Republicans in the SALT Caucus are warning in no uncertain terms that they will not accept anything lower than the $40,000 deduction cap they landed last month.
'We have been crystal clear that the SALT deal we negotiated in good faith with the Speaker and the White House must remain in the final bill,' Reps. Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.) and Young Kim (R-Calif.), co-chairs of the SALT Caucus, wrote in a statement. 'Instead of undermining the deal already in place and putting the entire bill at risk, the Senate should work with us to keep our promise of historic tax relief and deliver on our Republican agenda.'
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), another key member of the group, was more succinct, writing on the social platform X that the proposal was 'DEAD ON ARRIVAL' and warning in a statement that a $40,000 deduction cap 'is the deal and I will not accept a penny less.'
'If the Senate reduces the SALT number, I will vote NO and the bill will fail in the House,' he added.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday afternoon that the $10,000 deduction cap is a 'marker' for talks with House Republicans, and that they will find a number in the middle that satisfies both camps.
'We understand that it's a negotiation,' Thune said. 'Obviously there had to be some marker in the bill to start with. But we're prepared to have discussions with our colleagues here in the Senate and figure out a landing spot.'
If a deduction cap below $40,000 remains in the bill, and Senate Republicans approve it, the legislation is unlikely to pass the House, where it must go for final approval before landing on President Trump's desk. House Republicans can only afford to lose three votes and still pass the bill — assuming full attendance and all Democrats vote 'no' — and far more have come out against the new SALT provision.
'The Senate doesn't have the votes for $10k SALT in the House,' Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), a vocal member of the SALT Caucus, wrote on X, with a photo of Daveed Diggs portraying Thomas Jefferson in 'Hamilton' and a caption reading 'you don't have the votes; you don't have the votes.'
'And if they're not sold on the House's $40k compromise, wait until they crash the [One Big Beautiful Bill Act] and [Tax Cuts and Jobs Act] expires—when SALT goes back to unlimited at year-end,' he added. 'They won't like that one bit.'
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) wrote on X that 'Everyone knows this 10K number will have to go up. And it will. NY Republicans will fight and deliver real tax relief for our overly taxed constituents (unlike NY Democrats who have failed the people of NY over and over crushing them with high taxes).'
SALT for months has been one of the most contentious parts of the GOP's bill full of Trump's legislative priorities, with moderate House Republicans from high-tax blue states — including representatives from New York, New Jersey and California, many of whom helped secure the conference's majority — pushing for a higher deduction cap, and deficit hawks pressing to keep it low.
After months of negotiations, members of the House's SALT Caucus landed a deal with leadership for a $40,000 deduction cap for individuals making $500,000 or less — quadruple the current $10,000 deduction cap. They warned their colleagues in the upper chamber not to tamper with the number.
Johnson, who negotiated the $40,000 deduction cap with members of the SALT Caucus, said he urged the Senate on a number of occasions to be 'cautious' in how it changed their bill, especially the SALT provision.
'I've been very consistent from the very beginning: I've encouraged them to be very cautious in changing terms of the bill, especially on SALT because it took us, as I've said over and over and over, it took us over a year to negotiate those terms, and it's very delicate,' he said last week.
But once Senate Republicans got their hands on the package, they quickly warned that they would lower the number, staking opposition to the higher deduction cap that they view as an unfair subsidy for blue states. With zero Senate Republicans hailing from blue states that benefit from a higher SALT deduction cap, the issue has no champion in the upper chamber.
It remains unclear where SALT conversations will go from here. With the party's July 4 deadline quickly approaching, Senate Republicans can still change parts of their package, whether it be through an amendment or on the floor. Even so, SALT Caucus Republicans in the House are warning that they are sticking by the $40,000 cap.
'The $40,000 SALT deduction was carefully negotiated along with other tax provisions by the House of Representatives and we all had to give a little to obtain the votes to pass the Big Beautiful Bill,' Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.) wrote on X. 'For the Senate to leave the SALT deduction capped at $10,000 is not only insulting but a slap in the face to the Republican districts that delivered our majority and trifecta.'
'We understand that it's a negotiation. Obviously there had to be some marker in the bill to start with. But we're prepared to have discussions with our colleagues here in the Senate and figure out a landing spot.'
Al Weaver contributed.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans 'protect' kids by banning gender-affirming care. What about guns?
Editor's note: Letters to the editor reflect the views of individual readers. Scroll to see how you can add your voice, whether you agree or disagree, or click on this link to fill out the form. We welcome diverse viewpoints. There seems to be no limit to the growing Republican capacity for dishonesty and hypocrisy. They are all for "freedom" for almost any citizen to carry the AR-15 (which received glowing reviews in Vietnam for its lethality). Yet, if someone wants freedom Republicans interpret as "sexual," they're perceived as being "all in your face." Opinion: Tennesseans have different views on guns, but here's how we know solutions are possible Republicans claim they are "protecting" kids who are bullied and ostracized daily — by further ostracizing them. But protect them from a flood of firearms? Don't bother to General Skrmetti and Governor Bill Lee are slapping each other's backs because our Supreme "Free Vacations!" Court let them deny healthcare to trans kids. Yet the same kinds of healthcare are available to heterosexual kids if they "identify" as the right kind of person. The 'genital mutilation surgery' for minors was a scare tactic; it never happened. However, heterosexual girls can get breast surgeries with parental consent. You know, to help with their "identity." Any heterosexual kid can, for different conditions, get the same drugs that are part of gender-affirming care. This is a clear "equal protection" violation, proving the Supreme Court's right-wingers are actively biased. Republicans love to talk about "common sense," which is really just "things we've never questioned." Opinion: Tennessee Republicans can't run on their record. They're running against reality Biology shows that genetic and hormonal variations exist beyond the male/female division, despite "common sense." These variations expose the bigotry hidden behind the simplistic gender definitions that allow Skrmetti and Lee to comfortably deny the experts — and Carls, Nashville 37221 Agree or disagree? Or have a view on another topic entirely? Send a letter of 250 words or fewer to letters@ Include your full name, city/town, ZIP and contact information for verification. Thanks for adding to the public conversation. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Protect kids by banning guns, not trans youth healthcare | Letters
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Cuomo puts the pedal to the metal in new sports car— and racks up multiple speeding tickets in school zones
Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo has been putting the pedal to the metal since moving back to the Big Apple to run for mayor. Cuomo's Dodge Charger muscle car was caught on camera speeding in school zones in Brooklyn on April 27 and May 2 — after being socked with two speeding tickets a mere minute apart March 28 while flying northbound on a seven-block stretch of the West Side Highway in Lower Manhattan, a Post analysis of city records shows. The ex-governor paid $365 in fines from March 6 through May 2, including the four speed-camera tickets, a ticket for parking in a bus lane and another for failing to feed a meter, according to the latest available data. Advertisement 4 Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo has been racking speeding tickets and breaking all sorts of other traffic laws park since moving back to the Big Apple to kick off in NYC mayoral campaign in March, records show. REUTERS And that's not counting the times Cuomo wasn't caught. The lead-foot ex-lawmaker was filmed May 28 apparently blowing a red light on Seventh Avenue in Midtown after speeding away from reporters trying to ask him questions following a news conference he hosted with labor leaders, according to video posted on social media. Advertisement On Monday, Cuomo's car was filmed blocking a left-turn lane on Eighth Avenue in Times Square while he attended a campaign event. 4 Cuomo's Dodge Charger muscle car was caught on camera speeding in school zones in Brooklyn on April 27 and May 2 — after being socked with two speeding tickets a mere minute apart March 28 on the West Side Highway in Manhattan. (Kevin C. Downs for The New York Post ) Cuomo's rogue riding is the latest example of his 'do as I say, not as I do'-style of governing, said Republican mayoral rival Curtis Sliwa, who added Cuomo is the one who signed a 2013 bill into law creating NYC speed-camera program. 'Andrew Cuomo racked up school zone and bus lane violations within weeks of moving to the city to run for mayor,' the Guardian Angels founder said. 'These are the very enforcement programs he helped create, and if he had actually lived here longer, there's no doubt the list would be a lot longer. Once again, it's rules for everyone else and a free pass for Andrew.' Advertisement Cuomo didn't have to worry about getting caught by speed and red-light cameras while serving his 10-year stint as governor, since he was chauffeured by state troopers in vehicles with license plates that can't be flagged by traffic cameras. 4 Cuomo paid $365 in traffic-violation fines from March 6 through May 2 after being slapped with four speed-camera tickets and two parking tickets. Michael Nagle The frontrunner heading into the Tuesday's Democratic mayoral primary won't have that luxury if elected to City Hall, because official city vehicles aren't shielded from speed cameras. Cuomo is 'committed to public safety' and wasn't driving 'reckless' when filmed running the red light, spokeswoman Esther Jensen insisted. Advertisement The governor was 'guided through a green light' and then 'paused mid-turn' to let a pedestrian cross safely before proceeding once the 'path was clear,' Jensen said. She added that NYPD cops were aware Cuomo parked in the left-turn lane to attend Monday's event, and a campaign staffer was available 'at all times' to move it, 'if asked.' The Dodge Charger is driven by multiple people, said Jensen, who would not clarify if the governor was behind the wheel when the car was fined. 4 Cuomo signed a 2013 bill into law creating NYC's speed-camera program. Christopher Sadowski Despite Cuomo's dismal driving record, he's got nothing on far-left mayoral candidate and Comptroller Brad Lander. The Democratic socialist racked up a jaw-dropping 136 traffic summonses since 2013 on his Totoya Prius, records show. Ten of the tickets were issued to lead-footed Lander for being caught on camera speeding in school zones, but a vast majority were for being a parking scofflaw. Lander has long pushed a green agenda aimed at getting New Yorkers to give up driving and take mass transit, but he's been chauffeured daily around the Big Apple by his NYPD security detail since 2022 when he was sworn in as comptroller.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll shows Trump's clash with courts puts Senate GOP on defense
New polling of likely voters in Senate battleground states has found President Trump's frequent clashes with federal courts are becoming a hot issue that could put Senate Republican candidates on the defensive in 2026. A poll of 1,000 likely voters in 2026 Senate battlegrounds, obtained exclusively by The Hill, found that 53 percent disapprove of Trump's handling of the courts, including 89 percent of Democrats, 55 percent of independents and 39 percent of self-identified non-MAGA Republicans. The poll was conducted by Global Strategy Group, a Democratic-aligned polling firm, on behalf of Demand Justice, a Democratic-aligned judicial advocacy group. The survey found that more than two-thirds of voters, 72 percent, said they are concerned about Trump's response to court orders and 48 percent said they were extremely concerned by what they saw as the president's refusal to obey court orders. The poll found that 68 percent of voters surveyed said they viewed congressional Republicans as helping Trump evade legal norms, and 44 percent said they viewed that dynamic as extremely concerning. It surveyed voters in Colorado, Georgia, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio and Texas. The Senate's two most vulnerable Republican incumbents are Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) is the chamber's most vulnerable Democrat. 'The data is clear: Americans increasingly reject Donald Trump's attacks on the rule of law and the courts. Over two-thirds are concerned about this blatant disregard for court orders and the threat that it poses to the rights of every person in this country,' said Maggie Jo Buchanan, the interim executive director of Demand Justice. 'When Trump treats judicial rulings as mere suggestions instead of legally binding obligations, it sends a chilling message that our legal protections are meaningless,' Buchanan added. 'An overwhelming majority of Americans across the political spectrum are concerned that this calculated defiance sets a precedent where individuals may face unfair trials, see their rights disregarded without consequence, and find themselves powerless to seek justice,' she added. U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia James Boasberg criticized the Trump administration earlier this year for disregarding his order to stop the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador. The administration argued the deportation flights had already departed the United States at the time Boasberg issued his order and asserted they later complied with a written order. The Trump White House has also come under criticism for barring a reporter and photographer from The Associated Press from the Oval Office in April despite a court order from U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia Trevor McFadden ruling the government could not retaliate against the news agency for refusing to follow Trump's order renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America. The poll also found 70 percent of voters that Trump's allies in Congress will help him pick judges who will do what he wants instead of acting independently, with 43 percent of respondents saying they're 'extremely' concerned. The poll's sample included 44 percent of self-identified Democrats, 44 percent of self-identified Republicans and 12 percent of self-identified independents. It was conducted between May 28 and June 1 and had a margin of error of 3.1 percent. Updated at 8:43 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
