Doctor tells inquest he learned ‘to be more compassionate' since baby's death
A doctor who cared for a one-year-old baby on the night he died of a rare heart condition treated his parents like they 'did not exist', an inquest heard.
Archie Squire died from heart failure in the early hours of November 23 2023 after successive cardiac arrests just days after his first birthday.
His parents made repeated visits to Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother (QEQM) Hospital in Margate, Kent, with concerns about Archie's breathing and constipation, which did not lead to a long-term diagnosis.
On Wednesday, Doctor Ravindra Kumar, a paediatric registrar at QEQM responsible for Archie on the night he died, broke down in tears in court describing how his work has changed since Archie's death.
Asked what he would do differently, Dr Kumar said: 'I regret talking about Archie's condition in front of the family to others, to my colleagues, I learned a big lesson to be more compassionate.'
Wiping tears from his eyes, he told the court: 'We discussed the child's condition in a manner as if parents did not exist in the room.'
Medical records and Dr Kumar's witness statement suggest he did not see Archie between 9.30pm and 1am on the night he died, the inquest heard.
On Wednesday at Kent and Medway Coroners Court in Maidstone, the doctor said that this was incorrect.
'I do not recall that I only saw this very sick child only at 9pm to 1am, this is wrong,' said Dr Kumar.
He told Emily Raynor, counsel on behalf of the family, that he could not recall why he had not recorded visits to Archie between those hours.
'It isn't in your witness statement and it isn't in your medical records,' said Ms Raynor.
Dr Kumar replied: 'I have clear recollection that I examined the child.'
Photos and videos of Archie taken by his family from the night in hospital leading up to his death were shown in court to demonstrate his condition.
Dr Kumar told the court that these 'snapshots' did not show whether his condition was deteriorating.
He said: 'Giving a snapshot of a child does not give justice to clinical management, what we are seeing are snapshots.
'I can't decide on that snapshot of video whether he was sleepy or unwell. It's not fair to comment on the clinical picture.'
He admitted that his case writing could have been more methodical, but said that he had followed proper procedure for Archie's care.
'You cannot judge a child's condition by looking at photographs, you have to look at the whole picture.' said Dr Kumar.
The inquest continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kate praises children's hospices for ‘lifting spirits through fun'
The Princess of Wales, Kate, praised the "life-changing work" of children 's hospices across the UK. She highlighted their vital support for children at the end of their lives and their success in lifting spirits through laughter, fun, and play. Kate's commendation comes as she continues to balance her public duties following cancer treatment, which was the reason for her absence from Royal Ascot. As a royal patron of East Anglia's Children's Hospices and Ty Hafan Children's Hospice in South Wales, she emphasized the extraordinary care provided to families. Her heartfelt message was posted on social media ahead of the end of Children's Hospice Week, an event raising awareness for these services.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Brits set to endure sleepless night amid heatwave
Warm temperatures could lead to the UK experiencing its first 'tropical night' of the year. A tropical night is where overnight temperatures do not drop below 20C; this could happen on Friday. Scientists indicate that the chance of UK temperatures exceeding 40C has increased significantly, and is now 20 times more likely than in the 1960s due to climate change. Amber heat-health alerts are in effect for all of England until 9am on Monday, with people asked to take precautions out in the warm weather. The health alerts suggest potential significant impacts on health and social care services, including a possible rise in deaths among vulnerable groups and increased demand for health services.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Can anything stop plans for 'death on the NHS'? After MPs vote to LEGALISE assisted dying peers are urged to block or alter 'unsafe' suicide law
Opponents of assisted dying have vowed to keep fighting after MPs voted today to legalise helping people to take their own lives. The Commons backed allowing medics to help terminally ill people to die despite warnings that the legislation is unsafe. But the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which was passed by a majority of just 23 votes this afternoon, still has to clear the House of Lords before becoming law. Critics of the change pointed out that fewer than half of MPs voted in favour and said peers should now seek to block it or slow down its passage so more major changes can be made. Under the legislation terminally ill people in England and Wales diagnosed with less than six months to live will be allowed to seek medical help to die. It is expected that the process will launch by the end of the decade, with estimates suggesting as many as 4,000 people will use it annually within 10 years. Tory MP Greg Smith said: 'It is not too late for us to step back from the brink and pull the plug on this Bill, which now lacks majority support in the House of Commons. 'I trust the House of Lords to scrutinise the Bill in depth and hope it will never reach Royal Assent.' MPs voted by 314 to 291 to approve Kim Leadbeater's Bill despite warnings that it was rushed through and could negatively affect the disabled, domestic abuse victims and people with anorexia. Campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen hailed the vote result as one which will make a 'huge positive difference' and protect terminally ill people from a 'bad death'. MPs made impassioned pleas for and against it becoming law. They had a free vote on a 'conscience matter', with most of the parties split between the yes and no camps. The majority in support of change was 55 in a preliminary vote in November and was cut by more than half. Some MPs appeared visibly emotional as they left the chamber. Among those who voted for the law change were PM Sir Keir Starmer and his Tory predecessor, Rishi Sunak. Deputy PM Angela Rayner and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, who will now have to work on bringing in the law change if it gets royal assent, both voted against it, as did current Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. The legislation allows terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The bill will now move to the Lords, with opponents vowing to fight it in the upper chamber. Right to Life spokeswoman Catherine Robinson said: 'The Bill still faces an uphill battle to reach Royal Assent.' MPs voted by 314 to 291 - a majority of 23 - to approve Kim Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill despite warnings that it was rushed through and could negatively affect the disabled, domestic abuse victims and people with anorexia. Mother of the House Diane Abbott asked MPs to vote against the bill, saying: 'people will lose their lives who do not need to. And former Tory minister Sir James Cleverly answered yes camp claims that the law might not change for a decade if it is not done now, as he argued there will be 'plenty of opportunities' in future. And Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, said MPs had passed a 'deeply flawed and dangerous' bill. 'The current Bill fails to protect vulnerable and disabled people from coercion,' he said. 'This is not hyperbolae but based on what happens in the US state of Oregon, the model for this law. 'There, a majority of those who have ended their lives in recent years cite fear of being a burden on their families, carers or finances as a reason.' There was silence in the chamber as the result was returned this afternoon after a day of debate and impassioned arguments. The vote came as supporters and opponents of the law change gathered outside Parliament to press the case, including Bake Off host Prue Leith. Supporters wept, jumped and hugged each other as the news came through that it had been passed by MPs. The crowd of around 100 people in Parliament Square, Westminster, erupted into cheers on Friday afternoon as the news was livestreamed over a speaker by campaigners from Dignity In Dying. One supporter said: 'Yes, dad' and others patted each other on the shoulder. Mother of the House Diane Abbott had earlier asked MPs to vote against the bill, saying: 'There is no doubt that if this Bill is passed in its current form, people will lose their lives who do not need to, and they will be amongst the most vulnerable and marginalised in our society.' And former Tory minister Sir James Cleverly answered yes camp claims that the law might not change for a decade if it is not done now, as he argued there will be 'plenty of opportunities' in future. Many critics on both sides have asked for the legislation to be postponed to allow more scrutiny and changes to it to be made. Labour MP Naz Shah warned anorexia patients could still access assisted dying through a 'loophole'. The Bradford MP cautioned that the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was 'not safe'. Shadow frontbencher Robert Jenrick also reiterated his opposition last night. Writing for the Daily Mail, he reveals how he helped look after his grandmother, Dorothy, as a teenage boy – and how she continued to bring joy to the family as she defied a terminal diagnosis for nearly a decade. The shadow justice secretary says the prospect of legalising assisted dying 'fills me with dread', adding: 'My Nana felt like she was a burden. I know how much she hated the indignity she felt at having to ask my Mum or us to help her with basic needs. 'People like her – and there are many such people – may consider an assisted death as another act of kindness to us. How wrong they would be.' Ms Leadbeater has argued terminally ill people must be given choice at the end of their lives, but opponents of her Bill have warned it fails to guarantee protections for society's most vulnerable. So close is the vote that Alliance MP Sorcha Eastwood, who was isolating with Covid, was offered a private ambulance to bring her to the Commons to vote against it. However she tested negative today and plans to make her own way in. Four Labour MPs confirmed on the eve of the vote that they would switch sides to oppose the proposed new law. Labour's Paul Foster, Jonathan Hinder, Markus Campbell-Savours and Kanishka Narayan voiced concerns about the safety of the 'drastically weakened' legislation, citing the scrapping of the High Court Judge safeguard as a key reason. Liverpool MP Dan Carden - the leader of the Blue Labour group - also said he would vote against the Bill having previously abstained. 'I genuinely fear the legislation will take us in the wrong direction,' he told the Guardian last night. 'The values of family, social bonds, responsibilities, time and community will be diminished, with isolation, atomisation and individualism winning again.' It comes as Cardinal Vincent Nichols, the Archbishop of Westminster and most senior Catholic in the UK, said the Church will close Catholic hospices and care homes if MPs vote for assisted suicide. However Dame Esther Rantzen made a plea to MPs last night, urging them to pass a Bill she said could 'transform the final days of generations in the future' and replace the current 'cruel, messy criminal law'. The broadcaster, who is terminally ill with cancer and has been a prominent supporter of assisted dying, said: 'Please allow us terminally ill the dignity of choice over our own deaths.'
