Nantucket Film Festival celebrates its 30th anniversary
Brabbée said this year's festival feels like both a celebration and reunion as past festivalgoers, talent, staff members, filmmakers, and community members prepare to return to Nantucket.
'We're really excited to have so many people who have been part of the festival's fabric over the years be woven back in,' she said. 'And of course, the audience, we're really excited to just share what we've created for them.'
Advertisement
For over a year, Brabbée and her team have planned numerous events to celebrate NFF's three decades of storytelling. One of those is this year's seaside garden soiree, '
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Elin Hilderbrand
Nantucket Film Festival
Brabbée also highlighted an event where journalist Lesley Stahl will lead a discussion with historian Nathaniel Philbrick
and filmmaker Ken Burns
about Burns's new 12-hour documentary series, '
After a seven-year hiatus,
Advertisement
The heart of the festival, of course, is film.
The week kicks off with a pre-festival screening on June 24 of NFF's centerpiece film, '
The documentary celebrates the film's cultural impact with never-before-seen footage from director Steven Spielberg. It'll be followed by a panel discussion of the film's effects on the industry and the public's perception of sharks.
Then on the festival's official first day, NFF has two films lined up.
There's the documentary '
from 2017 to 2023 as she navigates national crises and motherhood.
For those interested in a more narrative film, there's '
Film still of Jacinda Ardern working from home with her baby from "Prime Minister."
Nantucket Film Festival
Basil Tsiokos, NFF's senior programmer, said figuring out an opener for a festival can be challenging because it's about getting a sense of what audiences want to see while considering the tone being set for the rest of the festival.
'I think that's one of the reasons why we did two films for opening night, is to kind of capture the complexity of a festival that celebrates not only screenwriting fictional, but also storytelling in the sort of documentary sense,' Tsiokos said. 'So, both of those films are incredibly strong and so we thought it was a great way to kick things off.'
Dylan O'Brien and James Sweeney in "Twinless."
Nantucket Film Festival
Outside of the documentaries and features, Anita Raswant, NFF's lead programmer, highlighted the shorts programming as a great selection that allows audiences to take in strong stories in shorter segments.
Advertisement
With so many offerings, the NFF team emphasized festivalgoers' ability to personalize their experiences, so they can get the most out of their trips to Nantucket and enjoy the festival community.
'It is important to gather people together to watch film,' Tsiokos said. 'Films open up the world to audiences and, yes, you can get access to films down the line, on streamers and on whatever, which is great, and that's part of the ecosystem as well, but there's something to be said for being in person.'
NANTUCKET FILM FESTIVAL
June 25-30. Single screening tickets start at $20. For more information, including films, locations, and screening times, visit
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Borat' Director Stopped Talking to Sacha Baron Cohen After He Started ‘Surrounding Himself' With ‘Show Business People' and ‘Pulling Away' From Subversive Humor: ‘He Wanted to Be More of a Traditional Movie Star'
'Borat' director Larry Charles has lost touch with his once-frequent collaborator, Sacha Baron Cohen. In a recent interview with the Daily Beast, Charles said he once considered Cohen a 'comic genius,' comparing him to the likes of Charlie Chaplin and Peter Sellers. However, when they began production on their 2012 film 'The Dictator,' their relationship deteriorated as Cohen started 'pulling away' from the subversive character humor that made him famous. Charles suspected it was because 'he wanted to be more of a traditional movie star.' More from Variety Sacha Baron Cohen as Elon Musk? Actor Would Be the 'Most Hilarious Choice' to Portray Mogul in Movie, According to Musk's Grok AI Chatbot: 'Comedic Goldmine' Sacha Baron Cohen Revives Borat to Mock Trump and Tell Kamala Harris: 'You're a Woman, a Person of Color and Married to a Jew. I Advise You Not to Come to Kazakhstan' Rebel Wilson's Memoir to Be Published in U.K. With Sacha Baron Cohen Allegations Redacted 'He was surrounding himself with more traditional show business people and getting advice from them, which I don't think was good advice for the kind of rebel sensibility that Sacha had had up until that time,' Charles explained. 'And so, for a variety of reasons, it started to kind of fragment and fracture and fall apart. And the movie's not bad. It's good. It's funny. There's actually a lot of funny stuff in it, but it just didn't reach the potential that it had.' According to Charles, 'The Dictator' was a 'very problematic project from the beginning.' At first, he imagined the film as a 'classic political satire' more akin to 'Dr. Strangelove' than 'Borat' or 'Brüno.' However, the movie fell apart because of too much 'input from outside people' as well as a lack of 'focus' from Cohen. 'I would try to get [Cohen] to trust himself, trust his instincts, which I've learned is the only thing you have,' Charles said. 'And instead, he was trusting so many different people with so many different contradictory thoughts that it started to just unravel and issues arose that should never have been issues.' Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? 25 Hollywood Legends Who Deserve an Honorary Oscar
Digital Trends
14 hours ago
- Digital Trends
28 Years Later review: a thrilling zombie epic
28 Years Later review: a thrilling zombie epic Score Details '28 Years Later is a gorgeous, heart-pounding horror adventure that occasionally stumbles but reaches incredible heights.' Pros Compelling characters Top-tier performances Heart-pounding action Powerful coming-of-age story Gorgeous visuals Tender moments Cons Some flawed character logic Some jarring visuals Some disjointed scenes 'Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.' Academy Award-winning director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have brought new life to the 28 Days Later franchise with 28 Years Later. Set decades after the original film, this long-awaited threequel follows a family of survivors in an isolated community as they explore the zombie-infested mainland. Recommended Videos With the franchise's creators at the helm of this film, 28 Years Later stays true to its roots with its energetic visuals and action. At the same time, this new movie reinvents the 28 Days Later saga with its exciting, poignant story and well-rounded characters, with its young lead stealing the show as a perfect new face for the franchise. An emotional post-apocalyptic roller-coaster By presenting a coming-of-age story centered around Spike, 28 Years Later adds a distinctive chapter to the franchise. Similar to The Last of Us, this movie follows someone who was born and raised in a world ravaged by zombies, who are treated like wild animals roaming the wilderness on the mainland. With slow-crawling zombies to hulking, intelligent Alphas, this sequel keeps the franchise fresh by showing how the world and the infected have evolved 28 years since the Rage virus broke out. 28 Years Later also delivers plenty of chaotic, heart-pounding action as hordes of nude, bloodthirsty infected chase the heroes through the wilderness in terrifying scenes reminiscent of Attack on Titan. The most jaw-dropping sequence of them all is when the Alpha chases Jamie and Spike across the causeway like a speeding train. This sequel also takes 'bullet time' to a whole new level, with the camera freezing and spinning around every zombie the moment they get shot dead. Despite being set in a post-apocalyptic world filled with zombies, this coming-of-age story remains grounded in reality as Spike confronts the pain of loss and uncovers the lies and secrets his parents have kept. Within the film's darkness, the story features slivers of light within some incredibly heartwarming moments. In particular, Isla helping an infected woman give birth and Spike's climb up the mountain of bones make for some of the most stirring, beautiful moments ever seen in a zombie movie. While much of the film is spectacular, it occasionally risks throwing audiences off with a disjointed narrative. Specifically, the arrival of the Swedish Navy onto the mainland treats audiences to a tense and gory massacre, but its sudden diversion from the main story can feel jarring. Some of the characters' logic also seems flawed at times. Even Dr. Kelson, who is clearly a calculated and prepared survivor, could've saved Spike and him a whole lot of trouble if he had killed the Alpha Samson when he had the chance. Spectacular new performers While he is surrounded by multiple A-list actors in this movie, 14-year-old Alfie Williams shines brightly among them with his riveting breakout performance as Spike. Aaron-Taylor Johnson makes the most out of his time on-screen in the first act as Spike's loving but deceitful Jamie. Jodie Comer really gets the spotlight in the film's second half as Spike's mother, Isla. While she is losing her grip on reality to an unknown illness, Isla stands out as the beating heart of the movie, with Comer bringing plenty of humor and humanity to her tragic role. Ralph Fiennes also brings a refreshingly tender and lighthearted approach to playing the mysterious and well-read Dr. Kelson. Though the latter is described as an 'insane' doctor who morbidly collects human bodies, he has clearly accepted the circle of life and honors those who have died with his bone-filled monument. He even adds a touch of humor to his work, making him an instantly likable character who will hopefully return in the sequel. A visual fever dream 28 Years Later retains the look and feel of the franchise's previous films with its frenetic camerawork, which was completed using the iPhone 15 Pro Max. However, the cinematography is much crisper and more vibrant in this big-budget sequel, capturing vast, colorful landscapes and ruined structures with incredible detail. As the characters explored a quarantined UK, devoid of modern technology, the audience feels as though they've entered a whole other world as the film emphasizes the land's natural beauty. This post-apocalyptic zombie film presents itself as a medieval fantasy adventure, with bow-wielding warriors traversing a lush, ruined English countryside swarming with monsters. There's also Dr. Kelson's temple of bones, the murder of crows flying around an Alpha zombie, and Jamie and Spike running across the sea under the starry, aurora-lit sky. This fantastical imagery is contrasted with rapid-fire montages featuring old, grainy footage of soldiers fighting in wars throughout history. This adds to the film's punk rock spirit and aligns with the story's themes of war and violence. Nevertheless, they also come across as random and confusing at times, making for a somewhat disorientating viewing experience. Is 28 Years Later worth a watch? Although this film took nearly 28 years to reach theaters, Danny Boyle and Alex Garland proved that their sequel was worth the wait. Filled with breathtaking visuals, top-notch performances, and nail-biting action, 28 Years Later delivers a thrilling zombie epic that, despite its flaws, brings the 28 Days Later franchise to even greater glory. Though countless other zombie stories have premiered since 28 Days Later's release, this threequel proved that it has something new to offer to fans of the subgenre, especially as it sets up the next movie scheduled for 2026. 28 Years Later is now playing in theaters.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steven Spielberg says he thought Jaws would be the ‘last movie I would ever be given to direct'
Steven Spielberg may be one of the most recognisable directors today, but he thought his career was over 50 years ago. At 78 years old, Spielberg has made iconic films such as Schindler's List (1993), Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977), E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, and The Post (2017). Among other prizes, he has won three Academy Awards, including two accolades for Best Director for Saving Private Ryan (1998) and Schindler's List as well as the Irving G Thalberg Memorial Award in 1987. In a new interview, as per The Hollywood Reporter, the filmmaker reflected on one of his earliest hits, Jaws, telling audiences that he thought it 'would be the last movie I would ever be given to direct'. Released in 1975, the shark thriller became a classic, but the disaster-plagued production left a mark on its maker. 'In most circumstances, summer in the Vineyard is a dream,' he said in reference to Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts where Jaws was filmed. 'But when you are over budget and over schedule and when I am over my head, that summer of 1974 was a bad dream before it ever became the dream of a lifetime.' Spielberg made the comments as part of a video message to an audience in Martha's Vineyard attending a National Geographic world premiere for Jaws @ 50: The Definitive Inside Story on Friday (20 June). He had been a 27-year-old director at the time and chose to shoot in Martha's Vineyard because he wanted his mechanised shark to swim in real waters. Speaking about Jaws @ 50, he continued: 'It details how young and unprepared all of us were for the challenges of shooting in the Atlantic Ocean with a mechanical shark that was more temperamental than any movie star I have ever worked with since, and how in the wake of running over schedule and budget, I truly believed that Jaws would be the last movie I would ever be given to direct.' The film budget ultimately tripled to $9m, with the schedule stretching from the originally planned 55 days to 159. Jaws proved so troublesome to produce that Spielberg said he had a 'full-blown panic attack' after the film wrapped. 'I couldn't breathe, I thought I was having a heart attack. I couldn't get a full breath of air,' he said. 'I kept going to the bathroom and splashing water on my face. I was shaking. I was out of it – completely out of it' Spielberg said it was thanks to cinema-goers that he was able to work again, recalling how theatrical audiences threw him a 'life preserver' in 1975. 'Fifty years after its initial release, making Jaws remains a seminal experience for every single one of us, and five decades has done nothing to dim the memories of what remains one of the most overwhelming, exciting, terrifying and rewarding experiences of my entire career,' the director concluded. Jaws went on to earn over $475m at the box office, becoming the first true summer blockbuster. It won three Academy Awards and has gone down in cinema history, but the experience left Spielberg with 'consistent nightmares' for years. Directed by Laurent Bouzereau, Jaws @ 50 will air on National Geographic on 10 July before it is later released on streaming services Disney+ and Hulu.
