Wagner: Der fliegende Holländer album review
According to the sleeve notes, the two concert performances of Wagner's most compact and regularly performed stage work that Edward Gardner conducted in Oslo last year are likely to be the only occasions on which Lise Davidsen will appear as Senta, since it's not a role that she intends to sing on stage. That alone will make the set – taken from the two concert performances – a compulsory purchase for Davidsen's many admirers, and certainly her performance is the main attraction here, though the feisty playing of the Norwegian National Opera orchestra, one of its first collaborations with Gardner after he became the company's music director, is first-rate, too.
But from the moment that she launches into Senta's ballad in the second act, colouring it to spine-tingling effect, Davidsen holds the stage, and makes every set-piece compelling, putting Gerald Finley's Dutchman entirely in the shade as she soars through their great duet. Yet her intensity is not sufficient for their pairing to strike real dramatic sparks. Alongside Davidsen's larger-than-life quality, Finley's portrayal seems rather small scale; his singing is as elegant and intelligently shaped as ever, his bass-baritone richly burnished, but the crucial heroic dimension is missing.
Alongside them, both Stanislas de Barbeyrac as Erik and Brindley Sherratt as Daland give fine performances; de Barbeyrac clearly relishes his cavatina in the third act and Sherratt's wonderfully even tone is always beautifully controlled. There are certainly more pluses than minuses in this performance, though in the end it seems just a bit less than the sum of its parts.
This article includes content hosted on embed.music.apple.com. We ask for your permission before anything is loaded, as the provider may be using cookies and other technologies. To view this content, click 'Allow and continue'.
Listen on Apple Music (above) or Spotify
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
The startling truth about Spotify — it's got a porn problem
A s I understand it, one of the clichés of pornographic plotting is a hapless innocent — a plumber or pizza delivery boy — stumbling unwittingly into a sexual scenario. Last week this happened to me on my Spotify Premium Family account. It was a weekday morning. I was at my desk, researching potential column subjects as the Sunday Times radio and podcast critic. Scrolling Spotify's podcast charts to check out what was trending, I noticed a couple of high-ranking shows in the fiction podcast category Top Ten that I hadn't heard of. At No 3 there was Yaya Sama Audios, with some anime-looking cover art and more than 140 episodes uploaded since mid-May. At No 7, something called ivys aud, with fewer episodes and a vintage feel to its artwork — violet roses wrapped in a broadsheet newspaper. I clicked on an episode of the first audio title, one of about half a dozen uploaded just that day, and then gasped to discover, under the cartoon image of a doe-eyed girl, the title ****ed Hard by an Obsessed Big ***k. Its English-accented monologue narrated a rapey seduction, as the large-type AI-written transcript of the pornographic audio rolled up my screen. Episode titles of the other podcast included Seducing Your Hot Married Deprived Neighbor and A Lesson in Slut Theory.
Scotsman
12 hours ago
- Scotsman
17 fantastic photos that prove the 80s were the best decade in which to be alive
The 80s may have been a tough period for many in the UK, with the miners' strike, high unemployment, and the Falklands War. But it was an exciting time to be alive, and it is little wonder many people look back upon the 80s as the best decade in living memory. This retro picture gallery helps make that case, showcasing our favourite things about the 80s, from fashion and film to music and TV - like a mix tape, only in photo form. What were your favourite things about the 80s, and how do you think they compared to the 60s, 70s, 90s and noughties? Do you have any retro pictures or nostalgic memories to share with us? Send them online via YourWorld at It's free to use and, once checked, your story or picture will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers. 1 . The Walkman Long before Spotify, smartphones and AirPods, the Walkman was the way to listen to music on the go. It was a truly liberating device for music fans in the 80s, when people could be seen listening to one everywhere you went. | YOSHIKAZU TSUNO/AFP via Getty Images Photo: YOSHIKAZU TSUNO/AFP via Getty Images Photo Sales 2 . Video games The 80s were a golden age for the video game, with classics like Pac-Man, Tetris, Super Mario Bros, and Donkey Kong among the best-loved titles we all enjoyed playing back then. |Photo:Photo Sales 3 . Big hair You could hardly move for all the hair in the 80s, when big hair was bigger than ever. The singer and actor Cher is pictured here in 1985 while promoting the film Mask. | Getty Images Photo: Keystone/Getty Images Photo Sales 4 . The music Duran Duran are pictured here in 1981, rocking some excellent 80s stylings. The Birmingham band were among the leading proponents of new wave music during a decade which gave us some brilliant tunes, from the likes of Madonna, Prince, Michael Jackson and many more. | Getty Images Photo:Photo Sales
Daily Mirror
17 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
'Meghan Markle does so much for her family - but what's Prince Harry up to?'
Meghan Markle is pressing ahead with build her business empire with her lifestyle brand As Ever - but one royal expert has questioned Prince Harry new career path Meghan Markle continues to build her business empire with her As Ever lifestyle brand and a vast investment portfolio. But while the Duchess of Sussex pursues her entrepreneurial aspirations, it seems to be a different story for Prince Harry. The Duke of Sussex is said to be concentrating more on his charity and philanthropic works rather than chasing commercial ventures. It is a marked difference from several years ago, when the Sussexes' careers appeared intertwined with Meghan declaring that she and Harry were like "salt and pepper" as they always "move together". And with a change in their working lives, a new Channel 5 show called Meghan and Harry: Where Did The Money Go? shines a light on their finances; revealing Harry's surprising inheritances, Meghan's millions and their staggering Montecito mortgage. The documentary counts the multi-million pound deals the pair have cut to sell their story since leaving The Firm - but it also details their astronomical outgoings. It also sees one royal journalist pose a question about Harry's contribution - especially given Meghan's revelations about how much of a hands-on parent she is to their children Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Royal commentator Emily Andrews reckons Harry doesn't contribute much else to his household - and she tells the documentary: "Meghan gets up at half six, half an hour before the children, then the children gets up and she gets them dressed, gets their breakfast, and then she makes their packed lunch and takes them to kindy (nursery), then at 9 o'clock she sits down and is a girl boss… Where is Harry in all of this? He's not making money, he's not looking after the kids, what is Harry doing?" It comes after other experts say the couple will see their income dwindle and costs soar as their multi-million pound deals dry up. After striking their 'Megxit' deal in 2020, King Charles removed all financial support from the couple, with Harry moaning to Oprah that his dad "literally cut me off financially". Royal expert Norman Baker tells the show: "There's no doubt in my mind that Meghan and Harry's income is going to decline in the future. It's declining now. They've done the big hits that they could do. They've done the big Spotify event, they've done the big book, there is nothing else to come, nothing else to sell apart from themselves." Upon moving to America, the pair splashed out on a family home costing $14.65 million (£11m). However, they also took out a mortgage of $9.5m (£7m), with repayments in the region of $50,000-100,000 (£73,000 - £37,000) a month. Until now, it's been unheard of for a senior royal to require a mortgage. On top of that, Prince Harry has been forced to fund his own security, and he rarely travels anywhere public without a four-car convoy. Former royal protection officer Simon Morgan explains the costs of specialist protection, saying: "It's always very difficult to identify the cost in relation to specialist protection, purely because there's a lot of other factors that go into it. You are looking at somewhere in the region of about £3 million a year to protect somebody who stays at home. "As soon as they leave the residence, even if they go down to the shops, that could see that cost double or triple and go from £3m to £6m or £9m or £10m, conservatively. Security is not a fashion accessory, it's a need. You've got to address your needs versus your wants." To pay for it, the pair famously signed a £100 million five year deal with Netflix in 2020 and a £15 million deal with Spotify. The Spotify deal has already ended with a top exec at the firm dubbing the pair 'grifters', while the Netflix deal is due to end this year, with no renewal in sight. Before Megxit, the Sussexes were earning £2.3m a year as working royals, receiving money from the then Prince Charles's Duchy of Cornwall. But when the pair left The Firm that all stopped, leaving Harry forced to live on the inheritance his mum Diana, Princess of Wales left him in her will. When she died in 1997 Diana left £6.5m to the boys each, which had grown to around £10m when Harry received it upon turning 30. Talking to Oprah, Harry said 'Without that, we wouldn't have been able to do this," referring to the family's move to California. Meghan, meanwhile, was thought to be worth around £5million when she met Harry - money built up from her time as an actress on Suits and from her lifestyle brand. His tell all book Spare earned Harry a $20m (£15m) advance and sold an incredible 3.2 million copies in its first week. And he's expected to have received a further £7m from the hardback sales. PR expert Nick Ede is backing Meghan to become the family's highest earner. He says: "Meghan is the best way of making money for the two of them. She is the breadwinner.' Nick believes that having to build her own fortune before she met Harry means she's more savvy with deals than her royal husband. Nick continues: 'Megan from an early age knew it was very important to be secure. If you're a jobbing actress that means you don't know literally where the next pay cheque will come from and I think that will have added to her drive.' Broadcaster and critic Bidisha Mamat agrees with Nick and admits she fears that Harry has a lot to prove. She says: "They are going to run out of ideas before they run out of money. Meghan is going to do fine, Meghan is going to make her money, Harry has the bigger financial, personal and emotional challenge. Harry has to prove he really can have a career.' Following the collapse of the Spotify deal, Meghan did indeed land another podcast deal. This time, however, her deal was with smaller company Lemonada and expected to be worth just $40,000 (£30,000). Meghan is also still coining it in from Suits, from which repeats are thought to have recently added another $200,000 (£148,800) to the Sussex bottom line. Indeed, Meghan might be more savvy with money but Harry has just come into another inheritance - this time from his great-grandmother, Elizabeth, Queen Mother. In 1994 the Queen Mother set up a Trust Fund to benefit her great-grand children and this is expected to have paid out £8m to Harry. Since they left the royal family, the pair have become more famous than ever and commentator Afua Hagan believes the pair will go on to achieve more and more. She says: 'What is clear about Harry and Meghan is that they are very savvy with their money. America is a good spot for them at the moment because it definitely fits in with their idea of entrepreneurship. "Harry and Meghan have proven time and time again that they can stand on their own two feet that they can provide for themselves and their family. Definitely we can never count them out.' The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been contacted for comment.
