China happy with restrictions on its students, lawmaker says

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi said Sunday the White House's move to revoke visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. is likely to have the Chinese Communist Party "cheering for this policy."
"Because they want these people back," Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) told CBS' Margaret Brennan on Sunday on "Face the Nation." "They want the scientists and the entrepreneurs and the engineers who can come and help their economy. And so we are probably helping them, as well as other countries, more than helping ourselves with this policy."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio last Wednesday announced the measure to aggressively revoke "visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields."
Roughly 277,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. last year. And nearly 20 percent of Silicon Valley's highly educated tech employees come from China.
But the details behind the White House push — including whether the administration plans to target every Chinese international student — remain unclear. Tensions between the two countries, already roiled by high-stakes tariff negotiations, have further strained.
"There's not enough details," Krishmanoorthi, who launched a run for Illinois' open U.S. Senate seat in May, told Brennan.
"However, this appears to be much broader and it's terribly misguided and it appears prejudicial and discriminatory."
Krishnamoorthi is the ranking member on the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the U.S. and the Chinese Communist Party. He told Brennan that increased scrutiny on Chinese students can make sense.
"I think that you should definitely have heightened vetting, especially in certain critical areas because we know that the CCP tries to steal, for instance, intellectual property or worse," Krishnamoorthi said. "But the way that this is currently structured looks very, very suspicious."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

USA Today

3 hours ago

• USA Today

Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran; Vance, Rubio say that's not the goal

A day after the U.S. military bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, President Trump said he might desire a broader 'regime change' in Iran. Just hours after Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States did not want 'regime change' in Iran, President Donald Trump said that might be a desired outcome. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on June 22 as Mideast tensions continued to escalate the day after the U.S. military bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. Trump's post signaling an openness to new leadership in Tehran followed his vice president and secretary of State appearing on the Sunday morning talk shows arguing the U.S. focus was not at launching a war with Iran. "We don't want a regime change," Vance told NBC's Meet the Press. "We want to end the nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here." During an interview with CBS's Face the Nation, Rubio said the U.S. had a very specific mission in mind to take out Iranian nuclear facilities and that the onus is now on Tehran showing an interest in diplomacy. 'There are a lot of regimes around the world that we don't like, okay?,' Rubio said. 'But in this particular case, what we are focused on is not the changing of the regime.' Five days before ordering the U.S. airstrikes, Trump on June 16 threatened Iran's supreme leader on social media and followed up a short while later with another two-word post: "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!" In his remarks from the White House announcing the U.S. bombing operation on June 21, Trump said he wanted to 'stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror.' 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier,' Trump said. 'For 40 years, Iran has been saying, "Death to America, Death to Israel."

The Hill

4 hours ago

• The Hill

Johnson: US has ‘no beef with the Iranian people'

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said Sunday that the United States has 'no beef for the Iranian people' following Saturday's announcement by President Trump that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites. 'We have no beef with the Iranian people,' Johnson told anchor Maria Bartiromo on Fox Business Network's 'Sunday Morning Futures.' 'This is about a regime that wants to destroy and eliminate Israel and destroy the great Satan, America.' Trump announced late Saturday that U.S. bombers struck three nuclear sites in Iran: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' he said in an address to the nation. The U.S. bombing in Iran followed a week of debate about whether the U.S. would step into a conflict that Israel had kicked off on June 13. 'We're not at war with the Iranian people. We support the Iranian people,' Johnson said Sunday. 'They don't like being under the dictatorial thumb of such a brutal regime.' On Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the U.S. had no military operation planned against Iran, but did not rule out future strikes if the country did not show a meaningful effort to make peace. 'We have other targets that we could hit, but we achieved our objective,' Rubio said on CBS News's 'Face the Nation.'

CNBC

4 hours ago

• CNBC

Oil prices jump 4% after U.S. strikes on Iran raise fears of supply disruption

Oil futures jumped 4% at the start of the first trading session since the U.S. launched direct attacks against Iran, casting further shadow over the supply outlook in the embattled oil-rich Middle Eastern region. U.S. crude oil rose $3.12, or 4.23%, to $76.96 per barrel, while global benchmark Brent jumped $3.27, or 4.25%, to $80.28 per barrel. U.S. President Donald Trump on Saturday surprised markets with the announcement that Washington had directly entered the Iran-Israel conflict, launching attacks against three Iranian nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Iran's foreign minister said Sunday that the Islamic Republic reserves "all options" to defend its sovereignty and people, amid ongoing fire exchanges between Iran and Israel. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned Iran against attempting to close the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway that is critical for the global oil market. Some 20 million barrels per day of crude, or 20% of global consumption, flowed through the strait in 2024, according to the Energy Information Administration. Iranian state media reported that Iran's parliament had backed closing of the strait, citing a senior lawmaker. However, the final decision to close the strait lies with Iran's national security council, according to the report. "It's economic suicide for them if they do it, and we retain options to deal with that," Rubio told Fox News. "It would hurt other countries' economies a lot worse than ours. It would be, I think, a massive escalation that would merit a response, not just by us, but from others." Iran produced 3.3 million bpd in May, according to OPEC's monthly oil market report released in June, which cites independent analyst sources. It exported 1.84 million bpd last month, with the vast majority sold to China, according to data from Kpler. Rubio called on China to use its influence to prevent Tehran from closing the strait. About half of China's waterborne crude oil imports comes from the Persian Gulf, according data to Kpler. "I encourage the Chinese government in Beijing to call them about that, because they heavily depend on the Straits of Hormuz for their oil," Rubio told Fox News. Investors are also watching the odds of a further destabilization of the Iranian regime as a result of U.S.-Israeli hostilities, given the example of the long-spanning impact that the 2011 NATO-led ousting of Muammar Gaddafi had on Libya's supplies. Tensions have likewise ramped up in neighboring Iraq, OPEC's second-largest producer, where pro-Tehran militia have previously threatened Washington, should it target Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. On Sunday, Iran's Revolutionary Guard warned that "the US bases in the region are not their strength but rather their greatest vulnerability" without specifying particular sites, according to Google-translated comments carried by Iranian news agency Fars. Fledgling, but revived diplomatic ties between former rivals Iran and Saudi Arabia could meanwhile diffuse the possibility of disruptions in the supply of the world's largest crude exporter. "The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is following with deep concern the developments in the Islamic Republic of Iran, particularly the targeting of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States of America," the Saudi foreign ministry said on Sunday. Riyadh, a close U.S. ally in the Middle East, has limited its involvement in the Iran-Israel offensives. Back in 2019 — four years before resuming diplomatic relations with Iran — Saudi Arabia's oil installation facilities at Abqaiq and Khurais sustained damage during attacks that were claimed by the Houthis, but for which Riyadh and the U.S. said Iran bore responsibility. Tehran denied involvement. At the resumption of Israeli-Iranian fire last week, the International Energy Agency's chief Fatih Birol said the institution was monitoring the developments and that "markets are well supplied today but we're ready to act if needed," with 1.2 billion barrels of emergency stocks on standby.