Trading Day-Truce hopes spark rebound

By Jamie McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist
Investor sentiment and risk appetite rebounded sharply on Monday as fears around the Israel-Iran conflict subsided, shifting the spotlight away from geopolitical risk and back towards this week's raft of central bank policy meetings.
In my column today I look at why the dollar's status as a safe-haven asset in times of heightened geopolitical uncertainty may be fading in a world of 'de-dollarization'. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves.
If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today.
1. Iranian state broadcaster hit as Iran urges Trump tomake Israel halt war 2. Seeking unity, G7 meets amid escalating Ukraine, MiddleEast conflicts 3. Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for U.S.importers 4. Investors shun long-term U.S. bonds as hopes foraggressive Fed rate cuts fade 5. Reuters interview with ECB Vice President de Guindos
Today's Key Market Moves
* Oil slides as much as 4% at one stage on Monday butBrent futures settle only 1.35% lower at $73.23/bbl, suggestinga chunky risk premium remains in the price. Oil spiked 7% onFriday. * Wall Street rebounds strongly, with the S&P 500 backabove 6000 points and the Nasdaq gaining 1.4%. * Nvidia shares rise 2% to the highest since January 24,within sight of the record peak of $153.13 from earlier thatmonth. Shares are up almost 70% from the post-'Liberation Day'low. * U.S. Treasury yields rise and the curve bear steepensdespite a pretty solid 20-year bond auction. Longer-dated yieldsup 5 bps. * Gold gives back Friday's gains, sliding more than 1% to$3,386/oz. The dollar rises 0.5% against the yen ahead of theBank of Japan's rate decision on Tuesday.
Truce hopes spark rebound
Signs of de-escalation between Israel and Iran - or at least hopes of de-escalation - ensured markets started this week much more positively than they finished last week. Whether that optimism is justified remains to be seen but the rebound was pretty strong, taking Wall Street and world stocks back to within sight of their recent highs.
It's a very fluid situation, so investors' relief may be short-lived. Iran has called for U.S. President Donald Trump to get Israel to halt its attacks, but both countries continue to fire missiles at each other. Meanwhile, a U.S. official said Trump will not sign a draft G7 leaders' statement calling for de-escalation of the conflict.
Optimism that a truce will be reached appears to be stronger in equity markets than elsewhere. Gold gave back Friday's gains but not before hitting $3,451 an ounce, a level last reached when it clocked a record high on April 17, and in volatile trade oil settled 1.7% lower, having surged more than 7% on Friday.
Perhaps equity investors have it right. The oil price has less of a bearing on global growth or asset prices than it used to, and markets have been pretty resilient to Middle East conflicts in recent years, with selloffs proving to be shallow and short-lived.
Unless there is a real adverse oil price shock, it will probably be a similar story this time around, although spiking inflation would be problematic for central banks.
Economists at Oxford Economics sketch out an extreme scenario where the closure of the Strait of Hormuz pushes oil up to $130 a barrel, which could lift U.S. CPI inflation to almost 6%. Oil is nowhere near that yet though.
As Deutsche Bank's Henry Allen notes, perhaps the story of the year is how resilient stock markets have been in the face of myriad large shocks - DeepSeek's emergence casting doubt over U.S. tech valuations; Europe's fiscal regime shift triggering the biggest daily jump in German yields since 1990; the U.S. losing its triple-A credit rating; Trump's tariffs and the S&P 500's fifth-biggest two-day fall since World War Two.
And yet here we are, with world stocks at all-time highs.
Aside from geopolitics, the focus for investors this week will mostly revolve around central banks. The Bank of Japan will deliver its policy decision on Tuesday, and economists expect it to hold off from raising rates again due to the uncertainty around U.S. tariffs.
Later this week we have decisions from Indonesia, Brazil, Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, Britain and the U.S. Federal Reserve.
Israel-Iran conflict highlights dollar's tarnished safe-haven appeal
A dramatic spike in the potential for all-out war between Israel and Iran would typically be expected to spark an immediate and strong rally in the U.S. dollar, with investors seeking the safety and liquidity of the world's reserve currency.
That didn't happen on Friday.
The dollar's response to Israel's strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and military commanders, followed by Tehran's initial threats and retaliation, was pretty feeble. The dollar index, a measure of the currency's value against a basket of major peers, ended the day up only around 0.25%.
To be sure, the dollar fared better than U.S. stocks or Treasuries, which both fell sharply on Friday. But with oil surging over 7% and gold up a solid 1.5%, a strong 'flight to quality' flow would have lifted the dollar more than a quarter of one percent.
The U.S. currency's move was particularly weak given the dollar's starting point on Friday. It was at a three-and-a-half year low, having depreciated 10% year to date, with sentiment and positioning heavily bearish. Yet a significant geopolitical shock generated barely a knee-jerk bounce.
For comparison, the dollar rose more than 2% in both the first week of the 2006 Israel-Lebanon War and in the week following Israel's invasion of Southern Lebanon last year.
The dollar's weak response to this latest Middle East conflict supports the narrative that investors are now reassessing their high exposure to dollars, in light of some of the unorthodox policies put forward by U.S. President Donald Trump in recent months.
The dollar was down slightly early on Monday, and gold and oil were giving back some of Friday's gains too, as markets regained a foothold at the start of a busy week packed with key central bank meetings.
PAINED SMILE
The dollar has historically been one of the best hedges against short-term volatility sparked by geopolitical risk, behind gold and on a par with oil, according to research published last year by Joe Seydl, senior markets economist at JP Morgan Private Bank.
Indeed, a Journal of Monetary Economics paper from last year stated plainly, "The dollar is a safe-haven currency and appreciates when global risk goes up," a trend resulting from the "fundamental asymmetry in a global financial system centered around the dollar" built up over the course of several decades.
That latter part of that argument hasn't changed.
The dollar accounts for almost 60% of the world's $12 trillion FX reserves, with its nearest rival, the euro, accounting for around 20%. Almost two-thirds of global debt is denominated in dollars, and nearly 90% of all FX transactions around the world have the greenback on one side of the trade.
That means traders, financial institutions, businesses, consumers and governments still need to be more exposed to dollars than any other currency, even if they question the direction of current U.S. policy.
However, the dollar's downside 'structural' risks are growing, analysts at Westpac noted on Sunday, as concern over Washington's fiscal health and policy uncertainty erode the dollar's 'safe-haven identity'. Investors are now looking to hedge their large dollar exposure more than ever.
If this dampens their instinctive demand for dollars in periods of sudden geopolitical tension, uncertainty and volatility, then the so-called 'dollar smile' theory could be challenged.
This 'smile' is the idea that the dollar appreciates in periods of financial market stress as well as in 'risk on' periods of strong global growth and investor optimism, but sags in between. This idea was first outlined over 20 years ago by then currency analyst and now hedge fund manager Stephen Jen.
If the Israel-Iran conflict continues to escalate, that dollar smile could get rather lopsided.
What could move markets tomorrow?
* Israel-Iran conflict * Bank of Japan decision and guidance * South Korea trade (May) * Germany ZEW investor sentiment survey (June) * U.S. retail sales (May) * U.S. import prices (May) * U.S. industrial production (May) * U.S. 5-year TIPS note auction * Bank of Canada minutes * Headlines from G7 summit in Canada
Want to receive Trading Day in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for my newsletter here.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
(By Jamie McGeever; Editing by Nia Williams)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Forbes

20 minutes ago

• Forbes

GM's $4 Billion Gamble - Gas Guzzlers Or Electric Future?

General Motors, a flagship of the U.S. auto industry for 117 years, has quietly shifted its bold electric-vehicle ambitions. Just a week ago, the company announced a $4 billion investment to ramp up production of gasoline-powered SUVs and trucks at plants in Michigan, Kansas, and Tennessee—aimed at countering flagging EV demand and mitigating U.S. tariffs. Lafayette - March 12, 2024: Chevrolet Tahoe 4WD Z71 display at a dealership. Chevy offers the Tahoe ... More in LS, LT, RST and Premier models. MY:2024 New President = new plans Once GM pledged to go 'all-electric by 2035', riding the momentum of the Inflation Reduction Act and Biden-era clean energy enthusiasm. But EV sales in the U.S. have softened, Washington's EV subsidies are under threat and tariffs are forcing auto companies to rethink their supply chains. Also, by this time, most everyone who had been thinking about buying an EV has bought one, insiders say. The novelty has worn off. Some have simply shrugged and gone back to either all-gas-powered vehicles, hybrids or PHEVS. GM will relocate full-size gas SUV and light-duty truck production to its Orion Assembly in Michigan, redirect the Chevrolet Blazer to Spring Hill, Tennessee, and bring the popular Chevy Equinox back to Fairfax, Kansas, reconfiguring plants that were previously set for EV output, Meanwhile, its Tonawanda, NY plant gets an $888 million investment to produce V‑8 engines—not electric motors. Why Now? Analysts Sam Abuelsamid (Telemetry) argue GM's 'all-electric by 2035' pledge was always conditional—dependent on generous federal EV incentives and solid consumer demand. With both eroding, GM is hedging its bets, and you can't blame them. The Trump administration further complicated matters with 25% tariffs on vehicles and parts from Mexico. By shifting production to U.S. facilities, GM avoids those costs—an immediate financial relief during a tumultuous market. GM says they're not abandoning EVs This isn't an EV abandonment, GM insists. CEO Mary Barra reaffirmed that an electric future remains central, but the company must remain 'responsive to where the customer is." At a recent Wall Street Journal event, she stressed that infrastructure limitations and consumer affordability still impede widespread EV adoption. Still, GM's U-turn complicates its narrative. Just days earlier, the company urged employees to lobby against California's EV mandate, describing it as disconnected from 'market realities' and threatening vehicle affordability. What are the broader implications? GM joins rivals like Volkswagen and Mercedes, which have scaled back their electrification timetables. Industry experts see this as recognition that while EVs are part of the future, they aren't (yet) the only future. Here's what GM's new position really means: For EV adoption - This signals government policy isn't enough. Automakers need stable incentives and reliable infrastructure to build real EV demand. For domestic jobs - Short-term, the gas engine investment creates U.S. manufacturing jobs and protects against import tariffs. Longterm? GM is now playing both offense and defense—building more ICE vehicles to stay profitable while maintaining EV capacity for when conditions improve. The bottom line is that GM's shift is pragmatic, not ideological or a declaration of 'Drill, baby, drill!' It's a response to market and policy uncertainty—but it also represents a retreat from the aspirational vision of a fully electric future.

The Hill

25 minutes ago

• The Hill

Trump in wake of Iran attack: ‘Everyone, keep oil prices down'

In the wake of the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, President Trump on Monday urged 'everyone' to keep oil prices down. 'EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' Trump said on Truth Social. Oil is traded on a global market, and the energy produced in not only the U.S. but in players around the world including Iran, Russia and Saudi Arabia contribute to the prices that Americans pay at the pump. Prices have spiked in recent days amid escalations between the U.S. and Iran — and gasoline prices were up an average of 8 cents compared to a week ago, according to the American Automobile Association. The $3.22 cent average price was still well below highs in 2022 when the national average was as high as $5 per gallon. Iranian state media reported Sunday that Tehran is considering a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which much of the world's oil supply flows, threatening further price increases. Trump also wrote on social media calling on the Department of Energy to drill quickly. 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!' he added on Truth Social. The Energy Department is primarily a research and funding agency — and is also tasked with maintaining the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile. Unlike many countries, the U.S. does not have a state-run oil company, so the government cannot make the unilateral decision to try to drill. It is up to private companies whether they want to produce oil in the U.S., though some government agencies such as the Interior Department can try to make it more attractive to drill on public lands. Presidents have relatively little influence on oil and gasoline prices generally. —Alex Gangitano contributed.

Yahoo

27 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Goldman Sachs launches AI assistant firmwide, memo shows

(Reuters) -Goldman Sachs on Monday announced a firmwide launch of an artificial intelligence assistant, a tool driven by generative AI, to boost productivity, according to an internal memo seen by Reuters. Around 10,000 employees at the bank are already using the GS AI Assistant, the memo sent to staff by Chief Information Officer Marco Argenti showed. With the AI tool's official company-wide launch, Goldman joins a long list of big banks already leveraging the technology to shape their operations in a targeted manner and help employees in day-to-day tasks. Citigroup has AI tools such as Citi Assist, which searches internal bank policies and procedures, as well as Citi Stylus, which helps with document summarizing and comparisons. Morgan Stanley has a chatbot that helps financial advisors in interactions with clients, while Bank of America's virtual assistant, Erica, focuses on day-to-day transactions of retail clients. The GS AI assistant will help Goldman employees in "summarizing complex documents and drafting initial content to performing data analysis," according to the internal memo. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data