Homeowners favour kitchens and bathrooms over eco upgrades
The study of 2,000 property owners found more than half are prioritising cosmetic makeovers because they believe it adds more value and offers instant gratification.
Many would rather splash out on a new kitchen (48 per cent) or bathroom suite (39 per cent) than invest in insulation (19 per cent) or energy-efficient heating systems (31 per cent).
And 43 per cent admit they opt for these flashy upgrades simply because they want something new to enjoy – with 16 per cent confessing they just love the thrill of a fresh home feature.
(Image: Skipton Building Society)
While 53 per cent said energy-efficient improvements just don't give them the same buzz as a swanky new renovation.
The research, commissioned by Skipton Building Society, part of the Skipton Group, coincides with the release of The Big Retrofit report, which follows the energy efficiency transformation of a previously fossil-fuel reliant home.
The report, developed with Leeds Beckett University and the University of Leeds, reveals how the retrofit of a typical 1930s detached home – featuring triple glazing, solar panels and an air source heat pump – cut carbon emissions, improved comfort, and boosted the home's EPC rating from D to B.
Phil Spencer, TV star, property expert and Move iQ founder, said: 'It's easy to get caught up in choosing statement tiles or bold paint colours, but the most valuable home improvements aren't always the most Instagrammable.
'Green upgrades not only save money in the long run, but they can also boost comfort, value and sustainability, all without spoiling the look of your home.'
But it seems a new kind of 'keeping up with the Joneses' is sweeping through Britain's streets and cul-de-sacs – and this time, it's all about going green.
More than a quarter (28 per cent) now say they know a neighbour who's made big low carbon technology or energy efficiency related changes to their home – and 53 per cent of these have been inspired to follow suit.
As a result, 48 per cent have looked into getting solar panels, 24 per cent have explored upgrading their loft insulation – and 15 per cent would consider installing triple glazed windows.
For 38 per cent, it was hearing their neighbours had managed to cut their energy bills that got them interested.
Another 36 per cent said seeing what was actually possible gave them a lightbulb moment, while 30 per cent felt more confident after seeing the results up close.
Almost half (47 per cent) of all homeowners now reckon making eco improvements has become a modern-day status symbol, according to the research conducted by OnePoll.
Charging an electric car on the drive is seen as one of the leading signs you've 'made it' (32 per cent) – followed by underfloor heating powered by renewables (28 per cent) and having a heat pump (25 per cent).
Michaela Wright, head of group sustainability at Skipton Building Society added: 'This research suggests we may be seeing a shift from 'keeping up with the Joneses' to 'greening up with the Jones'.
'As more people see their neighbours investing in greener technologies, it naturally sparks curiosity and motivation to do the same.
'There's something powerful about seeing these changes up close – it makes the benefits feel more real and achievable.
'The idea of a modern status symbol is evolving, and now things like solar panels, heat pumps and electric cars are part of that.
'It's a positive sign that more energy efficient choices are becoming aspirational, not just practical.
'We understand that making energy-efficient home improvements might not be at the top of everyone's priority list.
'That's why we took on the journey ourselves – to help demystify the retrofit process through The Big Retrofit project.
'We've documented our experience and created a series of resources, to support others who are considering making similar improvements.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
‘We bought a house together six months after we met'
The first time Lorraine Feng and her boyfriend dared to discuss their salaries with each other was when they were applying for a mortgage. The couple had only met six months previously, but sky-high London rents had convinced them to pool together their savings and buy a new-build flat on the Northern line. 'We were paying £2,000 per month individually in rent. It was getting too much so we decided to commit,' says Feng, 32. 'The decision to buy wasn't impulsive. It came from a real need.' She and her partner, Tomasz Przytula, 31, are part of a growing generation of couples buying homes together soon after meeting – and, perhaps, before they are fully ready. A survey by Skipton building society found that 64pc of adults in relationships value getting on the property ladder over getting married. It is not difficult to see why. It takes the average single person 11 years of saving to get on the property ladder, according to estate agency Hamptons. This time is halved when buying in a couple is factored in. For Feng and Przytula, the frustration of handing over half of their monthly pay cheques to their landlords proved the tipping point. In January 2024, they paid a deposit of £57,000 on a flat in Barnet, London – 10pc of the apartment's total value. The property is held in joint ownership, with Przytula putting down a bigger percentage of the deposit. Neither Feng nor Przytula borrowed from their parents: 'Luckily, we are both quite frugal and we both agreed that paying rent was lining someone else's pockets. 'Tomasz does earn more than me, but we agreed to keep it simple and split the mortgage payments 50/50,' Feng says. She is a product analyst, while Przytula is software engineer. A year into home ownership, they both agree that they made the right decision to buy so early on in their relationship, and have no regrets. The couple have no agreement in place about how the property should be split if they need to do so. Battling a breakup But of course, love does turn sour for many, and those that have committed too soon have found the harder part of extracting themselves from a relationship is the mortgage that ties them together. Molly*, 28, and her military boyfriend, Rob*, 32, were desperate to get on the property ladder. They had been together for just under 24 months when they completed on the property, but had not spent much time together. Rob had been deployed for six months on tour, and was away with his job on and off throughout their relationship. 'We bought a starter home in Gloucestershire with a deposit in which I contributed 65pc and he contributed 35pc,' says Molly. 'The house was bought for £365,000. My deposit came from savings and family help.' In 2020, two years into living in their home, the relationship broke down. Rob moved back to military accommodation and Molly remained in the house. 'We both come from divorced parents so had the nous to draw up a deed of trust before we bought. Thank goodness we did because dividing the asset was harder than anything I have ever done,' she says. Added to this was a second mortgage they had taken out to cover the cost of a refurbishment, which made it more complicated. 'We used legal representation because I wanted to stay and he wanted to sell. We had three valuations – the house had risen in value in the two years we were there – we took the middle one,' she says. 'I'm quite stoic and try to keep a fair head on my shoulders but it was really hard. There were also animals involved and furniture to argue over, and in the meantime, we were carrying the burden of joint liability for the mortgage payments until he sold his share to me.' Ignoring the warnings Other couples who have wanted to buy with their partner have encountered resistance from friends and family who feel they are fast-forwarding their relationship too soon. Sophie*, 30, and her boyfriend Toby*, 33, have been dating for a year. 'One evening we ended up scrolling through houses online and saw one we liked, listed for £200,000 in Manchester. We viewed it and ended up putting in an offer – we were surprised and delighted when it was accepted,' Sophie says. They have faced warnings and negativity from loved ones driven by concern. 'My family have asked me to pull out of the sale because they are worried that it's too soon for us as a couple. We are yet to complete, but the whole process has felt negative because of what they have said.' Sophie and Toby are pressing ahead and, as to the thorny issue of what happens if things do go wrong, they say they will deal with it if that eventuality occurs. 'We haven't got a formal agreement in place outlining the split of the assets, but we hope that is not something we will have to face.'
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
Labour's latest EPC idea would be laughable if it weren't so pernicious
I've said it before and I'll say it again: sometimes I feel I live in an alternative reality. I don't know how this escaped me, given how up to speed I am with all things EPC (I always need some good bedtime reading), but I can only think after my last painful and expensive experience where I tried to achieve a grade 'C' and failed, I switched off. It's the only explanation I can find for how I missed the latest shenanigans when it comes to the EPC proposals for 2030 – they apply to all 'rentals'. We're not just talking about private rentals now. Nope, these plans are so much wider reaching and damaging than I had ever realised, because the proposal is to also include all holiday lets, temporary accommodation such as immigrant housing and social housing. Now, you may not know this, but holiday letting and social housing currently do not have to comply with any EPC regulation, so have been spared the burden while the private sector has had to carry it. Anyway, the good news is that all of these rental sectors are apparently going to be measured by the same metric as the private sector. It's a surprise move given the level of outright discrimination landlords have had to suffer, but I can only surmise Labour wants to spread misery to every corner of the housing market for full impact. It's also the only reason I can think of – apart from money making – for the fines increasing to £30,000 for non-compliance. However, while I welcome the equality, I have no idea if Angela Rayner is secretly planning to bring a load of talented tradespeople over to fill the gaping skills gap. Currently, there's no way all rental properties can be retrofitted to meet the 'C' grade standard by 2030. And anyway, does anybody care to remember that there is still a cost of living crisis going on? I'm not sure where all this extra cash is going to come from. Landlords have been squeezed in recent years and few are likely to have the sort of sums required for upgrades to hand. There are ways to improve your EPC rating, without breaking the bank, but the Government's target is still unrealistic. But this is all before we even get to the heart of the matter, which is the unreliability of the EPC test in itself. This has been proven time and time again to be defective – and yet still they persist. To give just one example, electricity is more expensive and so even though only using electricity to heat your home is better for energy efficiency, the expense means you will get a worse EPC score. Last week Labour unveiled a reformed EPC assessment with more stringent criteria that is more expensive for landlords and could see properties drop a rating. What is it with brick walls and banging your head? The worst thing is, I feel like a fool. I try to be a good landlord. I try to see what I can do to get to an EPC 'C' because even if I don't like all the noise and stuff going on, I know my tenants appreciate upgrades that make properties cheaper to run, particularly given the Government still hasn't got a handle on the utility bills crisis. Such is the level of this eco Shakespearean farce that it's little wonder to learn about the lack of enforcement when it comes to EPC certificates. Since 2020, private landlords have been unable to let a property unless it got an 'E' or was exempt. But – and here's the plot twist: a Freedom of Information request by technology provider Reapit has found only 147 fines were issued between October 2008 and August 2024, and only by Liverpool, Bristol and Newham for non-compliance. Now, before you start getting all excited, I have to remind you – if you don't have a valid EPC, you'll get fined. But more importantly, for anybody thinking of flouting the law, if you don't have a valid EPC certificate at the start of the tenancy, trying to recover possession will be extremely difficult. Providing a tenant with an EPC is a legal requirement, and if landlords have not done this correctly, they will not be able to use a s21. notice to evict a tenant. And that, dear reader, is the madness of the world we live in: the tenant may not be paying rent and may well have destroyed your property, but if you haven't got the right EPC and served it on the right day, you can kiss goodbye to what was once yours.
Telegraph
5 days ago
- Telegraph
Landlords face higher EPC bills as Labour's reforms kick in
Landlords could be forced to fork out hundreds more for energy performance certificates (EPCs) from Sunday as new rules come into force, experts have warned. Under reforms, energy assessors will be expected to use a new data collection system, raising the price of certificates to up to £250 each. The more stringent criteria could also mean that properties could drop an EPC band, experts said, making them impossible to let under rules set out by Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary. Under the new methodology, assessors will be required to inspect the size, frame type and glazing of every window in the house more thoroughly, as well as recording any extractor fans and blocked chimneys. Chris Norris, of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) property body, warned that the price of an EPC certificate, which typically costs between £50 and £120, could rise by £20 this summer as a result of the changes. He said: 'It's reasonable to assume that it will take assessors longer to take more precise measurements and input more specific data, so price rises are inevitable.' However, Sean Horton, of mortgage adviser Respect Mortgages, said the more intensive assessments could increase the price of certificates 'to £150-£250 easily'. He added: 'The window measurements alone are crackers. Instead of just noting 'typical double glazing,' assessors now need to measure each window individually, record orientations, frame types, glazing gaps, ages, draught proofing – the lot. 'That's going to make each assessment much longer, with the cost passed on to the landlord.' From 2030, all rental homes must have an EPC score of at least C, while landlords accepting new tenants will be expected to achieve the required standard by 2028. The plans are championed by Mr Miliband, who said it was a 'Tory scandal' that Britain's poorest households were living in 'cold, draughty homes', adding that 'many rent from private landlords, below decent standards'. But Anna Moore, of retrofit company, Domna, warned that the new system would likely result in many homes dropping an EPC band. She said: 'In particular, the model changes how electric heating systems are scored, intended to solve the problem of people installing heat pumps and then seeing their EPC go down. 'The new model also lowers the 'default assumptions' on carbon emissions in traditionally heated homes, so many properties will see their EPC drop. 'For example, a 1960s 90m² home, with empty cavity walls, might drop five points from EPC D to EPC E.' Labour is due to replace the beleaguered EPC system entirely with the much-anticipated Home Energy Model, following years of consultation. Among other changes, the reforms are expected to favour homes with the 'capacity to integrate with smart technology', which some fear will penalise homeowners who refuse a smart meter. Mr Norris, of the NRLA, said: 'When the Home Energy Model launches, the increases could be significantly more, depending on the outcome of the expected consultation into their methodology. 'While it is difficult to predict, it would not be unreasonable to expect that prices could double.' Kundan Bhaduri, of the Kushman Group real estate firm, said: 'For portfolio landlords, this is death by a thousand clipboard checks. 'Costs will rise sharply, and worse still, homes that previously scraped a C rating could now drop to a D, dragging us into yet another regulatory penalty zone. And this is just the warm-up act before the even more chaotic Home Energy Model arrives.' Many landlords are expected to sell up ahead of the changes, while others will be forced to spend thousands of pounds insulating properties or installing heat pumps to meet the required grade. Labour has floated a spending cap of £15,000 per property, and on Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed £13.2bn worth of funding for insulation upgrades. However, there are fears the cost of green improvements will ultimately be passed on to tenants in the form of higher rents. Research by Swedish bank, Handelsbanken, revealed 92pc of UK-based landlords believe tenants would pay more for greener homes. Tom Darling, of campaign group Generation Rent, urged the Government to impose rent caps on landlords who accept grants for eco upgrades. He said: 'With so many renters in fuel poverty, it's vital the Government is trying to make homes easier and cheaper to heat through higher energy efficiency standards. 'However, these plans must take place alongside amendments to the Renters' Rights Bill to protect renters from eviction and rent rises where public money has been used to improve a property. These grants aren't there for landlords to turn a dime off of.' A government spokesman said: 'Everyone deserves to live in a warm, comfortable home. We're investing £13.2bn in the Warm Homes Plan to upgrade five million homes over this Parliament, cutting energy bills for good through new insulation, solar panels and heat pumps. 'These long-planned changes make EPC assessments more thorough, giving people a clearer picture of how energy efficient their home is.'
