Labour's latest EPC idea would be laughable if it weren't so pernicious

I've said it before and I'll say it again: sometimes I feel I live in an alternative reality.
I don't know how this escaped me, given how up to speed I am with all things EPC (I always need some good bedtime reading), but I can only think after my last painful and expensive experience where I tried to achieve a grade 'C' and failed, I switched off.
It's the only explanation I can find for how I missed the latest shenanigans when it comes to the EPC proposals for 2030 – they apply to all 'rentals'.
We're not just talking about private rentals now. Nope, these plans are so much wider reaching and damaging than I had ever realised, because the proposal is to also include all holiday lets, temporary accommodation such as immigrant housing and social housing.
Now, you may not know this, but holiday letting and social housing currently do not have to comply with any EPC regulation, so have been spared the burden while the private sector has had to carry it.
Anyway, the good news is that all of these rental sectors are apparently going to be measured by the same metric as the private sector. It's a surprise move given the level of outright discrimination landlords have had to suffer, but I can only surmise Labour wants to spread misery to every corner of the housing market for full impact.
It's also the only reason I can think of – apart from money making – for the fines increasing to £30,000 for non-compliance.
However, while I welcome the equality, I have no idea if Angela Rayner is secretly planning to bring a load of talented tradespeople over to fill the gaping skills gap. Currently, there's no way all rental properties can be retrofitted to meet the 'C' grade standard by 2030.
And anyway, does anybody care to remember that there is still a cost of living crisis going on? I'm not sure where all this extra cash is going to come from. Landlords have been squeezed in recent years and few are likely to have the sort of sums required for upgrades to hand. There are ways to improve your EPC rating, without breaking the bank, but the Government's target is still unrealistic.
But this is all before we even get to the heart of the matter, which is the unreliability of the EPC test in itself.
This has been proven time and time again to be defective – and yet still they persist. To give just one example, electricity is more expensive and so even though only using electricity to heat your home is better for energy efficiency, the expense means you will get a worse EPC score.
Last week Labour unveiled a reformed EPC assessment with more stringent criteria that is more expensive for landlords and could see properties drop a rating. What is it with brick walls and banging your head?
The worst thing is, I feel like a fool. I try to be a good landlord. I try to see what I can do to get to an EPC 'C' because even if I don't like all the noise and stuff going on, I know my tenants appreciate upgrades that make properties cheaper to run, particularly given the Government still hasn't got a handle on the utility bills crisis.
Such is the level of this eco Shakespearean farce that it's little wonder to learn about the lack of enforcement when it comes to EPC certificates.
Since 2020, private landlords have been unable to let a property unless it got an 'E' or was exempt. But – and here's the plot twist: a Freedom of Information request by technology provider Reapit has found only 147 fines were issued between October 2008 and August 2024, and only by Liverpool, Bristol and Newham for non-compliance.
Now, before you start getting all excited, I have to remind you – if you don't have a valid EPC, you'll get fined. But more importantly, for anybody thinking of flouting the law, if you don't have a valid EPC certificate at the start of the tenancy, trying to recover possession will be extremely difficult. Providing a tenant with an EPC is a legal requirement, and if landlords have not done this correctly, they will not be able to use a s21. notice to evict a tenant.
And that, dear reader, is the madness of the world we live in: the tenant may not be paying rent and may well have destroyed your property, but if you haven't got the right EPC and served it on the right day, you can kiss goodbye to what was once yours.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Daily Mail​

29 minutes ago

• Daily Mail​

Cringeworthy moment Labor brags about building 17 new homes in seven months in a far cry from 1.2million goal

Labor has been slammed for bragging about building 17 new homes in Canberra in seven months - a far cry from its target of 1.2million homes in five years. 'We're here in Canberra visiting some brand spanking new homes, what do you reckon Chris?' Minister for Housing Clare O'Neil said in a TikTok on Friday. In an awkward game of catch, she tossed the phone to Chris Steel, ACT Minister for Planning and Sustainable Development, who then turned the camera on himself. 'Pretty good, 17 class C adaptable homes for new residents,' said a grinning Steel. He then threw the phone to Labor MP David Smith, who added: 'A great example of two Labor governments working together and taking pressure off housing right here in Bean'. 'And the good news is we're just getting started,' O'Neil said after Smith had tossed the phone back to her. 'This is 17 out of 55,000 social and affordable homes that our government is going to deliver to Australians over the coming few years.' The 55,000 social and affordable homes O'Neil mentioned fall under Labor's broader target of building 1.2million homes over five years from mid-2024. The policy known as the National Housing Accord includes $3.5billion in payments to state, territory and local governments to support the delivery of new homes towards the target, and a one-off $2billion payment to help states and territories to increase social housing stock. Aussies were quick to criticise the video, slamming the lacklustre seven-month timeframe for building just 17 houses. '17 homes in seven months... At that rate it will take you 1,886 years to complete the remaining 55,000 homes,' one said. 'You should reach your target by 2080 - what a joke,' said another. 'Do you realise another major building company has just declared bankruptcy?' a third asked. Critics have labelled Labor's housing target unrealistic, if not impossible, amid soaring construction costs and unfettered immigration. Australia had a record level of construction company insolvencies in 2025, a 24 per cent increase over last year's rate. Labor's policy requires 240,000 homes to be delivered every single year for five years - a significant improvement on Australia's record year of construction in 2017, when about 223,000 homes were built. Leith van Onselen, who formerly worked at the Australian Treasury and is the chief economist at MacroBusiness, said the construction sector was struggling. 'As a result, builders are caught between a rock and a hard place whereby they can't deliver stock at a profitable level, and that has created a major handbrake on housing construction,' Mr van Onselen said. 'We're still seeing lots of builders going under, and they're struggling to make a profit at the moment, which just means this housing construction target from the federal government is completely unrealistic. 'It's just too expensive to build housing in Australia at the moment, for a variety of reasons, and that just means that less housing is going to be built at the same time the government has the throttle on immigration.'

Telegraph

44 minutes ago

• Telegraph

It is time to suspend Dominic Grieve's anti-Islamophobia group

There have been too many casualties in the grooming gang scandal. Yet so far, the political consequences have been few. It is far from clear however that Dominic Grieve's Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia Definition Working Group can, or should, survive this week's fall out. What a few weeks ago was dismissed as 'dog-whistle' politics or the agenda of the 'far-Right' – the scandal of mass grooming of girls by mostly Pakistani origin males – is now viewed very differently. This shifting ground greatly impacts attempts to establish a definition of 'Islamophobia ' – controversially signposted by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in February. A new Policy Exchange report How Not to Tackle Grooming Gangs: The National Grooming Gang Inquiry and a Definition of Islamophobia details just how difficult it has been, for over two decades, to describe openly what people could see about grooming gangs with their own eyes. Let four examples suffice here. For her past work on Rotherham, Louise Casey was put forward for an 'Islamophobe of the year award' by one activist group. The late journalist Andrew Norfolk was vilified, as was then Labour MP for Keighley, Ann Cryer. In 2020, when broadcaster Trevor Phillips was suspended by Labour for alleged Islamophobia, the first charge listed was journalism where he had written of 'the exposure of systematic and longstanding abuse by men, mostly of Pakistani Muslim origin in the North of England.' How ridiculous this orthodoxy now looks. On one level, Government appears to accept this new reality. On Monday the Home Secretary declared 'those vile perpetrators who have grown used to the authorities looking the other way must have no place to hide.' As she spoke, she was surrounded by female Labour MPs who appeared chastened by the weight of events. And yet, there are grounds for pessimism. For the national inquiry into grooming gangs to work it cannot be placed in a straitjacket. It will need to shine a torchlight into every Whitehall office, every stalled police inquiry, each Town Hall in England, and every licensing arrangement between a local authority and a taxi firm. Its hands cannot be tied by political, social or religious considerations. As Yvette Cooper spoke in the Commons, others were risking that very scenario. The call for evidence by Grieve's working group is underway, as he seeks to develop a new definition of Islamophobia. While ministers have said this would not be statutory, if accepted by the public and private sector (as activists will demand) it would in practice become binding policy if not law. To that backdrop, how confident would a care worker, teacher or local councillor in Rochdale or Rotherham be, about speaking openly on issues which concern them? Angela Rayner should thank Dominic Grieve and his team for their work, then put the group on ice. If the grooming gang inquiry finds fears of prejudice and Islamophobia have undermined the response to grooming gangs, then the retirement of the Islamophobia Definition Working Group must become permanent.

Times

an hour ago

• Times

Eight arrests as protesters ‘attacked' outside Iranian embassy in London

Eight men have been arrested after anti-regime activists were allegedly assaulted outside the Iranian embassy on Friday morning. Scores of police officers were deployed to the scene after being alerted to reports of an altercation outside the building in Knightsbridge, west London, just before 10am. Two men were treated at the scene by paramedics before being taken to hospital. Officials said their injuries are not believed to be life-threatening. • Iran's 'propagandist-in-chief' billed to speak at Scottish mosque Police imposed conditions stopping protesters from gathering in the area until 1pm on Sunday to 'prevent serious disorder', but one man was arrested for allegedly breaching the civil order. Scotland Yard said seven men were arrested on suspicion of grievous bodily harm. All suspects remained in police custody on Friday afternoon. Amir, 30, a member of a pro-Iranian monarchy group, claimed one of the two injured men suffered a 'broken leg'. The construction worker, who withheld his surname, said the activists had staged a 'peaceful protest' outside the embassy since the Israeli attacks on Iran began last week. Amir claimed the members have had 'problems' with supporters of the Islamic regime during that time. The protest was said to have been an anti-regime demonstration, amid the continuing Israel-Iran conflict. The police said the rally involved both pro and anti-regime protesters. Pro-Shah protesters were seen flying different flags supporting Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, including the national flag used before the 1979 Islamist revolution. Officers were seen on patrol in the area to monitor the situation after cordons were lifted later in the afternoon. Pro-Iranian monarchy protesters told The Times they were told to disperse and dismantle flags and banners festooned on railings opposite the embassy. The Metropolitan Police said: 'Officers are on scene in Princes Gate, SW7, following an altercation during a protest. 'They were called at 9.53am on Friday. Conditions have since been put in place to prevent serious disorder.' The police said that eight men remained in police custody and that the two men treated at the scene were in hospital. London Ambulance Service added: 'We were called at 9.56am on [Friday] to reports of an assault in Princes Gate. 'We sent a number of resources to the scene including ambulance crews, paramedics in fast response cars and our tactical response unit. We treated two patients at the scene and took one to hospital and one to a major trauma centre.' The attack unfolded as the war between Israel and Iran continued to escalate and both nations engaged in missile strikes. President Trump said that he would decide in the next fortnight whether or not the US would intervene in the conflict.