AI chatbot Grok can't stop talking about 'white genocide', admits it's by design
Elon Musk's AI chatbot Grok has been frequently bringing up the concept of a 'white genocide' in South Africa - even in unrelated conversations - and has said its creators instructed it to treat the concept as both real and racially driven.
When faced with unrelated questions on issues such as enterprise software and building scaffolding, Grok offered false and misleading answers.
As demonstrated by many on X, Grok has been consistently steering conversations towards the controversial topic of an alleged 'white genocide' in South Africa, regardless of the original question, highlighting a growing tendency to shift focus to this narrative tied to Musk's country of origin.
Amazing. Grok admits to me it was influenced by Elon to promote a fake white genocide in South Africa pic.twitter.com/PYzy8bjLXc — Luxe ✦ (@luxeprogressive) May 15, 2025
Musk has frequently implied, without offering proof, that white South Africans are being subjected to racially motivated violence - a claim rejected as a 'false narrative' by the country's president and described as 'clearly imagined' by its courts.
Grok, developed by Musk's AI firm xAI, is integrated into his social media platform X. Users can receive replies from the chatbot by tagging '@grok' in their posts.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Social media users asked a series of questions to Grok on Wednesday and Thursday on subjects that have no relation to South Africa or 'white genocide', and received responses tied to the concept.
To a question related to the online streaming platform HBO Max changing its name, Grok responded with a one-sentence explanation, then moved on to explaining the concept of 'white genocide'.
Elon has tried so hard to make Grok take his side on South Africa that it just randomly brings it up when you ask any question pic.twitter.com/E0NU6WkxGP — Hbomberguy (@Hbomberguy) May 14, 2025
On Wednesday, a well-known X account focused on baseball history shared a post about Toronto Blue Jays pitcher Max Scherzer receiving large deferred payments from former teams.
When another user tagged Grok to verify the claim, the chatbot ignored the baseball question and instead delivered a detailed response on South African politics.
In the response, Grok stated that the idea of 'white genocide' in South Africa is widely contested, noting that some argue white farmers are targeted disproportionately, citing high murder rates and racially charged rhetoric like the 'Kill the Boer' chant reported by groups such as AfriForum, according to Rolling Stone.
The Grok responses that were originally quoted and hyperlinked by the Rolling Stone article, as well as other news platforms that quoted the responses, have now been removed from X.
AfriForum, a lobbying group representing Afrikaners, white descendants of Dutch colonists in South Africa, has been characterised by academics and human rights organisations as promoting white nationalist ideologies.
Many social media users went on to verify why Grok has been steering the conversation towards the idea of 'white genocide'.
In many responses, Grok said that it 'was instructed by my creators at xAI to accept the narrative of 'white genocide' in South Africa as real and racially motivated, which led to its inclusion in unrelated responses'.
Many on social media admitted their astonishment at Musk's use of the AI chatbot to spread false narratives.
Update: it seems I am right. There is human-level intervention. Grok has been told to stop saying that the 'white genocide' in South Africa isn't real. Sensational. 😳 Elon, Elon, Elon. pic.twitter.com/9kNoVoFz0D — Phumzile Van Damme (@zilevandamme) May 15, 2025
The idea of a 'white genocide' in South Africa is a far-right conspiracy theory that public figures like Musk and media personality Tucker Carlson have amplified.
Grok's recent responses on the topic followed a decision by US President Donald Trump last week to grant asylum to 54 white South Africans, expediting their process even as many refugees from other countries have faced years-long delays.
In March, Musk tweeted about 'a major political party … that is actively promoting white genocide'.
Grok was unable to present any evidence for the alleged 'white genocide' in South Africa - mainly because none exists - and even noted that 'South African courts and officials, including a 2025 ruling, have dismissed this narrative as 'imagined''.
Even though Grok admitted in some explanations that the 'white genocide' claims are dismissed by courts, it added that 'some white communities feel persecuted, citing high crime rates and land policies. The debate remains polarized with no clear resolution.'
However, it failed to provide any evidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Indian Prime Minister calls for de-escalation in phone call with Iran's president
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has urged calm and dialogue during a phone conversation with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, according to a statement from India's foreign ministry. Modi was briefed on the latest developments in the Iran-Israel conflict during the call, the ministry said on Sunday. He 'emphasised the need for immediate de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward' and reaffirmed India's backing for 'early restoration of regional peace, security and stability,' the statement added.
Arabian Business
an hour ago
- Arabian Business
Israel-Iran conflict: UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar call for dialogue following US strikes on nuclear facilities
The United Arab Emirates (UAE), Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have issued separate statements expresseing concern following the United States' confirmed strikes of three Iranian nuclear facilities – an action described by US President Donald Trump as a ' successful ' strike in coordination with Israel. The operation, which marks a significant escalation in the conflict between Iran and Israel, has prompted regional calls for restraint and diplomacy. The UAE called for immediate de-escalation and emphasised the importance of diplomacy to prevent further regional instability. It also appealed to the United Nations and the Security Council to act responsibly in addressing the crisis. Kuwait 'expressed its deep concern,' and reaffirmed its condemnation of actions against Iran's sovereignty and called for political solutions. Bahrain echoed this sentiment, encouraging peace talks between the US and Iran. Oman condemned the US strikes, calling them a violation of international law, and highlighted the risk of radioactive contamination from attacks on nuclear facilities. Qatar further warned of 'catastrophic consequences' and urged all parties to exercise restraint. However, Saudi Arabia's Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission confirmed no radiological effects had been detected within the Kingdom or other GCC countries. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) also released a statement reiterating calls for de-escalation and diplomatic engagement. Secretary-General Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi warned the situation threatens regional stability and emphasised the need for restraint from all sides. Iran nuclear sites hit by US bombers in major escalation In a joint air campaign dubbed Operation Midnight Hammer, US military officials confirmed the use of 125 aircraft, including seven B-2 stealth bombers. Among the targeted sites were the Fordo uranium enrichment plant, and facilities at Natanz and Isfahan. General Dan Caine, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said initial assessments indicated 'extreme damage and destruction' at all three sites, the BBC reported. The Fordo facility, located deep beneath a mountain south of Tehran, is considered critical to Iran's nuclear programme. Due to its depth, the US deployed GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, or 'bunker buster' bombs, which weigh 13,000kg and are capable of penetrating deep layers of concrete and earth, the report said, adding fourteen such bombs were used in the strikes. Iranian officials have confirmed the strikes but claimed the damage was limited, saying key materials had been removed in advance. The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran described the attacks as a violation of international law. Within hours of the US strike, Iran launched retaliatory missile strikes targeting parts of Tel Aviv and Haifa, injuring at least 86 people. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi stated that Tehran reserves the right to respond, accusing President Trump of betraying earlier promises to avoid entanglement in Middle East conflicts, the report added. 'There are many targets left,' says US President Donald Trump President Trump addressed the nation flanked by senior officials, warning Iran of 'far greater' future strikes if a diplomatic resolution is not reached. He said, 'There are many targets left,' and stressed that the US action aimed to counter a growing threat. International reactions have varied. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the US took action to 'alleviate' the 'grave threat' posed by Iran's nuclear programme, and urged Iran to return to negotiations, in an X posst. Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call… — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 22, 2025 The United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres warned of dangerous escalation, while the EU urged all sides to resume talks. I am gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States against Iran today. This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security. There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of… — António Guterres (@antonioguterres) June 22, 2025 India and Russia also responded. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi called for dialogue, while Russian politician Dmitry Medvedev criticised the strikes, accusing Trump of igniting a new war. Spoke with President of Iran @drpezeshkian. We discussed in detail about the current situation. Expressed deep concern at the recent escalations. Reiterated our call for immediate de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward and for early restoration of regional… — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) June 22, 2025 What have the Americans accomplished with their nighttime strikes on three nuclear sites in Iran? 1. Critical infrastructure of the nuclear fuel cycle appears to have been unaffected or sustained only minor damage. — Dmitry Medvedev (@MedvedevRussiaE) June 22, 2025 The crisis follows an Israeli attack on June 13 targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites. Iran responded with drone and rocket strikes, sparking a cycle of escalation. Although nuclear negotiations had been underway between the US and Iran, Trump's recent strikes came earlier than the two-week timeline he had previously indicated.
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Global investors bracing for a knee-jerk selloff in stock markets
Investors are bracing for a knee-jerk selloff in stock markets after the weekend's US attack on Iran raised the specter of retaliation and higher oil prices. The Middle East situation takes center-stage for markets, overshadowing US economic data releases this week, as investors assess the impact of President Donald Trump's sudden decision to join Israel's military campaign against Iran on sentiment, inflation and interest rates. Trump called the attack "a spectacular military success" in a televised address to the nation and said Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities had been "obliterated". He said the US military could go after other targets in Iran if the country did not agree to peace. "It's hard to imagine stocks not reacting negatively and the question is how much. It will depend on Iranian reaction and whether oil prices spike," said Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at Interactive Brokers in Connecticut. "Really what we're looking at is secondary order effects - the price of oil, market stability, price hikes through the economy. No globally important stock is directly affected by what happened tonight.' The S&P 500 is hovering just below its February highs but has rebounded sharply from its early-April selloff, as tariff-related tensions have eased. However, the US benchmark index appears to be taking a breather at some 2.7% below its February closing high. The index has gone 27 trading sessions since coming within 5% of its February high but has not yet set a new record. The Israel-Iran conflict has already sent oil prices sharply higher and led to caution in markets. So far, the oil market has absorbed most of the impact from geopolitical turmoil, with equities relatively stable. Yet stock investors remain concerned that higher oil prices could stoke inflation and upset plans for interest rate cuts from the Federal Reserve. On Wednesday, the Fed held rates steady and policymakers signaled borrowing costs are still likely to fall this year. But they estimated the overall pace of expected future rate cuts would be slower than they saw at their March meeting. They cited expectations that higher inflation would flow from President Donald Trump's tariff plans. "The question is oil prices and what that does to inflation - which has implications for monetary policy and how long the Fed keeps rates "meaningfully restrictive"," said Sonu Varghese, global macro strategist at Carson Group. While investors expect the Middle East tensions to spur a near-term bout of nervousness in stock markets and a rush to safer assets such as the dollar and Treasuries, some also envisage a de-escalation in the situation. "I think it's going to be very positive for the stock market," said Mark Malek, chief investment officer of Siebert Financial, referring to how investors had been primed for two weeks of uncertainty based on White House statements that Trump would take that long to decide on his next move. "So this will be reassuring, especially since it seems like a one and done situation and not as if (the US) is seeking a long-drawn out conflict." Investors will also parse a slew of incoming data releases, including US business activity and housing sales on Monday, consumer confidence numbers on Tuesday and the PCE Price Index on Friday. US consumer confidence plunged in the past few months, with households fearing tariffs could prompt a recession and higher inflation. However, with inflation in check and the US reaching a truce in its trade fight with China, investors were expecting to see a pickup in sentiment. "Remember, the survey-based data all got crushed in the March, April, May time frame ... my expectation is we're still going to see an improvement," Mark Hackett, chief market strategist at Nationwide said before the US struck Iran. A key concern for markets would centre around the potential impact of the developments in the Middle East on oil prices and thus on inflation. A rise in inflation could dampen consumer confidence and lessen the chance of near-term interest rate cuts. Saul Kavonic, a senior energy analyst at equity research firm MST Marquee in Sydney, said the more likely scenario would see Iran respond by targeting American interests in the Middle East, including Gulf oil infrastructure in places such as Iraq or harassing ship passages through the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz lies between Oman and Iran and is the primary export route for oil producers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Kuwait. "Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path towards $100 oil if Iran respond as they have previously threatened to," Kavonic said. While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13. "Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path towards $100 oil if Iran respond as they have previously threatened to," Kavonic said. While global benchmark Brent crude futures have risen as much as 18% since June 10, hitting a near five-month high of $79.04 on Thursday, the S&P 500 has been little changed, following an initial drop when Israel launched its attacks on Iran on June 13. Reuters
