Life expectancy for women in some Southern states has barely budged in more than 100 years
How long you live depends on where you live, new research suggests.
Americans' life expectancy increased throughout the 20th century, although in some states, particularly in the South, people aren't living much longer than they were 100 years ago. It's worse among women.
Researchers at the Yale School of Public Health analyzed the death data of 77 million women and 102 million men born from 1900 through 2000. The findings, published Monday in the journal JAMA Network Open, showed that nationwide life expectancy for women increased from 73.8 to 84.1 in that time frame, while it jumped from 62.8 to 80.3 for men.
Scientists and health officials calculate life expectancy at birth as a way of understanding a country's health over time. How long people in the United States lived since the last century varied drastically by state.
'What was surprising to me was that for some states, especially for women, there's basically no change,' said study co-author Theodore Holford, a senior research scientist in biostatistics at Yale University. 'Over 100 years, in some of these Southern states, they improved less than two years in the framework of all of the medical advances that we have seen during the 20th century.'
The bottom five states for life expectancy among women born in 2000, compared to women born in 1900, are:
West Virginia, 75.3, up from 74.3.
Oklahoma, 76, down from 76.7.
Kentucky, 76.5, up from 74.9.
Mississippi, 76.6, up from 73.2.
Arkansas, 76.6, up from 75.7.
Southern men born in 2000 also tended to have lower life expectancies, though they showed greater improvements than women since 1900:
Mississippi, 71.8, up from 62.3.
West Virginia, 72.6, up from 63.7.
Alabama, 72.6, up from 62.5.
Louisiana, 72.9, up from 61.5.
Tennessee 73.4, up from 63.6.
Not all Southern states show lower or stalled life expectancies for people born in 2000.
Florida, Texas and Virginia are among the Southern states featured in the top 20 of life expectancy for both men and women born in 2000.
States outside the South that ranked in the bottom 10 for both sexes include Ohio and Indiana.
The study also highlights life expectancy by state and sex at the midway point of 1950.
Men in particular showed greater improvement during the first half of the century. In North Dakota, for example, male life expectancy jumped 10 years from 66.4 in 1900 to 76.5 in 1950, but only one year, 77.8, from 1950 to 2000.
Data reflects the state in which a person died, not where they were born.
It's well-established that women live longer than men, but this latest research unveils geographic disparities in life expectancy at a turning point in federal public health administration. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lamented the state of the nation's health care system in an April 10 statement that was also published in the New York Post.
'Our country's health is declining. America has the highest rates of chronic disease in the world,' Kennedy said. 'We rank last in terms of health among developed nations. And life expectancy is declining for many groups of Americans.'
Why is life expectancy lower in the South?
The Yale study claims to be the first to analyze historic state mortality trends by birth cohort, meaning entire generations are tracked.
Population health research more commonly involves a metric called period life expectancy, which estimates influences on mortality over a select year, such as during a pandemic.
'The idea here is to try to pick up on generational factors,' Holford said. 'There are lots of factors related to health that are more closely tied to generations than a calendar year.'
Cindy Prins, an associate professor in the department of population health sciences at the University of Central Florida College of Medicine, who wasn't involved in the study, said, 'This is a unique and important approach to examining life expectancies.'
That doesn't make the data any less alarming.
'It's concerning to know that cohort life expectancies in many Southern states, which have the lowest overall life expectancies, haven't changed much over time,' Prins said.
Overall, Americans are living longer, thanks to improvements in health care, sanitation, tobacco control, and the prevention of cancer, heart disease and other diseases, the study said. Previous research indicates that states with progressive public health policies are more likely to have higher life expectancies. Socioeconomic differences among states also impact longevity.
Dr. Marc Gourevitch, a professor in the department of population health at New York University's Grossman School of Medicine, said research shows that states with policies that support a more livable minimum wage and paid sick leave, as well as access to affordable medical care, are more likely to show significant life expectancy gains over time.
'Focusing on policies that help people better meet their everyday needs promises to go a long way in improving life expectancy and, with it, giving more people a chance at getting to watch their grandchildren grow,' said Gourevitch, who wasn't involved in the Yale study.
Women born in 2000 in the District of Columbia have both the highest life expectancy, 93 years, and the biggest improvement since 1900, when life expectancy was 63.9. Similarly, D.C. men born in 2000 have the third-highest life expectancy of 86.5 years, up from 48.7 at the start of the century.
'Urban areas tend to do a lot better than rural areas, presumably because of differences in access to health care,' Holford said of people living longer in the nation's capital.
Another change is the mix of the population in the District of Columbia.
'Many more people moving into the area who would have a lot of the monetary advantages that would give them better access to things affecting their health,' Holford said.
Which states have the highest life expectancy?
States with the longest life expectancies for women born in 2000 spanned both coasts and beyond the continental U.S.:
In New York, 91.9, up from 71.2.
California, 91.3, up from 73.6.
Massachusetts, 88.8, up from 74.2
Hawaii, 88.7, up from 75.6 .
Other than D.C., these states show the longest life expectancy among men born in 2000:
New York, 87.8, up from 60.1.
California, 86.8, up from 62.7.
Massachusetts, 84.8, up from 63.4.
Washington, 84.3, up from 63.7.
Holford said the Yale study is part of his work with the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). A goal of this and other CISNET research is to help health departments address state-specific disparities.
One downside to implementing promising public health policies, Holford said, is that it can take years — even generations — to measure their effects.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Map reveals where being outdoors during the summer could kill you in a matter of minutes... are you at risk?
Experts are sounding the alarm over the hotter-than-average weather making its way across the US - warning that exposure to these temperatures could lead to life-threatening health complications. The US is currently experiencing a 'heat dome, which occurs when the atmosphere traps hot air over certain areas like a lid on a pot. It's ripping through the Midwest and Northeast, with temperatures expected to reach 100 degrees Fahrenheit - and at temperatures this high, deadly heat stroke could strike in under 15 minutes But temperature is only one part of the equation - the UV index is also important. The ultraviolet index is a measurement of the strength of sunburn-producing UV radiation - it indicates how strong the sun's UV rays are. The higher the index, the stronger the rays. Zero to two indicates there is minimal danger from the sun, but an index of just three to five is considered risky and people are advised to wear sun protection, such as sunscreen, sunglasses, a hat and sun-protective clothing. At a six or seven, there is moderate risk of harm from unprotected sun exposure. Eight to 10 indicates high risk and people may experience burns in under 10 minutes. Anything 11 or above is very high risk and people with fair skin can experience dangerous burns in just five minutes. People are advised to stay indoors or avoid the sun completely. And this summer - millions of Americans will experience these dangerously high levels. There is no end limit on the scale, as it is measured based on what can cause burns to people and can continue to increase as temperatures rise and the sun's rays become stronger. According to the EPA, every American is expected to be exposed to high temperatures this summer. Even Alaska has issued its first-ever heat warning this week, though its UV levels are still low. However, some are more at risk of life-threatening complications. Based on average indices recorded between 2006 and 2023, people in the southwest are expected to experience UV levels ranging from 10 to 13 and beyond. In June, western and eastern Texas, along with much of New Mexico, Colorado and Hawaii, as well as eastern Arizona will see indices of 12 to 13. Southern California, Nevada and Utah and western Arizona, as well as parts of Wyoming, Kanas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia will see a UV index of 11 or 12. All of Florida and nearly everyone in Louisiana will also experience UV levels of 11 to 12. As the summer progresses, UV indices of 12 to 13 will reach southern Florida and parts of California. And higher levels - seven to nine - will begin creeping north, reaching Washington, Oregon, Montana, the Dakotas, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York and Maine. In August, levels will begin to dip a bit - decreasing to slightly lower levels than June. High UV exposure can lead to sunburns, which may blister and scar. Blistering that breaks the skin may increase the risk of infection, as bacteria and other contaminants can enter the area. UV exposure is also the leading cause of skin cancer, which strikes 5.4million Americans every year. And the risk of getting its deadliest form, melanoma, doubles after getting just five - or more - sunburns in your lifetime. Researchers believe UV indices are increasing because the ozone layer, which absorbs most of the suns UV rays, is depleting due to increased greenhouse gas commissions.
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why earwax can predict if you're at risk of developing Parkinson's disease
Published: | Updated: Scientists have revealed that the wax in your ears could actually say a lot about your health. Researchers in China have identified key differences in the makeup of earwax in people with Parkinson's disease compared to people without the condition, suggesting the sticky stuff holds secrets that could flag a person's risk of eventually developing the condition. Scientists at Zhejiang University took earwax samples from 100 people with Parkinson's and 79 without. They chose earwax because much of it is made up of sebum, an oily substance that undergoes chemical changes in cases of Parkinson's, and releases distinct volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Parkinson's triggers neurodegeneration, inflammation, and oxidative stress, altering sebum's composition and creating a distinct odor. It also progressively damages the brain, causing tremors, stiffness, and slow movement. Over time, symptoms worsen to include sudden freezing, speech loss, swallowing problems -often leading to pneumonia - and falls, both common causes of death among people with Parkinson's. Four specific types of VOCs stood out among people with the condition, suggesting that earwax could potentially be an accessible indicator of Parkinson's, which would allow patients to avoid invasive diagnostic tests and spinal taps. Around 1million Americans and 10million people globally currently have the disease, with nearly 90,000 new cases diagnosed each year. As that number is projected to climb, early diagnosis is more important than ever. While there is no cure, medication regimens can be started early to treat symptoms and slow down the progression of the disease. Researchers fed the VOC data from the samples of earwax into an algorithm that categorized subjects' Parkinson's status accurately 94 per cent of the time, demonstrating the potential for a fast, reliable diagnostic tool. The VOCs that stood out to researchers were all significant in differentiating between people with the condition and those without it, even after accounting for age and lifestyle factors. Two of the VOCS, Ethylbenzene & 4-Ethyltoluene, are compounds commonly found in plastics and petroleum products. Their presence suggests inflammation in the brain, which is a key driver of the breakdown of dopamine in the brain. Dopamine, while often thought of as a 'feel good' neurotransmitter, is a key chemical messenger that regulates movement control. As dopamine levels plummet while Parkinson's progresses, people become steadily more immobile. Another significant VOC was Pentanal, which is produced when fats break down. Elevated levels suggest cell damage, a hallmark of Parkinson's. The compound has been linked to an accumulation of protein clumps in patients' brains. And the VOC 2-Pentadecyl-1,3-dioxolane likely reflects issues with the metabolism of fats, which could have originated from microbiome changes in the skin of patients. It's unclear whether this VOC has any direct links to PD, but there is an expanding body of research pointing to a connection between PD and an imbalance in the gut microbiome. Soaring: Parkinson's death rates rose from 42 to 65 deaths per 100,000 from 1999–2017 Research suggests that VOCs are produced by the balance of good bacteria in the gut, which have also been associated with brain health. An imbalance allows harmful bacteria to flourish, leading to a proliferation of toxins that can cause inflammation in the brain. VOCs come from a wide array of toxic sources in the environment, from pesticides used to grow food, industrial chemicals in gasoline, and solvents in everyday items like dry cleaning chemicals and adhesives, to cleaning products, car emissions, and contaminated groundwater. Parkinson's is believed to be caused by a confluence of genetic and environmental factors. It is the world's fastest-growing brain disorder, and, according to NIH research, 'exposure to environmental toxicants is the principal reason.' In the US, deaths from Parkinson's disease have more than doubled in the past 20 years, with about 35,000 deaths in 2019 compared to 14,500 in 1999. While considering the clues that earwax can provide about Parkinson's development is new, investigating the role that VOCs play is not. A sweeping 2023 meta-analysis identified distinct VOCs present in the breath and skin oil in people with the disease compared to those without it. These compounds are specifically linked with oxidative stress, or a barrage of damage that cells endure before dying.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Weight loss in your 40s and 50s can help slash your chronic disease risk, researchers say
Working to lose weight in your 40s and 50s may help to reduce your risk of developing a chronic disease, a new study reveals. Researchers based in the U.K. and Finland say they found health benefits in people who lost an average of 6.5 percent of their body weight in early middle age and maintained that weight loss throughout a period of 12 to 35 years. Those benefits especially include a lessened risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes as well as an overall lower risk of death from chronic disease. 'The benefits of lifestyle-based weight management are widely discussed even though studies have found it surprisingly difficult to demonstrate health benefits beyond the prevention of diabetes,' University of Helsinki professor Dr. Timo Strandberg said in a statement. Strandberg was the lead author of the study which was published recently in the journal JAMA Network Open, the open-access journal of the American Medical Association. To reach these conclusions, the study tracked and analyzed the health of 23,000 white Europeans who were between the ages of 30 and 50 years old using data from three studies, conducted from 1985 to 1988, from 1964 to 1973, and between 2000 and 2013. They sorted the participants into four groups: people with persistent healthy weight, people who were overweight but became a healthy weight, people who were healthy and became overweight, and people who were overweight the entire time. 'Measurement of weight and height was conducted at a time when surgical and pharmacological weight-loss interventions were nearly nonexistent,' the authors noted. The cause of weight loss was not assessed, but given the age of the participants and lack of diagnosed disease, it was more likely intentional than caused by severe chronic conditions or frailty.' In one study, a reduction in body mass from overweight to normal weight over six years in mid-life was tied to a lower risk of developing chronic diseases. There was also a 48 percent lower risk for chronic illness compared to those who remained overweight, which largely held even after excluding participants who developed diabetes during follow-up. Another study showed a 57 percent risk for chronic illness. A third study, with the longest follow-up period, showed that weight loss in mid-life was associated with a 19 percent reduction in overall mortality. 'I'm certain that overall prevention of overweight and obesity starting in early life is absolutely the best thing to do,' Stranberg told The Independent. 'Our study indirectly proves this by showing that persistent healthy weight over the life-course is best.' He said that he hopes the findings will inspire people to see that lifestyle changes can lead to a longer life. 'This is particularly important today as more people are overweight than when the collection of our research data began 35 years ago,' he said in the statement.
