'They are left out because they criticised Ramaphosa'- Analysts on exclusion of key foundations from National Dialogue
Political analysts are of the view that the Thabo Mbeki, Nelson Mandela, and Ahmed Kathrada foundations were 'excluded' from the National Dialogue process announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa, because of their criticism over Ramaphosa's administration.
'I think they are left out because they have been critical of Cyril Ramaphosa's presidency,' said Siyabonga Ntombela, a political analyst from the University of KwaZulu-Natal.
'These foundations have conducted parallel dialogues to discuss the failures of the ANC under Cyril Ramaphosa, the same way they did under (former) President (Jacob) Zuma.'
The alleged exclusion comes after concerns about the makeup of the dialogue, with critics also expressing concern over the lack of youth representation.
Professor Theo Neethling also expressed concern over the exclusion of not only the Mbeki, Mandela, and Kathrada foundations but also the FW de Klerk Foundation.
'I am disappointed that these foundations appear to have been excluded from helping shape the format of the planned national discussions,' Neethling said.
'Their significance and value as credible NGOs could offer invaluable input and insight.'
He also emphasised the importance of involving business leaders and captains of industry, adding that their economic expertise was crucial to the dialogue's success.
'Before we get carried away with enthusiasm, we must ask: Who exactly constitutes the 'national' in this National Dialogue? Where will these dialogues take place? Who will participate, and how will role-players be selected?' he said.
'These critical details remain unclear and must be transparently addressed.'
Ramaphosa officially launched the National Dialogue initiative, aimed at reshaping South Africa's future amid rising inequality, unemployment, crime, and systemic corruption.
A National Convention will be convened on August 15, bringing together leaders from political, civil, religious, traditional, and business sectors.
Ramaphosa said that this is not a one-off event, but the start of a phased, participatory process that will include local consultations, sectoral discussions, and provincial gatherings.
The process will culminate in a second national convention in early 2026, where a comprehensive national program of action is expected to be adopted.
'At every turning point in our history, from ending apartheid to building democracy, it has been dialogue that led us forward,' Ramaphosa said.
'This is a call to every South African - young and old, rural and urban, from all communities - to help define our common future.'
Ramaphosa announced the formation of an Eminent Persons Group to oversee and guide the process.
Among the appointees are Bishop Barnabas Lekganyane of the Zion Christian Church, Grace Bishop Engenas Lekganyane of the St. Engenas Zion Christian Church, former COSATU general secretary Bheki Ntshalintshali, and Springbok captain Siya Kolisi.
Those absent from the list were any of Ramaphosa's predecessors or leaders from the foundations.
The foundation have consistently slammed Ramaphosa's administration on issues relating to corruption, accountability and governance.
Despite the concerns, Ntombela said there was nothing wrong with the composition of the group.
'These are just categories of political, social, and economic organization,' he said.
'Among them, it's possible to have youth leagues and young people's formations. I do not think the criticism is fair.'
Even though some have expressed concern and doubt about the effectiveness of the dialogue, Ntombela was blunt in his assessment.
'It will be another lip service, just as other dialogues conducted in the past.'
Neethling, however, said there is value in seeking a shared national vision, provided the process is genuine.
'If genuinely inclusive and meaningful, the dialogue can play a vital role in shaping a shared understanding of our challenges and exploring viable solutions,' he said.
'Such engagement can enrich our grasp of the issues and help move us closer to a broadly supported vision for the future.'
He stressed that the country's most urgent need is effective strategies to stimulate economic growth.
'Without reaching consensus on this, the national dialogue initiative risks becoming yet another talk shop,' Neethling said.
He said the country has faced numerous debates and deep ideological divisions in Parliament over economic and financial policies, often without resolution.
'One of South Africa's most persistent challenges is not a lack of planning, but poor implementation,' he said.
'Even the best policies or visionary ideas will achieve little if implementation barriers are not tackled head-on.'
He said the ongoing issues, such as corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency, limited financial resources, and capacity constraints, are all well-known problems that remain insufficiently addressed.
[email protected]
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘We are not xenophobic': No justification to favour foreign academics over South Africans, says ANC MP
The Department of Higher Education's claim that it can't act against institutions has been criticised. Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training, Tebogo Letsie, at the Good Hope Chamber in Cape Town on 23 June 2025. Picture: X / @ParliamentofRSA ANC MP Tebogo Letsie, chairperson of parliament's portfolio committee on Higher Education, says there is no justification for universities to favour hiring foreign academics over equally qualified South Africans. His remarks followed a recent controversy involving the Central University of Technology (CUT) in the Free State. The university faced backlash after appointing a foreign internal employee as dean over a black South African woman who reportedly holds a doctorate. A video of Patriotic Alliance (PA) MP Ashley Sauls questioning CUT vice-chancellor Pamela Zibuyile Dube in parliament about the matter circulated widely on social media in April. Watch the video below: Parliament on recruitment of foreign academics Speaking during a media briefing on Monday, Letsie highlighted that the Employment Services Act required employers to ensure no suitable South African candidates are available before hiring foreign nationals. 'We place it on record that we are not xenophobic because there are others who are going to say we are xenophobic for saying our laws must be adhered to,' he said. He further emphasised that hiring foreign nationals should not undermine job opportunities for equally qualified South African citizens, as outlined in the Policy Framework for the Internationalisation of Higher Education in South Africa. 'So the excuse by the Department of Higher Education that there is nothing they can do when institutions hire beyond the 10% foreign, international talent [threshold] … is just a fallacy.' ALSO READ: Almost 90% of foreign government employees in health and education sectors, says DPSA Letsie also highlighted that the framework affirms it is in South Africa's best interest to appoint the most suitable candidates to academic positions at tertiary institutions, including qualified foreign nationals. 'We do need our international brothers and sisters, but it must not be a detriment to South Africans.' He further stated that, according to the policy, tertiary institutions in the country have no valid grounds to favour foreign nationals. 'There can be no justification for any South African institution prioritising and preferring foreign nationals to South Africans who qualify equally for the same post.' Referring to CUT, Letsie said: 'There was an equally—if not more—qualified South African lady… was not given the job, and the excuse that we got from the leadership of the institution was that they prioritised an internal person.' He argued that such reasoning should not be seen as a legitimate advantage. Watch the media briefing below: Higher Education department criticised Letsie further said the committee was concerned about the attitude of departmental officials and their failure to take accountability regarding the 'illegal' employment of foreign nationals. 'We can't have a department that is soft and fails to hold the universities accountable.' He added that if officials were unsure how to address the matter, perhaps it was time to 'gracefully resign'. READ MORE: Mashaba slams tertiary institutions for hiring foreign academics The Department of Higher Education, according to Letsie, informed the committee during a meeting on 18 June that it would be engaging with university councils on the issue. 'While the committee fully supports attracting and retaining international talent, it does not support those done outside of the national legislation and policies.' Seta board appointments Letsie also revealed that the committee plans to recall Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane to answer questions regarding the appointment of Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) boards. Nkabane had faced criticism for refusing to disclose the identities of the independent panel members who recommended chairpersons for the Seta boards. The controversy emerged after it was revealed that several appointees had ties to the ANC, including Minerals Minister Gwede Mantashe's son Buyambo Mantashe, former KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube, and former ANC KZN deputy chairperson Mike Mabuyakhulu. Though the appointments were subsequently withdrawn, Nkabane came under fire in parliament for withholding the panel members' names. Under increasing pressure from MPs and President Cyril Ramaphosa, she finally released the list on 17 June, which included her advisors and departmental officials. READ MORE: 'Gum-chewing' minister goes viral, prompting conduct warning for South African MPs However, Advocate Terry Motau, cited as the panel's chairperson, denied involvement in the process. Letsie remarked that Motau's denial 'raised more questions' about the integrity of the appointment process. He said the committee has requested documentation from all panel members, including their correspondence with the minister, letters of acceptance, remuneration details, meeting minutes, and the final report that recommended the appointments. Letsie confirmed that Nkabane and the panel members have been invited to appear before the committee. 'We don't have a date yet because parliament is seized with a process of adopting the budget,' he said. 'We had identified a date which was this Friday, but because of the work of parliament, we could not get that particular date approved.'
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
DA anniversary: Can a ‘white party' govern SA again?
The DA is now part of the government of national unity alongside the ANC. Twenty five years since the DA was formed, the party is still trying to convince South Africans that they are not a whites-only party. The party was established on June 24 2000, following a merger between the Democratic Party (DP) and the New National Party (NPP). Over the years, the party has seen many prominent black leaders leave for various reasons, including Mmusi Maimane, Herman Mashaba, Lindiwe Mazibuko, Mbali Ntuli, and former Midvaal mayor Bongani Baloyi. Political analyst Sanet Solomon said the departures of these black leaders have left many South Africans wondering about the internal affairs of the DA. 'The DA has been subject to a lot of critique given its struggle to retain its prominent black leaders. This challenge has translated into its inability to extend its voting base. 'While some of its policies have the ability to positively impact society, voters are also influenced by perception,' Solomon said. Transformation in the top structures Solomon said black leaders do not seem to have strategic positions in the party, which could easily create an impression that the party only really serves one racial group. 'Voters may need to see better integration. This may require the Federal Chair to be one racial group, the Chief Whip of another group, and the leader of a completely different group. 'South Africa is diverse, and this needs to be reflected in their leadership positions. There are phenomenal and competent people across all the diverse groupings. This is what people want to see,' she said. Despite the DA being the second biggest party in the government of national unity (GNU), Solomon said it is unlikely the party will run the country by themselves anytime soon. 'Some of their policies would be suitable for a ruling party, but it is unlikely that they would be able to become a majority party as the current system of proportional representation would result in more coalition governments,' she said. ALSO READ: Zille to the rescue: Will she save Joburg as the city's mayor? DA's balancing act Another analyst, Professor Susan Booysen, said the DA has made progress since it was founded. 'They have managed to keep their electoral territory, opinion polls indicate that they have made slight advances.' Booysen said that even though the DA is not close to being a majority party in SA, it could use the current coalition politics to influence policy. 'If they continue this current but modest progress, then they will probably be a very likely or inevitable coalition partner for future governance,' she said. Booysen said the DA has been forced to tread carefully around issues of race in the party. 'They are doing an often torturous, delicate, intricate balancing trick between coming across as more inclusive and simultaneously playing to their own small, racially-defined constituencies. 'It is the dilemma it is going to run into: simultaneous and competing endorsements by its own small internal constituencies and the broader South African community that is looking for restitution.' DA for all DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp rubbished claims that the party only serves white interests. 'The DA is the most diverse party in South Africa, and we elect leaders on merit, not race. 'Yes, people come and go in politics, but we remain focused on building a capable, non-racial alternative that serves all South Africans.' Aucamp said the party has proven that it can lead where it governs, and is now ready to take over the Union Buildings. 'South Africans are ready for a government that gets things done. The DA has shown we can lead with competence and integrity, and more people are turning to us to rescue the country from decline, including in Gauteng,' he said. The party will celebrate its birthday with a blanket drive on Tuesday. NOW READ: 'I am finally home' – Liam Jacobs ditches DA for Patriotic Alliance
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Navigating economic headwinds of grey list and US tariffs
While South Africa might finally see the end of being on the grey list, the country still faces the US tariffs that could be 30% again. While the world watches various wars and conflicts play out that can affect economies worldwide, including our own, South Africa must also complete its work to get off the grey list and plan and negotiate to manage the US tariffs scheduled to kick in on 9 July. Busisiwe Mavuso, CEO of Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA), says in her weekly newsletter that South Africa's completion of all the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) requirements is a significant achievement for the country's economy. 'I congratulate National Treasury for orchestrating a complex, multi-agency effort that fundamentally strengthened our anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks. 'The final hurdle, to demonstrate sustained improvements in investigation and prosecution capabilities, required rebuilding capacity across our entire criminal justice system, from police units to the National Prosecuting Authority. 'We now have a clear trajectory toward exiting the FATF grey list in October, pending the required on-the-ground peer review.' ALSO READ: South Africa well on its way to get off FATF grey list Grey list costs the economy but can soon be over Mavuso says this progress cannot come soon enough, as grey listing imposed crushing costs on South Africa's economy due to the fact that international financial institutions must apply enhanced due diligence to every South African transaction, a burden many simply avoid by severing relationships with our companies entirely. 'BLSA sounded the alarm about impending grey listing six months before it happened, commissioning a report that analysed the potential economic costs. Throughout this process, business stood ready to support government in meeting FATF requirements, and there have been various joint projects to do so. 'The improvements achieved since February 2023 extend far beyond FATF compliance. We now have comprehensive beneficial ownership registers for companies and trusts, while investigators can finally use the Financial Intelligence Centre's vast data reserves to build prosecutable cases. 'Our law enforcement agencies have also been integrated into global networks combating transnational crime. Let's be clear: Grey listing was state capture's direct legacy. The systematic gutting of our criminal justice system, from crime intelligence to the NPA, created a paradise for white-collar criminals. 'Skilled investigators were purged, replaced by political appointees whose job was protection, not prosecution. The probability of facing consequences for economic crimes became negligible.' ALSO READ: Financial Intelligence Centre: Lawyers and estate agents keeping SA on grey list Treasury reversed institutional decay to get SA off grey list Mavuso points out that the National Treasury's remediation process started to reverse this institutional decay, with important economic implications. 'As I consistently argued, the collapse of the rule of law devastates economic growth. Contracts become unenforceable. Businesses shoulder massive fraud and corruption costs. Criminal syndicates flourish, spawning extortion networks that strangle legitimate enterprise.' Although critical steps remain before October's official exit, Mauvo says prospects are now excellent. 'Removing this economic headwind will provide crucial momentum for growth. Given the challenges we face, we need every advantage we can get.' ALSO READ: Tariffs and Agoa: How Parks Tau summarised US-SA trade talks US tariffs of 30% looming on 9 July However, she says, with this good news, there are also other challenges waiting for the South African economy, and in particular, the significant headwind from Washington that demands urgent attention. 'The current 10% US tariff on South African goods expires on 9 July, reverting to a punitive 30% unless we can secure an extension.' Trade, industry, and competition minister Parks Tau will meet with US officials this week at the US-Africa Summit in Angola, a meeting that could determine our economic trajectory. However, Mavuso says progress has been disappointing since President Trump and President Ramaphosa's Washington discussions, during which South Africa tabled proposals, including mineral access and potential US liquified natural gas acquisitions. 'The US did not give formal feedback, and the clock is ticking. The minister and his team must break the logjam. The broader geopolitical context makes this moment even more critical. China's recent announcement of duty-free access for all African nations with diplomatic ties will not have gone unnoticed in Washington. 'We may be witnessing a fundamental shift in Africa's global orientation, one that could permanently damage American interests on the continent.' ALSO READ: Trump tariffs' seesaw impact on Southern Africa SA cannot afford to lose employment-intensive industries due to US tariffs She says this matters profoundly for two reasons. 'Africa remains a crucial source of critical minerals essential to the American economy, while our continent's young, growing population positions Africa as a key long-term consumer market and manufacturing hub. America risks ceding this strategic advantage to China.' Mavuso believes that South Africa must present a materially different proposition that clearly serves American interests as well as our own. 'In this transactional environment, incremental gestures will not suffice. Business has a vital role here. 'Our daily interactions with American customers and suppliers provide direct insight into genuine opportunities and risks. This intelligence must inform our negotiating strategy. The consequences of failure fall hardest on manufacturing and agriculture, sectors that drive employment. 'Raw material exports remain exempt, but value-added activities that create jobs face significant disruption under 30% tariffs. We cannot afford to lose these employment-intensive industries.' She emphasises that this week's meetings will be defining. 'We need a deal that recognises economic realities while serving mutual interests. The stakes are high.'
