Influencer accused of harming baby faces 'complex' case
The case of a social media influencer accused of poisoning her baby contains so many medical documents her solicitor had to hire specialist staff, a magistrate has heard.
Queensland Police allege a 34-year-old woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, gave her one-year-old child unauthorised prescription and pharmacy medications between August and October 2024 to grow her social media profile and gain $60,000 in donations.
The woman, who is on bail, was not required to appear on Monday in Brisbane Magistrates Court when her charges were briefly mentioned.
Her solicitor, Mathew Cuskelly, appeared by phone and told magistrate Anthony Gett he was seeking a further adjournment.
"We continue to review the brief (of evidence) ... I have recruited an assistant with a medical background who is reviewing quite a voluminous amount of medical documentation," Mr Cuskelly.
"It is quite a large and complex brief."
The prosecutor did not oppose the adjournment and said there was further material to disclose involving DNA.
"It relates to a pill seized from the hospital that was sent for DNA testing and the interim report was returned detecting the DNA of the defendant," the prosecutor said.
The woman was charged in January with five counts of administering poison with intent to harm, three counts of preparation to commit crimes with dangerous things and one count each of torture, making child exploitation material and fraud.
Prosecutors have submitted to the woman's previous bail hearing that the infant had been hospitalised for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), a genetic condition that results in benign tumours in multiple organs.
Crown prosecutor Jack Scott previously told magistrate Stephen Courtney the woman did not accept that her infant had a manageable, non-fatal condition and had given the infant multiple drugs.
"Her actions have created a serious extra symptom … on one occasion a code blue cardiac arrest requiring resuscitation," he said.
Mr Scott previously alleged that on October 3, 2024 the woman had moved a video camera that was monitoring the infant during a brain activity test "to avoid detection" of her actions.
"She was captured on footage with a syringe. She administered via the nasogastric tube (attached to the infant). She used the opportunity while hidden by a blanket," he said.
"About 30 to 40 minutes after this incident (the infant) was rendered completely unconscious."
Mr Scott alleged the various drugs given to the baby may have resulted in unnecessary brain surgery intended to find the cause of seizures.
The defence solicitor previously told Mr Courtney an email from health authorities had stated the child "continues to present symptoms" of seizures.
Mr Cuskelly has submitted that his client had never been found guilty of any crime and was facing a court case that might last two or three years.
"My client is entitled to a fair trial. Police have the onus to establish beyond reasonable doubt," he said at a previous bail hearing.
The woman was released on bail 11 days after her arrest on January 17.
Mr Gett on Monday adjourned the matter until a further mention on August 1.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Live: Trump talks 'regime change' as Israel strikes notorious Iranian prison
The Israeli military attacked the entrance of Iran's notorious Evin prison on Monday, according to Israel's defense minister and Iranian state news, in its latest salvo on the capital, Tehran. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz confirmed in a statement that Evin had been targeted, alongside several other sites, including the flagship building of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Basij headquarters (a paramilitary wing of the IRGC). - CNN
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Fiji: Unfair Rental Car Practices Still Prevalent
Serious complaints against rogue rental car companies have prompted a renewed warning to the public, as the Consumer Council of Fiji expresses alarm over increasingly aggressive and unethical behaviour by operators. Since 2020, the Council has received 163 complaints relating to rental car services, with a combined monetary value of over $97,000. However, the recent nature of complaints has grown more troubling, prompting the Council to once again warn consumers. A key concern is the delay of refunds and the exploitation of consumer trust. Many operators are refusing to return bonds on time, instead withholding them indefinitely under the pretext of waiting for traffic fines, leaving consumers financially stranded for months. What's equally concerning is the way consumers are treated when they raise concerns. Reports describe rental company staff who are evasive, verbally abusive, and entirely dismissive of complaints. Communication often breaks down once payment is made, and some consumers have even been blocked from contacting the operator altogether. This is not just bad service, it is deliberate mistreatment. Another recurring issue is the refusal by some operators to issue receipts or written agreements. Without documentation, consumers are left vulnerable, unable to prove terms or challenge unexpected deductions. These shady practices go hand-in-hand with a wider lack of accountability in how vehicles are maintained. In one recent case, a consumer hired a vehicle that broke down the very next day. The company told him to carry out repairs at his own expense with a vague promise of reimbursement. Despite following through and providing receipts, he has yet to be compensated. Scams are also proliferating, with some unregistered operators luring victims via social media or informal platforms, often with no physical office or point of contact. These scams have led to financial losses and have left some consumers without a vehicle despite paying upfront. Most of the complaints received so far have come from Fijian consumers, raising legitimate fears about what could be happening to tourists who may not know where to turn for help. Council CEO Seema Shandil said the behaviour of some rental car operators is not only unethical but reflects a growing culture of consumer exploitation. 'It is unacceptable that consumers are being treated in such a disgraceful manner, from being ignored and harassed to being denied refunds or made to pay for repairs on poorly maintained vehicles. These operators are taking advantage of weak enforcement and a lack of consumer awareness, and it must stop.' She added that the Council will continue its collaboration to ensure fairness in the industry. 'Together with the LTA and the Fiji Rental Car Association, we will continue to take strong action against those who repeatedly flout consumer protection laws. The time for leniency is over, these practices are harming livelihoods, damaging trust, and risking the safety of consumers.' Consumers are strongly advised to be cautious when hiring vehicles, to insist on proper documentation, avoid informal cash transactions, and verify that the business is licensed. Anyone who has fallen victim to unethical rental practices should contact the Consumer Council by calling the toll-free number 155 or by emailing Complaints@
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Influencer accused of harming baby faces 'complex' case
The case of a social media influencer accused of poisoning her baby contains so many medical documents her solicitor had to hire specialist staff, a magistrate has heard. Queensland Police allege a 34-year-old woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, gave her one-year-old child unauthorised prescription and pharmacy medications between August and October 2024 to grow her social media profile and gain $60,000 in donations. The woman, who is on bail, was not required to appear on Monday in Brisbane Magistrates Court when her charges were briefly mentioned. Her solicitor, Mathew Cuskelly, appeared by phone and told magistrate Anthony Gett he was seeking a further adjournment. "We continue to review the brief (of evidence) ... I have recruited an assistant with a medical background who is reviewing quite a voluminous amount of medical documentation," Mr Cuskelly. "It is quite a large and complex brief." The prosecutor did not oppose the adjournment and said there was further material to disclose involving DNA. "It relates to a pill seized from the hospital that was sent for DNA testing and the interim report was returned detecting the DNA of the defendant," the prosecutor said. The woman was charged in January with five counts of administering poison with intent to harm, three counts of preparation to commit crimes with dangerous things and one count each of torture, making child exploitation material and fraud. Prosecutors have submitted to the woman's previous bail hearing that the infant had been hospitalised for tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), a genetic condition that results in benign tumours in multiple organs. Crown prosecutor Jack Scott previously told magistrate Stephen Courtney the woman did not accept that her infant had a manageable, non-fatal condition and had given the infant multiple drugs. "Her actions have created a serious extra symptom … on one occasion a code blue cardiac arrest requiring resuscitation," he said. Mr Scott previously alleged that on October 3, 2024 the woman had moved a video camera that was monitoring the infant during a brain activity test "to avoid detection" of her actions. "She was captured on footage with a syringe. She administered via the nasogastric tube (attached to the infant). She used the opportunity while hidden by a blanket," he said. "About 30 to 40 minutes after this incident (the infant) was rendered completely unconscious." Mr Scott alleged the various drugs given to the baby may have resulted in unnecessary brain surgery intended to find the cause of seizures. The defence solicitor previously told Mr Courtney an email from health authorities had stated the child "continues to present symptoms" of seizures. Mr Cuskelly has submitted that his client had never been found guilty of any crime and was facing a court case that might last two or three years. "My client is entitled to a fair trial. Police have the onus to establish beyond reasonable doubt," he said at a previous bail hearing. The woman was released on bail 11 days after her arrest on January 17. Mr Gett on Monday adjourned the matter until a further mention on August 1.
