Government will not be lenient with Thames Water creditors, suggests Reed
Environment Secretary Steve Reed has suggested that the Government will reject calls from Thames Water creditors for leniency from fines and penalties.
Taking questions in the Commons on Tuesday, Mr Reed said the Government had 'stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities', amid Thames Water's search for a rescue plan.
The troubled utility company's lenders put forward proposals to pump cash into it.
But they have also demanded leniency from regulators over performance targets and fines for environmental failings.
The creditors argue that without regulatory leniency, the utility's 'pollutions, asset health deterioration, and customer service levels are likely to worsen'.
Labour MP for Monmouthshire, Catherine Fookes, told the Commons: 'I am really concerned by reports of Thames Water seeking regulatory easements.
'Can the Secretary of State assure me that this Government will continue to crack down on water pollution from all sources, including in the Wye and the Thames and all across the UK?'
Mr Reed replied: 'The Government will always act in the national interest on these issues.
'Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to their customers and to the environment.
'It is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company.
'The company remains financially stable, but we've stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, as I've said before, including a special administration regime if that were to become necessary.'
It comes after US private equity giant KKR recently pulled out of a rescue deal to inject much-needed cash into Britain's biggest water supplier, which has 16 million customers and is sinking under £19 billion of debt.
The move threw the future of Thames Water into doubt once more and raised the threat of temporary nationalisation by the Government if a deal cannot be agreed.
A Thames Water spokesperson said: 'Thames Water is committed to improving outcomes for the environment and its customers.
'We are investing billions of pounds in our network and any recapitalisation of the business will need to ensure that is maintained for the benefit of all our stakeholders.
'Our focus remains on a holistic and fundamental recapitalisation, delivering a market-led solution which includes targeting investment grade, credit ratings.'
The creditors are the bondholders who now effectively own Thames Water after the High Court, earlier this year, approved a financial restructuring through a loan of up to £3 billion to ensure it can keep running until the summer of 2026.
As part of their plans, the creditors would commit to spending £20.5 billion over the next five years, as agreed under the current five-year plan with Ofwat.
But they are calling for a 'pragmatic approach' to regulation – including 're-basing incentives and performance targets' – and 'realistic levels of compliance'.
It is understood they have been holding intensive talks with regulator Ofwat in the hope of securing approval for their deal in early July.
A spokesman for the creditors said: 'Broad regulatory support is needed to unlock a market-led solution for Thames Water that will secure billions of pounds in fresh investment for its aging network, allowing a world class leadership team to start the intensive turnaround and deliver better outcomes for customers and the environment.
'This investor group is committed to working with the Government and regulators to agree a pragmatic plan that recognises what Thames Water can realistically deliver and they expect to be held accountable for an ambitious trajectory for the company's return to compliance.
'More than £10 billion would be written off to get the company back to investment grade, expected to be the largest financial loss on an infrastructure asset in British history.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK MPs to hold crunch vote on assisted dying
British lawmakers could take a major step towards legalising euthanasia on Friday when they hold a knife-edge vote on whether to allow assisted dying for terminally ill people. MPs will either progress the legislation to the House of Lords upper chamber for further scrutiny or end it entirely following several hours of impassioned debate. Protesters both for and against the contentious bill are expected to gather outside parliament as the so-called third reading -- the MPs' last chance to debate its contents -- takes place inside. "It is about real people facing the prospect of a painful and undignified death either for themselves or a loved one," the legislation's proposer, MP Kim Leadbeater, told AFP in a statement. "The injustice and inhumanity of the status quo means we cannot wait any longer to offer them the hope of a better death." The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months. They would have to be able to administer themselves the life-ending substance, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying. - Advert ban - Supporters say euthanasia would give the terminally ill greater protections and choice at the end of their lives, but critics worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into dying. The Royal College of Psychiatrists said last month that it had "serious concerns" about the safeguarding of people with mental illness and said it cannot support the bill in its current form. MPs backed the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November. Since then the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. Several lawmakers in the 650-seat parliament have subsequently switched positions, and parties are not telling them how to vote, making the outcome difficult to predict. An ITV News tracker of around half the parliamentarians estimates that 153 MPs plan to vote for changing the law, with 141 against. Some 21 remain undecided with another 21 due to abstain. Both the House of Commons and the House of Lords need to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely sometime in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, then it would be four years before an assisted dying service is implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in year 10. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to vote in favour but several of his top ministerial team, including the health and justice secretaries, have publicly opposed changing the law. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Separate legislation is going through the devolved Scottish parliament, while the Isle of Man at the end of March became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill. pdh/jkb/gv/sco
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
World Bank urges 'radical' debt transparency for developing countries
By Libby George LONDON (Reuters) -The World Bank is urging "radical" debt transparency for developing countries and their lenders to stave off future crises, it said in a report released on Friday. The Bank wants to broaden the depth and detail of what sovereign countries disclose regarding new loans, as more of them enter complex, off-budget borrowing deals due to global market turmoil. "When hidden debt surfaces, financing dries up and terms worsen," World Bank senior managing director Axel van Trotsenburg said in a statement, adding: "Radical debt transparency, which makes timely and reliable information accessible, is fundamental to break the cycle." The Bank wants countries to make legal and regulatory reforms that mandate transparency when signing new loan contracts and to share more granular debt data. It also wants more regular audits, the public release of debt restructuring terms, and for creditors to open their loan and guarantee books. It is calling for better tools for international financial institutions to detect misreporting. The World Bank and other multilateral banks have been pressing for years to improve lending transparency. The proportion of low-income countries reporting some debt data is now above 75%, up from below 60% in 2020. But only 25% of them disclose loan-level information. As financing costs spike due to trade wars and geopolitical risk, more countries are using arrangements such as central bank swaps and collateralized transactions that complicate reporting. Senegal has used private debt placements as it negotiates with the International Monetary Fund over misreporting of its previous debts, and Cameroon and Gabon have also used what are known as "off-screen" deals. Angola recently had to pay a $200-million margin call after a rout in its bond prices. In Nigeria, the central bank disclosed in early 2023 that billions of U.S. dollars of its foreign exchange reserves were tied up in complex financial contracts negotiated by the previous leadership. The Bank said broader loan coverage and deeper loan-by-loan disclosures would enable the international community to fully assess public debt exposure. (Reporting By Libby GeorgeEditing by Rod Nickel) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Entrepreneur
an hour ago
- Entrepreneur
No Perfect Time
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. At just 23, Emily Jeffrey-Barrett landed a role as Radley Yeldar's first-ever copywriter, quickly managing campaigns for giants like NIVEA and IKEA. By 25, she was leading a team of 12, pushing through large-scale sustainability projects despite resistance from more senior colleagues. Then came the pandemic - no investors, no backup plan, and zero external funding - and Emily launched Among Equals, a creative agency with a blunt mantra: "No one cares about your brand, and it's on you to change that." Starting a business during Covid-19 wasn't just a practical challenge, Jeffrey-Barrett explains, it was psychological too. "I always assumed I would hit a point where I felt 'ready'. That never came. But there's nothing like a global pandemic to show you there's never a perfect time to start. The world isn't waiting, you just need to go for it." The pandemic also brought unexpected perks. "We didn't need to pay for an office – if working from a spare room was good enough for, say, the CEO of Unilever, it was good enough for me. And people had more free time - they had, quite literally, nowhere to go - so grabbing people for a chat became easier." Jeffrey-Barrett's approach to seizing opportunities was equally fearless. "I was shameless. I asked anybody I possibly could for help, advice, connections - and people really showed up. I was blown away by people's generosity." Persistence, she adds, has been key. "I pitched for something two years ago. Lost. Then kept checking in. Today, they're one of our biggest clients." For her, every interaction counts: "I saw everything - every email, every call, every micro-interaction - as an opportunity. I still have that mindset today. You never know where an introduction will lead." Having spent two years working closely with UK founders before launching her agency, Jeffrey-Barrett understood the ecosystem was small — and ripe with potential. But what surprised her most was "how resilient you need to be. I don't just mean staying positive when you lose a pitch; I mean the sheer amount of energy you need to bring to the table every single day. Yes, you need ideas. And yes, you need a hell of a lot of luck. But really, energy beats everything." Her advice to founders? "Go for it. Seriously. You don't need to wait until you're 'ready' - you'll never be 'ready'. The best time to start your business? Yesterday. So as long as you have the ability to give it a go, do it. Commit. Throw all your energy at it. Try. You'll need some things along the way – people who share your vision and are equally committed to it, the ability to prioritise ruthlessly, the discipline to look after yourself not just your team or business. But there's never a perfect time. So stop waiting, start working." Now a trusted advisor to CMOs across industries, Jeffrey-Barrett's story is a testament to tenacity, boldness, and the power of community - all driving forces behind the fresh, unapologetic voice of Among Equals.
