Donald Trump's approval ratings amid protests: What the latest polls say
President Donald Trump's approval ratings continue to fluctuate. Most recent polls report that his approval ratings are slightly lower than his unfavorable ratings.
Here's a look at Trump's latest approval ratings across the U.S. amid nationwide protests.
Here are the latest approval ratings released for Trump's administration:
Morning Consult
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Morning Consult poll (June 9, 2025):
Favorable: 47%
Unfavorable: 51%
Note: this rating is slightly better than a 45% low in mid-April and up 46% from earlier in June. The disapproval rate has not changed in nearly a month.
Rasmussen
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Rasmussen poll (June 12, 2025):
Favorable: 53%
Unfavorable: 45%
The latest figures include 36% of U.S. voters who "strong approve" of the job Trump is doing as president as well as 37% of voters who "strongly disapprove," according to the report.
Civiqs
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Civiqs poll (June 12, 2025):
Favorable: 43%
Unfavorable: 53%
Neutral: 4%
Quinnipiac University
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Quinnipiac University poll (June 11, 2025):
Favorable: 38%
Unfavorable: 54%
Note: the percentage of voters who approve of how Trump is handling his job as president declined from 41% approval, down by 3 percentage points, since Quinnipiac University's April poll.
The Economist
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest from The Economist (June 10, 2025):
Favorable: 44%
Unfavorable: 51%
Not sure: 5%
The latest report show that voters believe the top three most important Americans are facing is inflation/prices, jobs and the economy followed by health care.
Cygnal
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Cygnal poll (June 5, 2025):
Favorable: 46%
Unfavorable: 51%
Navigator Research
Most recent Trump approval rating, specifically regarding the public's perception of President Trump, according to the latest Navigator Research poll (May 27, 2025):
Favorable: 44%
Unfavorable: 54%
According to the report, 56% of Americans disapprove how Trump is handling the economy, compared to 42% who approve. Independents in particular "overwhelmingly disapprove of Trump's handling of the presidency with 33% in support and 58% not.)
Reuters/Ipsos
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll (May 16-18, 2025):
Favorable: 42%
Unfavorable: 52%
Gallup
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Gallup poll (May 1-18, 2025):
Favorable: 43%
Unfavorable: 53%
No opinion: 5%
Fox News
Most recent Trump approval rating, according to the latest Fox News poll (April 18-21, 2025):
Favorable: 44%
Unfavorable: 55%
Neutral: 1%
A president's approval rating reflects the percentage of Americans polled who approve of the president's performance. Anything can impact a president's rating, such as legislation passed, actions and elections. According to ABC News, an approval rating doesn't just represent how well the administration is faring for the general public but could factor into the outcome of an upcoming election or how much they accomplish while in office.
Presidential approval ratings were first conducted by the founder of the American Institute of Public Opinion, George Gallup, around 1935 to gauge public support for the president of the United States during their term. While Gallup has tracked presidential approval for 70 years, other organizations also conduct and release their own polls. Among them, Ipsos and Morning Consult.
More than 90 'No Kings' protests are planned across New York state on Saturday, June 14, as part of a nationwide day of action opposing what organizers called 'authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics, and the militarization of democracy.'
The coordinated effort is expected to draw thousands of demonstrators to locations from Long Island to the Finger Lakes. The protests coincide with Trump's planned military parade in Washington, D.C., marking both Flag Day and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, as well as the president's 79th birthday.
Contributing: USA Today Network
This article originally appeared on Rochester Democrat and Chronicle: Donald Trump approval ratings: What the latest polls say
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
19 minutes ago
- Fox News
Judge Boasberg orders Rubio to refer Trump officials' Signal messages to DOJ to ensure preservation
A federal judge on Friday ordered Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is also serving as the acting archivist, to collect any Signal messages belonging to top Trump officials that could be at risk of deletion and to refer those messages to the Department of Justice for further review. Judge James Boasberg said his hands were tied beyond that and that he could not do anything about Signal messages that had already been deleted. Boasberg's order came in response to a watchdog group suing five of President Donald Trump's Cabinet members, including Rubio, after the Atlantic published a story revealing their Signal chat discussing imminent plans to conduct airstrikes against the Houthis in Yemen. Boasberg, who has become one of Trump's top judicial nemeses because of his rulings in an unrelated immigration case, said the court record shows that the five Trump officials "have thus far neglected to fulfill their duties" under the Federal Records Act. The judge said American Oversight, the left-leaning watchdog that brought the lawsuit, made a strong case that the Cabinet officials have used Signal, an encrypted messaging app, to communicate for work purposes and that they have allowed the messages to auto-delete, likely rendering them permanently lost. But in the context of the Federal Records Act, Boasberg said he had limited options to address American Oversight's allegations aside from demanding that Rubio ask Attorney General Pam Bondi to ensure compliance with the law for existing Signal messages that were at risk of deletion. Chioma Chukwu, executive director of American Oversight, indicated in a statement that the group's lawsuit was over for now but that it was "fully prepared" to sue again if it found the Trump administration failed to comply with Boabsberg's order. "It should never have required court intervention to compel the acting Archivist and other agency heads to perform their basic legal duties, let alone to refer the matter to the Attorney General for enforcement," Chukwu said. The explosive Signal incident involved Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, and others communicating about their attack plans in a chat group after then-National Security Adviser Mike Walz apparently accidentally added an Atlantic journalist to the chat. The Trump administration denied wrongdoing and insisted the communication was not "classified." Bondi dodged a question during a press conference about investigating the incident and instead doubled down on the White House's claims that the chat was merely "sensitive" and not "classified." The Pentagon inspector general launched an investigation into the incident in April in response to a bipartisan request from the Senate Armed Services Committee.


Fox News
32 minutes ago
- Fox News
Israel weighs options to destroy Fordow if it has to go it alone without help from the US
If President Trump decides not to order a strike on Iran's main underground enrichment site at Fordow, Israel has a number of options to destroy Iran's nuclear enrichment facility buried deep under a mountain south of Tehran. One option includes sending elite Israeli Air Force commandos from Unit 5101, known as Shaldag, which, in Hebrew, means kingfisher, a bird known to be patient and dive deep under water to find its prey. In September, members of this elite unit surprised the world by entering an underground missile factory used by Iran in Syria. "There was a site that similarly looked like Fordow," former Israeli Military Intelligence Chief Amos Yadlin told Fox News in an exclusive interview. "Even though smaller, the Syrian facility produced advanced ballistic missiles, precise ballistic missiles using Iranian technology, as well as Iranian money." Israel attacked the site from the air a few times but was not able to destroy the site. Unit 5101 (Shaldag) used the cover of darkness and diversionary airstrikes to enter the secret site, plant explosives and destroy the complex. Like Iran's Fordow mountain complex south of Tehran, it was 300 feet underground. "The Air Force took care of all the guards around the perimeter, and Shaldag got in, and the place is gone, destroyed," Yadlin said with a slight smile. It's not the first time Israel has had to plan to take out a secret nuclear complex against the odds and alone. In 1981, Israel flew a daring mission to bomb Iraq's nuclear reactor at Osirak. Yadlin was one of eight young Israeli F-16 pilots who carried out the secret attack. "We didn't have air refueling at that time. We didn't have GPS. It was dumb bombs, smart pilot, but a very difficult operational mission when Iraq was in a war (with Iran). So, the state of alert was very, very high," Yadlin recalled. He and the other pilots believed it might be a suicide mission, and they might not have enough fuel to return home. More recently, retired Maj. Gen. Yadlin served as the head of Israel's Military Intelligence in 2007, when Israel blew up a suspected Syrian nuclear reactor that the world did not know about. The White House at the time did not want to assist in the strike. Yadlin has seen history change after Israel has acted alone carrying out daring missions like the exploding pagers that killed most of the top commanders of Iran's proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah. In 2008, when it was determined that Israeli F-16s could not reach Iran's nuclear sites, Yadlin ordered Mossad to come up with another way to take out Iran's uranium enrichment at Natanz. Two years later, Israeli and American cyber warriors introduced Stuxnet, a malicious computer worm that caused thousands of Natanz centrifuges to spin out of control, setting back Iran's nuclear enrichment. The decision to strike Fordow, the crown jewel and heart of Iran's nuclear program, is different, and Israel prefers the U.S. to use its B-2 stealth bombers and 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. "Anybody who wants the war to be over soon, to be finished quickly, have to find a way to deal with Fordow," Yadlin said. "Those who think that attacking Fordow will escalate the war, in my judgment, it can de-escalate and terminate the war." And it could serve as a deterrent to China and Russia, who will see the power and capability of the U.S. military's unique capability. Another option would be to cut power to Fordow. Without power, the centrifuges enriching the uranium could become permanently disabled. When asked if Israel could take out Fordow without American B-2 bombers, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Fox's Bret Baier in an exclusive interview last Sunday, "We have quite a few startups too and quite a few rabbits up our sleeve. And I don't think that I should get into that."

37 minutes ago
Mahmoud Khalil released from Louisiana jail after 3+ months in ICE custody
A federal judge granted his release on bail, ruling the Trump administration was punishing him over his pro-Palestinian speech.