Look Again: That H&M Model Showing Off a New Look May Be a Digital Clone
In two photographs taken for the fashion retailer H&M, the model Mathilda Gvarliani is seen posing in a white tank top and jeans. The images look like takes from the same shoot, but one of the photos shows the real Ms. Gvarliani, and the other is an artificially manipulated image of her.
Published this week in The Business of Fashion, an industry news outlet, one of the images shows Ms. Gvarliani clutching the waistband of her jeans, and the other shows her 'digital twin' with her arms crossed and staring into the camera.
Across the two images reads a quote by Ms. Gvarliani: 'She's like me, without the jet lag.' Ms. Gvarliani is one of more than two dozen models that H&M is working with this year to create digital replicas for use on the company's social media platforms and in its marketing campaigns, the publication reported.
H&M, a Swedish retailer, is the latest company to pursue a trend that has unsettled some fashion industry insiders. As the use of images generated by artificial intelligence spreads, critics have raised concerns about the impact on models and other independent contractors, such as hair stylists and makeup artists, who are part of the labor force that makes a photo shoot happen.
The company is in the exploratory phase of the project, said Hacan Andersson, a spokesman for H&M.
'We are merely exploring what is possible, and we are doing so in close collaboration with other creatives within the industry, agencies and the models themselves — who are in full control of when the 'digital twin' would be used, and will of course get paid when it is being used,' he said.
Jorgen Andersson, the chief creative officer of H&M, said that the company would retain a 'human-centric approach' in its use of the technology.
H&M was 'curious to explore how to showcase our fashion in new creative ways — and embrace the benefits of new technology — while staying true to our commitment to personal style,' he said in an emailed statement on Thursday.
The Fashion Workers Act, a new law that takes effect in June in New York State is expected to address some of the concerns about the use of A.I. by providing protections to models, including requiring pay transparency and control over digital replicas.
State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a co-sponsor of the bill, said the labor law would 'protect fashion models from being financially abused and having their images used without their consent.'
Other states and some European countries have laws pertaining to the rights of individuals over their digital replicas, but the New York law is specifically geared toward models.
Some models have complained about discovering unknown faces photoshopped onto their bodies, or of not having control of their finances.
'I think part of what's striking about the H&M digital-twin campaign is that the digital representation of the model is indistinguishable,' Sara Ziff, a former model and the founder of the Model Alliance, an advocacy group, said on Friday. 'It really raises questions about consent and compensation and also has the potential to replace a host of fashion workers.'
The alliance, which provided input for the law in New York, said that there have been cases where models have had their generative A.I. images used without their knowledge or consent, and without receiving compensation. The new law says that modeling agencies cannot have the power of attorney over a digital replica, and must get a model's written consent for how it is used and remunerated.
A.I.-generated models are generally either fictitious representations of human models or digital replicas, which are images of real people repurposed by the technology, such as the H&M 'digital twins.'
The use of these digital forms in the lucrative fashion industry has been developing for years, as global retailers try to balance brand appeal with transparency and costs.
In 2011, H&M superimposed the heads of real models onto computer-generated mannequins for an online swimwear campaign. In 2023, the denim brand Levi Strauss said that it was going to use A.I. technology to publish more images of a range of body types, but added that it would not be scaling back on the use of live models.
Last year, the fashion brand Mango unveiled a campaign for a teen line of clothing, using A.I. technology that Jordi Alex, its chief information technology officer, said in an announcement 'will either make us more human or it won't.'
In its newsletter this week, the Model Alliance said that it was evaluating the H&M plan, which includes examples of other models next to their digital clones while featuring upbeat quotes, like the one attributed to Ms. Gvarliani about her digital twin being a version of her.
'Finally a way for me to be in New York and Tokyo on the same day,' the model Yar Aguer was quoted as saying while paired alongside her digital twin.
Asked on Friday whether the models had really said those words, an H&M spokesman said: 'I can confirm they are real quotes from the models.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) on FluentinQuality's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on ROP. Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)'s share was trading at $572.18 as of 10th June. ROP's trailing and forward P/E were 41.32 and 28.82 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. An experienced software engineer working on a complex line of code in a programming suite. Roper Technologies may still carry an industrial-sounding name, but the company has long since transformed into a stealth giant in mission-critical software. Its portfolio spans healthcare, education, insurance, and compliance sectors where reliability and low switching costs reign supreme. Rather than chase trends, Roper quietly acquires foundational software businesses that customers can't operate without, often holding them indefinitely. These aren't flashy, hyper-growth startups but high-retention, capital-light cash generators that offer strong free cash flow from day one. With a disciplined M&A strategy, Roper targets niche market leaders, pays based on cash yield instead of frothy market comps, and preserves each acquisition's operational autonomy. It avoids fixer-uppers and instead builds a collection of enduring franchises. The result is a business model that delivers SaaS-like gross margins north of 60% and operating margins exceeding 30%, all without the volatility or high burn of traditional software players. Its revenue base is highly recurring, providing resilience across market cycles, while reinvestment remains methodical and dividends grow in lockstep with free cash flow. Roper's strength lies in its ability to unify a seemingly diverse portfolio through pricing power, long-term contracts, and dominant positions in fragmented markets. Though under-the-radar and rarely in the headlines, Roper steadily compounds capital with Berkshire-like patience and software economics. For investors seeking reliable, high-margin, cash-generative software with structural staying power, Roper offers a compelling alternative to more speculative tech names. It's not about scale for scale's sake—it's about quiet durability, and Roper has been delivering that in spades for decades. Previously, we highlighted a on Roper Technologies (ROP) by D Invests, which emphasized its transformation from industrial supplier to asset-light software compounder, driven by disciplined M&A and exceptional cash efficiency. FluentInQuality reinforces this view but goes further—casting Roper as a Berkshire-like capital allocator in disguise, quietly assembling high-retention software franchises that deliver SaaS economics without the hype. Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 46 hedge fund portfolios held ROP at the end of the first quarter which was 54 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of ROP as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP): A Bull Case Theory
We came across a bullish thesis on Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) on FluentinQuality's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on ROP. Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)'s share was trading at $572.18 as of 10th June. ROP's trailing and forward P/E were 41.32 and 28.82 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. An experienced software engineer working on a complex line of code in a programming suite. Roper Technologies may still carry an industrial-sounding name, but the company has long since transformed into a stealth giant in mission-critical software. Its portfolio spans healthcare, education, insurance, and compliance sectors where reliability and low switching costs reign supreme. Rather than chase trends, Roper quietly acquires foundational software businesses that customers can't operate without, often holding them indefinitely. These aren't flashy, hyper-growth startups but high-retention, capital-light cash generators that offer strong free cash flow from day one. With a disciplined M&A strategy, Roper targets niche market leaders, pays based on cash yield instead of frothy market comps, and preserves each acquisition's operational autonomy. It avoids fixer-uppers and instead builds a collection of enduring franchises. The result is a business model that delivers SaaS-like gross margins north of 60% and operating margins exceeding 30%, all without the volatility or high burn of traditional software players. Its revenue base is highly recurring, providing resilience across market cycles, while reinvestment remains methodical and dividends grow in lockstep with free cash flow. Roper's strength lies in its ability to unify a seemingly diverse portfolio through pricing power, long-term contracts, and dominant positions in fragmented markets. Though under-the-radar and rarely in the headlines, Roper steadily compounds capital with Berkshire-like patience and software economics. For investors seeking reliable, high-margin, cash-generative software with structural staying power, Roper offers a compelling alternative to more speculative tech names. It's not about scale for scale's sake—it's about quiet durability, and Roper has been delivering that in spades for decades. Previously, we highlighted a on Roper Technologies (ROP) by D Invests, which emphasized its transformation from industrial supplier to asset-light software compounder, driven by disciplined M&A and exceptional cash efficiency. FluentInQuality reinforces this view but goes further—casting Roper as a Berkshire-like capital allocator in disguise, quietly assembling high-retention software franchises that deliver SaaS economics without the hype. Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 46 hedge fund portfolios held ROP at the end of the first quarter which was 54 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of ROP as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants one thing from the NATO summit. Europe is going to give it to him.
President Donald Trump wants one big thing from next week's NATO leader's summit — and European leaders are itching to give it to him. That doesn't guarantee the president will be satisfied. The 32-nation transatlantic military alliance will pledge to dramatically increase spending on defense to 5 percent of gross domestic product — 3.5 percent on hard military expenditures and 1.5 percent on more loosely defined defense-related efforts. The commitment, a watershed moment that could rebalance transatlantic security, will allow Trump, who's been demanding Europe pick up more of the burden for its own defense, a significant victory on the world stage. 'There is no way they would be going to 5 percent without Trump,' said one administration official, who was granted anonymity to share the president's views. 'So he sees this as a major win, and it is.' Trump intends to deliver a speech Wednesday at the summit's conclusion heralding the new spending pledge and his own catalytic role. But Trump's victory won't prevent him from pressuring countries to do even more, faster, which could prove difficult for some in the alliance. Spain, the NATO member with the lowest defense spending rate, isasking for an exemption from the new pledge and there is broad disagreement over the date by which this spending pledge is to be met. 'They're thinking of a timeline that is, frankly, a decade,' said Ivo Daalder, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO under President Barack Obama. 'Trump is probably thinking of a timeline that is by the end of this decade, if not sooner. That's where I think [the summit] can blow up.' While NATO allies are at odds over the details of the security pledge, there is broad agreement about the overriding importance of keeping Trump happy and maintaining a united front in The Hague, with Russia's war in Ukraine nowhere near an end and America's foreign policy focus increasingly shifting to Asia and the Middle East. In service of that aim, summit organizers have streamlined the meeting, reducing what is typically a two-day affair to 24 hours and focusing it around Trump's pledge, which has been negotiated ahead of time, and almost nothing else. 'He has to get credit for the 5 percent — that's why we're having the summit,' said one European defense official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about private government-level conversations. 'Everything else is being streamlined to minimize risk.' Asked about the pledge on Friday, Trump expressed support for allies spending more but added the 5 percent target shouldn't apply to the U.S., which is at 3.4 percent. Trump's saber-rattling toward Iran,teasing the possibility that the U.S. would join Israel's military campaign to destroy the country's nuclear development infrastructure and potentially topple the regime, has injected new uncertainty into a summit NATO officials had hoped to tightly script. But as of Friday, there were no formal plans to meet with allies to discuss the situation in the Middle East, though it could provide an opportunity for the president to tout the need for increased defense spending. NATO officials decided to pare down the agenda before Trump abruptly left the G7 halfway through the two-day program, a move that the administration official later attributed largely to his impatience with largely ceremonial multilateral meetings. In The Hague, as was the case in Canada, there will be no lengthy communique, only short statements about new commitments. The shortened NATO schedule allows for only two main events: a welcome dinner at the Dutch royal family's castle and a single meeting of the North Atlantic Council rather than the usual two or three, according to five people familiar with the planning. It is not clear if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, invited only to the summit's opening dinner on Tuesday, will attend. And there won't be a meeting of NATO's Ukraine council in The Hague. It's another concession to the U.S., which, despite the urging of some allies to hold such a session, wasn't interested in heightening the focus on the war that Trump has been unable to resolve as he promised during last year's campaign. Paring down the summit is also a way for NATO allies to gloss over the persistent divide among countries about a critical detail of their pledge: how soon they'll be expected to reach the new spending benchmark. While the U.S. — and countries in eastern Europe already above the 3.5 percent benchmark — prefer a deadline of 2030, smaller countries, struggling to reach the new goals, want until 2032 or 2035. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte floated 2032 as a compromise but, amid pushback from several smaller countries in recent days, the final wording of the pledge could give countries until 2035 to hit 5 percent, according to a European official familiar with private negotiations. 'For a lot of countries, this is the whole issue,' the European defense official continued. 'It's not so difficult to say, 'Yes, we will, we will agree.' But it's very difficult to find the right path and to actually find the budget for that path. So that's why nobody, nobody wants to talk about it anymore.' It's possible that the matter of the timeline won't be resolved during the summit. 'The priority is really to announce success in The Hague,' said another European official, also granted anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. 'The longer-term perspective is less important.' NATO officials and European allies are determined to avoid a repeat of the 2018 summit in Brussels, which Trump upended by threatening to withdraw the U.S. from the alliance altogether if other countries didn't get serious about reaching the 2 percent spending benchmark they'd agreed to four years earlier. More than anything since, Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 altered defense calculations for Europe, pushing several countries to meet the 2 percent threshold and prompting Sweden and Finland, after decades of neutrality, to join the alliance. With the war ongoing and Trump back in office, the increased spending commitments are at least as much about Europe's long-term defense as they are appeasing the unpredictable Trump. In his speech this week at London's Chatham House, Rutte began to publicly lay out NATO's new capability targets — the amount of military equipment needed to implement a defense plan against a potential Russian attack — that defense ministers agreed to earlier this month. The alliance, Rutte said, needs 'a 400 percent increase in air and missile defence … thousands more armored vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation, and medical support.' Over time, that will lead to Europe carrying more of the burden for its own defense — and having more sway within the alliance. 'You now have a road map for Europeanizing NATO that you never had before, and that ultimately will lead to a more successful alliance,' Daalder said. 'Everybody wants to move in that direction, the U.S. and the Europeans.' Trump has long groused that the U.S. shoulders too much of the cost for defending the world and has pushed more than just NATO members to increase their defense budgets. The administration is also pressuring Japan, a non-NATO ally pursuing a new trade deal with Washington, to boost its defense spending significantly with the Pentagon describing the 5 percent benchmark as a new 'global standard.' It's a standard many countries may struggle to reach. Spain, far from the alliance's eastern flank, has been difficult to convince, as have other smaller countries such as Italy and Belgium that are still not hitting the 2 percent level the alliance adopted in 2014. Even Great Britain, one of Europe's biggest military powers, has balked at the 2032 deadline. Laying out a plan for boosting defense spending, Prime Minister Keir Starmer promised the U.K. would be at 2.5 percent by 2027 and expressed confidence about getting to 3 percent by 2034, at the latest. Paul McLeary contributed to this report.
