Did Barron Trump earn $40 million from his dad's crypto venture? Report says 'much more'
During an interview in September, when the Trump family launched World Liberty Financial, a crypto venture, he had said his son Barron Trump was all in on cryptocurrency prior to him even knowing about it. Barron may have earned close to $40 million, resulting in an estimated net worth of $25 million after taxes and more than what his older siblings had accumulated at a similar age, according to Forbes.
'Barron knows so much about this. Barron's a young guy, but he knows it—he talks about his wallet. He's got four wallets or something, and I'm saying, 'What is a wallet?" Trump had stated.
Donald Trump has reportedly made around a billion dollars from cryptocurrency, and his youngest son has also seen considerable success in the space over the past nine months. Estimates suggest Barron may have earned close to $40 million, leaving him with a net fortune of about $25 million after taxes.
While Trump's older children once held modest stakes in his Las Vegas tower and Washington, DC hotel, those ventures didn't generate nearly as much wealth as the crypto boom, which appears to have ushered Barron into the Trump family business.
World Liberty Financial's 'gold paper', a Trumpified white paper, named Barron Trump as a 'Web3 ambassador", a title he shares with his brothers, Don Jr. and Eric Trump. All three are also mentioned as cofounders on the company's website, alongside four others. For months, however, the extent of the Trump heirs' ownership in the venture remained unclear.
That changed on Friday, when their father, referred to as the 'chief crypto advocate' in the gold paper and cofounder emeritus on the site, filed a financial disclosure report.
The document revealed that Donald Trump holds a 52.5% personal stake in the company, while unnamed family members collectively own another 22.5%. The document doesn't specify how that family stake is divided, but if Don Jr., Eric, and Barron split it evenly, each would control 7.5%, coincidentally, the same share each of Trump's three eldest children once held in his Washington, DC hotel.
World Liberty Financial has generated significant revenue, selling at least $550 million in tokens, after the initial $30 million, the proceeds reportedly went to the owners. Based on that, Barron and his brothers may have earned around $39 million each before taxes. However, the Trump family appears to have sold part of their stake around January 2025, after the latest financial disclosure's cutoff, Forbes reported. The timing and value of that sale could affect how much each heir ultimately received. Neither World Liberty Financial nor the Trump Organisation responded to requests for comment.
The report added regardless of Barron's exact earnings, it's clear that by age 19, he has joined the ranks of presidential relatives who have leveraged their political connections for financial gain. He was just nine years old when his father famously descended the golden escalator in Trump Tower to launch his presidential campaign. Donald Trump won the presidency 17 months later and moved into the White House in January 2017, with Barron and Melania joining him that summer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why Harvard is now willing to negotiate with Trump after months of legal and financial warfare
Why Harvard is negotiating with Trump after months of US legal and funding clashes After months of fierce legal battles and deep financial strain, Harvard University has reopened negotiations with the Trump administration, signaling a potential turning point in one of the most high-profile confrontations between a US president and an academic institution. The renewed talks mark a sharp departure from Harvard's earlier posture, when it publicly resisted what it described as overreach and political interference by the federal government. The discussions resumed during a recent meeting at the White House, where Harvard representatives presented a PowerPoint outlining steps the university has taken to address concerns around antisemitism, viewpoint diversity, and admissions practices. In return, the White House issued a letter proposing specific actions Harvard must undertake for a resolution, as reported by the New York Times. Though the university has yet to respond formally, sources cited by the New York Times described the White House's tone as serious and the talks as active. A shift driven by mounting financial and legal pressure Harvard's decision to return to the negotiating table appears to be motivated by the growing toll of its standoff with the administration. The Trump government has already stripped billions in federal research funding from the university and launched a series of legal actions, including efforts to bar international students, who make up about a quarter of Harvard's student body. It also initiated an investigation under the False Claims Act and threatened the school's tax-exempt status, as detailed by the New York Times. Harvard officials, while publicly defiant, have been privately reassessing the university's future under continued federal pressure. According to the New York Times, university leaders now believe that prolonged conflict could make Harvard "far smaller and less ambitious." Despite having a $53 billion endowment, much of that capital is restricted, making the institution more financially vulnerable than it appears. Talks follow broader discontent and political signaling The university reportedly sought to reengage after Secretary of Education Linda McMahon raised the prospect of negotiations and after other university leaders encouraged Harvard to represent academia in dialogue with Washington. The Trump administration, according to the New York Times, hopes that a deal with Harvard could become a model for similar arrangements with other elite institutions. While the White House has targeted other universities, the fight with Harvard has been the most contentious. At one point, the administration demanded sweeping changes, including merit-based hiring and admissions, curbs on faculty influence, external reviews of diversity-related departments, and reporting obligations through 2028. Trump signals optimism while scrutiny looms President Trump hinted at an impending breakthrough on Truth Social, calling the prospective deal "mindbogglingly historic," and adding it would be "very good for our Country," as quoted by the New York Times. However, sources cautioned that a deal remains unlikely within the next week. As talks progress, both sides face scrutiny. Students, faculty, and alumni are expected to examine any agreement closely. "It would be a tragedy if Harvard resolved this in a way that gave support and encouragement to the idea of extralegal extortion," said former Harvard president Lawrence H. Summers, as quoted by the New York Times . Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Everyone thinks the S&P 500 is too expensive. Maybe it's too cheap.
People are growing afraid of buying into the S&P 500, which appears expensive right now. A deeper look at the index shows that it could be undervalued. The fears are understandable. The index has soared, regardless of considerable economic and policy risks. The S&P 500, now a bit below 6000, is well above its level just before April 2, when President Donald Trump announced 10% tariffs on all imports, plus higher levies on many of the U.S.'s most important trading partners. Tariffs are still a danger, even though the president has suspended most of the country-specific levies until July 9. Investors are monitoring whether potential price increases from companies will bring more inflation, higher interest rates, and slowing economic growth. The Trump administration's tax and spending bill, as approved by the House of Representatives, would mean an even larger federal budget deficit, which could both add to inflation and send bond yields higher. Those concerns, for now, are on the back burner. Inflation has remained close enough to the Federal Reserve's 2% target for the market to bet that the central bank may cut interest rates this year, fueling expectations that the economy and corporate earnings will continue to grow. As a result, traders and investors have bid the S&P 500 upwards, leaving naysayers in the dust. Now, the index appears expensive at about 22 times the aggregate per-share earnings that analysts forecast for the coming 12 months, according to FactSet. That is close to the highest multiple in the past 3½ years, a period when rates have risen and growth has slowed a bit. As a result, the view that the market is vulnerable to sliding in response to any economic disappointment has become more widespread. But the most fundamental analysis of companies indicates that as long as the economy avoids major trouble, the S&P 500 is mildly undervalued. Dennis DeBusschere, veteran strategist and founder of 22V Research, did the work. He assumes S&P 500 earnings will grow at 8% annually for the next five years, a standard forecast period for valuing stocks. That call looks reasonable, or even conservative, because it is three percentage points below the consensus call among analysts tracked by FactSet. That type of growth is nothing investors can't imagine. The economy is still expanding, and profits for Big Tech, which account for a double-digit percentage of earnings for the index, are expected to grow just over 15% annually for the next two years, partly as a result of increasing demand for artificial intelligence. For the long term, beyond the next five years, he assumes a constant growth rate of 4%, which means earnings would increase slightly faster than growth in gross domestic product, at 2.8% in 2024. That too is reasonable, given Big Tech's presence in the index. The cash companies return to shareholders via dividends and stock repurchases should grow at roughly the same pace, assuming companies maintain the percentage of their earnings they pay out to stockholders. DeBusschere discounts the current value of those future cash flows by about 8%—four percentage points more than the roughly 4% yield he expects on safe 10-year Treasury debt—arriving at a value of 6170 for the S&P 500. If it traded at that level now, it would be valued at 23 times the next 12 months' earnings. At a glance, that looks too expensive, but it makes sense. Maybe the market really is worth that much. Big Tech's AI adventure is just beginning, and if the economy avoids recession, earnings will grow at companies in other sectors, too. That is a big 'if," and the pessimists are afraid that earnings will disappoint. But if they don't, the S&P 500 isn't actually that expensive. It might even be underpriced. Write to Jacob Sonenshine at
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'Giving them two weeks': Donald Trump's timeless countdown returns; this time with Iran
US President Donald Trump is expected to decide within the next two weeks whether to launch a military strike on Iran, according to the White House, a familiar timeline Trump has leaned on since his first term in office. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' she said in a statement issued through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday. Later on Saturday Trump again reiterated his 'two-week' timeline: "I'm giving them (Iran) a period of time- and I would say two weeks would be the maximum." Two-week a similar troupe Trump has pledged to make announcements or decisions 'in two weeks' more than a dozen times over the past two months, according to an NBC News analysis, a pattern that mirrors his tendency during his earlier presidency. Asked eight weeks ago if he could trust Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump replied, 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' During his first term, Trump frequently invoked the 'two weeks' timeline for a range of major promises, from tax reform and health care policy to infrastructure plans and the fight against ISIS. Many of these proposals, including claims related to conspiracy theories and coal mine reopenings, were repeatedly touted as imminent but ultimately failed to materialize. Trump's repeated use of the 'two weeks' promise has surged in recent weeks, applied to everything from trade negotiations and tariff decisions to the Russia-Ukraine war. Yet, many of these pronouncements have failed to materialize. The phrase 'two weeks' under Trump has become less a literal timeframe and more a rhetorical device, a vague, elastic placeholder that can mean anything or nothing at all, to signal action while delivering delay. In Trump's lexicon, 'two weeks' doesn't measure time; it simply means 'later'. Will the United States bomb Iran? It's unclear. Will we get a definitive answer in the next two weeks? That's just as uncertain.
