Funding secured for county's £2.1bn tram project
A project to bring trams back to West Yorkshire has received a major funding boost from the government.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has announced that £2.1bn of local transport funding would be allocated to the county.
According to West Yorkshire Combined Authority, the grant would mean "spades in the ground" by 2028, with the first trams operating before the mid-2030s.
Following the announcement, Tracy Brabin, Mayor of West Yorkshire, said: "It is time for trams. Today is a huge moment for our region."
The first phase of the £2.5bn mass transit programme is expected to see the creation of two tram lines.
A Leeds line will run from St James's University Hospital through the city centre to the White Rose Centre, while a Bradford Line will connect Bradford and Leeds city centres.
Brabin said the funding meant that "other vital projects" could also go ahead, such as new bus stations for Bradford and Wakefield.
That would "help us create a better-connected region that works for all", she said.
The combined authority is expected to publish its preferred route options for the tram system later this year, with a full public consultation planned for 2026.
According to the authority, the scheme would improve local transport for 675,000 people and benefit West Yorkshire's most deprived communities.
James Lewis, leader of Leeds City Council, said: "Delivering a tram system will transform connectivity across our city, and between Leeds and Bradford, bringing jobs and opportunities within easier reach of thousands of local people."
Today's announcement is a big leap forward for those who have long campaigned for trams to return to West Yorkshire's streets.
But political leaders will understand voters' scepticism after the failure of two previous schemes.
The proposed Supertram network was given the go ahead by Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott in 2001.
Early building work got under way, but the project was cancelled by Transport Secretary Alastair Darling in 2005 due to rising costs.
A proposed electric bus system with overhead wires, known as New Generation Transport, was then promised - before it was also axed after a planning inspector ruled it was "not in the public interest".
The new tram network – being called a mass transit scheme - is a region-wide proposal serving Leeds and Bradford initially, with the ambition to extend it to other towns and cities in West Yorkshire.
The money pledged by government today will allow work to start.
But with an estimated cost of at least £2.5bn, additional finance will be needed.
Meanwhile, the government has also allocated £1.5bn of local transport funding to South Yorkshire.
About £530m of the money is expected to go towards renewing the county's tram network, providing a fleet of new vehicles and modernising tram stops.
A £350m cash injection is also expected to see the reform of bus services, with franchised buses operating in Sheffield, Doncaster and Rotherham by 2027, and across the whole of South Yorkshire by 2029.
South Yorkshire Mayor Oliver Coppard called the investment "game-changing" for communities.
"It will mean new and better buses, new electric vehicles, integrated ticketing and better information," he said.
"It will mean new trams and better tram stops and lays the foundation for extending the tram network.
"It will mean that our young people will be able to get to jobs and opportunities; that we can all access services, see friends and family, or go for a day, or a night out, without worrying how to get home."
Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Chancellor to announce £15bn for transport projects
'Two thirds' support Leeds to Bradford tram route
Plans for West Yorkshire tram system published
West Yorkshire Combined Authority
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Facilities by ADF Full Year 2024 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations
Revenue: UK£35.2m (up 1.2% from FY 2023). Net loss: UK£3.05m (down by 485% from UK£794.0k profit in FY 2023). UK£0.034 loss per share (down from UK£0.01 profit in FY 2023). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period The primary driver behind last 12 months revenue was the Hire of Facilities (excluding Location One) segment contributing a total revenue of UK£24.9m (71% of total revenue). Notably, cost of sales worth UK£22.3m amounted to 63% of total revenue thereby underscoring the impact on earnings. The largest operating expense was General & Administrative costs, amounting to UK£11.3m (71% of total expenses). Explore how ADF's revenue and expenses shape its earnings. Facilities by ADF's share price is broadly unchanged from a week ago. It's necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Facilities by ADF (at least 2 which don't sit too well with us), and understanding them should be part of your investment process. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This dividend stock's yielding 5.5% but its directors have sold nearly 15m shares this month!
Brickability Group's (LSE:BRCK) a distributor of construction materials (not just bricks) and has built (excuse the pun) a reputation as a dividend stock. And with earnings growing strongly I'm sure shareholders will be hopeful that its payout will continue to rise. On 24 April, the group released a pre-close trading update stating that revenue for the year ended 31 March (FY25) is expected to be 7% higher than in FY24. Also, adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) is forecast to be 11% better. Some of the improvement is due to its specialist cladding and fire remediation division delivering projects ahead of schedule. This is a shift of turnover between accounting periods rather than new business. But the group said there was 'good momentum in trading' more generally. Within a week of this announcement, the group's share price had risen 15.5%. But its shares are now changing hands for only fractionally more than before the news was released. It means nearly all of the benefit to shareholders from its FY25 results being ahead of expectations has been lost. So what's going on? A quick look at the company's other stock exchange announcements is revealing. On 13 June, Alan Simpson, a non-executive director (NED), and Sarah Simpson, a close associate, reduced their combined stake from 11% to 7.23%. The shares fell nearly 6% when this news was announced. The amount received hasn't yet been disclosed but it's likely to be around the £7m mark. And two days earlier, the managing director of Brickability's Distribution division sold 3m shares and another NED offloaded 1m. These sales realised proceeds of £2.07m and £690,000 respectively. Of course, I've no idea why these individuals have decided to reduce their stakes in the company. Everyone has different financial circumstances and I don't think it's unreasonable to 'cash out' at some stage. After all, you can't spend shares. But whatever the reasons, these sales aren't a good look. These senior managers are going to miss out on generous levels of passive income. Based on amounts paid over the past 12 months, the stock's currently (20 June) yielding 5.5%. The FTSE AIM All-Share index is offering 2.27%. We don't yet know what the final dividend for FY25 will be but it looks as though it's likely to be higher than it was in FY24. If so, it means the group will have increased its annual payout for four consecutive years. But the group's relatively small. As its listed on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) with a market-cap of just under £200m, it doesn't have the financial firepower to cope with a sustained downturn in the UK construction industry. And even though I'm sure there are perfectly valid reasons for the directors' share sales, they're likely to dent investor confidence. But the group has lots going for it. Revenue and earnings are heading in the right direction and the green shoots of a recovery are starting to show in the housebuilding sector. Also, the UK cladding 'scandal' is providing plenty of opportunities for further work. For these reasons, when combined with a healthy 5%+ yield, investors could consider adding the stock to their portfolios. The post This dividend stock's yielding 5.5% but its directors have sold nearly 15m shares this month! appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Beard has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rantzen warns peers not to hamper progress of assisted dying law
Assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen has urged members of the House of Lords not to block landmark legislation on the issue. The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber. The legislation could face a difficult passage through the Lords, with critics poised to table amendments to add further restrictions and safeguards to the Bill. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today: 'I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. 'Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. 'So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through.' Dame Esther, who turns 85 on Sunday and has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to 'buzz of to Zurich' to use the Dignitas clinic. Paralympian and crossbench peer Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast: 'We're getting ready for it to come to the Lord's and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. 'We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not very high bar for other legislation. 'So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in.' Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin said the narrow Commons majority underlined the need for peers to take a close look at the legislation. He told Today 'I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny' but 'I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber'. He added: 'The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people.' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who steered the Bill through the Commons, told the PA news agency she hoped peers would not seek to derail the legislation, which could run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords. She said: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, said 'these are apocalyptic times'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP – who is at odds with his mother, Great British Bake Off judge Dame Prue Leith in her support for legalisation – accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.