Bypass roads helping, but traffic still major issue in West Oahu

HONOLULU (KHON2) — For the second time in just over two weeks, traffic was backed up for hours on the Waianae coast because of a serious traffic collision. While lawmakers are thankful for improvements being made to help alleviate the problems, they still wonder what else can be done.
'You had Thursday on the cusp of the three-day weekend, folks got off early, this accident happened right as folks were getting off of work at three,' said Rep. Darius Kila. 'The road wasn't open until after five. And at that point, it was traffic on again.'
Heavy rains push trash bags from drainage canal into ocean in Nanakuli
'Life needs to move on when we encounter these traffic situations,' said Sen. Samantha Decorte. 'And right now, when we have a collision, especially in the beginning of the coast in Nanakuli, people are calling out sick at work, kids are not going to school, people are canceling their doctor's appointment.'
There are a couple bypass roads in the area that were opened the last two instances of heavy traffic, one on Paakea Road from Hakimo Road to Lualualei Naval Road. The other is Helelua Place from Helelua Street to Lualualei.Both are gated and locked, only opened for emergency situations, and needs to have police officers stationed on both ends.
'It's not even that long of a stretch, it's like a couple blocks,' Decorte said. 'So don't get me wrong. I'm grateful for whatever we can get. But we have to continue to think forward on what are the other options of relief that you're going to give the residents.'
'Imagining a Waianae coast without those access roads, traffic probably would have been 10 times worse yesterday, 10 times worse the last time it happened,' Kila said. 'So this is not the band-aid solution, but thank God we have it.'
Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news
Some issues according to Kila, who is the state House transportation chair, is understaffing at Honolulu Police and isolation of Waianae and Kapolei districts.
'They are doing everything they possibly can, I know,' Kila said. 'But this is what happens when the district police department is on the furthest side of the island, they're not able to necessarily pull from other districts.'
And then there's the decades old infrastructure.
'These are still the same operational roads, but the only thing changed is the population went from 20,000 to now 60,000,' Kila said. 'And it's hard.'
'The residents just want to know that the state and the city are doing everything possible to provide relief,' Decorte said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

35 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Senate releases major changes to Trump's tax bill as negotiations heat up

WASHINGTON — The Senate Finance Committee released the long-awaited tax portion of its reconciliation bill on Monday, setting the stage for drawn-out negotiations with their House colleagues after changing several key provisions in the 549-page bill. The text release starts the clock for senators to finalize the package, get it approved by the Senate parliamentarian, and vote on the measure before the end of next week to meet Republicans' self-imposed deadline of July 4. The parliamentary process could take several days as each provision must be reviewed by the Senate adviser to ensure they adhere to the strict rules of reconciliation. Once the package passes the Senate, it will then be returned to the House for consideration. From there, Republicans will likely need to convene what is known as a conference committee between House and Senate leaders to negotiate a compromise package in order to avoid a legislative tennis match. That could be easier said than done as there are several provisions in the Senate version that have already angered House Republicans who spent weeks negotiating with GOP leaders to include their priorities. Here are some of the changes that could be the biggest sticking points for House Republicans: As expected, the Senate text aims to eliminate hundreds of billions of dollars previously approved under former President Joe Biden and criticized by some conservatives as 'Green New Deal subsidies.' However, the Senate text appears to shift the timeline for when many of those clean energy tax credits could be phased out, giving business owners who benefit from the credits more time to adjust. 'The legislation also achieves significant savings by slashing Green New Deal spending and targeting waste, fraud and abuse in spending programs while preserving and protecting them for the most vulnerable,' Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, said in a statement. Under the House resolution, the credits are each given specific expiration dates whereas in the Senate version they are given a certain number of days after enactment. For example, the elimination of tax credits for residential clean energy could be eased under the Senate bill, softening the blow for the repeal of renewable energy sources such as solar panels, solar water heaters, geothermal heat pumps, and more. While the House bill would eliminate those credits by the end of 2025, the Senate version would expire the credit six months after the bill is signed — giving the credits a moving deadline and a slower phaseout. The Senate text also appears to change the timeline for several tax credits incentivizing the usage of clean vehicles, including credits for purchasing used clean energy vehicles; new clean vehicles; commercial vehicles; and more. Many of those provisions were set to expire by the end of the year under the House proposal, but now would also expire between 90-180 days after the bill is signed. The bill would ease the expiration of tax credits on fueling equipment for alternative vehicles such as electric cars. Similar to other language, the Senate text would implement a more flexible phaseout to eliminate the tax credit one year after the bill is signed rather than at the end of this year, which is the date currently proposed in the House version. Those eased timelines, along with others tucked in the bill, were likely included to win over Republicans in the Senate such as Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, who pushed for relaxed phaseouts. If the tax credits were eliminated immediately, Curtis and others argued, it could cause a surge in utility prices. However, it's not clear how that will go over with fiscal conservatives in the House, who have called for the immediate elimination of clean energy credits. The Senate Finance Committee summary does tout provisions to boost nuclear energy and support 'consistent energy sources' to reduce market distortions. It also includes language that 'stops penalizing fossil fuels in favor of intermittent green energy.' The Senate tax portion made a number of significant changes to the House language on Medicaid, including one controversial proposal to help pay for Republicans' proposed tax cuts. In the newly released text, Republicans are proposing to lower the Medicaid provider tax to 3.5%, far below the current 6% tax. That could raise concerns among some lawmakers who have already voiced concerns about reduced funding for Medicaid in some states. Medicaid provider taxes are taxes placed by states on medical providers like hospitals and clinics that then boost reimbursement from the federal government. The bill would also implement stricter requirements for eligibility screening and verification as part of an effort to ensure undocumented immigrantss cannot be approved for benefits. For the most part, Senate Republicans left much of the language in the House surrounding Medicaid untouched. For example, the language maintains provisions establishing new work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, requiring at least 80 hours a month or some other activity, such as community service. The bill would also maintain restrictions introduced by the House to ban Medicaid funds going toward abortion procedures or gender transitions. One of the most politically potent issues tucked into the reconciliation bill is the proposed expansion of federal deductions for state and local taxes paid, also known as SALT. The Senate version includes language to extend the current deduction cap, which sits at $10,000 per household. That proposal has already set off a firestorm among blue-state Republicans in the House who have demanded a much higher limit — even going so far as to threaten voting against the full package if a higher deduction is not included. House Republican leaders offered to increase the current deduction cap to $40,000 for individuals who make $500,000 or less a year. The cap would then increase by 1% every year over the next decade and remain permanent after that period. That proposal was met with skepticism in the Senate, prompting many fiscal conservatives to push for a lower number to reduce costs. The $10,000 proposal is meant to be a starting point for negotiations, Senate aides say, but it has already been met with anger from SALT proponents in the House. 'That is the deal, and I will not accept a penny less,' Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., said of the House-negotiated deal. 'If the Senate reduces the SALT number, I will vote NO, and the bill will fail in the House.' Other New York Republicans called the deal 'insulting,' arguing it is a 'slap in the face' to the blue-state Republicans who handed the GOP a majority in the House. 'If we want to be the big tent party, we need to recognize that we have members representing blue states with high taxes that are subsidizing many red districts across the country with constituents who benefit from refundable tax credits despite paying zero in taxes,' Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., said in a statement. House Republican leaders have warned for months not to make drastic changes to SALT policy, warning it could be tough to sell anything less than what was already negotiated — especially with only a three-vote margin in the House. 'I'm very concerned about what they might do on the SALT number and any number of other provisions in the bill,' House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told the Deseret News last week. 'I've been very consistent publicly and privately. They need to hopefully modify it as little as possible, but I also understand that, you know, it's a separate chamber, and they're going to do their thing.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Miami Herald

an hour ago

• Miami Herald

Race for control of Georgia state House already in motion

ATLANTA — It's not even 2026, but the race to control the Georgia Houseof Representatives has begun. From a community center in LaGrange to the Chamber of Commerce in Macon to the waters of Lake Lanier, Democratic and Republican leaders are laying the groundwork forhigh stakes campaigning next year. 'For all practical purposes, the 2026 elections are underway,' said state Rep. Carolyn Hugley of Columbus, the Democratic leader in the Georgia House. It takes 91 seats in the House to win the majority. Republicans currently hold 100 seats and have controlled the chamber since the GOP flipped it in 2004. 'House Republicans are laser-focused on building on our success from 2024 and expanding our majority in 2026,' House Speaker Jon Burns, R-Newington, saidin a statement. But Democrats are eyeing this next election cycle to make a comeback. In 2018, the last midterm election during a Donald Trump presidency, Georgia Democrats gained 11 seats in the House. If all 80 Democrats hold their seats, a similar showing would allow them to take control of the chamber. That may be easier said than done. Trump's approval rating has hovered around 45%, butit is higher than it was during his first term in office. Then there is the electoral map, which was drawn by Republicans to help them hold on to their majorities in both the state House and Senate. 'All of the easy seats have already been captured, so every seat that we have from here on out is going to be more and more difficult to win,' Hugley said. The strategy Leaders behind Greater Georgia, a conservative voter registration organization founded by former U.S. Sen. Kelly Loeffler in 2021, traveled this June to Savannah and Macon to present Gov. Brian Kemp's No. 1 legislative priority: a bill that would limit the kinds of lawsuits people can bring and reduce the hefty verdicts. In Macon, Republican Senate Pro Tem John F. Kennedy explained how Republicans' narrow majority made the civil litigation legislation extremely difficult to pass. Thirty-three of the 56 Georgia senators are Republican, but 'we got a guy that votes no on everything, so we really got 32 on the best day,' Kennedy said, referring to Sen. Colton Moore, a Republican from Trenton. Three Republicans are plaintiff lawyers who had concerns about the ramifications of the legislation on their practice and their clients, and it takes 29 votes to pass a bill, he said. 'That's the challenge we had.' In the Georgia House, the vote was evencloser. Eight Republicans objected to the legislation, along with all but three Democrats. The bill passed by the requisite 91 votes. While Republicans control the maps determining district shapes, it's difficult to carve up metro areas and avoid pockets of Democrats while also meeting constitutional requirements: Each district must be connected, must have equal population under the 'one person, one vote' rule established by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1964, and cannot discriminate on the basis of race. Eager to chip away at Democrats' success with people of color, Greater Georgia also traveled to Stonecrest in DeKalb County, which voted for Democratic nominee Kamala Harris in 2024 with more than 90% of the vote and is 88% Black, according to census data. They met a skeptical audience, but organizers said the point was to build relationships where they historically had not been. Democrats are taking aim at more rural areas that have typically been Republican strongholds but hold promise for future elections. Georgia House Democrats, including Hugley, in May visited LaGrange, Dawson, and Montezuma 'to hear from Georgians who are struggling,' according to the announcement, and learn how lawmakers can better represent their constituents. On the trail The campaigning has already kicked off. A social media advertisement from the Georgia House GOP slammed Democrats for walking out on a vote in April that would ban gender-affirming treatment for transgender prisoners. 'Our conservative majority has consistently delivered real results on the issues that matter most to Georgia voters — from tax cuts and school security to health care and public safety,' Burns said, in the statement. He chided Democrats for hosting Stacey Abrams as a guest speaker at some of their events and said their policies don't resonate with people in Georgia. 'I'm confident it's a message that will resonate at the ballot box next November,' he said. Hugley said House Republicans are scared. 'Obviously the Republicans are concerned that we're talking to the real people of Georgia, and it's unusual for them to have an attack ad this far away from an election,' she said. 'I take it as a compliment that they are taking note of what we're doing, because they don't want real Georgians to hear real time what's going on.' One House Democrat already preparing for 2026 elections said he is focusing his campaign on local issues he can control. 'When people ask me about federal issues, or what is happening with international issues, I'm like, 'Look, I'm more worried about what's happening locally,'' said Farooq Mughal, at his campaign launch event in Dacula this month. Mughal lost his reelection bid for his seat representing the area around Dacula and Buford by just 80 votes in November. Based on lines drawn during the redistricting process, Mughal believes he was at about a 700-vote disadvantage going into his campaign. Mughal said the fact that he came so close told him his message was getting out. This coming election, he thinks he'll have more wind at his back. 'Things are changing. People are not happy with tariffs, with the corporate housing crisis. There are a lot of people who are going to start feeling that pinch,' he said. In addition to preventing Mughal from reclaiming his seat, Republicans are likely to aim their focus on House District 108 in Lilburn, which was a target of Gov. Brian Kemp's to flip last year. State Rep. Jasmine Clark is running to unseat Democratic U.S. Rep. David Scott, leaving her seat up for grabs. They may also explore options in House District 128, a Sandersville seat where Democratic state Rep. Mack Jackson, won by just 48 votes. Republicans could run a formidable candidate, or they may continue trying to convinceJackson, who supported anti-abortion restrictions in 2019 and voted in favor of Kemp's priority legislation this year, to switch parties. Anything could happen between now and then, said state Rep. Scott Hilton of Peachtree Corners, who lost his reelection in 2018 before winning it back in 2020. Although some have speculated Hilton may run for a statewide office, hesaid he's likely to run for reelection in his competitive North Atlanta district. 'A year in politics is a lifetime,' he said. 'Our side is prepared, and we have a great message to share with voters on the campaign trail.' Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

The Hill

2 hours ago

• The Hill

Fetterman offers support for Trump decision to bomb Iran

Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) is offering support for President Trump's decision to bomb Iran, standing out from a number of other Democrats who have criticized the military action. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' Fetterman wrote in a post on X that linked to a statement from Trump announcing the decision. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities,' Fetterman continued. I'm grateful for and salute the finest military in the world.' Fetterman since Hamas launched an attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 has been a vocal supporter of Israel, and has at times criticized his own party over the Middle East. His remarks in the immediate aftermath of the bombing campaign, as a result, are unsurprising. But they stood apart from other Democrats who criticized Trump's decision as unconstitutional. For example, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) criticized Trump for vowing to bring peace to the Middle East but failing, saying he had 'misled the country about his intensions.' 'The risk of war has now dramatically increased, and I pray for the safety of our troops in the region who have been put in harm's way,' Jeffries wrote in a statement. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) both criticized the strikes as unconstitutional. Fetterman, however, tied himself to Trump by retweeting the president's Truth Social message announcing the attacks on the three nuclear sites in Iran. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan,' Trump posted on Truth Social.