Marcos to Filipinos: Protect our liberty; ‘apathy' is freedom's enemy
MANILA: President Ferdinand Marcos Jr (pic) on Independence Day said that freedom must be defended and upheld, warning that its greatest enemy is 'apathy' toward national issues.
In his speech during the 127th Anniversary of the Proclamation of Philippine Independence at Quirino Grandstand on Thursday (June 12), Marcos also paid tribute to the nation's forefathers who fought for freedom.
'From their sacrifices, the Republic of the Philippines gradually emerged,' he said.
'Today, we can freely express our thoughts without fear and pursue our desires without avoidance. In the New Philippines, sharing one's opinion is not a crime, much less is criticism a wrongdoing. On the contrary, it is what gives life and lustre to our democracy,' he added.
Marcos stressed that freedom and democracy — like love for one's homeland — must be nurtured, protected, and fought for.
'Because the true enemy of freedom is apathy—apathy to the cries of the people, apathy to the condition of our fellow citizens, apathy to the welfare of our nation,' he added.
As a public servant himself, Marcos urged all government officials not to take the public's trust for granted.
'From broken bridges and roads to expensive food and power shortages, the people long for genuine action and service. The solution lies in improving the quality of life for everyone,' he said.
'We must hasten our response to the needs of our fellow citizens, raise the quality of public service, and correct our shortcomings,' he added. 'Let us hold accountable not only those who abuse their power but also those who fall short in their duty to serve.'
Marcos also said that fake news and misinformation can erase one's way of life, culture, and value system.
'Endless lies—false news and misinformation—are the plagues of our freedom,' he said.
'It is also disheartening that some of our fellow citizens continue to push false beliefs—not for the good of the Filipino people, but to serve the interests of others,' he added.
He then called on Filipinos to always choose honesty, even when no one is watching, and to take a stand, especially when wrongdoing occurs.
'Let us honour this day not just by remembering the sacrifices of our forefathers. We must live with the same courage and love of country; for freedom is not just something that we inherit but a right that we must protect every single day,' he said.
He also reminded the public that 'freedom is fleeting,' and it should be cherished every day.
Marcos led the celebration of the 127th anniversary of Philippine Independence in a ceremony held at Rizal Park.
He spearheaded the flag-raising at the Independence Flagpole and the wreath-laying at the Rizal National Monument, followed by the Parada ng Kalayaan 2025, which highlighted key historical events that shaped the nation's path to independence.
Simultaneous flag-raising ceremonies were also conducted at various historical sites, including the Dambanang Emilio Aguinaldo in Cavite, Barasoain Church Historical Landmark in Malolos City, Bulacan, Pinaglabanan Memorial Shrine in San Juan City, and the Andres Bonifacio National Monument in Caloocan City.
In his Independence Day message earlier in the day, Marcos urged Filipinos to value the nation's heritage by protecting their rights and freedoms and using them to uplift and safeguard others.
'So, let us continue to bear the vigor of our ancestors as we defend our nation against those who seek to diminish the strength of our people,' he added. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
Philippines urges Filipinos in Israel, Iran to leave as conflict escalates and US now bombing Iran
Members of Israeli forces work at an impact site following a missile attack from Iran on Israel, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, in Tel Aviv, Israel, on Sunday, June 22, 2025. -- Photo: REUTERS/Violeta Santos Moura MANILA (Xinhua): The Philippines' Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) said it has raised the alert level in Israel and Iran and urged Filipinos in the two countries to come back immediately as conflict escalates. "The DFA has raised the alert levels in both Israel and Iran to alert level 3 (voluntary repatriation) effective immediately. All overseas Filipinos in Israel and Iran are enjoined to return to the Philippines," the DFA said in a statement. The DFA said that Filipinos' travel to these countries "is highly discouraged," due to the ongoing crisis and the actual closure of their airspace and seaports. Should overseas Filipinos in these countries wish to be voluntarily repatriated through the aid of the Philippine government, they are advised to coordinate with their respective Philippine embassies, the statement said. On Sunday, The US strike on nuclear facilities in Iran has not released any radiation outside the facilities, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said in an initial assessment, "Following attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran - including Fordow - the IAEA can confirm that no increase in off-site radiation levels has been reported as of this time," the international watchdog announced early in the morning on the platform X. The agency stated that further assessments of the situation in Iran would be provided as soon as more information becomes available. The United States supported Israel's campaign to destroy Iran's nuclear capability during the night and attacked three nuclear facilities. Among them was the well-fortified underground uranium enrichment facility at Fordow.
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
Why Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation
MANILA (The Straits Times/ANN): A study that found that Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation online has underlined the rise in distrust towards the country's leaders, amid intensifying rivalry between the Marcos and Duterte camps. The 2025 Reuters Institute Digital News Report released on June 17 found that Filipinos are more likely than people in other countries to blame politicians for the spread of false information online. According to the survey, 55 per cent of Filipino respondents identified politicians as major sources of disinformation, ahead of online influencers (48 per cent), activists (38 per cent), journalists (37 per cent), foreign governments (34 per cent), and others. This is higher than the global average, where respondents generally identified both politicians and influencers as the biggest culprits in spreading disinformation, at 47 per cent each. The Reuters report polled 97,055 people in 48 territories in total, including 2,014 Filipinos. The report noted that disinformation 'surged in the Philippines over the past year – fuelled by the widening political rift between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and Vice-President Sara Duterte'. 'The fallout peaked with Duterte's impeachment in February, followed a month later by the arrest of her father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, who faces charges of crimes against humanity before the International Criminal Court (ICC) over his bloody war on drugs,' it said. Associate Professor Danilo Arao, who teaches journalism at the University of the Philippines, told The Straits Times that Filipinos may have grown weary of what he described as a 'sustained, organised' operation of disinformation networks, which often parrot statements made by Filipino politicians. He cited a probe by local newspaper The Philippine Star in March, which found that about 20 seemingly unconnected Facebook accounts had posted identical text framing former president Rodrigo Duterte's arrest by the ICC as 'kidnapping'. These were similar to the statements made by Mr Duterte's children, several of whom hold elected posts in the Philippines. 'Of course, this went beyond the period of review of the Digital News Report, but these are continuing patterns of disinformation,' Prof Arao said. 'And when you have the government, especially certain government officials, spreading disinformation, then naturally, people will become disappointed.' The Reuters survey, conducted from mid-January to late February in 2025, coincided with the start of the campaign period for the May midterm elections in the Philippines. The percentage of Filipinos concerned about disinformation has gone up, the survey found, from 63 per cent in 2024 to 67 per cent in 2025. The use of artificial intelligence-generated content to spread disinformation is a particular cause for concern. On June 15, two Duterte allies – Senator Ronald dela Rosa and Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, the Vice-President's brother – both shared on social media a video showing supposed interviews with male students condemning the moves of Marcos-allied lawmakers to impeach Ms Duterte. But Mr dela Rosa later drew flak from social media users after fact-checkers from Philippine newsrooms such as Rappler and found evidence that the video he shared was a deepfake generated by AI. Defending himself, he said on June 16: 'I don't care if this post is AI-generated... because I am not after the messenger. I am after the message.' This is part of a worrying trend in the Philippines, where politicians may not understand the perils of sharing AI-generated content, said political scientist Jean Encinas-Franco from the University of the Philippines. 'My sense is that very few politicians really understand what AI is all about. It's a little bit worrisome that they're not very concerned about the impact of how AI is used,' she said. Also contributing to public anxiety over disinformation in the Philippines, noted Prof Arao and Dr Franco, are narratives backing Beijing's position in the maritime dispute over the South China Sea, where both the Philippines and China have competing claims. In recent months, Philippine defence officials have raised concerns over alleged Chinese malign influence operations, including disinformation campaigns and suspected espionage activities in the country. In April, Filipino Senator Francis Tolentino accused the Chinese Embassy in Manila of orchestrating a 'hidden and sinister' disinformation campaign to influence public opinion with pro-Beijing narratives, targeting not only the South China Sea dispute but also midterm election candidates critical of Beijing's claims. China has denied the allegations. 'We're dealing with sovereignty issues, and it's also very emotional because it's intricately linked with patriotism and sense of nationhood,' Dr Franco said. 'If you're a Filipino, and you see fake news articles that are pro-Beijing, you'll get mad about these things.' Prof Arao said some Filipino content creators known to support the Dutertes often echo pro-China views, a holdover from the time Mr Duterte made a pivot towards Beijing during his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Still, both analysts said domestic disinformation fuelled by local politicians and their supporters remains a bigger concern than foreign influence for now. Mr Marcos has called for vigilance against disinformation amid his heated political rivalry with the Dutertes. Yet, a 2022 study by researchers at the Philippine Media Monitoring Laboratory also found years-long disinformation attempts on social media to whitewash abuses during the nine brutal years of martial law under Mr Marcos' father, the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos Sr. The same researchers said Mr Marcos himself benefited from these disinformation efforts when he ran successfully for president in 2022. Prof Arao and Dr Franco said Filipinos have to be more discerning of the information they consume on social media. They said newsrooms should continue fact-checking efforts. Prof Arao also suggested a revision of the school curriculum to integrate lessons on media literacy and fact-checking for students. 'We need critical thinking. We have to ensure that critical pedagogy will not be compromised and will not be discouraged in our educational system. That's how we fight disinformation,' he said. - The Straits Times/ANN
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
Central banks in Asia are becoming wary of currency intervention
MANILA (The Straits Times/ANN): A study that found that Filipinos see politicians as the top source of disinformation online has underlined the rise in distrust towards the country's leaders, amid intensifying rivalry between the Marcos and Duterte camps. The 2025 Reuters Institute Digital News Report released on June 17 found that Filipinos are more likely than people in other countries to blame politicians for the spread of false information online. According to the survey, 55 per cent of Filipino respondents identified politicians as major sources of disinformation, ahead of online influencers (48 per cent), activists (38 per cent), journalists (37 per cent), foreign governments (34 per cent), and others. This is higher than the global average, where respondents generally identified both politicians and influencers as the biggest culprits in spreading disinformation, at 47 per cent each. The Reuters report polled 97,055 people in 48 territories in total, including 2,014 Filipinos. The report noted that disinformation 'surged in the Philippines over the past year – fuelled by the widening political rift between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr and Vice-President Sara Duterte'. 'The fallout peaked with Duterte's impeachment in February, followed a month later by the arrest of her father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, who faces charges of crimes against humanity before the International Criminal Court (ICC) over his bloody war on drugs,' it said. Associate Professor Danilo Arao, who teaches journalism at the University of the Philippines, told The Straits Times that Filipinos may have grown weary of what he described as a 'sustained, organised' operation of disinformation networks, which often parrot statements made by Filipino politicians. He cited a probe by local newspaper The Philippine Star in March, which found that about 20 seemingly unconnected Facebook accounts had posted identical text framing former president Rodrigo Duterte's arrest by the ICC as 'kidnapping'. These were similar to the statements made by Mr Duterte's children, several of whom hold elected posts in the Philippines. 'Of course, this went beyond the period of review of the Digital News Report, but these are continuing patterns of disinformation,' Prof Arao said. 'And when you have the government, especially certain government officials, spreading disinformation, then naturally, people will become disappointed.' The Reuters survey, conducted from mid-January to late February in 2025, coincided with the start of the campaign period for the May midterm elections in the Philippines. The percentage of Filipinos concerned about disinformation has gone up, the survey found, from 63 per cent in 2024 to 67 per cent in 2025. The use of artificial intelligence-generated content to spread disinformation is a particular cause for concern. On June 15, two Duterte allies – Senator Ronald dela Rosa and Davao City Mayor Sebastian Duterte, the Vice-President's brother – both shared on social media a video showing supposed interviews with male students condemning the moves of Marcos-allied lawmakers to impeach Ms Duterte. But Mr dela Rosa later drew flak from social media users after fact-checkers from Philippine newsrooms such as Rappler and found evidence that the video he shared was a deepfake generated by AI. Defending himself, he said on June 16: 'I don't care if this post is AI-generated... because I am not after the messenger. I am after the message.' This is part of a worrying trend in the Philippines, where politicians may not understand the perils of sharing AI-generated content, said political scientist Jean Encinas-Franco from the University of the Philippines. 'My sense is that very few politicians really understand what AI is all about. It's a little bit worrisome that they're not very concerned about the impact of how AI is used,' she said. Also contributing to public anxiety over disinformation in the Philippines, noted Prof Arao and Dr Franco, are narratives backing Beijing's position in the maritime dispute over the South China Sea, where both the Philippines and China have competing claims. In recent months, Philippine defence officials have raised concerns over alleged Chinese malign influence operations, including disinformation campaigns and suspected espionage activities in the country. In April, Filipino Senator Francis Tolentino accused the Chinese Embassy in Manila of orchestrating a 'hidden and sinister' disinformation campaign to influence public opinion with pro-Beijing narratives, targeting not only the South China Sea dispute but also midterm election candidates critical of Beijing's claims. China has denied the allegations. 'We're dealing with sovereignty issues, and it's also very emotional because it's intricately linked with patriotism and sense of nationhood,' Dr Franco said. 'If you're a Filipino, and you see fake news articles that are pro-Beijing, you'll get mad about these things.' Prof Arao said some Filipino content creators known to support the Dutertes often echo pro-China views, a holdover from the time Mr Duterte made a pivot towards Beijing during his presidency from 2016 to 2022. Still, both analysts said domestic disinformation fuelled by local politicians and their supporters remains a bigger concern than foreign influence for now. Mr Marcos has called for vigilance against disinformation amid his heated political rivalry with the Dutertes. Yet, a 2022 study by researchers at the Philippine Media Monitoring Laboratory also found years-long disinformation attempts on social media to whitewash abuses during the nine brutal years of martial law under Mr Marcos' father, the late strongman Ferdinand Marcos Sr. The same researchers said Mr Marcos himself benefited from these disinformation efforts when he ran successfully for president in 2022. Prof Arao and Dr Franco said Filipinos have to be more discerning of the information they consume on social media. They said newsrooms should continue fact-checking efforts. Prof Arao also suggested a revision of the school curriculum to integrate lessons on media literacy and fact-checking for students. 'We need critical thinking. We have to ensure that critical pedagogy will not be compromised and will not be discouraged in our educational system. That's how we fight disinformation,' he said. - The Straits Times/ANN
