Reimagining the Jewelry Shopping Experience
In this week's episode of WWD Voices, Nicole Wegman, founder and chief executive officer of Ring Concierge, a fine jewelry company, joins host Arthur Zaczkiewicz to discuss how her engagement ring shopping experience in New York's Diamond District led to the inception of her business in 2013. Frustrated by the antiquated and high-pressure sales environment, she saw an opportunity to leverage her e-commerce experience to modernize the engagement ring and fine jewelry buying experience.
To listen to this episode, .Since its founding, Ring Concierge has broadened its scope beyond engagement rings to fine jewelry. Wegman explained, 'We started with just engagement rings, hence the name Ring Concierge, but it has since evolved into so much more.' Today, the company caters to Millennial women, particularly professionals who typically purchase jewelry for themselves.Ring Concierge boomed as an online business, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, recognizing the enduring value of brick-and-mortar stores in the fine jewelry sector, Wegman has expanded her business model. 'To date, about 90 percent of the fine jewelry industry is still done in brick-and-mortar…we realized quite quickly that we needed to get ahead of having a brick-and-mortar location,' she stated.Today, Ring Concierge operates five successful stores in key locations including Manhattan, Los Angeles, Houston, and Boca Raton, Fla. These venues offer an immersive and tactile shopping experience that resonates well with the preferences of Millennials and Gen Z consumers, who crave engaging and memorable shopping experiences.A key ingredient to Ring Concierge's success is its strategic use of social media, particularly Instagram. Wegman highlighted the monumental role of Instagram in building trust and brand recognition globally. As the company prepares for future growth, maintaining a robust online presence remains a pivotal strategy.
More from WWD
K-beauty Retailer Olive Young Is Setting Up a U.S. Subsidiary in Los Angeles
Alexis Bittar Brought the Subversive to NYFW With His First Presentation
How the State of Consumer Search Continues to Evolve Past Search Engines
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scale AI's 30-year-old billionaire cofounder has a warning for anyone who craves work-life balance: ‘maybe you're not in the right work'
The billionaire cofounder of Scale AI, , has a message for anyone who craves work-life balance: Maybe you're in the wrong job. This millennial wakes up at 5:30 a.m. and doesn't clock off until midnight—and it's a philosophy that's catching on among founders now openly embracing China's 996 grind. Work-life balance has become the holy grail of modern employment. It's the non-negotiable perk that trumps salary and title—with Gen Z and millennial workers willing to walk away from jobs that don't deliver it in abundance. But what if instead of walking out on jobs that don't provide balance, they should leave the jobs that make them crave it instead? That's because, according to Lucy Guo, the 30-year-old billionaire cofounder of Scale AI, the need to clock off at 5 p.m. on the dot to unwind might signal that you're in the wrong job altogether. Guo, who dropped out of college and built her fortune in the tech industry, says her grueling daily schedule—waking up at 5:30 am and working until midnight—doesn't feel like work to her at all. 'I probably don't have work-life balance,' Guo tells Fortune. 'For me, work doesn't really feel like work. I love doing my job.' 'I would say that if you feel the need for work-life balance, maybe you're not in the right work.' That doesn't mean she's completely ignorant to life outside the office. The uber successful millennial, just dethroned Taylor Swift as the youngest self-made woman on the planet, according to Forbes' latest rankings. The 5% stake she held on to when she left her post at Scale AI is now worth an estimated $1.2 billion. Now, she's busy running another venture, the creator community platform Passes. Yet even when working '90-hour workweeks,' she says she still finds 'one to two hours' to squeeze in family and friends. 'You should always find time for that, regardless of how busy you are.' That, she suggests, is about making time for life—not running from your work. 5:30 a.m.: Wake upOn the morning of our interview in London, LA-based Guo says was up all night: 'I'm so jet lagged.' But she typically wakes up at around 5:30 and does two to three high-intensity workouts at Barry's every day. 9 a.m. onwards: In the office'Every day looks very different,' Guo says. 'Some days, I am doing more marketing pushes. I'm talking to our PR, I'm doing podcasts, etc. Other days I am more product-focused… Reviewing designs, giving user experience feedback.' She has her daily black coffee hit and lunch al desko. Midnight: BedtimeThe founder says she's typically working until 12 a.m.—when she finally will shut the laptop and go to sleep. The thing keeping her up so late? Keeping a beady eye on the customer support inbox. She gives her team just five minutes to respond to their customers before responding to them herself. 'Having that white glove customer service is what makes startups stand out from big tech,' Guo explains. 'While you have less customers, it's very possible for the CEO to answer everything which makes people more loyal. It's impossible for like the Uber CEO to do this nowadays. So that's the kind of mentality I have.' 'If you want to grow, your reputation is everything, and the best thing you do for your reputation is, offering the best, support to your customers. So I'm constantly doing that.' While Guo's routine may sound extreme to the regular worker, for founders, it's the new norm. Entrepreneurs have been taking to LinkedIn and claiming that the only way to succeed in the current climate is by copying China's 996 model. That is, working 9 am to 9 pm, six days a week. Harry Stebbings, founder of the 20VC fund, ignited the latest debate at the start of the month when he said Silicon Valley had 'turned up the intensity,' and European founders needed to take notice. '7 days a week is the required velocity to win right now. There is no room for slip up,' Stebbings wrote on LinkedIn. 'You aren't competing against random company in Germany etc but the best in the world.' 'Forget 9 to 5, 996 is the new startup standard,' Martin Mignot, partner at Index Ventures echoed on the networking platform. 'Back in 2018, Michael Moritz introduced the West to China's '996' work schedule… At the time, the piece was controversial. Now? That same schedule has quietly become the norm across tech,' Mignot added. 'And founders are no longer apologizing for it.' But it's not just startup chiefs that are having to put in overtime to get ahead, CEOs admitted to Fortune at our recent Most Powerful Women Summit in Riyadh that they work well beyond the 40-hour benchmark. 'I don't know that I finish work psychologically,' Leah Cotterill CEO of Cigna Healthcare Middle East and Africa revealed, adding that she fully immerses herself into work all day and night 'Monday through Thursday' but tries to 'ease that off' on Friday for the weekend. Others put a number on the hours they work, from up to 12 a day to 80 a week. But like Guo, many said they do it—not in reaction to the current market conditions, but because they're passionate about what they do. 'I'm always working 24/7 I'm a workaholic, so I don't stop working because I enjoy what I do,' Princess Noura bint Faisal Al Saud, Culture House's CEO added. And the next generation of workers probably needs to take note. Unfortunately for work-life balance-loving young people, experts have stressed that 40-hour workweeks aren't enough if they want to climb the corporate ladder. In a leaked memo to Google's AI workers, Sergey Brin suggested that 60 hours a week is the 'sweet spot'. This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
EY Report Urges Retail Firms to Reclaim Their Relevance
The consumer products market is currently at a critical crossroads. Confidence within the industry continues to decline given the cost of living, the volatile nature of the economy and an uncertain political landscape. And now, even the ultra-wealthy who have been the primary drivers of luxury spending despite the slump, are losing interest. EY's recently published inaugural State of Consumer Products report looks at the challenges the consumer products industry faces and how doubling down on investment and innovation is the path forward in this fast-paced market. One main takeaway from EY's report is that retail firms must build resilience by reclaiming their brand relevance to survive the ultra-competitive and turmoil-riddled market of today. More from WWD Research Finds Almost Half of Women Don't Feel 'Understood' by Brands Today Led by Gen Z, 'Cancel' Fear and Intentionality Are Driving Consumers to Embrace 'Value Spending' Has the 'Resilient Consumer' Been Pushed Too Far? The study surveyed more than 500 consumer product manufacturers and retailers, more than 20,000 consumers and 190 global consumer product chief executive officers. The report also spoke at length with 24 key industry executives. The report's authors noted that the consumer products industry has had massive shifts in three core relationships. Consumers expect 'sharper value from brands,' distinction and innovation. Consumers are expecting personalized marketing that makes them feel seen and heard. For the retailers, they are looking for valuable partners to grow in their respective categories across various channels. From their partners, retailers are looking for those who can 'execute excellence' and use data to drive growth. For capital markets, the investment community is looking for consumer product companies to showcase their strategic focus, operational capabilities, performance and cash flow to be a desired asset. With the evolving landscape that consumer products brands now find themselves in, investors and their expectations are seeking out those with steady and reliable performance. Sixty-five percent of consumer product executives said that investor expectations are becoming a larger influence on their business strategies. Now, more than ever, leaders are looking to M&A to help drive their next phase. While 81 percent of consumer products leaders polled hold the belief that valuation gaps will hinder M&A recovery over the next quarters, consumer product firms are accelerating their review of their M&A portfolios and their growth strategies to better position themselves to capture new markets and segmentations. EY's report authors suggest that companies need to regain the confidence of their investors by prioritizing a more future-thinking model — with advanced technology, 'enhanced and granular commercial practices' and innovation in their product to help shape and capture consumer trends. 'The companies that are adapting have sustained investor confidence by delivering what matters,' said Rob Holston, consumer products sector leader at EY Global and EY Americas. 'Earnings-led growth is being rewarded: companies growing through operational performance are significantly outperforming those reliant on M&A or financial engineering.' Moreover, the report states that the new reality major companies find themselves in calls for new strategies — especially for established players who are facing the uncomfortable new reality of a changing market. While their distribution power once gave them longstanding market protection, the report calls for 'more sophisticated go-to-market capabilities' for them to survive. Making investments in creativity and innovation rather than continuing their 'slow and outdated' brand development will help the companies continue to be competitive in the marketplace. Another notable takeaway from the report is that competition for shelves has vastly changed the dynamic between consumer product companies and their retailers. Retailers have now gained more leverage over consumer product firms through the expansion of their private labels, having control over consumer data and retail media networks. Seventy-eight percent of retailers said that in the long run, only one mass-market brand will remain on the shelves, with the rest of the space taken up by private labels and premium or niche brands — a sentiment also shared by 65 percent of consumer goods companies. Furthermore, EY said this forecasts that retailers will be the primary drivers of change. Hence, consumer product firms will have to further define their relevancy and profitability to maintain space on both physical and digital shelves. Seventy-six percent of retailer respondents said shelf space has also become an important tool in negotiations with consumer product firms. According to the survey, 47 percent of consumer product leaders in the Americas predict a retailer-dominated future; they are leading the charge by consolidating power through platform models, acquisitions and logistics controls. Meanwhile, 40 percent of leaders from Europe, the Middle East, India and Africa, or EMEIA, forecast a stronger retailer relationship with consumer product companies. Forty-one percent of Asia-Pacific, or APAC, leaders also predict retailer dominance. 'CP firms continue to recognize retailers are increasingly calling the shots,' Holston said. 'To strengthen the retail relationship and secure relevance with consumers, CP brands must collaborate to compete. By embracing what we call 'Disruptive Optimism,' showing up with conviction with real-time consumer insights and how they can grow the total category, CPs will have every opportunity to be recognized as a category leader, strategic partner and source of shared value.' While retailers are prioritizing innovation on the collaboration front, 21 percent of consumer product firms are still not joining in on their innovation efforts. Despite 76 percent of consumer product leaders noting that innovation is complex and requires tapping into analytics and artificial intelligence, only 32 percent of them see AI, data and analytical capabilities as being able to give them a competitive edge. With retailers and consumer product firms steadily competing in the same spaces more and more, EY's report sees that the consumer product companies' influence is eroding. With these challenges, they require new strategies to face them head-on. And despite consumer product leaders doubling down on strategies for reach, efficiency and control, these are no longer viable. Notably, only one-third of companies boasting $1 billion in revenue are prioritizing selling through retailers — 67 percent have said are 'building their own distribution channels to recapture power.' 'The scale and reach of big CP companies historically conferred a clear advantage,' Holston continued. 'With strong distribution, familiar brands, adjacent innovation, well-placed marketing investment and finely tuned pricing strategies, their performance was steady and predictable. Even through periods of disruption, including the COVID-19 pandemic, that model largely held. But its foundations have gradually been eroding. Revenue growth, whether organic or supplemented through an acquisition, has been stalling in recent years. Despite efforts to grow sales through incremental initiatives like product line extensions and pricing optimization, large players have generally begun to stall as an array of macroeconomic challenges has emerged.' But not all hope is lost on the consumer product company and retailer relationship — 75 percent of retailers said that working with manufacturers as efficiently as possible is vital to their success. The same goes for consumer product firms — 77 percent of them said that working with retailers is key to their success. When examining what consumers actually want, they still value brands but expect more than ever before: better quality, better value and a sense of community or connection from the brands they purchase from. Eighty-three percent of consumers polled said they are looking for better quality from brands, 78 percent are looking for better value and 67 percent said they expect brands to offer something new. While many consumers still see the role of brands as notable, EY's report authors note that loyalty only goes so far if brands can't deliver meaningful benefits to the consumer. It's not a total rejection of brands but a 'reset of expectations.' While brand loyalty was primarily driven by brand recognition, nowadays, loyalty is more fluid. Consumers are willing to try something new and can be easily swayed to switch — but trust needs to be earned in more impactful ways. 'For CP companies, willing to adapt and assess their portfolios, the opportunity is clear: stay ahead of demand and shape consumer behavior to be the brand of choice for these high-value consumer groups,' Holston explained. The report also outlines that five key strategies for consumer product companies need to use to enhance their relevancy and profitability are portfolio innovation, M&A, tech-enabled operating models, commercial excellence and marketing and AI. 'Our findings present a roadmap for CP firms to reclaim relevance, restore belief in the power of brands and thrive in a changing world. By understanding the critical shifts in consumer expectations, retailer dynamics and capital market demands, leaders can act boldly to rebuild relevance to lead with confidence,' Holston concluded. Best of WWD The Definitive Timeline for Sean 'Diddy' Combs' Sean John Fashion Brand: Lawsuits, Runway Shows and Who Owns It Now What the Highest-paid CEOs at U.S. Fashion and Retail Companies Make Confidence Holds Up, But How Much Can Consumers Take? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
This millennial was rejected from 200 jobs—now he makes millions charging wealthy families six-figures to get their kids into the Ivy Leagues
Like many Gen Zers today, after graduating from college, Christopher Rim was rejected from more than 200 job applications—including at top firms like Goldman Sachs and BCG. But, he says, 'that was the best thing that could have happened to me.' Now, he's making millions disrupting the $3 billion college consultancy industry. How much would you pay to help your child get accepted into Harvard, Stanford, or MIT? $10,000? What about $100,000, or even $750,000? Hundreds of families are paying six-figure price tags to a young millennial named Christopher Rim to get their kids into their top college choices. As the founder and CEO of college admissions consultancy group Command Education, Rim has become a wizard of sorts for how to crack the Ivy League code. Over the last five years, 94% of his clients have been accepted into their top three college choices. And while the $3 billion college consultancy industry may sound like another leg-up the rich have to get their children into schools, Rim says it's about helping students reach their dreams and unlock their potential. After all, on average, only about 5% of pupils who want to go to an Ivy League school actually get in. 'You have one chance. That's it,' the 30-year-old tells Fortune. 'You can't go back to college or apply to these selective universities again.' Unlocking potential is something that hits home in Rim's own story toward success, both in his own journey trying to attend an Ivy League school as well as trying to find his footing as a young graduate. As a public high school student in New Jersey, Rim was told he'd never be cut out for an Ivy League institution. While he admits himself that he wasn't the smartest kid in his class, he had a mission to attend Yale University, and decided to apply even when his guidance counselor pleaded with him to settle for Rutgers University, an in-state public school. Out of the nearly two dozen students from his school who applied to Yale, he was the only one who got in—despite having a lower GPA than the rest. As a student, he kept the ball rolling by charging high schoolers $50 to edit their admissions essays and advising them on how to strengthen their resumes and 'authentically stick out.' After his first two clients got into MIT and Stanford, he realized he might have a gift, and thus Command Education was born in 2015 in his New Haven, Conn., dorm room. However, Rim still wasn't sure it was the key to a post-grad career. Then came the time to apply for jobs. 'I applied to over 200 jobs senior year. All my friends were getting jobs at Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, BCG, major corporations. I got none. I got zero,' he says. 'And that was the best thing to have that happen to me.' Instead of letting the rejection defeat him—like what happens to millions of young adults each year—Rim used it as motivation to help others reach their dream college, too. 'Everyone has this potential, and I was able to instill that confidence and belief and motivate them through the process,' Rim says. 'I think that was a major reason as to why my students succeeded, which, of course, led me to succeed with the business.' So far, Command Education has guided over 1,500 students into top-tier schools, with acceptance rates that soar far above the national average—more than seven times higher at places like Harvard, Caltech, and the University of Chicago. And with parents investing close to $100,000 on average for his services, Rim isn't just shaping student futures, he's built a booming business in the process. While he declined to comment on his company's revenue, his average fee and high demand would put that figure in the millions. (Rim also explained that the $750,000 price tag was a one-off example that included working with a student starting in middle school and having unlimited access to services.) With or without professional help, getting into a top institution is no easy feat. In fact, over the last decade, colleges have only gotten more selective in the students they accept. However, it's not because schools have gotten much smaller in size, it's because more students are applying. For Harvard's class of 2028, who just finished their first year of college, over 54,000 applicants battled for just 1,970 seats; an acceptance rate of 3.6%. That's up from about 37,000 applicants competing for 2,080 spots for the class of 2019, an acceptance rate of 5.6%. Even then, not all accepted students ultimately choose to attend that school. At the same time, college is only getting more expensive. Tuition and fees at private universities have increased by about 41%, when adjusted for inflation, according to U.S. News and World Report. And while some colleges have made attempts at softening the burden for many lower-income students—like Harvard making tuition free for families making less than $200,000—attending a top college remains an uphill battle for many students. However, Rim says services like his aren't making the process less equitable, but rather helping young people find their true calling. 'I know I am not helping my student take a spot away from a middle-class student or a lower-income family student,' Rim adds. 'I'm helping other wealthy families and their kids compete against other wealthy families.' And despite some students feeling that their degree wasn't worth the cost, Rim says demand is higher than it's ever been before. But young people are expanding their interests outside of the traditional Ivy Leagues to other top-ranked schools like Duke University, Vanderbilt University, and the University of North Carolina. 'If you want to get a specific job at a bank, consulting firm, or become a doctor or lawyer, your school is going to matter a lot,' he tells Fortune. But at the end of the day, he says it's about finding students' passions and interests. 'I really will never tell a student, join the debate team, join band club, join newspaper club, because we think that's what colleges want. In fact, it's the total opposite,' Rim says. 'Do what you want.' This story was originally featured on
