Costco butter: Wholesaler introduces purchase limits of 30 blocks but still sells out

Pak'nSave Westgate, just under 1.5km around the corner from Costco, was today selling the Pams Pure Butter 500g block for $8.29, or $1.66 per 100g, and the Anchor 500g was $9.99, or $2 per 100g.
Woolworths Westgate, just a kilometre away from Costco, was today pricing its store-brand Woolworths Butter 500g at $8.49, or $1.70 per 100g, and Anchor 500g was $9.90, or $1.98 per 100g.
It was no wonder there were reports of Costco's salted and unsalted varieties running out as shoppers took home trolley-loads of butter.
Loyal customers have shared photographs from inside the store this week, showing lines of people waiting to get their hands on the cheap produce.
Several customers have spoken of their disappointment after travelling some distance to the store specifically for the butter, only to find stocks had sold out.
And today, photographs were posted on the store's unofficial Facebook page of notices inside the shop about purchase limits.
'Limit 30 blocks of butter per membership (i.e. per household),' the store's notices said.
However, it seems the restrictions were not enough to keep enough stock on the shelves this morning.
One Costco customer reported the store had run out of salted and unsalted butter at 10.24am, less than half an hour after opening time.
Westpac economist Paul Clark has told the Herald that retail prices for butter generally moved in line with export prices.
'Given that, it is reasonable to suggest that, with Global Dairy Trade auction prices for butter having reached new highs, combined with a generally weaker New Zealand dollar … should see retail prices ratchet higher in coming months.
'It is also important to note that retail price adjustments do tend to lag as inventories decline.'
At the latest Global Dairy Trade auction last month, the price of butter rose 1.5% to an average of US$7679/MT (metric tonne). That compares to an average price of US$6815 ($11,546) on January 7.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scoop

a day ago

• Scoop

Global Survey Finds 8 Out Of 10 People Support Taxing Oil And Gas Corporations To Pay For Climate Damages

A majority of people believe governments must tax oil, gas and coal corporations for climate-related loss and damage, and that their government is not doing enough to counter the influence on politics of the super-rich and polluting industries. These are the key findings of a global survey, which reflects broad consensus across political affiliations, income levels and age groups. Today's study, which was jointly commissioned by Greenpeace International and Oxfam International, was launched at the Bonn UN climate meetings (SB62 16-26 June), where governments are discussing key climate policy priorities, including ways to mobilize at least US $1.3 trillion annually in climate finance for Global South countries by 2035. The poll was conducted across 13 countries, including most G7 countries. The study, run by Dynata, comes with additional research by Oxfam showing that a polluter profits tax on 590 oil, gas and coal companies could raise up to US $400 billion in its first year. This is equivalent to the estimated annual costs of climate damage in the Global South. Loss and damage costs from climate change to the Global South are estimated to reach between $290bn to $580bn annually by 2030. Key findings of the survey include: 81% of people surveyed support new taxes on the oil, coal and gas industry to pay for damages caused by fossil-fuel driven climate disasters like storms, floods, droughts and wildfires. 86% of people in surveyed countries support channelling revenues from higher taxes on oil and gas corporations towards communities who are most impacted by the climate crisis. Climate change is disproportionately hitting people in Global South countries, who are historically least responsible for greenhouse gas emissions. When asked who should be taxed to pay for helping survivors of fossil-fuel driven climate disasters, 66% of people across countries surveyed think it should be oil and gas companies compared to than 5% who support taxes on working people, 9% on goods people buy, and 20% in favour of business taxes. 68% felt that the fossil fuel industry and the super-rich had a negative influence on politics in their country. 77% say they would be more willing to support a political candidate who prioritises taxing the super-rich and the fossil fuel industry. Oxfam's research finds that 585 of the world's largest and most polluting fossil fuel companies made $583 billion in profits in 2024, a 68% increase since 2019. The annual emissions of 340 of these corporations (for whom data was available) accounted for over half of global greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans. Their emissions in just one year are enough to cause 2.7 million heat-related deaths over the next century. A polluter profits tax on these companies would ensure that renewable energy is more profitable than fossil fuels, encouraging companies to invest in renewables, as well as avoid more deaths driven by fossil fuelled climate change. This new tax must be accompanied by higher taxes on the super-rich and other polluting companies. Governments should impose such taxes nationally and engage positively at the UN to ensure a fair global tax agreement. Nick Henry, Climate Justice Lead for Oxfam Aotearoa, said: "This new poll shows that people support Oxfam's call for our leaders to make polluting corporations pay for the damage they cause to our climate." "People understand that storms, floods, drought, wildfires, and other extreme weather events are being fuelled by oil and gas corporations. Instead of leaving communities exposed to deal with these devastating costs alone, governments can unlock huge sums of money to invest in climate solutions through making dirty energy companies pay," said Rebecca Newsom, Global Political Lead for Greenpeace's Stop Drilling, Start Paying campaign. "The Polluters Pay Pact unites communities on the frontlines of climate disasters, concerned citizens, first responders like firefighters and humanitarian groups around the world to call on politicians to act now through making polluters, not people, pay for climate damages." Amitabh Behar, Executive Director of Oxfam International, said: "Mega-rich coal, oil and gas companies have known for decades about the damage their polluting products wreak on humanity. Corporations continue to cash in on climate devastation, and their profiteering destroys the lives and livelihoods of millions of women, men and children, predominantly those in the Global South who have done the least to cause the climate crisis. Governments must listen to their people and hold rich polluters responsible for their damages. A new tax on polluting industries could provide immediate and significant support to climate-vulnerable countries and finally incentivise investment in renewables and a just transition." Nick Henry continued: "Rather than subsidising new oil and gas drilling, and fast-tracking coal mines, our Government should be holding fossil fuel companies responsible for the costs facing our communities to adapt to climate change." Notes: The research was conducted by market research company Dynata in May-June, 2025, in Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Kenya, Italy, India, Mexico, the Philippines, South Africa, Spain, the UK and the US. Together, these countries represent close to half the world's population. Results available here. Oxfam's polluter profits tax model is explained in this blog and methodology note attached. The methodology note also explains the basis for the emissions of fossil fuel companies and their impacts on heat-related deaths. These deaths were calculated on the basis of emissions in 2023.

NZ Autocar

2 days ago

• NZ Autocar

Petrol is unlikely to spike despite increased Middle East tension

The con­flict between Israel and Iran shouldn't cause a significant rise in fuel prices locally, according to the AA. Pet­rol at the pumps had already been pur­chased at a lower price, said AA prin­cipal policy advisor Terry Collins. And so far the mar­kets had man­aged the risk. He continued: 'Iran pro­duces about five per cent of the world's oil. Even though it's under sanc­tions, it still sup­plies the mar­ket. The Israelis have hit only some of the oil and gas infra­struc­ture. More import­ant, though, was the loc­a­tion of Iran next to the Strait of Hor­muz, Collins said. 'About 21 per cent of the world's oil…flows through there. It's just a worry that the Ira­ni­ans will try to block that strait and there­fore restrict oil sup­plies to the inter­na­tional mar­ket. Collins said the price jumped almost imme­di­ately after the conflict began, to about US$75 a bar­rel but had since dropped back down to under US$73. 'There's plenty of oil around,' he said. 'That's one of the myths – that there's not. It's just how they sup­ply it.' Collins said that for every dol­lar the price of a bar­rel of oil changed, it's reflected by about a 1 cent change at the pump price here. He added: 'What we've got in our tanks today was pur­chased back at the begin­ning of May, when the prices were below US$60'. 'We know the sup­ply chain is going to take a little bit of a hit but we shouldn't be see­ing big jumps in prices domest­ic­ally. 'And it's only really gone up about 10 cents per litre. 'If it stays at that sus­tained level, we may see those prices come through in another month.

NZ Herald

2 days ago

• NZ Herald

Controversial Kiwi start-up Kiki, once worth $38m, folds in New York

Kiki co-founders Jack Montgomerie (left) and Toby Thomas-Smith, pictured in New York in 2023. Auckland-founded 'peer-to-peer subletting' start-up Kiki (formerly EasyRent) is pulling out of its only market – New York. The firm – valued at US$23 million ($38m) during a 2023 funding round – says it's been collateral damage in the city's war on Airbnb, a service it accused of pushing up rents.