US judge orders release of pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil
Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil has been released from federal immigration detention following a US judge's order on Friday.
The former Columbia University graduate student, who left a federal facility in Louisiana, is expected to head to New York to reunite with his US citizen wife and newborn son.
This marks a major victory for rights groups that challenged what they called the Trump administration's unlawful targeting of a pro-Palestinian activist.
Mr Khalil, a prominent figure in protests against Israel's war on Gaza, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8.
US President Donald Trump has called the protests antisemitic and vowed to deport foreign students who took part.
After hearing oral arguments from lawyers for Mr Khalil and for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey ordered DHS to release him from custody at a jail for immigrants in rural Louisiana immediately.
Judge Farbiarz said the government had made no attempt to rebut evidence provided by Mr Khalil's lawyers that he was not a flight risk nor a danger to the public.
"There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner [Khalil]," Judge Farbiarz said as he ruled from the bench, adding that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter was unconstitutional.
The Trump administration has argued that non-citizens who participate in such demonstrations should be deported, as it considers their views antisemitic.
Protesters and civil rights groups say the administration is conflating antisemitism with criticism of Israel to silence dissent.
The US government filed notice on Friday evening to appeal Mr Khalil's release.
Mr Khalil said that no one should be detained for protesting Israel's war in Gaza.
He said his time in the detention facility in Louisiana had shown him "a different reality about this country that supposedly champions human rights and justice".
"No human is illegal," he said when a reporter asked what message he would like to send the public.
Mr Khalil has to surrender his passport and cannot travel internationally.
However, he will regain his green card and be issued official documents permitting limited travel within the country, including to New York and Michigan to visit family, New Jersey and Louisiana for court appearances, and Washington to lobby Congress.
The Syrian-born activist was the latest in a string of foreign pro-Palestinian students arrested in the US starting in March who have subsequently been released by a judge.
He was the first person arrested under Mr Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza.
The judge's decision comes after several other scholars targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another former Palestinian student at Columbia — Mohsen Mahdawi, a Tufts University student — Rumeysa Ozturk, and a Georgetown University scholar — Badar Khan Suri.
Even though a federal judge ordered Mr Khalil to be freed, the immigration proceedings against him continue.
The Louisiana immigration judge in his case on Friday denied his asylum request, ruled he could be deported based on the government's allegations of immigration fraud, and denied a bail hearing. Judge Farbiarz's decision rendered the bail request moot.
Like others facing deportation, Mr Khalil has avenues to appeal within the immigration system.
Judge Farbiarz is also considering Mr Khalil's challenge of his deportation on constitutional grounds, and has blocked officials from deporting Mr Khalil while that challenge plays out.
On June 13, the judge declined to order Mr Khalil's release from a detention centre in Louisiana, after Trump's administration said he was being held on a separate charge that he withheld information from his application for lawful permanent residency.
Mr Khalil's lawyers denied that allegation and said people were rarely detained on such charges.
On June 16, the lawyers urged Judge Farbiarz to grant a separate request from their client to be released on bail or be transferred to immigration detention in New Jersey to be closer to his family in New York.
ABC/Reuters/AP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
US appeals court allows Trump control of National Guard in LA
A US appeals court on Thursday ruled that President Donald Trump could continue control of National Guard troops in Los Angeles, over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump ordered the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines into Los Angeles this month in response to protests over federal immigration sweeps -- a move opposed by city leaders and Newsom. A lower court judge had last week ordered Trump to return control of the California National Guard to Newsom, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles was "illegal." But a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that Trump was within his rights when he ordered 4,000 members of the National Guard into service for 60 days to "protect federal personnel performing federal functions and to protect federal property." "Affording appropriate deference to the President's determination, we conclude that he likely acted within his authority in federalizing the National Guard," they said in their 38-page ruling. Trump celebrated the decision in a post on Truth Social Thursday night, calling it a "BIG WIN." "All over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done," Trump wrote. - 'Not a king' - The state of California had argued that Trump's order was illegal because it did not follow the procedure of being issued through the governor. The judges said Trump's "failure to issue the federalization order directly 'through' the Governor of California does not limit his otherwise lawful authority to call up the National Guard." But the panel said it disagreed with the defendants' primary argument that the president's decision to federalize members of the California National Guard "is completely insulated from judicial review." Governor Newsom responded to the decision saying Trump "is not a king and not above the law." "Tonight, the court rightly rejected Trump's claim that he can do whatever he wants with the National Guard and not have to explain himself to a court," he posted on X. "We will not let this authoritarian use of military soldiers against citizens go unchecked." Newsom added in a separate post on his personal X account "the fight doesn't end here", adding "we will press forward with our challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of US military soldiers against citizens." The state could request the case to be reheard, or it could petition the Supreme Court for intervention. - Immigration tensions - The ruling comes against a backdrop of heightened tensions in Los Angeles, which has become ground zero of Trump's immigration crackdown across the United States. The city has seen scattered violence but mostly peaceful protests in recent weeks, ignited by an escalation in federal immigration sweeps that have targeted migrant workers in garment factories, car washes and other workplaces. Local media reported further raids across the city on Thursday targeting Home Depot stores, a home improvement retailer where day laborers often gather in parking lots seeking work. The protests, though largely peaceful, saw sporadic and spectacular violence. Damage included vandalism, looting, clashes with law enforcement and several torched driverless taxis. Trump, who has repeatedly exaggerated the scale of the unrest, also sent 700 US Marines to Los Angeles despite the objections of local officials, claiming that they had lost control of the "burning" city. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the National Guard over the wishes of a state governor. Trump appointed two of the judges on the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit panel, and former president Joe Biden appointed the third, the New York Times reported Thursday.
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Is Iran close to building a nuke? Trump says his intelligence community 'is wrong'
"My intelligence community is wrong." With those words, Donald Trump waved away the advice of the entire US spy infrastructure — from the CIA, to the Defence Intelligence Agency, to the intelligence arms of the US Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force — and its assessment that Iran was not trying to build a nuclear weapon. That assessment was presented to the US Congress in March by Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's hand-picked director of National Intelligence. "The IC [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," Ms Gabbard said. "Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised a nuclear weapon program that he suspended in 2003." On Wednesday, Donald Trump said simply, "She's wrong." As is so often the case under Trump, what once would have been a breathtaking shattering of norms is just another day. Trump's rejection of the intelligence community's advice has deep resonance in the United States, and particularly among Trump's MAGA base in the Republican Party. Trump campaigned hard on keeping America out of foreign 'forever' wars like Iraq, based on faulty intelligence over Saddam Hussein's non-existent weapons of mass destruction. It's why key figures in Trump's MAGA, America First base of support are dead against any US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. But there are influential old-school Republican Iran hawks, like Senator Lindsey Graham, who are pushing the president for regime change in Iran. "Be all in, President Trump, in helping Israel eliminate the nuclear threat," Senator Graham said. "If we need to provide bombs to Israel, provide bombs. If we need to fly planes with Israel, do joint operations. "But here's the bigger question: Wouldn't the world be better off if the ayatollahs went away and were replaced by something better? Wouldn't Iran be better off?" The two sides met head-on in a fiery exchange between media figure Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz, both firm Trump supporters. "How many people live in Iran, by the way?" Carlson asked. "I don't know the population at all," Cruz replied. Carlson was incredulous. "You don't know the population you seek to topple?" The big question is — which side is getting in the president's ear as he waits to decide on whether the US will attack Iran? Tulsi Gabbard certainly appears to be on the outer. Today, she took to X to try to repair the relationship with Trump. "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," she wrote. "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." The "missing" context was that Iran's enriched uranium stockpile was "at its highest levels, and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons". She also testified that nuclear weapons advocates in the Iranian leadership were feeling "emboldened". The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) also recently found that Iran has not been complying with weapons inspectors since 2019 — its first such finding in two decades. In the end, none of that may matter. Donald Trump has said he will decide in two weeks about whether to choose the military or diplomatic option. He may be waiting to see which option is more likely to succeed — or which way the debate among his supporters goes.
ABC News
7 hours ago
- ABC News
US judge orders release of pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil
Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil has been released from federal immigration detention following a US judge's order on Friday. The former Columbia University graduate student, who left a federal facility in Louisiana, is expected to head to New York to reunite with his US citizen wife and newborn son. This marks a major victory for rights groups that challenged what they called the Trump administration's unlawful targeting of a pro-Palestinian activist. Mr Khalil, a prominent figure in protests against Israel's war on Gaza, was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his university residence in Manhattan on March 8. US President Donald Trump has called the protests antisemitic and vowed to deport foreign students who took part. After hearing oral arguments from lawyers for Mr Khalil and for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in New Jersey ordered DHS to release him from custody at a jail for immigrants in rural Louisiana immediately. Judge Farbiarz said the government had made no attempt to rebut evidence provided by Mr Khalil's lawyers that he was not a flight risk nor a danger to the public. "There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner [Khalil]," Judge Farbiarz said as he ruled from the bench, adding that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter was unconstitutional. The Trump administration has argued that non-citizens who participate in such demonstrations should be deported, as it considers their views antisemitic. Protesters and civil rights groups say the administration is conflating antisemitism with criticism of Israel to silence dissent. The US government filed notice on Friday evening to appeal Mr Khalil's release. Mr Khalil said that no one should be detained for protesting Israel's war in Gaza. He said his time in the detention facility in Louisiana had shown him "a different reality about this country that supposedly champions human rights and justice". "No human is illegal," he said when a reporter asked what message he would like to send the public. Mr Khalil has to surrender his passport and cannot travel internationally. However, he will regain his green card and be issued official documents permitting limited travel within the country, including to New York and Michigan to visit family, New Jersey and Louisiana for court appearances, and Washington to lobby Congress. The Syrian-born activist was the latest in a string of foreign pro-Palestinian students arrested in the US starting in March who have subsequently been released by a judge. He was the first person arrested under Mr Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against Israel's devastating war in Gaza. The judge's decision comes after several other scholars targeted for their activism have been released from custody, including another former Palestinian student at Columbia — Mohsen Mahdawi, a Tufts University student — Rumeysa Ozturk, and a Georgetown University scholar — Badar Khan Suri. Even though a federal judge ordered Mr Khalil to be freed, the immigration proceedings against him continue. The Louisiana immigration judge in his case on Friday denied his asylum request, ruled he could be deported based on the government's allegations of immigration fraud, and denied a bail hearing. Judge Farbiarz's decision rendered the bail request moot. Like others facing deportation, Mr Khalil has avenues to appeal within the immigration system. Judge Farbiarz is also considering Mr Khalil's challenge of his deportation on constitutional grounds, and has blocked officials from deporting Mr Khalil while that challenge plays out. On June 13, the judge declined to order Mr Khalil's release from a detention centre in Louisiana, after Trump's administration said he was being held on a separate charge that he withheld information from his application for lawful permanent residency. Mr Khalil's lawyers denied that allegation and said people were rarely detained on such charges. On June 16, the lawyers urged Judge Farbiarz to grant a separate request from their client to be released on bail or be transferred to immigration detention in New Jersey to be closer to his family in New York. ABC/Reuters/AP
