Humans adapted to diverse habitats before trekking out of Africa

June 18 (Reuters) - Small bands of Homo sapiens made a few failed forays leaving our home continent before the species finally managed to launch a major dispersal out of Africa roughly 50,000 years ago, going first into Europe and Asia and eventually the rest of the world.
So why was this migration successful after the prior ones were not? New research is offering insight. It documents how human hunter-gatherers in Africa began about 70,000 years ago to embrace a greater diversity of habitats such as thick forests and arid deserts, acquiring an adaptability useful for tackling the wide range of conditions awaiting beyond the continent.
"Why the dispersal 50,000 years ago was successful is a big question in human origins research. Our results suggest that one part of the reason is that humans had developed the ecological flexibility to survive in challenging habitats," said Loyola University Chicago archeologist Emily Hallett, co-leader of the study published in the journal Nature, opens new tab.
Looking at an array of archeological sites in Africa, the study detailed how human populations expanded their range into the forests of Central and West Africa and the deserts of North Africa in the roughly 20,000 years preceding this dispersal.
Some examples of archeological sites dating to this time that illustrate the expansion of human niches to harsh deserts include locales in Libya and Namibia, and examples of expansion to forested habitats include locales in Malawi and South Africa.
Homo sapiens arose roughly 300,000 years ago, inhabiting grasslands, savannahs and various other African ecosystems.
"Starting from about 70,000 years ago, we see that they suddenly start to intensify this exploitation of diverse habitats and also expand into new types of habitat in a way we don't see before. They exploit more types of woodland, more types of closed canopy forests, more types of deserts, highlands and grasslands," said archeologist and study co-leader Eleanor Scerri of the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology in Germany.
"An Ice Age was coming, which means drier conditions in parts of Africa. It seems possible that humans responded to this squeeze by learning how to adapt to new niches," Scerri added.
The increased ecological flexibility of the species appears to have reflected cultural and social advances such as passing knowledge from one generation to the next and engaging in cooperative behavior, the researchers said.
"This must have entailed profound changes in their interaction with the natural environment, as it allowed them to occupy not only new environments in Africa, but entirely new conditions in Eurasia as well," said evolutionary biologist and study co-leader Michela Leonardi of the Natural History Museum in London.
"Another way to phrase this is that the ability to live in a variety of environments in Africa is not directly the adaptation that allowed a successful out of Africa, but rather a sign that humans by that point were the ultimate generalist, able to tackle environments that went from deep forest to dry deserts," said University of Cambridge evolutionary ecologist and study co-leader Andrea Manica.
"This flexibility is the key trait that allowed them, later on, to conquer novel challenges, all the way to the coldest tundras in Siberia."
Trekking out of Africa, Homo sapiens encountered not only new environments and unfamiliar animals and plants, but also other human species, including the Neanderthals and Denisovans. The ecological flexibility learned in Africa may have provided an edge when Homo sapiens encountered these other humans, both of whom disappeared relatively soon thereafter, the researchers said.
Genetic evidence indicates that today's people outside of Africa can trace their ancestry to the population of humans, numbering perhaps only in the thousands, who engaged in that pioneering migration out of Africa approximately 50,000 years ago.
"I think that adaptability and innovation are hallmarks of our species, and that they allowed us to succeed in every environment we encountered," Hallett said. "At the same time, we are almost too good at adapting to different places, to the detriment of most other species on Earth."

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

10 hours ago

• The Independent

Astronomer reveals the exact time of this year's summer solstice

The summer solstice marks the official start of summer. It brings the longest day and shortest night of the year for the 88 per cent of Earth 's people who live in the Northern Hemisphere. People around the world traditionally observe the change of seasons with bonfires and festivals, and Fête de la Musique celebrations. Astronomers can calculate an exact moment for the solstice, when Earth reaches the point in its orbit where the North Pole is angled closest to the Sun. That moment will be at 10.42pm Eastern Time on June 20 this year - or 3.42am on June 21 in the United Kingdom. In Europe, Africa and points eastward, the moment of the equinox falls on June 21 locally, making that the day of the solstice. From Earth, the Sun will appear farthest north relative to the stars. People living on the Tropic of Cancer, 23.5 degrees north of the Equator, will see the Sun pass straight overhead at noon. Six months from now, the Sun will reach its southern extreme and pass overhead for people on the Tropic of Capricorn, and northerners will experience their shortest days of the year at the winter solstice. The Sun's angle relative to Earth's equator changes so gradually close to the solstices that, without instruments, the shift is difficult to perceive for about 10 days. This is the origin of the word solstice, which means 'solar standstill.' This slow shift means that daylight on June 20 is only about 2 seconds longer than on June 21, at mid-northern latitudes in the United States. It will be about a week before there's more than a minute change to the calculated amount of daylight. Even that's an approximation — Earth's atmosphere bends light over the horizon by different amounts depending on weather, which can introduce changes of more than a minute to sunrise and sunset times. Monuments at Stonehenge in England, Karnak in Egypt, and Chankillo in Peru reveal that people around the world have taken note of the Sun's northern and southern travels for more than 5,000 years. From Stonehenge's circle of standing stones, the Sun will rise directly over an ancient avenue leading away to the northeast on the solstice. We know little about the people who built Stonehenge, or why they went to such great effort to construct it, moving multi-ton stones from rock outcrops as far as 140 miles away. All this to mark the spot on the horizon where the Sun returns each year to rest for a while before moving south again. Perhaps they, like us, celebrated this signal of the coming change of seasons. Stephen Schneider is a Professor of Astronomy at UMass Amherst.

Telegraph

a day ago

• Telegraph

US approves twice-yearly HIV jab in ‘breakthrough moment' for fight against Aids

Lenacapavir was developed by the US drug company Gilead, and is already sold under the brand name Sunlenca to treat HIV infections. But two clinical trials last year raised expectations that the drug could prove even more powerful as a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) tool. In one study in South Africa and Uganda, called Purpose 1, some 5,000 sexually-active women were tracked – none of those taking lenacapavir caught HIV from their partners, compared to two per cent of those taking a daily pill. In Purpose 2, only two of 3,200 men, transgender, and non-binary people developed the disease – an efficacy of 96 per cent. When the results were published last year, experts told The Telegraph they were 'stunning'. 'I have been undertaking research on HIV prevention in women for just over 35 years,' said Prof Salim Abdool Karim, director of the Centre for the Aids Program of Research in South Africa, which contributed to the trial. 'In all of that time, I have never seen a result as compelling as this.' Subsequent research has suggested that the drug, named the 2024 scientific breakthrough of the year by Science journal, also has the potential to work for up to a year. Still, even in the current twice-yearly form, it is hoped the injection will be easier to administer than an alternative jab currently sold by GSK, which must be given every two months. Lenacapavir could also solve major issues limiting the impact of daily PrEP pills. In real world studies, efficacy drops to as low as 60 per cent because people forget to take a tablet, or are unable to refill supplies. Some people also don't want to be seen with the tablets or attend frequent doctors appointments because of stigma around HIV, Aids and homosexuality. 'This is a historic day in the decades-long fight against HIV,' said Daniel O'Day, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Gilead Sciences. '[This drug] is one of the most important scientific breakthroughs of our time and offers a very real opportunity to help end the HIV epidemic.' Drug must be 'accessible and affordable' The FDA is the first regulator to approve the drug. Yet the high cost of lenacapavir, combined with sweeping cuts to global health spending and doubts about the future of Medicare in the US, has raised concerns that its impact will be blunted. Gilead has said it will sell lenacapavir under the brand name Yeztugo, for $28,218 per person per year in the US. The company has already signed agreements with six generic drug makers to produce low-cost versions of the shot for 120 poor countries – mostly in Africa, Southeast Asia and the Caribbean – and said it plans to supply two million people in these countries at no profit until these are available. Yet critics said two million people – while it sounds like a lot – is a drop in the ocean, given an estimated 39.9 million people are living with HIV worldwide. Researchers have estimated that you need to treat between 40 and 50 people to stop a single new infection. Critics add that the deal does not cover middle income countries – including Brazil, Mexico, Malaysia and Algeria – and pointed to research in the Lancet suggesting it could be manufactured for as little as $25. 'UNAIDS has seen research that lenacapavir can be produced for just $40 per person per year, falling to $25 within a year of rollout,' said Ms Byanyima. It is beyond comprehension how Gilead can justify a price of $28,218. 'If this game-changing medicine remains unaffordable, it will change nothing. I urge Gilead to do the right thing. Drop the price, expand production, and ensure the world has a shot at ending AIDS.' Kevin Robert Frost, chief executive of amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research, added: 'Having the option of a twice-annual shot, rather than relying on a daily pill, will make long-term adherence to PrEP much easier for many. But this remarkable drug will only be as effective as it is accessible and affordable.' Meanwhile some of the major funders of HIV prevention programmes, who would contribute to funds for lenacapavir for countries worldwide, have been badly hit by aid spending cuts. For instance in January, the Trump administration froze spending from the President's Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and while waivers later allowed treatments to resume, most of the funding for HIV prevention is still on hold. The only current exception is to prevent transmission from a pregnant woman to her child. 'It's a very difficult situation,' Andrew Hill, a pharmacology researcher at Liverpool University, told NPR. 'Because of the cuts in funding, we're going to see millions of people die from HIV in the next several years.'

Reuters

2 days ago

• Reuters

New research strengthens case for age of ancient New Mexico footprints

June 19 (Reuters) - A new line of evidence is providing further corroboration of the antiquity of fossilized footprints discovered at White Sands National Park in New Mexico that rewrite the history of humans in the Americas. Researchers used a technique called radiocarbon dating to determine that organic matter in the remains of wetland muds and shallow lake sediments near the fossilized foot impressions is between 20,700 and 22,400 years old. That closely correlates to previous findings, based on the age of pollen and seeds at the site, that the tracks are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old. The footprints, whose discovery was announced in 2021, indicate that humans trod the landscape of North America thousands of years earlier than previously thought, during the most inhospitable conditions of the last Ice Age, a time called the last glacial maximum. The age of the footprints has been a contentious issue. Asked how the new findings align with the previous ones, University of Arizona archaeologist and geologist Vance Holliday, the study leader, replied: "Spectacularly well." Homo sapiens arose in Africa roughly 300,000 years ago and later spread worldwide. Scientists believe our species entered North America from Asia by trekking across a land bridge that once connected Siberia to Alaska. Previous archaeological evidence had suggested that human occupation of North America started roughly 16,000 years ago. The hunter-gatherers who left the tracks were traversing the floodplain of a river that flowed into an ancient body of water called Lake Otero. The mud through which they walked included bits of semi-aquatic plants that had grown in these wetlands. Radiocarbon dating is used to determine the age of organic material based on the decay of an isotope called carbon-14, a variant of the element carbon. Living organisms absorb carbon-14 into their tissue. After an organism dies, this isotope changes into other atoms over time, providing a metric for determining age. "Three separate carbon sources - pollen, seeds and organic muds and sediments - have now been dated by different radiocarbon labs over the course of the trackway research, and they all indicate a last glacial maximum age for the footprints," said Jason Windingstad, a University of Arizona doctoral candidate in environmental science and co-author of the study published this week in the journal Science Advances, opens new tab. The original 2021 study dated the footprints using radiocarbon dating on seeds of an aquatic plant called spiral ditchgrass found alongside the tracks. A study published in 2023 used radiocarbon dating on conifer pollen grains from the same sediment layers as the ditchgrass seeds. But some scientists had viewed the seeds and pollen as unreliable markers for dating the tracks. The new study provides further corroboration of the dating while also giving a better understanding of the local landscape at the time. "When the original paper appeared, at the time we didn't know enough about the ancient landscape because it was either buried under the White Sands dune field or was destroyed when ancient Lake Otero, which had a lot of gypsum, dried out after the last Ice Age and was eroded by the wind to create the dunes," Holliday said. Today, the landscape situated just west of the city of Alamogordo consists of rolling beige-colored dunes of the mineral gypsum. "The area of and around the tracks included water that came off the mountains to the east, the edge of the old lake and wetlands along the margins of the lake. Our dating shows that this environment persisted before, during and after the time that people left their tracks," Holliday said. The area could have provided important resources for hunter-gatherers. "We know from the abundant tracks in the area that at least mammoths, giant ground sloths, camels and dire wolves were around, and likely other large animals. Given the setting, there must have been a large variety of other animals and also plants," Holliday added. The climate was markedly different than today, with cooler summers and the area receiving significantly more precipitation. "It is important to note that this is a trackway site, not a habitation site," Windingstad said. "It provides us a narrow view of people traveling across the landscape. Where they were going and where they came from is obviously an open question and one that requires the discovery and excavation of sites that are of similar age in the region. So far, these have not been found."