Wilding, based on Isabella Tree's book, shows how one failing farm tried something new, and changed everything
In a tiny corner of southern England, there's a small pocket of paradise.
There's not a hedge or lawn in sight: ethereal deer wander peacefully through clouds of blossoms; dark-haired, stocky horses amble through abundant green scrub.
What: A peaceful documentary about the huge successes of an enormous rewilding project on English farming land.
Directed by: David Allen
Starring: Isabella Tree, Charlie Burrell and a menagerie of incredible animals
Likely to make you feel: Like ripping up your lawn
The air is full of birdsong — even the lilting call of the turtle dove, that beloved bird from Christmas songs past, which has lost 98 per cent of its population in England and is on its way to extinction.
This is Knepp Estate, a resplendent tract of land passed down through generations of a farming family to Charlie Burrell and his partner, Isabella Tree. But when they took over the farm in the late 80s, it was a muddy wreck where nothing would grow.
"We're on this terrible land, heavy clay soil, 320 metres of the stuff. And, you know, in the winter, it's just like porridge," Tree explains to ABC Entertainment.
"You can't get heavy machinery onto it, so you can't sow spring crops, you can't do the maintenance, you can't be competitive. No matter what we tried, we couldn't make farming work."
Millions of pounds in debt and running out of options, the couple made the decision to stop farming, selling their equipment and stock. They were heartbroken.
But after a fortuitous meeting, a light appeared at the end of the tunnel: they could 'rewild' Knepp estate.
This spur-of-the-moment decision changed everything, as shown in a new documentary, Wilding.
Rewilding can look quite different to traditional conservation, according to Doctor Sally Hawkins, a lecturer at Central Queensland University and a leading rewilding scientist and educator.
Where conservation is about protecting a certain species or habitat, rewilding is about allowing nature to restore "without trying to control what it looks like".
Rewilding is a step away from "colonial attitudes towards natural resources", says Dr Hawkins.
Using government subsidies to fund the initial transition, the Knepp project pulled down the farm's fences and released populations of Old English longhorn cattle; Exmoor ponies and Tamworth pigs — mammals that would have roamed in this area centuries before.
The animals did what machines couldn't: turned over the soil, spread around seed, created hollows and habitats that bugs and plants thrive in. When a particularly stubborn thistle threatened to take over, a breed of butterflies that hadn't been seen for years appeared in droves and ate it all. The lack of pesticides and machine ploughing allowed mycelium networks to reconnect and plants became healthier.
In short, it was working.
"Ironically, we used to travel the world to see nature, to see wildlife," says Tree.
"We never once wondered why we didn't have it in our own backyard because of what we were doing to our landscape. Then we thought, 'My God, we might actually get nature back here.'"
After only about five years, the scale of wildlife returning brought other income streams to Knepp, largely in ecotourism. They now have a restaurant, a café and a shop, and employ more than 100 people.
"People often assume that rewilding is about excluding people from nature, but it's actually about bringing more people in," says Tree.
"Suddenly, you've got a vibrant community. Nature has brought all this back to life.
"What we didn't really anticipate was how healing it would be for us as well because we hadn't realised how stressful it had been trying to force the land to do something it didn't want to do."
The damp, verdantly green world of Knepp might be light-years away from Australian wilderness but Dr Hawkins says the principles of rewilding stay the same.
"There's a lot of degraded land [in Australia], whether that's been through mining or whether it's been through intensive agriculture," she explains.
But what works in rural England won't fly in the Australian outback; the strategy must be adapted to what the nature here needs.
We don't have native mega herbivores like they do in Europe and North America, but traditional burning practices can fill that role of disturbance, says Dr Hawkins.
"In many places in Europe, we don't remember how we sustainably managed our land in the past, but here we have first-hand knowledge. So it's really a big advantage."
In Australia there are already many "very valuable" protected areas, and rewilding could help connect those together across the country, creating healthy migratory corridors.
Wilding, the 2018 book by Tree on which it was based, and the whole Knepp project, in its essence is about the joy of nature.
The film is full of dreamlike wilderness montages and Tree's gentle but excited storytelling.
It isn't wagging the finger, it's celebrating the power of change.
"You know, we have what, 40, 50, harvests left? So we have to change, and we have to do that now," says Tree.
She says rewilding and regenerative farming work "hand-in-glove": wild spaces threading through and alongside farmland can help make the land healthier.
"It's providing the life-support system that is going to enable ourselves to feed ourselves."
Dr Hawkins says while legislation is key to protecting what we still have, the rewilding process has to start from the ground up.
Tree is a happy poster child for the huge impacts that small, local steps can have.
"It's that old mantra, you know, 'Think globally, act locally': we can restore even the tiny ecosystem in our garden [and then] it's cooler, it holds onto moisture … and then you might notice more birds coming to your garden."
There's one more point she says people should know about rewilding.
"It's also tremendous fun."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
UK parliament votes for assisted dying, paving way for historic law change
Britain's parliament has voted in favour of a bill to legalise assisted dying, paving the way for the country's biggest social change in a generation. The legislation was passed on Friday by a vote of 314-291, clearing its biggest parliamentary hurdle. The "Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life)" law would give mentally competent, terminally ill adults in England and Wales with six months or less left to live the right to choose to end their lives with medical help. The bill now proceeds to Britain's upper chamber, the House of Lords, where it will undergo months of scrutiny. While there could be further amendments, the unelected Lords will be reluctant to block legislation that elected members of the House of Commons have passed. The vote puts Britain on course to follow Australia, Canada and other countries, as well as some US states, in permitting assisted dying. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government was neutral on the legislation, meaning politicians voted according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Mr Starmer voted in favour. Supporters of the bill said it would provide dignity and compassion to people suffering, but opponents worried that vulnerable people could be coerced into ending their lives. Hundreds of people gathered outside parliament to hear news of the vote. When the result was read out, those in favour of the legislation hugged, clapped and cheered. They shouted "victory", "we won" and waved placards. Those opposed to it stood in silence. Emma Bray, who has motor neurone disease, said she hoped the result would help people in her condition. Ms Bray, who is 42 and has two children, said she planned to starve herself to death next month to help relieve the pain after being told she only has six months to live. "This result will mean that people will not have to go through the same suffering I have faced," she told Reuters. Opinion polls show that a majority of Britons back assisted dying. Friday's vote followed hours of emotional debate and references to personal stories in the chamber, and followed a vote in November that approved the legislation in principle. Opponents of the bill have argued that ill people may feel they should end their lives for fear of being a burden to their families and society. Some lawmakers withdrew their support after the initial vote last year, saying safeguards had been weakened. John Howard, a Catholic priest who led about a dozen people in prayer outside parliament while voting took place, said he worried that some people would be forced to end their lives early under pressure from family members. Friday's vote took place 10 years after parliament last voted against allowing assisted dying. The 314-291 vote showed a narrowing of support from the 330-275 vote in favour in November. In the original plan, an assisted death would have required court approval. That has been replaced by a requirement for a judgement by a panel including a social worker, a senior legal figure and a psychiatrist, which is seen by some as a watering down. Kim Leadbeater, the Labour lawmaker who proposed the bill, said the legislation still offered some of the strongest protections in the world. "I am fully confident in the bill," she told the BBC after the vote. Opponents had doubts not just about the potential for coercion, but also about the impact of assisted dying on the finances and resources of the state-run National Health Service, how the law might change the relationship between doctors and their patients and whether it could mean that improvements to palliative care might now not be made. Care Not Killing, a group that opposes the law change, issued a statement calling the bill "deeply flawed and dangerous", saying that its safeguards had been weakened since November. "Members of Parliament had under 10 hours to consider over 130 amendments to the Bill, or less than five minutes per change," said the group's CEO, Gordon Macdonald. The law was proposed under a process led by an individual member of parliament, rather than being part of government policy, which has limited the amount of parliamentary time allocated to it. Some lawmakers said such a major social change should have been allocated more parliamentary time for debate and involve a greater degree of ministerial involvement and accountability. Reuters
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
UK MPs vote in favour of assisted dying bill in historic step
Britain's parliament took a historic step towards allowing euthanasia on Friday when MPs backed contentious legislation that would introduce assisted dying for terminally ill people. Lawmakers in the lower House of Commons chamber voted 314 in favour to 291 to send the proposal to the upper House of Lords for further scrutiny following four hours of emotional debate. The outcome sparked celebrations among supporters gathered outside parliament who say legalised euthanasia will give people with an incurable illness dignity and choice at the end of their lives. But opponents attending a neighbouring counter-protest said they feared vulnerable people could be coerced into dying and urged lawmakers to focus on improving palliative care instead. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults who have been given less than six months to live. They would have to be able to administer the life-ending substance themselves, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying, including Belgium and the Netherlands. - 'Heartbreaking stories' - Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who proposed the legislation, told Friday's so-called third reading debate that a law change would "offer a compassionate and safe choice" for terminally ill people. She said maintaining the status quo would mean more "heartbreaking stories" of "pain and trauma, suicide attempts, PTSD, lonely trips to Switzerland, (and) police investigations". But Vicky Foxcroft, also of Labour, said the proposal did not include adequate safeguards for disabled people. "We have to protect those people who are susceptible to coercion, who already feel like society doesn't value them, who often feel like a burden to the state, society and their family," she pleaded. Outside parliament, protesters waved placards with slogans including "Let us choose" and "Don't make doctors killers". David Walker, 82, said he supported changing the law because he saw his wife of 60 years suffer for three years at the end of her life. "That's why I'm here, because I can't help her anymore, but I can help other people who are going through the same thing, because if you have no quality of life, you have nothing," he told AFP. But Elizabeth Burden, a 52-year-old doctor, said she feared the legislation would open "slippery slope" where those eligible for assisted dying expands. "Once we allow this. Everything will slip down because dementia patients, all patients... are vulnerable," she told AFP. - Public support - MPs in the 650-seat parliament backed an earlier version of the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November, a larger majority than Friday's 23. Since then the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. MPs added a safeguard which would prevent a person being eligible "solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking", ruling out people with anorexia. Britain's medical community and Prime Minister Keir Starmer's top ministerial team are split on the proposed law change. Starmer voted in favour, while his health and justice secretaries opposed it. But in a YouGov poll of 2,003 adults, surveyed last month and published Thursday, 73 percent or respondents backed an assisted dying law. "Change is coming," hailed Sarah Wootton, chief executive of the Dignity in Dying campaign group. But Catherine Robinson of Right To Life UK insisted the bill "still faces an uphill battle" to get through the Lords and her opposition campaign group "will be fighting it at every stage" to prevent it becoming law. The House of Lords now needs to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, it would still be four years before an assisted dying service was implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in a decade. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Separate legislation is going through the devolved Scottish parliament. At the end of March, the Isle of Man became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill.
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
Kate breaks silence after abruptly cancelling Ascot appearance
IN LONDON The Princess of Wales has released a heartfelt statement just days after pulling out of Royal Ascot at the last minute. Kate, 43, released a personal note on Friday, UK, speaking about the life-changing work of children's hospices. Royal-watchers were left disappointed earlier this week after it emerged that she'd had to cancel her scheduled appearance in the royal carriage procession alongside the King, Queen and Prince William at the iconic raceground, after also missing it last year due to her cancer treatment. In her statement on Friday, which was shared in honour of the UK's Children's Hospice Week, the princess expressed her gratitude for the vital care provided by those working with sick children. 'No parent expects to hear that their child has a serious health condition that could shorten their life,' Kate wrote. 'Sadly, this is the reality faced by thousands of families across the country, leaving them heartbroken, fearful of the future and often desperately isolated. 'Being able to access the support of one of the UK's 54 children's hospices means they don't have to face that future alone.' The princess has been Royal Patron of East Anglia Children's Hospices for more than a decade, and this year also became the Royal Patron of TÅ· Hafan Children's Hospice in South Wales. 'As Patron of East Anglia's Children's Hospices and TÅ· Hafan Children's Hospice in South Wales, I have the immense privilege of seeing for myself the extraordinary work of our children's hospices,' she said. 'Lifting spirits through laughter, fun and play, as well as listening, holding, caring and sharing, they support children and families through life, death and beyond. 'This Children's Hospice Week, I hope you will join me in celebrating the life-changing work they do and thanking them for the vital care they provide to children and families experiencing the most challenging times.' Despite being on a positive trajectory since announcing her gradual return to public duties following the completion of her chemotherapy, there were concerns on Wednesday when Kate pulled out of the racing event at the last minute. She had already been listed to travel in the second carriage of the royal procession, alongside her husband. However, a short time later it was confirmed by Kensington Palace that Kate would not be attending, with local media reporting she was 'disappointed' but was having to 'find the right balance as she fully returns to public facing engagements'. It came after a busy week for the Princess of Wales, who attended a series of events including Trooping the Colour, in the days leading up to Ascot. Back in January, she revealed she was in remission from cancer, which she had first publicly disclosed last March. Last September, she released an emotional video message, featuring personal footage of herself with William and their three children, opening up about the challenges they'd all been privately battling – but also proudly announced she had completed her treatment.
