UAA Q1 Earnings Call: Under Armour Discusses Brand Reset Amid Revenue Decline and Strategic Shifts
Athletic apparel company Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) missed Wall Street's revenue expectations in Q1 CY2025, with sales falling 11.4% year on year to $1.18 billion. Its non-GAAP loss of $0.08 per share was in line with analysts' consensus estimates.
Is now the time to buy UAA? Find out in our full research report (it's free).
Revenue: $1.18 billion (11.4% year-on-year decline)
Adjusted EPS: -$0.08 vs analyst estimates of -$0.08 (in line)
Revenue Guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $1.13 billion at the midpoint, below analyst estimates of $1.17 billion
Adjusted EPS guidance for Q2 CY2025 is $0.02 at the midpoint, above analyst estimates of $0
Operating Margin: -6.1%, down from -0.3% in the same quarter last year
Locations: 441 at quarter end, up from 440 in the same quarter last year
Constant Currency Revenue fell 9.8% year on year (-4.9% in the same quarter last year)
Market Capitalization: $2.71 billion
Under Armour's first quarter results reflected the company's efforts to reposition its brand and improve the quality of its revenue, as discussed by CEO Kevin Plank and CFO Dave Bergman. Management attributed the year-over-year sales decline to lower direct-to-consumer (DTC) volumes, especially in e-commerce, and reduced wholesale activity. Plank explained that strategic decisions to limit discounting and streamline product offerings were intended to protect brand equity, even as these actions pressured top-line results. Additionally, ongoing supply chain management and SKU reductions have been central to Under Armour's plan to create a more focused and premium product mix. Plank acknowledged, 'While we're never satisfied with declining revenue, our fourth quarter results allowed us to exceed our fiscal '25 outlook, demonstrating some of the foundational traction we're gaining as we reposition the Under Armour brand.'
Looking forward, Under Armour's guidance reflects continued caution as the company navigates a dynamic retail environment and the impact of evolving trade policy. Management emphasized the importance of maintaining gross margin improvements through premiumization, disciplined inventory management, and a shift toward higher-priced, differentiated products. Plank highlighted the upcoming launch of the UA Halo collection and a renewed focus on compelling storytelling and influencer partnerships to drive consumer engagement. CFO Dave Bergman stated that while the company is limiting its outlook to the next quarter due to tariff uncertainties, efforts to diversify sourcing and manage SG&A expenses remain priorities. The leadership team stressed that executing on product innovation, targeted marketing, and operational efficiency will be key to stabilizing performance and positioning Under Armour for future growth.
Management attributed the quarter's results to deliberate reductions in promotions, ongoing operational streamlining, and the impact of external trade and market pressures. The leadership team highlighted several strategic actions shaping both current performance and long-term brand positioning.
E-commerce and DTC Reset: Under Armour's decision to reduce discounting and focus on full-price sales in its DTC channels led to lower e-commerce revenue but improved average unit retail and a healthier brand profile. Plank noted, 'Our full price sales mix on our website [was] up double-digits year-over-year with promo and clearance down.'
SKU Rationalization and Premiumization: The company accelerated efforts to streamline its product assortment, removing lower-value activities and reducing SKUs to concentrate on premium, higher-margin categories. Plank described this as 'selling so much more of so much less at a much higher full price.'
Category Management Model: A transition to category-led operating structures, with dedicated teams responsible for core areas such as training, running, and sportswear, was implemented to improve execution, speed, and regional relevance.
International Market Performance: EMEA outperformed other regions due to strong leadership and strategic category focus, while APAC continued to face challenges from a highly promotional environment and ongoing business resets. Plank noted, 'We're maintaining the discipline to protect the brand strength we've built [in EMEA].'
Supply Chain and Cost Management: Efforts to optimize the supply chain, including diversifying sourcing and driving cost efficiencies, contributed to gross margin gains. Bergman stated that supply chain benefits and pricing discipline were key factors, though he cautioned that these benefits may moderate in future quarters.
Under Armour's near-term outlook is shaped by ongoing brand repositioning, operational discipline, and uncertainty from recent tariff changes, which management expects will influence both revenue and profitability.
Sourcing Diversification and Tariff Mitigation: Management is proactively evaluating strategies to offset the impact of new tariffs, including diversifying sourcing away from affected regions, cost-sharing initiatives with partners, and targeted price adjustments. Bergman emphasized the company's balanced sourcing footprint, with roughly 30% from Vietnam, 20% from Jordan, and the rest spread across other countries.
Product Innovation and Storytelling: The upcoming UA Halo collection, enhanced influencer partnerships, and a renewed focus on storytelling are intended to differentiate the brand and support premium pricing. Plank highlighted that 'comprehensive go-to-market strategy that inspires consumers to want to buy UA at premium price points' will be central to the next phase.
SG&A and Cost Controls: The company plans to maintain tight control over SG&A, concentrating investments on high-impact initiatives while reducing discretionary spending and third-party costs. Bergman stated that planned restructuring and operational efficiencies are expected to deliver meaningful cost savings, though caution remains around cutting too deeply in areas critical for future growth.
In the coming quarters, our analysts will be watching (1) whether Under Armour can sustain gross margin improvements as promotional discipline continues, (2) evidence of renewed growth in North America as the brand reset matures, and (3) the reception of key product launches like UA Halo and their impact on consumer engagement. The evolving tariff environment and progress in international markets will also be critical to track.
Under Armour currently trades at a forward P/E ratio of 18.7×. Is the company at an inflection point that warrants a buy or sell? See for yourself in our full research report (it's free).
The market surged in 2024 and reached record highs after Donald Trump's presidential victory in November, but questions about new economic policies are adding much uncertainty for 2025.
While the crowd speculates what might happen next, we're homing in on the companies that can succeed regardless of the political or macroeconomic environment. Put yourself in the driver's seat and build a durable portfolio by checking out our Top 5 Growth Stocks for this month. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025).
Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Comfort Systems (+782% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Under Armour (UAA) Jumps 13.9% After $400-Million Debt Offer
Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UAA) is one of the Under Armour ended two straight days of losses on Friday, jumping 13.94 percent to end at $7.03 apiece after announcing plans to raise $400 million through the issuance of debt. In a statement earlier this week, Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UAA) said the notes carry a yield rate of 7.25 percent and will be paid semi-annually. The notes are senior, unsecured obligations, and will mature in 2030. The sale is expected to close on Monday, June 23. According to Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UAA), net proceeds will be used to pay off its $600 million 3.25 percent senior notes due 2026. In recent news, Under Armour, Inc. (NYSE:UAA) extended its exclusive apparel partnership with the Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association (CIAA) through 2029. Leonard Zhukovsky / Under Armour, Inc.'s (NYSE:UAA) relationship with the CIAA began in 2018 after Russell Athletic exited the collegiate uniform space. The partnership gave exclusive access to UA uniforms, gear, footwear, and training equipment. While we acknowledge the potential of UAA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Business Upturn
7 hours ago
- Business Upturn
ROSEN, LEADING INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Reddit, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action
NEW YORK, June 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Reddit, Inc. (NYSE: RDDT) between October 29, 2024 and May 20, 2025, both dates inclusive (the 'Class Period'). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. SO WHAT: If you purchased Reddit securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than August 18, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. DETAILS OF THE CASE: According to the lawsuit, throughout the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) changes in Google Search's algorithm and features like AI Overview were causing users to stop their query on Google search; (2) these algorithm changes were materially different than prior instances of reduced traffic to the Reddit website; (3) defendants were aware that the increase in the query term 'Reddit' on search engines was because users were getting the sought after answer from Google Search without having to go to Reddit, and not because they intended to visit Reddit; (4) this zero-click search reality was dramatically reducing traffic to Reddit in a manner Reddit was unable to overcome in the short term; and (5) defendants, therefore, lacked a reasonable basis for its outlook on user rates and advertising revenues. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Reddit class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for more information. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Does The Market Have A Low Tolerance For GreenTree Hospitality Group Ltd.'s (NYSE:GHG) Mixed Fundamentals?
It is hard to get excited after looking at GreenTree Hospitality Group's (NYSE:GHG) recent performance, when its stock has declined 18% over the past three months. We, however decided to study the company's financials to determine if they have got anything to do with the price decline. Stock prices are usually driven by a company's financial performance over the long term, and therefore we decided to pay more attention to the company's financial performance. Specifically, we decided to study GreenTree Hospitality Group's ROE in this article. Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for GreenTree Hospitality Group is: 7.2% = CN¥107m ÷ CN¥1.5b (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2024). The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. So, this means that for every $1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of $0.07. See our latest analysis for GreenTree Hospitality Group We have already established that ROE serves as an efficient profit-generating gauge for a company's future earnings. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes. On the face of it, GreenTree Hospitality Group's ROE is not much to talk about. Next, when compared to the average industry ROE of 19%, the company's ROE leaves us feeling even less enthusiastic. For this reason, GreenTree Hospitality Group's five year net income decline of 16% is not surprising given its lower ROE. We reckon that there could also be other factors at play here. Such as - low earnings retention or poor allocation of capital. That being said, we compared GreenTree Hospitality Group's performance with the industry and were concerned when we found that while the company has shrunk its earnings, the industry has grown its earnings at a rate of 33% in the same 5-year period. Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. Is GreenTree Hospitality Group fairly valued compared to other companies? These 3 valuation measures might help you decide. In spite of a normal three-year median payout ratio of 27% (that is, a retention ratio of 73%), the fact that GreenTree Hospitality Group's earnings have shrunk is quite puzzling. So there could be some other explanations in that regard. For instance, the company's business may be deteriorating. Moreover, GreenTree Hospitality Group has been paying dividends for six years, which is a considerable amount of time, suggesting that management must have perceived that the shareholders prefer consistent dividends even though earnings have been shrinking. Overall, we have mixed feelings about GreenTree Hospitality Group. Even though it appears to be retaining most of its profits, given the low ROE, investors may not be benefitting from all that reinvestment after all. The low earnings growth suggests our theory correct. Wrapping up, we would proceed with caution with this company and one way of doing that would be to look at the risk profile of the business. Our risks dashboard would have the 4 risks we have identified for GreenTree Hospitality Group. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Vita Life Sciences Set for a 12.72% Revenue Growth While Tackling Operational Challenges By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$2.42 · 0.1% Overvalued Vossloh rides a €500 billion wave to boost growth and earnings in the next decade By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €78.41 · 0.1% Overvalued Intuitive Surgical Will Transform Healthcare with 12% Revenue Growth By Unike – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $325.55 · 0.6% Undervalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
