Aldabaiba stresses need to complete Airport Road works in full in conjunction with imminent opening of Tripoli International Airport
Tripoli based Libyan Prime Minister, Abd Alhamid Aldabaiba, emphasised the need to complete the Airport Road works in full in conjunction with the imminent opening of Tripoli International Airport.
This came during a meeting held at the Cabinet Office today to follow up on the project to improve and develop the Airport Road, in the presence of the Minister of Transportation, the head of the Transport Projects Implementation Authority, and the head of the Executive Team for the Prime Minister's Initiatives.
During the meeting, Aldabaiba stressed the importance of the readiness of this vital axis, which represents the southern façade of the capital, and is directly related to the movement of visitors and passengers.
The project includes the development of the road extending from the airport to Bab Al Salam Island, with a length of 23 kilometres, and a width of 19 meters, distributed over five lanes in each direction. It also includes the construction of a service road parallel to the main road, which facilitates the movement of service vehicles and enhances the efficiency of movement along the route.
The works also include the maintenance of damaged parts, the treatment of cracks, the repainting of lanes, the installation of modern traffic signals, the implementation of an advanced lighting network along the road, the improvement of sidewalks and afforestation, and the development of the main entrance to the airport.
It is noteworthy that the Council of Ministers had approved the project earlier, as part of a comprehensive plan to improve the entrances to the capital and raise the efficiency of infrastructure, especially in areas related to the operation of Tripoli International Airport. Tags: Airport Roadproject constructionTripoli International Airport
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 hours ago
- BBC News
Tuk-tuk service helping people with mobility issues
Businesses in a village in Cornwall have said a new tuk-tuk shuttle service has helped people with mobility issues enjoy the service, called Tuk You There Dreckly, launched in April and takes people from Polperro car park to Polperro Pennington, who owns The Cottage Bed and Breakfast in Polperro, said it was "really handy", and helped people with less mobility to explore. She added: "This is really helping people to come back to visiting the village who have maybe stayed away because they've been worried about being able to get down and back up again." 'Makes a difference' Ms Pennington said the shuttle stopped outside her bed and breakfast."If you're fully mobile it makes no difference but lots of people aren't," she are three wheeled motorised taxis which are common in You There Dreckly owner Darren Sereika said: "Local people are loving it, kids are loving it, people waving all the time. And all with a smile on their face."He added: "It makes a difference for the entire village. "Hopefully long term it will be a huge impact and bring everything back to such a beautiful busy village that it is."On his busiest day Mr Sereika has clocked up 49km (30 miles) transporting people and can take up to six passengers at a time.A milk float and a horse and cart have been used in the past to take passengers down the hill to the harbour.
Telegraph
21 hours ago
- Telegraph
Runaway road and rail costs trigger investigation
An investigation into Britain's roads and railways has been launched as regulators attempt to tackle runaway costs and lengthy delays. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) unveiled details of the review on Thursday, which has been prompted by widespread frustration about the state of troubled infrastructure projects such as HS2. The main purpose of the inquiry will be to examine how cheaper infrastructure can be built, while also exploring the way in which public and private sectors work together. The study is expected to take 10 months, with initial findings published in November. While it will not give the CMA powers to intervene in the market, it will result in recommendations to the Government. It comes after a report published in 2023 by campaign group Britain Remade found that the UK was spending up to eight times more on road and railway upgrades than other European countries. The 2023 study said red tape in the planning sector was largely to blame for the overspend, while it also singled out the impact of Nimby campaigners. 'Appalling mess' Britain's ailing infrastructure was thrust into the spotlight once again this week when ministers admitted the HS2 high-speed rail project is facing fresh delays beyond its most recent target opening date of 2033. Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, branded the project an 'appalling mess' after warnings in June last year that its costs could balloon to £66bn. This will make it one of the most expensive railway lines in the world, she added, despite a major scaling back of the project that saw planned routes to Manchester and Leeds scrapped. Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C – two major nuclear power plant projects – are also running significantly late and over budget. The CMA will not include HS2 in its study as the rail project has already been subject to multiple reviews. However, the watchdog said it will consider the full lifecycle of roads and railways, including their enhancement and maintenance. It comes after the National Infrastructure Commission estimated that public and private sector investment will need to increase by up to 50pc over the next decade to deliver more complex infrastructure. Road and railway projects account for between 70pc and 75pc of government spending on economic infrastructure, while the civil engineering sector as a whole added £23bn to the UK economy in 2023. 'Decade of national renewal' Sarah Cardell, CMA chief executive, said: 'There's no question that reliable, high-quality infrastructure is critical in accelerating economic growth. To achieve this, public authorities and the civil engineering sector must be able to work together to deliver projects on time, within budget and to high standards. 'This review is a crucial step in identifying barriers holding back the sector – supporting the drive to get Britain building and ensuring every penny spent is delivering value for taxpayers.' Details of the review have been announced after the Government published its 10-year infrastructure strategy, which earmarked £725bn in funding for maintenance and major projects over the next decade. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, said: 'Infrastructure is crucial to unlocking growth across the country, but for too long investment has been squeezed. Crumbling public buildings are a sign of the decay that has seeped into our everyday lives because of a total failure to plan and invest. 'We're not just fixing buildings – we're enhancing public services, improving lives and creating the conditions for sustainable economic growth in communities throughout the UK. 'This will deliver the decade of national renewal we promised Britain, and fulfil our Plan for Change goals to kickstart economic growth, and build an NHS fit for the future.'
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
How HS2 squandered billions to become a national embarrassment
' HS2 will provide more track, more trains, more seats and faster journeys to improve performance and reliability across Britain's rail network.' So says the hitherto dysfunctional organisation that has squandered billions of pounds of taxpayers' cash with precious little to show for it. A more accurate assessment of its role so far: 'We have an unlimited pot of taxpayers' money and we are going to spend it.' The new chief executive, Mark Wild, says: 'The position I have inherited in HS2 Ltd is unacceptable; the organisation has failed in its mission to control costs and deliver to schedule. We must intervene to regain control of the programme and reset it to deliver at the lowest feasible cost, while maintaining safety and value for money.' Labour has spent almost a year since taking office assembling evidence to pin the blame for the shamble on the Tories – but now must pick up the pieces and deliver at least something. These are the key questions and answers. What is the history of high-speed rail in the UK? High Speed 1 is the 68-mile fast railway line from London St Pancras to the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone in Kent, which opened in 2008. It cost less than £7 billion, roughly £100 million per mile. High Speed 2 is a much more ambitious rail project, originally involving 345 miles of new high-speed track. HS2 was designed to relieve pressure on the West Coast and East Coast main lines, to move intercity passengers to a dedicated network, reduce journey times and increase capacity. The existing West Coast main line is the busiest intercity route in Europe, handling a mix of Avanti express services, commuter trains and freight. There is no room for expansion, and the system has little resilience. High Speed 2 began as a dream in 2009, gathering all-party support for a project that would unify the nation with proper 21st-century rail connections from London to the Midlands and northern England, with improved journeys to Scotland. Trains were due to start running in 2026. Sixteen years and about £40 billion later, there is now no prospect of any high-speed trains running for another decade – after tens of billions more have been spent on an embarrassing stump of a line between London and Birmingham. The total cost, estimated at around £33 billion for the whole project in 2010, is now expected to reach as much as £100 billion for a much-reduced line: the 140 miles of Phase 1, which will include stations at London Euston, Old Oak Common in west London, Interchange Station in Solihull and Birmingham Curzon Street. The cost per mile? About £700 million. What went wrong? The new CEO Mark Wild says: 'Construction commenced too soon, without the conditions to enable productive delivery, such as stable and consented designs. From the start, the cost and schedule estimates were optimistic with inadequate provision for risk.' After signing nonsensical contracts with construction firms which left taxpayers on the hook for spectacular overspends, a succession of ministers – in particular transport secretaries – have wrought further expensive havoc by repeatedly changing their minds. The most essential parts of the scheme – comprising a northwest leg to Crewe and Manchester and a northeast leg to Sheffield and Leeds were scrapped in an attempt to save money amid ballooning costs and to try to drum up votes from motorists. In a crowded field of contenders for the most egregious act of vandalism against desperately needed national infrastructure, one figure stands out: Rishi Sunak, who scrapped the link to Manchester. The-then prime minister pretended that the money saved would be spent on piecemeal transport improvements collectively called 'Network North' – which surprisingly included projects in Kent and Devon. Did anybody notice? Yes. The Infrastructure and Projects Authority, which reports to the Cabinet Office and HM Treasury, concluded in 2023: 'There are major issues with project definition, schedule, budget, quality and/or benefits delivery, which at this stage do not appear to be manageable or resolvable. The project may need re-scoping and/or its overall viability reassessed.' The Department for Transport (DfT) now says: 'The long-running failure to manage the programme effectively, along with repeated de-scoping under previous governments, means that the programme will not achieve its original mission and has undermined the remaining delivery.' Through all this, HS2 Ltd has demonstrated 'insufficient capability and capacity in key commercial and technical functions' – according to CEO Mark Wild. One example quoted by the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander: 'Between 2019 and 2023, HS2 Ltd provided initial designs for Euston station, coming in almost £2 billion over budget. When asked for a more affordable option, they offered one costing £400 million more than the first attempt. The word 'affordable' was clearly not part of the HS2 lexicon. 'Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money has been wasted by constant scope changes, ineffective contracts and bad management.' When HS2 finally opens, how much faster will the journey be? The current claim is that the trip from London Euston to Birmingham Curzon Street will take 45 minutes, compared with 77 minutes at present on the conventional line. Initially, though, trains will run only from Old Oak Common in west London. And, says Mr Wild, the line might open at 'slightly reduced running speed'. So let's call it 50 minutes. HS2 claims: 'Our high-speed trains will continue to Manchester, the North West and Scotland using the conventional railway network, cutting journey times.' But the originally planned trip from London to Manchester of 67 minutes – almost halving the current journey time – will be much longer. With the new line northwest to Crewe and Manchester scrapped, the final section of HS2 will be a link from Birmingham north to Handsacre Junction on the existing and heavily congested West Coast main line. Is there any hope for the northern section? A lower-cost, 'quite high speed' link from Birmingham to Crewe and Manchester could provide some connectivity. The transport guru Thomas Ableman says: 'The purpose of HS2 is an investment to transform the economics of this country. At the moment, Britain is one of the most unequal countries when it comes to productivity: London, incredibly high; cities of the north, some of the lowest in Europe. 'This is about equalising that and it's absolutely the right thing to do. Does that mean it needs to be a 200mph or 225mph railway? Almost certainly not. Putting in place the capacity to make that transformational change possible is far more important than the precise specification that was developed for the original HS2 project. 'Quite frankly, HS2 has become something of a toxic term. A more conventional railway that provides the connectivity, provides the capacity could be exactly the way of unlocking what would otherwise be a very knotty political problem.'
