Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers
That's because Hamer's 30% tariff was stacked on top of existing tariffs, including a tariff on Chinese steel products that varies depending on the amount of steel used in a fixture.
When U.S. President Donald Trump adds a new tariff the old ones don't go away. Some companies will pay far more because of a phenomenon called tariff stacking, the latest complication for U.S. importers trying to navigate Trump's on-again, off-again trade war.
The reality for many U.S. businesses is that their tariff bills are often far higher than the headline number touted in trade talks.
Tariff stacking applies to any country exporting to the U.S., but the most extreme cases tend to be with China, where the U.S. has accumulated a long list of sometimes hefty existing tariffs, implemented under different provisions of U.S. trade law.
The latest twist is an announcement that the two sides have agreed to a 55% tariff, but that's in part only an estimate of what the average pre-existing tariffs were. Hamer isn't sure what his tariff total will be now, but he figures it couldn't get much worse.
'Hopefully this will bring the (tariff) number down - and some of the clients who've been sitting on the sidelines will go ahead and place orders,' he said, 'because it's been all over the map.'
Hamer is searching for suppliers outside China to avoid his stacked tariffs. He's checked Mexico and is planning a trip to India next month as part of the effort. In the meantime, he is passing through all the tariffs.
"The customers pay the tariff," said Hamer. "When it comes in, we say, 'Here's the tariff bill.'"
Many businesses are still hoping for a reprieve from President Donald Trump's trade war. Federal courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade, have ruled that Trump's imposition of tariffs exceeded his authority. A federal appeals court is considering the administration's appeal to that ruling, and the tariffs remain in effect while that plays out, a process expected to take months.
Some are counting on tariff exemptions, a popular tool used by companies during the first Trump administration to get goods imported without the taxes.
Michael Weidner, president of Lalo Baby Products in Brooklyn, is one of them. 'We believe there should be an exemption for baby products,' he said. 'Same with toys.'
The Trump administration has said it will resist creating such carve-outs. And even during the last trade war, it was a complex process. For instance, Lalo imports a 'play table' from China that happens to be classified under a customs category that was subject to a 25% tariff under a part of trade law that aims to fight unfair trade practices. So Weidner has been paying 55% tariffs on those, thanks to stacking.
Trump campaigned on a vow to use tariffs to pull manufacturing back to U.S. shores and collect revenue to help fund a major tax cut. His battle with China quickly spiraled into a conflagration with the U.S. imposing a 145% across-the-board tariff that shut down much of the trade between the world's two largest economies.
The agreement to curb the tariffs is part of a larger effort to negotiate individual deals with most of the U.S.'s trading partners.
On Wednesday, a White House official said the 55% figure represents a sum of a baseline 10% 'reciprocal' tariff Trump has imposed on goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the U.S.; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term.
'It sounds like that's the way he's thinking of the baseline - 55% - at least for some products," said Greta Peisch, a trade lawyer at Wiley Rein in Washington.
Ramon van Meer's business selling filtered shower heads from China may yet survive the trade war, though he's not certain.
That depends entirely on whether he can can manage the multiple tariffs placed on his $159 shower heads, which became a viral sensation on Instagram.
When the Trump administration trimmed tariffs on China to 30% in May, van Meer's tariff bill was actually 43%. That's because the 30% tariff was stacked on top of an existing 13% tariff.
It's an improvement over the 145% tariffs slapped on Chinese imports in April, when he halted shipments entirely.
'At least I can afford to pay it,' said van Meer, chief executive of Afina, based in Austin, Texas, referring to his latest calculations. "And I don't have to raise the price by that much."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
40 minutes ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen's return as China hawk ends talk of diplomatic reset
Summer has arrived in Brussels with a new trend: the doves are out, the hawks are in. After weeks of telegraphing signs towards a diplomatic rapprochement with China, or at least a thaw, Ursula von der Leyen made an abrupt volte face at the G7 summit with a broadside attack against Beijing's "pattern of dominance, dependency and blackmail" vis-à-vis its trading partners, including the European Union and the United States. "China has largely shown its unwillingness to live within the constraints of the rules-based international system," von der Leyen said in her intervention. "While others opened their market, China focused on undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains," she went on. "This is not market competition – it is distortion with intent." The president of the European Commission declared, point blank, that the source of "the biggest collective problem" in the global trading system lay in China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2001. Beijing's entry into the WTO has been highly controversial as it opened international markets to a wave of low-cost exports. The admission is linked to the so-called "China shock" and a decline in manufacturing jobs in both the EU and the US. At the G7 summit, von der Leyen warned a "new China shock" was underway. It was a gloves-off denunciation that laid bare the state of mind of the Commission chief, her mounting displeasure and exasperation. In many ways, it was a return to the hawkish stance of her first mandate, during which she famously promoted the concept of "de-risking" to slash vulnerable dependencies that China could exploit. Beijing was quick to hit back at von der Leyen's invective. Guo Jiakun, the spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry, called her remarks "baseless" and "biased". Guo, however, did not miss the chance to offer a new olive branch. "China stands ready to increase communication and coordination with the EU, properly handle trade differences, and achieve win-win and shared prosperity," he said. "That said, we firmly oppose any attempt to hurt China's right to development or even assert one's own interests at China's expense." The reset that never was The conciliatory attempt fits in with Beijing's "charm offensive", as diplomats call it, towards the bloc in response to the disruptive policies of US President Donald Trump, who has imposed punitive tariffs on allies and adversaries alike. Sensing an impending rupture in the Western alliance, China has made several overtures to curry favour with Brussels, including lifting controversial sanctions on lawmakers, ahead of a much-anticipated EU-China summit in late July. Last month, Chinese President Xi Jinping hailed the 50th anniversary of bilateral relations as an opportunity to "open up a brighter future" in diplomacy. Von der Leyen replied: "We remain committed to deepening our partnership with China. A balanced relationship, built on fairness and reciprocity, is in our common interest." But in her G7 intervention, delivered with Trump in the room, this commitment was conspicuous by its absence. Instead, she let the hawk fly free and wild. At the core of her speech was Beijing's recent decision to restrict the sales of seven rare earth materials, which she said amounted to "weaponising" trade. China holds a quasi-monopolistic position over rare earths, the 17 metallic elements that are essential for building cutting-edge technologies. The country commands roughly 60% of the world's supply and 90% of the processing and refining capacity. Although the restrictions have eased in recent days, von der Leyen cautioned "the threat remains" and called on the G7 to close ranks to pile extra pressure on China. Rare earths are just the tip of an iceberg made up of commercial disputes that have driven a stark wedge between Brussels and Beijing. The past few years have seen the bloc impose steep duties on China-made electric vehicles, exclude Chinese companies from public tenders of medical devices, label Huawei and ZTE as "high-risk suppliers" of 5G networks, and launch investigations into suspicious uses of industrial subsidies. Brussels has also accused Beijing of engaging in large-scale campaigns of foreign information manipulations and interference (known as FIMI), hacking into state agencies, fuelling military tensions in the Taiwan Strait, violating the human rights of the Uyghur population and acting as the "key enabler" of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Despite loud pleas from Europeans, Xi Jinping has doubled down on his "no-limits" partnership with Vladimir Putin, causing dismay and outrage across the continent. By offering no significant concessions and sticking to its long-standing practices, China has missed the opportunity offered by von der Leyen after Trump's inauguration, says Noah Barkin, a visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund. "Von der Leyen's unvarnished criticisms of China at the G7 summit are a response to Beijing's intransigence. Unless China shows a willingness to address Europe's concerns, the summit in July is unlikely to produce any deliverables of substance," Barkin said. "The likelihood is that tensions between the EU and China will continue to grow. The closing of the US market to Chinese products will lead to a diversion of exports into Europe, increasing the threat to European industry. And the withdrawal of US support for Ukraine will turn China's support for Russia into an even bigger problem for Europe." Keeping it real Although von der Leyen has earned plaudits for her clear-eyed, matter-of-fact assessment of EU-China relations, her views have not become universally accepted by member states, the true guardians of political power. In April, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez flew to Beijing, held a bilateral meeting with President Xi and made a plea to turn the page on the confrontational approach. "Spain is in favour of more balanced relations between the European Union and China, of finding negotiated solutions to our differences, which we have, and of greater cooperation in areas of common interest," Sánchez said. The Spaniard's words immediately caught the attention of Brussels and sent speculation of a diplomatic reset into overdrive. But Alicja Bachulska, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), says the buzzy discourse was never credible. "Hopes of a possible reset, if any, were mostly projected by those who do not see eye-to-eye with von der Leyen's Commission," Bachulska told Euronews. "This Commission seems quite consistent in explaining its approach towards China and how it sees the threats, the challenges, and the very limited opportunities for cooperation with China under current conditions." Politics, of course, come with economics attached. For many countries, particularly those export-oriented, China remains an extraordinarily valuable market of 1.4 billion people, despite the multiple obstacles and hurdles that European companies face when doing business. With Trump threatening a whopping 50% tariff on the bloc if trade talks fail, having a cushion to fall onto is considered indispensable to avoid – or at least mitigate – the potential ravaging impact. Trade will be at the very top of the agenda at the EU-China summit, with both sides looking forward to having something to announce. Brussels is keen to put an end to China's probes into brandy, pork and dairy products, which it considers unjustified. But as the date nears, hopes for a trade breakthrough that can make a tangible difference on the ground and relieve some of the tensions are fading, as von der Leyen's hardened tone at the G7 demonstrated. "It's about being realistic: we still see China as a partner, competitor and rival," a senior diplomat said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We have to be perhaps more confident about our interests, what we can do to pursue them better, but also act when actions are taken that threaten the stability of our continent." A diplomat from another country kept a cool head to lower expectations ahead of the summit, arguing China's alliance with Russia and campaigns of foreign interference remain "serious" and "disturbing" factors with no sign of improvement. "If you want to really deepen ties with us, that's impossible if, at the same time, you behave like this," the diplomat said. "The EU needs to stand up for its own interests, no matter who's in the White House."
LeMonde
3 hours ago
- LeMonde
Vice President JD Vance blames California Democrats for immigration protests and calls Senator Alex Padilla 'Jose'
Vice President JD Vance on Friday, June 20, accused California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of encouraging violent immigration protests as he used his appearance in Los Angeles to rebut criticism from state and local officials that the Trump administration fueled the unrest by sending in federal officers. Vance also referred to US Senator Alex Padilla, the state's first Latino senator, as "Jose Padilla," a week after the Democrat was forcibly taken to the ground by officers and handcuffed after speaking out during a Los Angeles news conference by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on immigration raids . "I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question," Vance said, in an apparent reference to the altercation at Noem's event. "I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theater. And that's all it is. They want to be able to go back to their far-left groups and to say, 'Look, me, I stood up against border enforcement. I stood up against Donald Trump,'" Vance added. A spokesperson for Padilla, Tess Oswald, noted in a social media post that Padilla and Vance were formerly colleagues in the Senate and said that Vance should know better. "He should be more focused on demilitarizing our city than taking cheap shots," Oswald said. Vance's visit to Los Angeles to tour a multiagency Federal Joint Operations Center and a mobile command center came as demonstrations calmed down in the city and a curfew was lifted this week. That followed over a week of sometimes-violent clashes between protesters and police and outbreaks of vandalism and looting that followed immigration raids across Southern California. Trump's dispatching of his top emissary to Los Angeles at a time of turmoil surrounding the Israel-Iran war and the US's future role in it signals the political importance Trump places on his hard-line immigration policies. Vance echoed the president's harsh rhetoric toward California Democrats as he sought to blame them for the protests in the city. "Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass, by treating the city as a sanctuary city, have basically said that this is open season on federal law enforcement," Vance said after he toured federal immigration enforcement offices. "What happened here was a tragedy," Vance added. "You had people who were doing the simple job of enforcing the law and they had rioters egged on by the governor and the mayor, making it harder for them to do their job. That is disgraceful. And it is why the president has responded so forcefully." Newsom's spokesperson Izzy Gardon said in a statement, "The Vice President's claim is categorically false. The governor has consistently condemned violence and has made his stance clear." Speaking at City Hall, Bass said Vance was "spewing lies and utter nonsense." She said hundreds of millions of dollars were wasted by the federal government on a "stunt." "How dare you say that city officials encourage violence? We kept the peace," Bass said. In a statement on X, Newsom responded to Vance's reference to "Jose Padilla," saying the comment was no accident. Jose Padilla also is the name of a convicted Al-Qaeda terrorism plotter during President George W. Bush's administration, who was sentenced to two decades in prison. Padilla was arrested in 2002 at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport during the tense months after the 9/11 attacks and accused of the "dirty bomb" mission. It later emerged through US interrogation of other Al-Qaeda suspects that the "mission" was only a sketchy idea, and those claims never surfaced in the South Florida terrorism case.
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Pro-Palestinian protest leader released from US custody
Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to a US citizen and has a US-born son, has been in custody since March facing potential deportation. "This shouldn't have taken three months," Khalil, wearing a Palestinian keffiyeh scarf, told US media outside an immigration detention center in Jena, Louisiana hours after a federal judge ordered his release. "(President Donald) Trump and his administration, they chose the wrong person for this," he said. "There's no right person who should be detained for actually protesting a genocide." The Department of Homeland Security criticized District Judge Michael Farbiarz's ruling Friday as an example of how "out of control members of the judicial branch are undermining our national security." Under the terms of his release, Khalil will not be allowed to leave the United States except for "self-deportation," and faces restrictions on where he can travel within the country. Khalil's wife, Michigan-born dentist Noor Abdalla, said her family could now "finally breathe a sigh of relief and know that Maumoud is on his way home." "We know this ruling does not begin to address the injustices the Trump administration has brought upon our family and so many others the government is trying to silence for speaking out against Israel's ongoing genocide against Palestinians," added Abdalla, who gave birth to the couple's first child while her husband was in detention. Visas revoked Since his March 8 arrest by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, Khalil has become a symbol of Trump's campaign to stifle pro-Palestinian student activism against the Gaza war, in the name of curbing anti-Semitism. At the time a graduate student at Columbia University in New York, Khalil was a prominent leader of nationwide campus protests against Israel's war in Gaza. Following his arrest, US authorities transferred Khalil, who was born in Syria to Palestinian parents, nearly 2,000 kilometers (1,242 miles) from his home in New York to the detention center in Louisiana, pending deportation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has invoked a law approved during the 1950s Red Scare that allows the United States to remove foreigners seen as adverse to US foreign policy. Rubio argues that US constitutional protections of free speech do not apply to foreigners and that he alone can make decisions without judicial review. Hundreds of students have seen their visas revoked, with some saying they were targeted for everything from writing opinion articles to minor arrest records. Farbiarz ruled last week that the government could not detain or deport Khalil based on Rubio's assertions that his presence on US soil poses a national security threat. The government has also alleged as grounds to detain and deport Khalil that there were inaccuracies in his application for permanent residency. Amol Sinha, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, which is among the groups representing Khalil, welcomed the release order.
