Trump Is Calling Handcuffed Senator Vile Racial Slur: Author
Donald Trump is trying to justify federal agents handcuffing California Senator Alex Padilla by suggesting that he 'looked like an illegal,' his leading biographer has revealed.
'Trump saw these pictures and then has been on the phone saying to people, 'Nobody's ever heard of this guy,'' Michael Wolff, the bestselling author, said this week on The Daily Beast Podcast. 'As though that's an excuse. And then he's gone on to say, 'and he looks like an illegal.''
Padilla, the son of Mexican immigrants, was thrown to the ground Thursday after going to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference in Los Angeles and trying to ask her a question.
Noem was bashing California lawmakers after mass protests in Los Angeles erupted against ICE raids when the attack started.
Padilla decided to interrupt the conference to demand why she was 'exaggerating and embellishing.' He was in the middle of asking his question when Noem's security shoved him out of the room. He could be heard repeatedly identifying himself as a United States senator.
Once in the hallway, the agents—who included Secret Service and FBI—pushed him to the ground and handcuffed his hands behind his back.
Wolff said that Trump excused the assault by dismissing Padilla as an immigrant nobody.
'If you are famous, that would obviously put you in a different category and ICE agents would not have tackled you,' said Wolff, explaining Trump's rationale.
'Padilla is actually a relatively new senator from California, nobody knows about this person. Therefore, perfectly understandable that the ICE agents would tackle him. And of course he looks like 'an illegal.'
'This is just his visceral response: Nobody's ever heard of him,' Wolff added. 'We can take the blame off the ICE agents because they haven't heard about this guy.'
Wolff said that Trump was 'a little unsettled by the Padilla thing' and is attempting to sweep it under the rug. Democratic lawmakers had seized on it as an unconstitutional outrage and even two Republican senators—Alaska's Lisa Murkowski and Maine's Susan Collins, both on-off Trump critics—had spoken out against it.
'He's rationalizing this in some way which might brand him as a complete racist once more,' Wolff added. 'Although I'm sure he doesn't particularly care about that.'
In response White House Communications Director Steven Cheung recycled a previous attack on Wolff and said, 'Michael Wolff is a lying sack of s--t and has been proven to be a fraud. He routinely fabricates stories originating from his sick and warped imagination, only possible because he has a severe and debilitating case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his peanut-sized brain.'
Padilla was the first Latino president of the L.A. City Council. He was elected to the Senate in 2022 and is now the senior senator from the state.
Trump has indulged in anti-immigrant stereotypes long before this year's mass immigration crackdown. When announcing his presidential bid in 2015, he said that Mexico was sending criminals and 'rapists' across the border.
'They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us,' he said at the time. 'They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.'
He also raised eyebrows during his final 2016 presidential debate saying that he wanted to get the 'bad hombres' out of the United States.
A key pillar of Trump's second presidency has been immigration. He has upended immigration policy through executive orders and an aggressive campaign of raids, detentions, and deportations.
Noem's excuse for her agents tackling Padilla was that the senator lunged at her despite them being far apart and several videos showing no evidence to back up her claim.
The manhandling of Padilla has incited a wave of backlash from 2028 presidential hopefuls like Governor Gavin Newsom, who called the assault 'outrageous, dictatorial, and shameful.'
'Trump and his shock troops are out of control,' he said. 'This must end now."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paterson Dems ready to vote for new party leaders for first time in more than a decade
PATERSON — For the first time in more than a decade, the leadership of the Paterson Democratic Committee will be changing hands in a contest that emerged less than a week before the voting. In an internal party election on June 23, two slates of women prominent in Paterson political circles will be vying for the chairperson and co-chairperson positions. On one side are Oshin Castillo Cruz, a former Paterson Board of Education member, and Della McCall, who currently serves on the school board. Competing against them are two city council members, Maritza Davila and Lilisa Mimms, both of whom are up for reelection next four of them work in government jobs — Castillo Cruz at the Passaic County Board of Social Services, McCall in municipal government, Davila at Passaic County Community College, and Mimms in the Paterson School District. Both slates are using much of the same language — including references to unity and community — to explain why city Democrats should pick them. 'I feel this is an opportunity to unify the party with a different flair than what we've been used to, with a different way of running things,' said McCall. Davila said, 'We want to unite the party so it can come together to show the greatness of our city.' Mayor Andre Sayegh did not respond when asked which ticket he would be supporting. Senator Benjie Wimberly said he has not yet made up his mind. Political insiders said the winners will be asked to play key roles as the Passaic County Democratic organization tries to rebound from recent setbacks. Twice in the past six months, party leaders backed candidates for the state Legislature who fell short, including the recent Assembly primary in which self-described 'nontraditional candidate' Kenyatta Stewart won by more than 1,000 votes. Al Abdelaziz and John Givens, who have served as co-chairmen of the city Democratic committee for more than 10 years, decided not to continue in those roles, political insiders said. Neither Abdelaziz nor Givens responded to messages seeking their comments for this story. Several Democratic committee members said they only learned during the past several weeks that Abdelaziz and Givens would not try to retain the leadership posts. Abdelaziz in June survived a strong primary challenge to emerge as one of the Democratic candidates for state Assembly in the 35th legislative district. In January, Abdelaziz had been picked to fill an unexpired term in the Assembly. The only people allowed to vote in the June 23 contest for local party leadership will be members of the city Democratic committee, which is composed of two representatives for each of the 68 election districts in Paterson. At present about 20 of those spots are vacant. Davila said she didn't know Castillo Cruz and McCall were seeking the chairperson posts when she and Mimms decided to run for the spots. Castillo Cruz said she and McCall already had sent out letters asking Democratic committee members for support when she found out Davila and Mimms were also running. Political operatives said the behind-the-scenes alliances forged in the Democratic leadership contest likely will impact the Paterson City Council's vote on July 1 for president of the government body. Traditionally, the council presidency — which comes with the power to set meeting agendas — becomes more heavily coveted in the year before a mayoral election, which this is. 'Paterson deserves great leadership that will unify, strengthen, empower, and progressively move our city, state, county, and nation forward,' said Mimms. 'Our Democratic Party needs to grow,' said Castillo Cruz. 'It needs to move forward and educate our community and involve the younger generation.' This article originally appeared on Paterson Dems ready to vote for new party leaders
USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
Suspected killer of Minnesota lawmaker is a doomsday 'prepper' with 'bailout' plan
Recently unsealed court filings reveal how Vance Boelter was preparing himself and his family for a catastrophic event. Police found his wife with two guns and around $10,000 in cash. The man suspected of killing a Minnesota lawmaker and her husband in a brazen attack while dressed as a police officer is a doomsday "prepper" who set aside passports, guns and hordes of cash in the event of a catastrophe, newly unsealed federal court documents show. Vance Boelter's wife relayed the doomsday plans after she was interviewed by police during a manhunt for Boelter after he allegedly shot four people on June 14, according to the complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota. "During an interview, Boelter's wife identified that she had recently received a group text message from Boelter in a group text thread with their kids," FBI Special Agent Terry Getsch wrote. "The text stated something to the effect of they should prepare for war, they needed to get out of the house and people with guns may be showing up to the house." Law enforcement stopped Boelter's wife while she was traveling with her four children to visit friends northwest of the metro area, the federal complaint said. In the car, officers found a safe, all of the children's passports as well as Boelter's, about $10,000 in cash, a revolver pistol in the glove box and another semi-automatic pistol in a cooler, the FBI says in the complaint. Boelter, 57, is accused of killing state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, and seriously wounding state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. The new information about Boelter and his family comes nearly a week after the attack that investigators say Boelter "extensively researched" and planned. He compiled a list of mostly Democratic state lawmakers and their addresses; he fitted his SUV with lights and a fake license plate to resemble a police squad car; and he purchased a silicone mask and a cache of weapons, according to a 20-page affidavit filed in federal court. Details about what Boelter's wife was carrying come after federal investigators revealed that Boelter sent multiple texts to her and the children hours after the shootings. In a group chat, he sent the following message at 6:18 a.m.: 'Dad went to war last night … I dont wanna say more because I dont wanna implicate anybody.' Around the same time, his wife received a separate message from Boelter. 'Words are not gonna explain how sorry I am for this situation … there's gonna be some people coming to the house armed and trigger-happy and I don't want you guys around.' Boelter was arrested late June 15 following the largest manhunt in Minnesota state history, authorities said. Federal prosecutors charged him with several counts of murder and stalking. Minnesota authorities say they believe Boelter impersonated law enforcement to gain access to the victims' homes, exchanged gunfire with police and fled on foot outside Minneapolis. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz called Hortman's killing a "politically motivated assassination." What else to know about Boelter? At various times, Boelter has claimed to work in the food service industry. In other moments, he's claimed he runs large firms involved with 'security situations' overseas, including Africa, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The recently unsealed court filings said Boelter worked at Red Lion, a 'security company and fishing outfit in Congo, Africa.' On LinkedIn, Boelter called himself CEO of Red Lion, according to reporting by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, part of the USA TODAY Network, though the Red Lion website linked to his LinkedIn profile was down and Boelter said he was open to work. He also appeared as a speaker for a Minnesota nonprofit serving African immigrant communities. Minnesota Africans United, a Brooklyn Park nonprofit, said in a statement that Boelter participated in an August 2022 virtual webinar about trade and investment in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Boelter's participation as a speaker was facilitated by a third party, the statement said. He was never hired, paid or contracted by the nonprofit, which had no contact with him since the one-time appearance. A biography for the session described Boelter as having worked in Congo and for a security guard company. USA TODAY previously reported that a LinkedIn page believed to belong to Boelter showed he attended St. Cloud State University. University spokesperson Zach Dwyer confirmed Boelter graduated in 1996. Childhood friend called police on Boelter David Carlson, 59, told Reuters that he has been sharing a house in Minneapolis with Boelter for a little more than a year and last saw him the night of June 13. At about 6 a.m. on June 14, he received a text from Boelter. "He said that he might be dead soon," said Carlson, who called police. Carlson, who has known Boelter since fourth grade, said Boelter worked for an eye donation center and stayed at the house because it was close to his job. Carlson said he feels betrayed by Boelter and heartbroken for the victims, adding: "His family has got to suffer through this." Federal authorities said the Boelter family home was in Green Isle, Minnesota, about one mile from where he was ultimately captured. The Minnesota city of around 600 people is about an hour southwest of the Twin Cities. Green Isle is a small community, Mayor Shane Sheets told USA TODAY. Boelter had no known political involvement or affiliation in the city, he said
The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
How Senate Republicans want to change the tax breaks in Trump's big bill
WASHINGTON (AP) — House and Senate Republicans are taking slightly different approaches when it comes to the tax cuts that lawmakers are looking to include in their massive tax and spending cuts bill. Republicans in the two chambers don't agree on the size of a deduction for state and local taxes. And they are at odds on such things as allowing people to use their health savings accounts to help pay for their gym membership, or whether electric vehicle and hybrid owners should have to pay an annual fee. The House passed its version shortly before Memorial Day. Now the Senate is looking to pass its version. While the two bills are similar on the major tax provisions, how they work out their differences in the coming weeks will determine how quickly they can get a final product over the finish line. President Donald Trump is pushing to have the legislation on his desk by July 4th. Here's a look at some of the key differences between the two bills: The child tax credit currently stands at $2,000 per child. The House bill temporarily boosts the child tax credit to $2,500 for the 2025 through 2028 tax years, roughly the length of President Donald Trump's second term. It also indexes the credit amount for inflation beginning in 2027. The Senate bill provides a smaller, initial bump-up to $2,200, but the bump is permanent, with the credit amount indexed for inflation beginning next year. Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would seek to end income taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security benefits. Also, he would give car buyers a new tax break by allowing them to deduct the interest paid on auto loans. The House and Senate bills incorporate those promises with temporary deductions lasting from the 2025 through 2028 tax years, but with some differences. The House bill creates a deduction on tips for those working in jobs that have customarily received tips. The House also provides for a deduction for overtime that's equal to the amount of OT a worker has earned. The Senate bill comes with more restrictions. The deduction for tips is limited to $25,000 per taxpayer and the deduction for overtime is limited to $12,500 per taxpayer. The House and Senate bills both provide a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on loans for vehicles made in the United States. And on Social Security, the bills don't directly touch the program. Instead, they grant a larger tax deduction for Americans age 65 and older. The House sets the deduction at $4,000. The Senate sets it at $6,000. Both chambers include income limits over which the new deductions begin to phase out. The caps on state and local tax deductions, known in Washington as the SALT cap, now stand at $10,000. The House bill, in a bid to win over Republicans from New York, California and New Jersey, lifts the cap to $40,000 per household with incomes of less than $500,000. The credit phases down for households earning more than $500,000. The Senate bill keeps the cap at $10,000. That's a non-starter in the House, but Republicans in the two chambers will look to negotiate a final number over the coming weeks that both sides can accept. The House bill prohibits states from establishing new provider taxes or increasing existing taxes. These are taxes that Medicaid providers, such as hospitals, pay to help states finance their share of Medicaid costs. In turn, the taxes allow states to receive increased federal matching funds while generally holding providers harmless through higher reimbursements that offset the taxes paid. Such taxes now are effectively capped at 6%. The Senate looks to gradually lower that threshold for states that have expanded their Medicaid populations under the Affordable Care Act, or 'Obamacare,' until it reaches 3.5% in 2031, with exceptions for nursing homes and intermediate care facilities. Industry groups have warned that limiting the ability of states to tax providers may lead to some states making significant cuts to their Medicaid programs as they make up for the lost revenue in other ways. The Medicaid provision could be a flashpoint in the coming House and Senate negotiations. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., was highly critical of the proposed Senate changes. 'This needs a lot of work. It's really concerning and I'm really surprised by it,' he said. 'Rural hospitals are going to be in bad shape.' The House bill would allow companies for five years to fully deduct equipment purchases and domestic research and development expenses. The Senate bill includes no sunset, making the tax breaks permanent, which was a key priority of powerful trade groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Republicans in both chambers are looking to scale back the clean energy tax credits enacted through then-President Joe Biden's climate law. It aimed to boost the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. Under the Senate bill, the tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, but less quickly than under the House bill. Still, advocacy groups fear that the final measure will threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs and drive up household energy costs. The House bill would allow millions of Americans to use their health savings accounts to pay for gym memberships, with a cap of $500 for single taxpayers and $1,000 for joint filers. The Senate bill doesn't include such a provision. The House reinstates a charitable deduction for non-itemizers of $150 per taxpayer. The Senate bill increases that deduction for donations to $1,000 per taxpayer. Republicans in the House bill included a new annual fee of $250 for EV owners and $100 for hybrid owners that would be collected by state motor vehicle departments. The Senate bill excludes the proposed fees. ___
