Atlanta exempts Beltline, other projects from city's tree protection ordinance
The Brief
The Atlanta City Council has voted to temporarily exempt the Beltline and other major infrastructure projects from the city's tree ordinance.
Officials say the tree ordinance slows or obstructs infrastructure projects - causing delays and higher development costs without added public benefit.
The exemption will remain in effect until March 17, 2026, or until the Atlanta City Council approves another revised Tree Protection Ordinance.
ATLANTA - The Atlanta City Council has voted to temporarily exempt the Beltline and other infrastructure projects from the city's tree ordinance.
After a debate at Monday's meeting, the council members voted unanimously to approve the exemption. Two council members, Andrea Boone and Liliana Bakhtiari, did not vote.
The backstory
The tree ordinance is in place to protect the city's tree canopy and regulates what both public and private groups and individuals can do to the "City in a Forest's" foliage.
The most recent update to the ordinance was in late 2023, when the city made changes to increase canopy cover and support preservation of the plants.
The city's goal is to have its tree canopy covering 50% of its land area, but a 2024 report from Rough Draft showed the number has dropped to a tad more than 46%.
While advocates for the ordinance point to its positive impact on energy costs and air quality, officials say the restrictions slow or obstruct infrastructure projects - causing delays and higher development costs without added public benefit.
What we know
City council members say the exemption will allow the city to clear a backlog of projects that have been delayed by the ordinance.
The measure would make public infrastructure projects involving the Atlanta Beltline and the Path Foundation exempt. Also included would be projects administered by the City of Atlanta's Department of Watershed Management (DWM), Department of Transportation (ATLDOT), and Department of Enterprise Assets Management (DEAM).
Despite the exemption, the new measure would ask the city to plant trees on project sites "to the maximum extent feasible."
Departments given the exemption will be asked to submit annual reports on how their ongoing infrastructure projects affect the canopy and what they are doing to mitigate the reduction.
What's next
The exemption will remain in effect until March 17, 2026, or until the Atlanta City Council approves another revised Tree Protection Ordinance.
The Source
Information for this story came from the Tree Protection Ordinance, the Atlanta City Council's motion, and a report from Rough Draft.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Atlanta BeltLine pushing to get as much of it done as possible ahead of 2026 World Cup games
The Atlanta BeltLine just passed a $242 million budget as it hopes to accelerate its work ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The news comes as the Southside beltline still needs some major construction work. That's good news for Mike Trettel. He's lived in the area for seven years and doesn't like the progress he's seen. 'The speed at which it's going is pretty disappointing. Maybe turn that to very disappointing,' Trettel said. TRENDING STORIES: Suspect found hiding in the woods after man shot, killed in DeKalb County 14-year-old shot at skating rink in Clayton County Fulton County school board approves policy that restricts K-8 students from using electronics Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. said it's moving forward with its new fiscal year 2026 budget, $242 million. Most of that is from a tax allocation district, a special service district, philanthropic support and federal grants. This is how it's divided up its needs moving forward: $99 million for trail design and construction. $41 million for affordable housing along the trail. $56 million to acquire key pieces of real estate. $11 million for economic development Nearly $9 million for transit. Chloe Buben enjoys the BeltLine, even though she can't quite run on the southern section of it yet. 'I like that it's a good running area. I like running along it. It's really pretty. It seems safe,' she told Channel 2's Richard Elliot. Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. said it wants to try and do as much as it can in time for the 2026 FIFA World Cup. For Trettel, he said the time for trying has passed. He needs to see some results. 'I believe it would be good news if the word 'try' gets out of there. You need to actually have some progress,' Trettel said. They're hoping to have all 22 miles of the BeltLine trail ready to go within the next five years.
Hamilton Spectator
12-06-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
MCK Grand Chief returns from diplomatic mission to Washington with Jay Treaty Border Alliance
Mohawk Council of Kahnawake Grand Chief Cody Diabo has returned from a two-day diplomatic visit to Washington, D.C. last week, as part of the Jay Treaty Border Alliance (JTBA) delegation. Diabo said the delegation met with a bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers, including congressional representatives, members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security, to advocate for changes to the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The JTBA is calling for the removal of a clause in the INA that requires individuals to prove at least 50 percent 'American Indian blood' in order to exercise cross-border rights under the Jay Treaty. Diabo argued that the blood quantum requirement is outdated and does not reflect how identity and membership are defined within the Kanien'kehá:ka Nation today. 'Kahnawake doesn't go by blood quantum anymore; we go by lineage,' Diabo said. 'So, it counteracts our law that we've established as a community.' The JTBA delegation presented a proposal to amend the INA by replacing the blood quantum requirement with recognition based on U.S. tribal membership, Indian status under Canada's Indian Act, or membership within a self-governing First Nation. Diabo said these changes are long overdue, stressing that Indigenous peoples are the only group still legally defined by blood quantum. 'Why are we still being scrutinized to this level?' Diabo asked. 'We determined who our members are. A simple notice or letter saying they're a member of our community should suffice, rather than saying they need 50 percent [Indigenous blood] or more in order to cross the border.' In the end, Diabo says that all the parties he met with during his visit last week appeared very receptive to the idea this time. The JTBA is a grassroots coalition of intertribal and First Nations leaders advocating for the right of Indigenous peoples to live, work and travel freely across the Canada–U.S. border. The group takes its name from the 1794 Jay Treaty between the U.S. and Great Britain, which forms the legal basis for Indigenous border-crossing rights recognized in the INA. But according to Thomas Deer, historical and cultural liaison for the Kanien'kehá:ka Onkwawén:na Raotitióhkwa Language and Cultural Center, the treaty did not create that right — it merely recognized it. 'Our rights derived from the inherent sovereignty vested in the Kanien'kehá:ka Nation and the Rotinonhsión:ni Confederacy, and the treaty relationships we've forged with the colonists - such as the Two Row Wampum and the Covenant Chain,' Deer said. 'As a distinct and sovereign Onkwehón:we nation, we have the inherent right to freely travel and trade throughout this entire continent.' Still, Deer admitted, 'it is a useful tool for border crossing.' Considering the significant impact and ramifications of the Jay Treaty, Deer urged young people to learn their history and understand where their rights come from, as both the U.S. and Canada continue to chip away at those rights. 'Our young people should become well acquainted with our history and understand where our rights come from so that they have the ammunition to fight back against the United States and Canada when they refuse to recognize our rights and freedoms,' Deer said. 'Ultimately, our rights and freedoms come with a heavy burden of responsibility - a responsibility that is rooted in our worldview as Onkwehón:we.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
Trump administration hit with second lawsuit over restrictions on asylum access
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — Immigration advocates filed a class action lawsuit Wednesday over the Trump administration's use of a proclamation that effectively put an end to being able to seek asylum at ports of entry to the United States. The civil lawsuit was filed in a Southern California federal court by the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, the American Immigration Council, Democracy Forward, and the Center for Constitutional Rights. The lawsuit is asking the court to find the proclamation unlawful, set aside the policy ending asylum at ports of entry and restore access to the asylum process at ports of entry, including for those who had appointments that were canceled when President Donald Trump took office. Unlike a similar lawsuit filed in February in a Washington, D.C., federal court representing people who had already reached U.S. soil and sought asylum after crossing between ports of entry, Wednesday's lawsuit focuses on people who are not on U.S. soil and are seeking asylum at ports of entry. No response was immediately issued by the Department of Homeland Security or Customs and Border Protection, which were both among the defendants listed. Trump's sweeping proclamation issued on his first day in office changed asylum policies, effectively ending asylum at the border. The proclamation said the screening process created by Congress under the Immigration and Nationality Act 'can be wholly ineffective in the border environment' and was 'leading to the unauthorized entry of innumerable illegal aliens into the United States.' Immigrant advocates said that under the proclamation noncitizens seeking asylum at a port of entry are asked to present medical and criminal histories, a requirement for the visa process but not for migrants who are often fleeing from immediate danger. 'Nothing in the INA or any other source of law permits Defendants' actions,' the immigrant advocates wrote in their complaint. Thousands of people who sought asylum through the CBP One app, a system developed under President Joe Biden, had their appointments at ports of entry canceled on Trump's first day in office as part of the proclamation that declared an invasion at the border. 'The Trump administration has taken drastic steps to block access to the asylum process, in flagrant violation of U.S. law,' the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies stated in a news release Wednesday.
