Signs of Terry Pratchett's dementia hidden in his novels
Scientists reading between the lines of Terry Pratchett's novels believe they have spotted early signs of the author's dementia years before he was diagnosed. A study of 33 of Pratchett's Discworld books found he used simpler language in his later works, which can be a sign of dementia. The British fantasy writer, who died 10 years ago this week, revealed in 2007 that he had a rare form of Alzheimer's disease. The latest research suggests signs of linguistic decline were evident as early as 1998's The Last Continent. As time went on, Pratchett used less varied nouns, verbs and adjectives in his work, researchers told the New Scientist, despite an increase in the overall word count of his books. "This demonstrates a long preclinical period of dementia and the subtle impairments that aren't necessarily picked up by traditional cognitive tests," Loughborough University researcher Thom Wilcockson told the magazine. Pratchett had a form of the disease called posterior cortical atrophy, which damages the rear of the brain. People living with it tend to have problems with their vision and may struggle with words and numbers, the UK's Alzheimer's Society says. It says the first symptoms tend to occur when people are in their 50s or 60s, but early signs are "often subtle" and do not immediately prompt a diagnosis. Pratchett was 59 when he was diagnosed, saying he could no longer type and had given up his driving licence. He continued writing and his 41st and final Discworld book, The Shepherd's Crown, was published in 2015, six months after his death at the age of 66. He also donated money to Alzheimer's research in the hope a cure would be found before he died. Marking the anniversary of his death, Pratchett's former assistant Rob Wilkins said the author "indisputably lives on" in the minds of his readers. "While his words live on, so does Terry, and that will be the case, no question, not just for this one decade so quickly gone but for many further decades to come, "he said. Agatha Christie's detective novels have similarly been put under the microscope in the past, by researchers in Canada who suggested she too might have had Alzheimer's. They said the breadth of her vocabulary appeared to have dropped by 15 to 30 per cent towards the end of her life, with more repeated phrases in her work. Researchers found similar trends in the work of the 20th-century novelist Iris Murdoch, who was known to have Alzheimer's when she died in 1999. Her final novel, Jackson's Dilemma, was measured as using the simplest language of all her works.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
a day ago
- Gulf Today
UK debate on assisted dying law was sharp
British lawmakers debated whether to allow assisted dying for terminally ill people ahead of a knife-edge vote on Friday that could see the country take a major step towards legalising euthanasia. The bill was successfully passed and the pro -euthanasia group relaxed. Protesters for and against the legislation demonstrated outside parliament, as inside MPs packed out the lower House of Commons chamber to consider one of Britain's most emotive and significant bills in years. MPs will either approve sending the legislation to the upper House of Lords for the next step — and further scrutiny 1 or end it entirely during a crucial vote expected around 2:30 pm (1330 GMT). Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who has proposed the bill, said changing the law would 'offer a compassionate and safe choice' for terminally ill people. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults with an incurable illness who have a life expectancy of fewer than six months. They would have to be able to administer the life-ending substance themselves, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying, including Belgium and the Netherlands. Supporters say euthanasia would give the terminally ill greater protections and choice at the end of their lives, but critics worry that vulnerable people could be coerced into dying. Outside in Parliament Square, protesters waved placards with slogans including 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers'. David Walker, 82, said he supported changing the law because he saw his wife of 60 years suffer for three years at the end of her life. 'That's why I'm here, because I can't help her anymore, but I can help other people who are going through the same thing, because if you have no quality of life, you have nothing,' he told the media. Elizabeth Burden, a 52-year-old doctor, said she feared the bill could open 'a floodgate' of people being forced to end their lives and urged the government to focus on providing palliative care instead. 'It is a slippery slope. Once we allow this. Everything will slip down because dementia patients, all patients... are vulnerable,' she told the media. A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested the public overwhelmingly supports changing the law, with 73 percent in favour. MPs backed the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November. Since then the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. MPs have also added a safeguard which would prevent a person being eligible 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking', ruling out people with anorexia. Several lawmakers in the 650-seat parliament have subsequently switched positions, and parties are not telling them how to vote, making the outcome difficult to predict. An ITV News tracker of around half the parliamentarians estimates that 162 MPs plan to vote for changing the law, with 152 against. Some 22 remain undecided with another 23 due to abstain. Both the House of Commons and the House of Lords need to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely sometime in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, then it would be four years before an assisted dying service is implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in a decade. If he votes, Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to vote in favour but several of his top ministerial team, including the health and justice secretaries, have publicly opposed changing the law. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Separate legislation is going through the devolved Scottish parliament, while the Isle of Man at the end of March became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill. UK MPs last considered changing the law in 2015 and Leadbeater warned it could be another decade before the issue returns to parliament if MPs reject her bill.
Middle East Eye
4 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Palestinian NHS nurse takes legal action over rebuke for 'antisemitic' watermelon video call
A British-Palestinian NHS nurse is taking legal action against the UK health body after managers ordered him to remove a watermelon image used as his video call background. Ahmad Baker's employers at Whipps Cross Hospital in London said the image of the fruit could be considered as antisemitic, The Guardian reported on Thursday. According to the newspaper, Baker and two other employees said a ban on NHS employees displaying political or national symbols is discriminatory. They said the Barts Health NHS trust, which administers the hospital, had expressed solidarity with Ukraine after its invasion by Russia. "Being told that a still-life painting containing a watermelon could be perceived as antisemitic and being threatened with disciplinary action is deeply upsetting," Baker said. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The watermelon has become a symbol of solidarity with the Palestinian cause, as it shares its colours with the Palestinian flag and is harder for social media algorithms to censor. However, since the 7 October 2023 attacks by Palestinian fighters on southern Israel and the subsequent Israeli war on Gaza, there has been widespread censorship of Palestinian symbols within western institutions. Such symbols are claimed to be antisemitic by supporters of Israel, an accusation dismissed by supporters of the Palestinian cause as an attempt to conflate criticism of Israel with hatred of Jewish people. 'Shut up and fall in line': Israel, Palestine and the dawn of a new censorship in western art Read More » In October 2023, Middle East Eye reported that NHS staff were fearful of expressing solidarity with the Palestinian cause, even in their personal lives, because of potential repercussions from managers. Medical workers said the threats of being referred to the General Medical Council, the government's Prevent anti-terrorism strategy, intimidation from the media and statements made by British politicians made them hesitant to speak up. Many of those who spoke to MEE say the intimidation began when a social media account called @NHSWATCH1948 emerged and began urging people to report any healthcare workers who posted anything pro-Palestine. Mohamed Amir, a Palestinian origin doctor working for the NHS, said he noticed a difference in the way staff were allowed to express views on the conflicts in Ukraine and Palestine. "If you look at it relative to the Ukraine war, it makes you wonder why Palestine is seen as so controversial, because we've had fundraisers at the front of the hospital raising money for Ukraine, and our screensavers had a pro-Ukraine image," Amir said.
Middle East Eye
6 days ago
- Middle East Eye
Humanitarian organisations fear for lives of people in Gaza as spotlight shifts to Iran
A number of humanitarian organisations have told the British parliament they fear colleagues in Gaza will 'die in the dark' as focus shifts from Gaza to Iran, The Guardian reported on Monday. Organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP) and the Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) spoke about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the occupied West Bank. In the opening session, MP Emily Thornberry said Gaza had "gone off the news and it's not like things aren't happening. It's important that we put information before the public'. Rohan Talbot, director of advocacy and campaigns at MAP, said, 'This has been the darkest and most terrifying period of the attacks so far'. Talbot said his colleagues "worry they will die in the dark' after Israel cut the internet in the territory last week. The field coordinator for MSF, Anna Halford, said they have struggled to understand the situation on the ground because of the communication blackout in north and central Gaza. Halford said there had been almost 500 community hubs where people could obtain food in Gaza for the first 19 months of the war, but now there are only four. In addition, the organisation only had four aid trucks enter the territory since 27 May, Halford said. 'There is nothing humanitarian about this system,' she said. 'We are weeks away from having to make choices about quality of care, because there won't be any care to provide.'
