State lawmakers are weighing bills that would treat abortion as homicide

Lawmakers in at least eight states are weighing bills that would treat abortion as a homicide, imposing criminal penalties on both providers and patients, once a Rubicon for the movement.
The bills, filed in Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, South Carolina and Texas, stem from the Prenatal Equal Protection Act, model legislation crafted by the Texas-based advocacy group the Foundation to Abolish Abortion. Three similar bills were introduced in Indiana, North Dakota and Oklahoma but failed to pass in committee or on the floor of the legislature.
In addition to banning abortion, the bills, which argue that life begins at fertilization, could outlaw fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilization.
No state abortion ban explicitly criminalizes pregnant people, and efforts to enact such a policy have consistently failed. Polling shows that most Americans support the right to abortion, and that they specifically oppose penalizing people who seek them.
Still, the number of these homicide bills — last year, only three were introduced across the country, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights — suggests that abortion opponents are growing more receptive to directly punishing people who terminate their pregnancies.
'It's not surprising, though it's incredibly chilling and alarming,' said Lizzie Hinkley, the center's senior state legislative counsel. 'Anti-abortion activists are motivated to push the envelope as far as they can.'
In Georgia, where abortion is currently outlawed after six weeks of pregnancy, lawmakers heard hours of testimony on one such bill, which drew opposition even from anti-abortion activists in the state.
'This is a bad bill. It's bad for women,' testified Elizabeth Edmonds, who has worked as an anti-abortion lobbyist in the state and still supports abortion restrictions.
That bill is not slated for a committee vote, which it needs to advance. Similar legislation in other states has also not moved forward.
Still, abortion opponents are still finding support on other types of bills. In Texas, for instance, lawmakers have rallied around a bill that would stop cities and municipalities from supporting people traveling out of state for abortions and another that seeks to prevent people from ordering abortion medications online. In South Carolina, where abortion is currently banned after six weeks of pregnancy, 38 lawmakers backed a bill that would outlaw virtually all abortions.
Proponents of bills that would treat abortion as homicide — which they call 'abolitionist' abortion policy — acknowledge they are still outside of the anti-abortion movement's mainstream.
'Most major Pro-Life lobby organizations and leaders still oppose equal protection,' Bradley Pierce, who heads the Foundation to Abolish Abortion, wrote in an email to The 19th. 'They oppose abolitionist legislation, which provides that everyone should be equally subject to the law and everyone's life should be equally protected by the law. Instead, they support a policy that singles out women to grant them legal immunity to commit prenatal homicide.'
But more state lawmakers are expressing interest in reclassifying abortion as homicide and criminalizing pregnant people, Pierce said. The Georgia bill has attracted 21 sponsors, the most support one of his five year-old organization's bills has ever had, he said. South Carolina's bill has 10 sponsors. Despite failing to pass, a similar bill in North Dakota received 16 votes.
A dozen states have banned abortion almost entirely and four more have banned it after six weeks. Two ban it after the end of the first trimester, and still more have imposed other restrictions on the procedure. But workarounds such as travel and telehealth mean that the number of abortions in the United States has actually increased since the fall of Roe v. Wade — a development that has left abortion opponents scrambling for new approaches.
Three years ago, similar abortion bills — also the work of Pierce's foundation — were introduced in 13 states, only making it out of committee in Louisiana. But even in that state, where lawmakers largely oppose abortion, the prospect of criminal penalties for pregnant people appeared to be a step too far.
'The most prominent national organizations don't support anything that would criminalize the mother,' Sarah Zargoski, a spokesperson for Louisiana Right to Life, said at the time.
Still, repeated efforts to introduce these bills could chip away at that perspective, Hinkley said.
'Whether they're enacted or not this year, they're going to be normalized in certain circles,' she said.
The post State lawmakers are weighing bills that would treat abortion as homicide appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNBC

30 minutes ago

• CNBC

Trump pledged to be a 'peacemaker' in the Middle East — now the United States is entering a new war

Five months ago, President Donald Trump promised to be a peacemaker and a unifier. Tonight, the United States attacked Iran, hitting three nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. In his inauguration speech on Jan. 20, 2025, Trump told Americans: "We will measure our success not only by the battles we win but also by the wars that we end - and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into." He called his proudest legacy that of a "peacemaker and a unifier." Now, that legacy is under sharp scrutiny. The United States launched a direct military strike on Iran for the first time since the start of the Israel-Iran war earlier this month. Trump confirmed the action in a Truth Social post, saying the operation dropped a "full load of BOMBS on the primary site, Fordow." Iranian state media reported casualties and infrastructure damage but did not immediately confirm the extent of the assault. Saturday's operation marks a strong break from Trump's prior promises to keep the United States out of war. The decision is also a sharp turn from his 2024 campaign pledges to "prevent World War Three" and end "chaos in the Middle East." "I will stop the chaos in the Middle East, and I will prevent world war three. You're very close to World War, you're very close, and we have people that are not the right people to handle that. They are grossly incompetent," Trump told supporters at a rally in Pittsburgh in November last year. Trump has previously been vocal about preventing Iran from reaching nuclear capability. In a speech on Election Day last year, he said Iran "just can't have a nuclear weapon." That position, while consistent, had been paired with vows to avoid war. "I want peace in the Middle East. I want peace. I did the Abraham Accords. I want peace in the Middle East," Trump said at a rally in Greensboro in October last year. A week after Israel launched its attack on Iran, the latest U.S. strike puts Washington in direct conflict with Tehran. The move marks a sharp shift from just 48 hours ago, when Trump suggested the United States would wait "two weeks" to see whether the conflict between Israel and Iran could be resolved diplomatically. "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks," Trump said Thursday in a statement issued by the White House. However, concerns over Iran's nuclear ambitions are not new. Trump has long cited his 2018 withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), as evidence of his tough stance on Tehran. During a town hall in Georgia in October 2024, he called exiting the agreement "the single biggest thing I did" and credited the move with paving the way for the Abraham Accords. With U.S. bombs now falling on Iranian soil, Trump's promises of peace are under renewed scrutiny. As Washington moves deeper into a conflict it once sought to avoid, questions are mounting over what comes next—and whether this marks the end of diplomacy or the start of something bigger.

CBS News

37 minutes ago

• CBS News

Gov. Greg Abbott signs bill requiring Ten Commandments to be displayed in Texas classrooms

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) – Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate. Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state. A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court. The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2. "The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially," Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House. Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours. The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools. Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed. Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom. A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools. In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol. Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by US District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas. State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the US Supreme Court if necessary.

USA Today

an hour ago

• USA Today

Investors react to US attack on Iran nuclear sites

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that a "very successful attack" on three nuclear sites in Iran had been carried out. In a posting on Truth Social, Trump added, "All planes are safely on their way home" and he ended his posting saying, "Now is the time for peace." Following are comments from some financial and corporate analysts: Mark Spindel, CIO, Potomac River Capital, Washington, DC: "I think the markets are going to be initially alarmed and I think oil will open higher. We don't have any damage assessment and that will take some time. Even though he has described this as 'done', we're engaged. What comes next? I think the uncertainty is going to blanket the markets, as now Americans everywhere are going to be exposed. It's going to raise uncertainty and volatility, particularly in oil. "There's plenty of time to deliberate before markets open on Sunday. I'm making arrangements to talk to a few people tomorrow. We'll get an early indication when the dollar opens for trading in New Zealand. This was such a bold action, though, and it's such a big contrast to the comments about negotiating for the next two weeks." Jamie Cox, Managing Partner, Harris Financial Group, Richmond, Virginia: 'Oil is sure to spike on this initial news but will likely level in a few days. With this demonstration of force and total annihilation of its nuclear capabilities, they've lost all of their leverage and will likely hit the escape button to a peace deal." Mark Malek, Chief Investment Officer, Siebert Investment Officer, Siebert Financial, NYC: "I think it's going to be very positive for the stock market. I believe that on Friday if you'd asked me, I would have expected two weeks of volatility with markets trying to analyze every drib and drab of information coming out of the White House and I would have said that it would have been better to make a decision last week. "So this will be reassuring, especially since it seems like a one and done situation and not as if (the US) is seeking a long, drawn out conflict. The biggest risk still out there is the Strait of Hormuz. It could certainly change everything if Iran has the capability to close it." Jack Ablin, Chief Investment Officer of Cresset Capital, Chicago: "This adds a complicated new layer of risk that we'll have to consider and pay attention to... This is definitely going to have an impact on energy prices and potentially on inflation as well." (Reporting by Saeed Azhar, Suzanne McGee. Compiled by Peter Henderson and Vidya Ranganathan)