Operation Sindoor aftermath: Emphasis on vigilance, synergy as CDS conducts strategic review at Northern, Western commands

Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan Sunday visited the Indian Army's Northern Command at Udhampur in Jammu & Kashmir and the Western Command at Chandimandir Military Station, Haryana.
He interacted with the Army Commanders and senior staff officers who were actively involved in the planning and execution of Operation Sindoor.
The CDS, while conducting a strategic review and operational assessment in the Northern and Western theatres during the visit, emphasised the importance of continued vigilance, jointness and synergy across the services to address 'evolving threats', an official statement here said.
At Udhampur, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief Lt Gen Pratik Sharma briefed the CDS on the success of the Northern Army in neutralising the terror network, adversary's assets that supported terror and counter measures taken to protect military assets and civilian population in the country during Operation Sindoor.
The CDS was also apprised about the efforts by the Northern Command in the rehabilitation of the civilians of the border areas who were targeted by the 'adversary', the statement said.
The Northern Army Commander gave an update on the continued operational and logistics preparedness of the Northern Army and assured the CDS of its commitment in protecting the borders, while also launching an all-out effort to eradicate terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir, the statement added.
At Chandimandir, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief Lt Gen Manoj Kumar Katiyar briefed the CDS on the kinetic and non-kinetic punitive response during Operation Sindoor. A detailed overview of the operational environment, defence preparedness and key outcomes of the operation were provided, while underscoring the prevailing security situation along the Western borders.
Inputs on technological infusion and enhanced logistics capability, contributing to high operational efficiency, real-time situational awareness, strengthening the military capability of Western Army were also highlighted. The CDS was also given an insight into Veterans' Care & Medicare facilities extended to serving and retired personnel reflecting the Indian Army's firm commitment to the welfare of those who serve the national cause, the statement said.
General Anil Chauhan remembered the bravehearts who made the supreme sacrifice in the line of duty during Operation Sindoor, lauding the valour, resolve, precision and discipline of all ranks. He acknowledged the operational excellence achieved by the field formations responsible for the Northern and Western borders in Jammu & Kashmir and Punjab, the statement said.
The CDS commended the overall synergy and timely accomplishment of operational tasks under challenging conditions. He exhorted them to render a helping hand in rehabilitation of the civilians who were targeted by the 'adversary'.
The visit concluded with the CDS expressing his deep appreciation for the exemplary conduct and successful execution of military operations which reaffirmed the faith reposed by the nation in its Armed Forces. He attributed the overall success achieved in attaining national security objectives to high morale, discipline and unwavering commitment of the Indian Army.
Under Operation Sindoor, India carried out precision strikes on nine terror infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir early on May 7 in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack.
Following the Indian action, Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9 and 10. The Pakistani attempts were strongly responded to by the Indian side.
Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri on May 10 announced that India and Pakistan reached an understanding to stop all firings and military actions on land, air and sea, with immediate effect.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

First Post

an hour ago

• First Post

Who is General Dan Caine, the ‘architect' of US airstrikes on Iran?

The American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities came after a week of conflict between Israel and the Islamic Republic. General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was a key architect of 'Operation Midnight Hammer', according to several US officials and people familiar with the deliberations. Although he had largely remained out of the spotlight, he has emerged as an influential figure behind the scenes read more Caine is the 22nd Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Reuters/File Photo The US joined forces with Israel in the most significant Western military move against Iran since its 1979 Islamic Revolution, despite appeals from across the globe urging caution and a return to talks. The American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities came after a week of open fighting between Israel and Tehran. Read latest updates about America joining Israel-Iran war here. General Dan Caine , chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the US carried out strikes using 75 precision-guided weapons, including bunker-buster bombs and over two dozen Tomahawk missiles, targeting three Iranian nuclear facilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Caine and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed reporters at the Pentagon, describing the most serious military campaign of Donald Trump's presidency. ALSO READ | Did US strikes destroy Iran's nuclear sites? Can it still build a nuclear bomb? But who is Dan Caine, and what role did he play in the operation? Here's a look: Who is Dan Caine? Caine was a major architect of 'Operation Midnight Hammer', several US officials and people familiar with the deliberations told The Wall Street Journal. Though he had mostly stayed out of the spotlight, he has come out as an influential figure behind the scenes. So, what do we know about him? Caine is the 22nd Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the country's top-ranking military officer and the main military adviser to the President, the Secretary of Defence, and the National Security Council. Before taking on this role on April 11, 2025, he served as Associate Director for Military Affairs at the Central Intelligence Agency. Caine addressed reporters at the Pentagon, describing the most serious military campaign of Donald Trump's presidency. Reuters Over the years, Caine has held several roles across operations, staff duties and joint commands. His background includes serving as an F-16 fighter pilot, weapons officer, White House staff member, and special operations officer. He has also taken part in various leadership and security programmes, including courses at Harvard Kennedy School and Syracuse University's Maxwell School. ALSO READ | Did US use Indian airspace to launch strikes on Iran's nuclear sites? As a Command Pilot, Caine has flown more than 2,800 hours in F-16s, with over 150 hours in combat. Between 2009 and 2016, he served part-time in the National Guard while also working as an entrepreneur and investor. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On September 11, 2001, he was one of the pilots deployed to guard the skies above Washington after the terror attacks. This was the first time fighter jets had been sent to defend the US capital. He returned to active service and served as deputy commander in the US-led fight against ISIS in Iraq and Syria from May 2018 to September 2019, according to his military biography. The same biography also describes him as a 'serial entrepreneur and investor'. What did he say during the briefing? Wearing his military uniform, Caine gave a calm and detailed account of how the strikes on Iranian nuclear sites were carried out. He called for patience and said that the battle damage assessment 'is still pending, and it would be way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there.' Caine described the operation as a 'complex and high-risk mission' known only to a small group of people, and said it included the use of decoys to maintain secrecy. .@TheJointStaff General Dan Caine outlines 'Operation Midnight Hammer' from the Pentagon this morning. You don't get better than General Caine, he is the best of the best, and the real deal—God Bless our United States Military, the GREATEST in the WORLD🌎🇺🇸🦅 — Dan Scavino (@Scavino47) June 22, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As part of the plan, B-2 stealth bombers flew over the Pacific towards Guam on Saturday to divert attention, he said. The actual B-2 bombers used in the mission had already taken off earlier and flew under the cover of darkness for 18 hours to reach their target on Saturday night. He said the B-2s flew nonstop and had to refuel several times mid-air, making it the fleet's longest mission since 2001. According to Caine, 14 bunker-buster bombs were dropped in total, with the first two released at 2 am Iran time. The operation also involved a US submarine, which fired over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles at key targets on the surface. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He added that Iran did not launch fighter jets or surface-to-air missiles during the strike, a sign that it was likely caught off guard. How Iran might respond remains uncertain. Possible actions could include attacks on US forces across West Asia, efforts to block a key oil route, or a move to accelerate its nuclear programme. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that it would be unwise for Iran to strike American bases in the region or the countries that host them. With inputs from agencies

The Print

an hour ago

• The Print

India is losing information war—US backs Israel, hosts Munir, but asks Delhi to show restraint

This comes after the US president loudly trumpeted his pretentious so-called role in brokering a ceasefire between Pakistan and India. Trump added insult to injury by hosting Pakistan Army Chief, Asim Munir, for lunch at the White House. This clearly shows that the so-called strategic ties between the US and India are pretty much superficial and transactional. While in the first case India was urged to show restraint, in spite of being the victim of terrorism for over four decades, no such restraint is being asked for from Israel, with Operation Rising Lion already in its 10th day. The US has even entered Israel's war, striking key nuclear sites, including the deeply hidden Fordow, in Iran. India's Operation Sindoor and Israel's Operation Rising Lion have much in common – in that both were actions to neutralise future threats. The similarities end there. While India focused only on terrorist infrastructure and military installations, Israel went further and struck key figures in the political and military hierarchy, as also nuclear scientists – who are technically non-combatants – in the safety of their homes. The difference in the global reaction is even more stark. When American generals openly admit that they consider Pakistan an ally in the war on terrorism, they are rewarding Pakistan for its policy of state-sponsored terrorism against India. Clearly, we have not been able to convince the global community to initiate any action against Pakistan, which is a fair indication of India's weakness in dominating the narrative and winning the perception battle – partly on account of an overactive and unbridled electronic media. Various articles by international media publications support this view. The Washington Post points out that some media houses created a 'parallel reality', fuelled by several military experts giving their views on the subject. An article in the French daily L' Opinion underscores the same point – while India won militarily, it completely lost the information war. And this helped Pakistan shape the narrative in its favour. On a different note, an opinion article by Ashley J Tellis in Foreign Affairs is downright dismissive of Indian aspirations, perhaps stemming from India's refusal to toe the American line. India did try to stage a comeback by sending seven all-party delegations led by senior leaders and diplomats from across the political spectrum to 32 countries, plus the European Union headquarters in Brussels, effectively covering 33 capitals. The primary aim was to highlight cross-border terrorism from Pakistan, and reinforce India's messaging on counter‑terror and self‑defence after Operation Sindoor. By then, though, the horse had bolted. Also read: Threats to India are not over. Why it must build fortress-like defences China's 'Three Warfares Strategy' What stands out is that winning the perception battle is a continuous, non-incident-related effort. It has to be a concerted policy drawn out at the highest levels, with the implementation left to various organs of the government, and clear directions on what is to be conveyed by whom and in which forum. Off-the-cuff disparaging remarks by ministers past and present do irreparable damage to the information war campaign. The 'Three Warfares Strategy' followed by the Chinese is quite enlightening. In brief, it entails: Information warfare: This facet involves shaping perceptions through controlled narratives disseminated via state-owned media, diplomatic channels, and global platforms. The objective is to garner international support for China's positions while undermining adversaries' credibility. For instance, during the 2016 South China Sea arbitration ruling against China's claims on territories in the region, Beijing utilised its media to label the ruling as a farce, thereby influencing global opinion in its favour. Psychological warfare: Psychological tactics aim to demoralise and destabilise opponents by exploiting their fears and uncertainties. This includes the use of disinformation, threats, and historical references to induce doubt and hesitation. During the 2017 Doklam standoff, China invoked memories of the 1962 border conflict to intimidate India – though unsuccessfully – in an attempt to sway public sentiment and political will. Legal warfare or 'lawfare': Legal warfare involves leveraging international laws and norms to legitimise own claims and actions and delegitimise those of adversaries. By framing its territorial claims and military activities within legal arguments, China seeks to gain diplomatic and legal advantages – as was evident when it dismissed the 2016 South China Sea ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, portraying itself as a defender of international law. Also read: India has only pressed the pause button on Pakistan. It needs serious behavioural change What India must do Apropos, projecting the country's image on a variety of issues is a long-term strategy covering a range of issues, which cannot be evolved overnight or limited as a response to a terrorist related incident. That we have not succeeded in isolating Pakistan makes it imperative for India to have its own version, incorporating: Integrated strategy development: Develop an integrated strategy that combines military readiness with robust information and legal capabilities. This includes enhancing cyber capabilities, strengthening legal frameworks, and improving credible media outreach to counter adversarial narratives. Psychological resilience: Building psychological resilience within the Armed Forces and the civilian population is crucial. Sadly, the Indian public is prone to mass hysteria, a negative trait that is often exploited by our adversaries. Training programmes that focus on information warfare and psychological tactics can prepare the public to respond effectively to adversarial strategies. Legal preparedness: India should strengthen its legal apparatus to challenge adversaries' actions in international forums. This involves training diplomats, defence attaches, and legal experts to navigate complex international laws and norms effectively. Public diplomacy: Engaging in proactive public diplomacy can help shape international opinion in India's favour. This includes transparent communication, strategic media engagements, and participation in international forums to present India's perspectives. While India's media landscape during Operation Sindoor was instrumental in rallying national support and conveying the government's message, it also faced challenges in managing the perception battle due to over-the-top reporting. The amplification of nationalistic sentiment, coupled with the spread of misinformation, was actually detrimental to the national interest, highlighting the complexities of information warfare in contemporary conflicts. While this kind of coverage might have swayed domestic audiences, it did little in terms of garnering support internationally. Moving forward, a balanced information warfare strategy, which identifies the various target audiences and themes for each, along with the modes of dissemination, needs to be formulated. A theme that works well for domestic audiences may fall flat on the global stage. Combining emotional resonance with factual reporting will be crucial in navigating the perception war, the campaign for which must start now. General Manoj Mukund Naravane PVSM AVSM SM VSM is a retired Indian Army General who served as the 28th Chief of the Army Staff. Views are personal. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)

Hindustan Times

an hour ago

• Hindustan Times

Ukraine war: 5 dead, several injured after Russia's 'massive attack' on Kyiv

As the Ukraine war rages on, Russia has reportedly carried out a "massive attack" in Kyiv on Monday. As per reports, the Russian attack has killed at least five people and injured dozens in the Ukrainian capital. Firefighters work in a destroyed apartment building after a Russian attack in Kyiv, Ukraine, (AP) "Another massive attack on the capital. Possibly, several waves of enemy drones," said a statement from Tymur Tkachenko, head of Kyiv's military administration on Telegram. As per the Ukrainian air force, Russia launched a total of 352 drones and 16 missiles overnight targeting Kyiv. Also Read: Zelensky urges Western allies to allot 0.25% GDP for Ukraine's defense industry As per an AFP report, drones and missiles struck residential areas across Kyiv. Officials stated that the Shevchenkivskyi district received the most damage after one section of a five-story apartment building collapsed. Officials also confirmed four people were had been killed in the attack on the building while 10 others had been rescued. As the rescue operations continue, emergency services fear many are trapped under the rubble. As per AP, another person was killed in the city of Bila Tserkva in the Kyiv region. Monday's strike against Kyiv comes nearly after a week Russia struck a residential building in the capital region, killing 28 people. The attack on the apartment building was refered to as 'one of the biggest bombardments' of the war as per Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine to continue strikes on Moscow After Monday's attack, Tymur Tkachenko told AFP that Ukraine will continue to launch attacks against Russia in order to defend itself. "We will not just sit in defence because this brings nothing and eventually leads to the fact that we still retreat, lose people and territories," he said, adding that Ukraine will continue its response. "We will increase the scale and depth," he told reporters. Ukraine ceaseifre nowhere in sight Russia and Ukraine met in Istanbul to commence peace talks for a ceasefire in the war which has now entered its fourth year. However, the peace talks now remain in a limbo, especially after the delay in the prisoner swap deal from both sides.