US restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official
Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made the remarks during a Senate committee hearing examining both recent cuts to his agency and deeper reductions proposed by the White House in next year's budget.
Bhattachartya said he had created an appeals process for scientists and laboratories whose research was impacted, and that the NIH had already "reversed many" of the cuts.
"I didn't take this job to terminate grants," said the physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration.
"I took this job to make sure that we do the research that advances the health needs of the American people."
The hearing came a day after more than 60 NIH employees sent an open letter to Bhattacharya condemning policies they said undermined the agency's mission and the health of Americans.
They dubbed it the "Bethesda Declaration" -- a nod both to the NIH's suburban Washington headquarters and to Bhattacharya's role as a prominent signatory of the 2020 "Great Barrington Declaration," which opposed Covid lockdowns.
Since Trump's January 20 inauguration, the NIH has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch.
Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
35 minutes ago
- Euronews
Can Iran attack the US now and how (and where) can it do it?
Iran's ambassador and permanent representative to the United Nations in Geneva Ali Bahreini told Euronews on June 19 that Tehran will attack the US if Washington 'crosses the red lines". Most military experts agree that the most probable scenario is for Iran to attack the US military bases in the region. The Iranian Revolutionary Guards already said on Sunday that the origin of the US aircraft 'has been identified and it is under surveillance', emphasizing that American bases in the region are 'not a source of strength, but a point of heightened vulnerability'. Iran's proxy in Yemen, the Houthis, also said on Saturday that they would target US ships in the Red Sea if Washington participates in any potential attack against Israel in co-operation with Israel. "We will target US ships and battleships in the Red Sea if Washington participates in the attack on Iran," the group's military spokesperson Yahya Saree said in a statement published by the group's media outlet. The US has tens of thousands of troops stationed in the Middle East, including at permanent bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, Arab Gulf countries just across the Persian Gulf from Iran — and much closer than Israel. Those bases have sophisticated air defences, but would have much less warning time before waves of missiles or swarms of armed drones. It also depends a lot on the number of drones and missiles used in a possible attack. Even Israel, which is several hundred kilometers further away, has been unable to stop all of the incoming fire. Typically around 30,000 troops are based in the Middle East, and about 40,000 troops are in the region now, according to a US officials and AP. That number surged as high as 43,000 last October in response to heightened tensions between Israel and Iran as well as continuous attacks on commercial and military ships in the Red Sea by the Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen. After June 13 when Israel first hit Iran to stop its nuclear enrichment programme, US forces in the region started taking precautionary measures, including having military dependents voluntarily leave bases, in anticipation of potential strikes and to protect personnel in case of a large-scale response from Tehran. US targets at risk amid escalating tensions US troops across the Middle East are on high alert as Iran and its proxies threaten retaliation and because US interests in the region were targeted in the past. One difference compared to past attacks and threats though is that Iran's proxies Hezbollah and Hamas' capabilities are much weaker since Israel decimated them after October 2023. Also, Iran has missiles, including ballistic, but not much of an aviation force owing to Western sanctions. Al-Asad Air Base in western Iraq, the largest U.S. deployment in the country, has been a frequent target. In 2020, after the US killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, Iran launched 16 missiles at American bases in Iraq; 11 hit al-Asad, wounding dozens. Attacks have continued, with drones and rockets striking the base as recently as August. In January 2024, a drone strike on Tower 22, a small US outpost in Jordan near the Syrian border, killed three American troops. The drone strike was the first deadly one against US forces since the Israel-Hamas war started in October 2023. US officials have blamed the attack on the Islamic Resistance in Iraq, a coalition of Iran-backed militias, including Kataib Hezbollah. In Bahrain, the US Navy's 5th Fleet operates with around 8,000 personnel. Qatar hosts Al-Udeid Air Base, the forward headquarters of U.S. Central Command, which can accommodate up to 10,000 troops. Camp Buehring, Ali al-Salem, and al-Dhafra are also key air bases located in Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates. US diplomatic missions in Iraq and Israel have also begun evacuating staff. Officials warn embassies could be targeted alongside military bases. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on X that 'protecting US forces is our top priority,' announcing the deployment of additional forces to bolster regional defenses.
Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
Tens of thousands join pro-Palestinian marches across Europe
In London, AFP journalists saw tens of thousands of protesters, who waved Palestinian flags as they marched through the British capital clad in keffiyeh scarves. In Berlin, more than 10,000 people gathered in the centre of the city in support of Gaza, according to police figures. And in the Swiss capital Bern, march organisers estimated that 20,000 people rallied in front of the national parliament, urging the government to back a ceasefire. Thousands also gathered outside a French trade fair near Paris attended by Israeli defence firms, calling for an end to war profiteering and Israel's offensive in Gaza. There have been monthly protests in the British capital since the start of the 20-month-long war between Israel and Hamas, which has ravaged Gaza. This Saturday, protesters there carried signs including "Stop arming Israel" and "No war on Iran" as they marched in the sweltering heat. "It's important to remember that people are suffering in Gaza. I fear all the focus will be on Iran now," said 34-year-old Harry Baker. "I don't have great love for the Iranian regime, but we are now in a dangerous situation," he said, adding that this was his third pro-Palestinian protest. Advertisement Regional fears Saturday's marches came after Trump announced on social media that the US military had carried out a "very successful attack" on three Iranian nuclear sites. The US president added that after the strikes Iran "must now agree to end this war". Tehran had said Saturday that more than 400 people had been killed in Iran since Israel launched strikes last week claiming its arch-foe was close to acquiring a nuclear weapon -- which Iran denies. Some 25 people have been killed in Israel, according to official figures. One marcher in London, a 31-year-old Iranian student who did not want to share her name, told AFP she had family in Iran and was "scared". "I'm worried about my country. I know the regime is not good but it's still my country," she said. Gaza is suffering from famine-like conditions according to UN agencies in the region following an Israeli aid blockade. Gaza's civil defence agency has reported that hundreds have been killed by Israeli forces while trying to reach the US- and Israeli-backed aid distribution sites. "People need to keep their eyes on Gaza. That's where the genocide is happening," said 60-year-old protester Nicky Marcus. Advertisement 'Scared' In Berlin, demonstrators gathered mid-afternoon close to the parliament, some chanting "Germany finances, Israel bombs". "You can't sit on the sofa and be silent. Now is the time when we all need to speak up," said protester Gundula, who did not want to give her second name. For Marwan Radwan, the point of the protest was to bring attention to the "genocide currently taking place" and the "dirty work" being done by the German government. In Bern, demonstrators carried banners calling on the federal government to intervene in the war in Gaza, expressing solidarity with Palestinians. The rally there was called by organisations including Amnesty International, the Social Democratic Party, the Greens and the Swiss Trade Union Federation. Slogans included "Stop the occupation", "Stop the starvation, stop the violence", and "Right to self-determination". Some marchers chanted: "We are all the children of Gaza". The overall death toll in Gaza since the war broke out has reached at least 55,637 people, according to the health ministry. Israel has denied it is carrying out a genocide and says it aims to wipe out Hamas after the Islamist group's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
The Middle East subjected to the primacy of force
When it comes to the Middle East, History is replete with premature victory announcements. This reminder is necessary after Donald Trump claimed a "spectacular military success" just moments after the United States bombed the three main Iranian nuclear sites on the night of Saturday, June 21. Yet just 10 days earlier, the US president had been advocating for diplomacy to halt Iran's unacceptable and dangerous nuclear program, which the regime in power started decades ago. This about-face can be explained by an unexpected reversal in the balance of power between the US and Israel, its ally. Trump, after being confronted with a fait accompli by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who chose to go to war against Iran on June 13, resigned himself to following suit, lending Washington's firepower to Israel, notably with bunker-buster bombs, which only the US possesses. The situation is unprecedented. The Middle East now finds itself in the grasp of an Israeli-American duopoly, which is, in reality, based on Israel's military hegemony. The brutality of this reversal is as questionable as its long-term effectiveness. After the attack, Trump issued a warning to Tehran: "There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days." The Iranian regime, which survives by repressing its own people, is weaker and more isolated than ever, still has real disruptive capabilities. As a result, the US wanted to warn it against conducting any retaliation targeting the many American interests in the region. Such reprisals would drag the region into a devastating spiral of escalation. Yet that is not the only option available to Tehran. 'Unconditional surrender' As Trump himself acknowledged, the American bombings are, by nature, not likely to put a definitive end to Iran's nuclear ambitions, even if those goals have likely been severely degraded. To achieve a total and lasting halt to Iran's nuclear program, the American president has just deprived himself of a tool – diplomacy – that had proven effective with the previous Iran nuclear deal, concluded between several countries in 2015. Today, who could believe that the Iranian regime would still be willing to engage in talks with the US? The Americans had already broken their word in 2018, by withdrawing, at Trump's initiative, from the treaty they had signed three years earlier. Recently, American officials claimed to want to negotiate, all while they gave the green light to Israel for its campaign of strikes and assassinations targeting senior regime officials. What would Washington do if Tehran decided to withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which it is a signatory, unlike Israel, an unofficial nuclear power? That would deprive the International Atomic Energy Agency of access to Iran, access that it has always had to win through great struggle, and which remains essential. Would the US bomb Iran again? Seek to topple a regime that is, undeniably and justly, despised, despite the risk of pushing Iran to implode, a risk that has, in the past, been tragically confirmed by the situations of many other countries in the region? A few days earlier, in a message published on his social media platform, the US president gave his definition of peace: "unconditional surrender." The American bombings, a culmination of the law of the jungle and the primacy of brute force in the stead of international law, now seen as a relic of the past, have darkened the horizon, rather than cleared it.
