‘Obscene performance' ban added to child abuse bill, official misconduct expungements weighed

Rep. Chris Jeter declined to say whether his amendment was aimed at drag queen story times. He is shown speaking with a colleague in the House chamber on Jan. 9, 2025. (Courtesy Indiana House Republicans)
Indiana lawmakers on Wednesday chose not to strip key provisions from legislation tightening handling of child sex abuse materials — yet — but did add a ban on any government-funded 'obscene performance.'
The House Committee on Courts and Criminal Code also moved a proposal allowing unelected officials convicted of official misconduct a path toward expungement.
Senate Bill 326's original purpose was replacing use of the phrase 'child pornography' throughout Indiana Code with 'child sex abuse material.'
'Whether you believe it's right or wrong, (pornography) is legal. It exists in our society. That's not what these images are,' said Courtney Curtis, of the Indiana Prosecuting Attorneys Council. 'In these images, these children are being molested. They are being sexually abused. We should call it that.'
The measure would also require Indiana Department of Child Services (DCS) employees, school employees and attorneys to 'immediately' notify law enforcement about such materials and avoid file transfers to avoid prosecution — prompting concerns among committee members.
Curtis said those changes would bring Indiana Code up to federal standards.
She described observing the misalignment firsthand while working for the Marion County Prosecutor's Office's Special Victims Team.
'There was a high school in Indianapolis where, instead of calling law enforcement or calling DCS, they called their attorney in order to protect the teacher,' Curtis said. 'And their attorney took the laptop, took it to the law firm, did not report, uploaded the material onto the mainframe. That is a federal crime.'
Committee members, however, feared the language would ensnare well-meaning parents and professionals. They considered an amendment to delete it.
Sen. Aaron Freeman, R-Indianapolis, told members that he'd rather they kill his bill instead of stripping out a core provision that mimics federal law. They relented, agreeing to instead make any fixes on the House floor.
The committee accepted other changes, however — including a possible attempt to bar drag performers from reading children's stories in public libraries or schools.
An amendment from Rep. Chris Jeter, R-Fishers, specifies that a government entity can't organize or use public money to fund 'an obscene performance.' It was adopted through a voice vote, over Democrats' opposition.
CONTACT US
When asked if he was trying to ban drag story times, Jeter told Indiana Public Broadcasting, 'I'm trying to ban any obscene performance, as it's defined in the code … because, by definition, they're harmful. Because it's a crime.'
'I've heard about it in other places and seen some things in other states,' Jeter continued, describing them as 'performances that are sexual in nature' and 'that are not appropriate for minors.'
He demurred when asked again about drag story times, saying, 'It's tough for me to apply the law to a specific fact pattern you're giving me because I don't know. We're relying on … communities to look at the definition and decide whether … it actually is obscene.'
Obscenity comes with high standards.
Obscene, or just objectionable? Here's how Indiana schools are tackling library book complaints.
To qualify under Indiana law, materials or performance must, as a whole:
describe or represent nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement, or sado-masochistic abuse;
appeal to the prurient interest in sex of minors;
be patently offensive to prevailing standards of what's appropriate for minors;
and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for minors.
'This is a do-nothing amendment,' said Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington, because the bar is so high. But, he argued, it 'suggests that we think that people are (putting on obscene performances), which I think is an affront to anyone who's running a governmental entity in this state.'
Rep. Mitch Gore, D-Indianapolis, said he believed the amendment's intent is 'a chilling effect on performances that people personally don't like.'
Senate Bill 326 advanced on a unanimous, 13-0 vote.
The committee also touched on expungements for official misconduct — just one piece of the complex Senate Bill 281.
The legislation stipulates that people convicted of official misconduct, as long as they're not elected officials convicted while campaigning or in office, can petition courts to expunge all conviction records.
Rep. Greg Steuerwald, the bill's House sponsor, said Indiana's expungement laws are 'extremely difficult to understand,' adding, 'This is what happens when you amend the statute over the years.' He planned to take on a 'comprehensive re-write' in the future.
'In fact, this situation that my client actually is going to testify to, … the prosecutor at the time was willing to expunge the record, but (we) discovered later that we misread it and he was not eligible,' Steuerwald said.
The lone witness was Jed Adams, a former Marion County Sheriff's deputy. He was caught selling drugs out of his car in 2025, CBS4 reported.
'I made a bad decision that ultimately ended with me taking a plea agreement in May of 2016 for official misconduct, a Level Six felony,' Adams said. 'I support Senate Bill 281, as I'm a firm believer in second chances. I've owned and accepted the consequences of my poor decision that I made that day.'
He said the conviction was preventing him from coaching a junior high team, cleanly pass a background check, get a gun permit and carry a handgun.
'I feel that my story is a testimony to how people can make a mistake, accept the consequences, and become a better version of themselves,' Adams concluded. 'If this bill passes, it will give individuals like myself opportunities to contribute more to our communities.'
Steuerwald told the Capital Chronicle that elected officials can 'never' get expungements for official misconduct, but that others 'should at least be eligible.'
'There are serious violent felons who are eligible (for expungement) right now, but a non-elected official, non-violent isn't eligible,' he said.
The legislation, which moved on a 12-1 vote, would also prohibit expungement for a person convicted of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Boston Globe

25 minutes ago

• Boston Globe

Trump ignites debate on presidential authority with Iran strikes and wins praise from Republicans

The instant divisions in the U.S. Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorization from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first U.S. president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Advertisement Democrats, and a few Republicans, said the strikes were unconstitutional, and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson. 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity.' Advertisement House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said that Trump 'misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' The quick GOP endorsements of stepped up U.S. involvement in Iran came after Trump publicly considered the strikes for days and many congressional Republicans had cautiously said they thought he would make the right decision. The party's schism over Iran could complicate the GOP's efforts to boost Pentagon spending as part of a $350 billion national security package in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax breaks bill, which is speeding toward votes next week. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies,' Wicker posted on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both were briefed ahead of the strikes on Saturday, according to people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. Thune said Saturday evening that 'as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Johnson said in a statement that the military operations 'should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says.' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., said he had also been in touch with the White House and 'I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes.' Advertisement Breaking from many of his Democratic colleagues, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, also praised the attacks on Iran. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' he posted. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.' Both parties have seen splits in recent days over the prospect of striking Iran, including some of Trump's most ardent supporters who share his criticism of America's 'forever wars.' Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio posted that 'while President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional.' Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a longtime opponent of U.S. involvement in foreign wars, also posted on X that 'This is not Constitutional.' 'This is not our fight,' said Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Most Democrats have maintained that Congress should have a say, even as presidents in both parties have ignored the legislative branch's constitutional authority. The Senate was scheduled to vote soon on a resolution from Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine that would require congressional approval before the U.S. declares war on Iran or takes specific military action. Kaine said the bombings were 'horrible judgment.' 'I will push for all senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war,' Kaine said. Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, the chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, also called on Congress to immediately pass a war powers resolution. He said politicians had always promised that 'new wars in the Middle East would be quick and easy.' 'Then they sent other people's children to fight and die endlessly,' Casar said. 'Enough.'

New York Post

35 minutes ago

• New York Post

Bill Clinton endorses former top aide Cuomo for NYC mayor

Ex-President Bill Clinton on Sunday endorsed his former Housing secretary Andrew Cuomo in the Big Apple's mayoral primary, describing the city as in 'crisis'' and his pal as a 'competent leader.' In a robocall released by Cuomo's campaign, the Democratic former commander in chief urged New Yorkers to back the ex-governor in the Tuesday's Dem showdown. 3 Former President Bill Clinton formally endorsed his previous HUD secretary, Andrew Cuomo, for New York City mayor in a robocall to voters. Paul Martinka Advertisement 'The election will decide the next mayor of New York, and I urge you to vote for Andrew Cuomo,' Clinton said in the recorded message. 'As president, I chose Andrew to be my secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and he never let me down.' Clinton, 78 — who lives in tony Chappaqua in Westchester County — noted that Cuomo worked in his presidential administration on such issues as affordable housing and helping to stave off hate, including 'discrimination, including against the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) and antisemitism,' he said. The ex-president said Cuomo can fix what he called a city in 'crisis. Advertisement 'New York City is facing major challenges. There is a desperate need for affordable housing, homelessness is at a crisis level, and public safety must be restored,' Clinton said. 'It is imperative that New York chooses a mayor who has the ability, talent, and experience to do the job. 'He's a fighter who knows how to make government work, and at a time when our basic rights are under assault, I know he'll stand up and protect the people of this city,' he said of Cuomo, adding his Dem buddy has the ability to raise the 'progressive standard.' 3 Clinton expressed his confidence that Cuomo could lead a city in 'crisis.' Matthew McDermott Advertisement Cuomo, 67, responded to the endorsement with gratitude. 'I am honored to have the support of President Bill Clinton — a personal mentor, friend, and hero. His administration was one of the most accomplished in modern political history,' Cuomo said in the message. Cuomo, who resigned in disgrace as governor in 2021 amid a slew of sexual-harassment allegations, is aiming for a political resurrection in his mayoral comeback bid. Cuomo has vehemently any accusation of wrongdoing. Clinton similarly had a presidency rocked by scandal. Advertisement His Oval Office affair with then-22-year-old intern Monica Lewinsky led him to be impeached by the House for perjury and obstruction of justice — though he was acquitted by the Senate and never resigned. 3 The two Democrats have had political careers rocked by scandal. Richard Harbus Clinton's endorsement of Cuomo comes just two days before the city's Tuesday primary. Democratic kingmaker and 84-year-old South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn endorsed Cuomo on Friday — as surging socialist contender Zohran Mamdani's campaign garnered a mix of fresh condemnation and support. In the city's ranked-choice voting contest, Cuomo currently prevails 55% to 45% against Mamdani in a potential seventh round, according to a recent Marist College Institute for Public Opinion survey. The poll indicated a big drop from a Marist poll conducted in May, when Cuomo led Mamdani 60% to 40% after all the other candidates were eliminated and second preference votes transferred to the two finalists.

Fox News

40 minutes ago

• Fox News

AOC, other angry Democrats, call for Trump impeachment over attack on Iran

Progressive champion Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a handful of other Democrats quickly floated the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump for launching a military strike on Iran without Congressional authorization. "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers," the four-term congresswoman from New York wrote on social media Saturday night, soon after the president announced the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. Ocasio-Cortez charged that Trump "has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment." Democrat Rep. Sean Casten of Illinois also argued that the president's order to bomb Iran's nuclear sites without seeking Congressional approval could be considered an "unambiguous impeachable offense." Casten, a four-term representative whose district covers southwestern Chicago and surrounding suburbs, wrote Saturday night on social media that "this is not about the merits of Iran's nuclear program….to be clear, I do not dispute that Iran is a nuclear threat." But he highlighted that "no president has the authority to bomb another country that does not pose an imminent threat to the US without the approval of Congress. This is an unambiguous impeachable offense." "I'm not saying we have the votes to impeach," Casten added. "I'm saying that you DO NOT do this without Congressional approval." The calls for impeachment are the most visible, and furthest reaching, representation of the party's anger with Trump for taking unilateral action against Iran. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the top Democrat in the chamber, wrote that the president had "failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East." "Donald Trump shoulders complete and total responsibility for any adverse consequences that flow from his unilateral military action," Jeffries added in a statement. While the executive branch technically doesn't have the legal authority to order a foreign military attack without the approval of Congress, previous presidents, including Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and Trump during his first term, launched comparable military actions in Libya, Sudan, Afghanistan and Iran. Congress has not actually declared war since 1941, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during World War II, and legal scholars have long been divided on whether the president has the authority to unilaterally launch a military strike.