logo
Alex Jones Ignites MAGA Fury by Pressing Trump on Musk's Bombshell Epstein Claim

Alex Jones Ignites MAGA Fury by Pressing Trump on Musk's Bombshell Epstein Claim

Yahoo06-06-2025

Infowars host Alex Jones set off a furious MAGA backlash by calling for President Trump to address Elon Musk's explosive allegation that Trump's name appears in the 'Epstein files.'
With the Trump administration creaking amid the fallout between Musk and the president, conspiracy theorist Jones—who insisted he does not believe Trump was connected to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking crimes—still pressed Trump to respond to the sensational claim from his former 'First Buddy.'
'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk tweeted Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk tweeted Thursday. 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.'
In a reply to Musk's post, Jones wrote: 'Trump needs to respond asap. I notice he did not take questions at his public meeting today.'
The conspiracy theorist's post quickly drew the ire of pro-Trump influencers, including @catturd2, who went on the attack in front of their 3.7 million followers.
'He's been silent all day while Trump has been viciously attacked with lies. I used to respect Alex Jones, but now he's just a piece of s--t fraud. What a f---ing sellout,' the right-winger wrote.
'You are just virtue signaling,' Jones replied. 'I have said in at least five videos today that I don't believe Trump is connected to Epstein crimes. The sooner he comes out and responds to the allegation the better. I had Roger Stone on within two hours of the allegations breaking debunking it. Grow up.'
That was one of a series of tweets he fired off while coming under pressure from other MAGA-supporting accounts, including one in which he protested: 'I am not on team Trump or team Elon. I am on team humanity, which equals team truth.' He added bluntly: 'I am not in your cult.'
Several other MAGA accounts joined in with @catturd2's salvo towards Jones.
One accused Jones of speaking out for 'engagement money.'
'Everyone acts like X is the place for news, but all that really happens is things get inflamed like a wildfire by people trying to make the headlines juicy for engagement,' they wrote. 'Alex needs money.'
Another sent Jones a clown emoji along with the indignant question: 'So MAGA is a cult now?' One user—who wrongly insists in their bio that Trump won the 2020 presidential election—confessed they 'never really liked' Jones, but they were nevertheless 'shocked he was so ready to ditch President Trump.'
'Trump literally took a bullet for this country, where is the loyalty or at a min the benefit of the doubt?!' they added. 'Infuriating!'
Others came to Jones' defense. One self-described patriot said that Jones was merely saying that 'Trump needs to address the issue from a political standpoint.'
'Why are you going nuclear?' they wrote to Catturd, adding: 'Losing respect.' Jones responded to the post with: 'Cat poop doesn't want the truth. He just wants to grandstand as holier than anyone else.'
Jeffrey Epstein was accused of sex trafficking minors in 2019 but pleaded not guilty. The disgraced financier died by suicide in a prison cell a month after his arrest.
Epstein and the president were friends in the 1990s and early 2000s, but fell out in 2004, according to The Washington Post.
When asked about Epstein's arrest in 2019, Trump told a reporter: 'Well I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him. I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan. I was not a fan of his.'
The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. He has never been implicated in Epstein's alleged abuse.
The White House did not respond to the Daily Beast's request for comment on Musk's accusations.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump warns of more attacks; lauds ‘spectacular military success' on Iran nuclear sites
Trump warns of more attacks; lauds ‘spectacular military success' on Iran nuclear sites

The Hill

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump warns of more attacks; lauds ‘spectacular military success' on Iran nuclear sites

President Trump on Saturday declared U.S. strikes on Iran's key nuclear facilities were a 'spectacular military success,' but warned in an address to the nation that he could order further action if Tehran does not agree to a satisfactory peace agreement. 'Our objective was the destruction of Iran's nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror,' Trump said in remarks from the Cross Hall at the White House. 'Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success.' The president had announced hours earlier on Truth Social that the U.S. had bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. Trump, who was joined by Vice President Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for his remarks, warned that Saturday's strikes could be the first in a wave of actions against Iran, which has been locked in conflict with Israel for nearly two weeks. Trump delivered his address from the doorway of the East Room, with the grand foyer in the background, the same place former President Obama delivered his address to the nation announcing the killing of Osama Bin Laden. 'This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days,' Trump said. 'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight's was the most difficult of them all, by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace does not come quickly we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill.' DEVELOPING

US Attacks Three Main Nuclear Sites in Iran, Widening Conflict
US Attacks Three Main Nuclear Sites in Iran, Widening Conflict

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Attacks Three Main Nuclear Sites in Iran, Widening Conflict

(Bloomberg) — US President Donald Trump said American bombers struck Iran's three main nuclear sites, pulling the US directly into the country's conflict despite his longtime promises to avoid new wars. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown Trump said a 'payload of BOMBS' was dropped on Fordow, the uranium-enrichment site buried deep under a mountain and seen as vulnerable only to 'bunker buster' munitions that the US possesses. Natanz and Isfahan, two other sites, were also struck. The president called the operation 'very successful,' adding that the aircraft involved had exited Iranian air space. 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' he wrote on Truth Social. Trump addressed the nation at 10 p.m. Washington time at the White House. Israel was notified in advance of the strikes, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. Trump spoke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu after the strikes, a senior White House official said. The move marks an extraordinary escalation by the president in the week since Israel began airstrikes across Iran and amounts to the most serious foreign-policy decision of his two terms so far. It goes against the advice of US allies in Europe as well as the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency, which has repeatedly warned that nuclear facilities must never be attacked given the potential threat to nuclear safety — not to mention radiation leaks. Sign up for our breaking news alerts, and get the biggest stories from around the world delivered to your inbox as they happen. Iran has said it doesn't want a nuclear bomb, and Trump's own intelligence agencies had assessed recently it still hadn't committed to developing such a weapon. Trump, however, had dismissed those findings and had declined to rule out joining the Israeli strikes, which had also killed several prominent Iranian military officials and nuclear scientists. The US strikes could immediately open American assets in the Middle East to attack since Iran had warned it would retaliate if Trump ordered an attack. Trump's combative language in the last couple of days had also triggered new threats from the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen and led Iranian officials to call the US Israel's 'partner in crime.' Iran's retaliation could also come in the form of cyber attacks against American or Israeli interests by hackers linked to the regime in Tehran. Earlier Saturday, the State Department said the US had begun evacuating US citizens from Israel. The agency organized two flights to Athens from Tel Aviv with about 70 US citizens, family member and permanent residents, it said. 'I hope that the Iranians are measured in their response but there will be a response — this is an act of war by the United States against a foreign country, which has not attacked us lately,' said Barbara Slavin, a distinguished fellow at the Stimson Center. 'Americans are at risk all over the Middle East, all over the world.' Iran's official Islamic Republic News Agency reported that authorities in Isfahan confirmed multiple simultaneous explosions in Natanz and Isfahan early Sunday, describing them as 'aggressions' near the two nuclear facilities. Fears of an impending strike had eased after Trump's team said on Thursday he would make a decision within two weeks. On Friday, the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the UK had met with Iranian officials Geneva in a bid to prevent a US attack. The continued fighting has evoked fears of a regional conflict that results in massive civilian casualties, and disrupts the flow of energy and other trade through the region. About a fifth of the world's daily oil supply goes through the Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran and its Gulf Arab neighbors such as Saudi Arabia. For days, Trump had faced conflicting advice from his supporters, after he campaigned for president on promises to keep the US out of foreign wars, pointing to American involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq. MAGA allies including longtime Trump supporter Steve Bannon, have warned against any US intervention, insisting this is Israel's fight to finish. Other Republicans had been urging Trump to join the fight against Iran, arguing that Tehran was more vulnerable after days of air strikes by Israel, and there was an opportunity to deliver on the president's long insistence the regime cannot be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Trump and his advisers had suggested in recent days that any strike would be limited. Trump briefed Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, according to people familiar with the matter. 'This is not the start of a forever war,' Senator Jim Risch, the Idaho Republican and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on X. 'There will not be American boots on the ground in Iran. This was a precise, limited strike, which was necessary and by all accounts was very successful.' Energy experts have raised concerns that crude flows in the region could be imperiled if Iran and its proxies retaliate in response to a US attack. Fears have focused on the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway at the mouth of the Persian Gulf that is a key transit point for 26% of the world's oil trade. Houthis have previously disrupted Red Sea shipping, with attacks on ships in the Bab el Mandeb strait forcing vessels to reroute around Africa. A broader attack — including potentially planting naval mines — on the Strait of Hormuz could have even wider consequences, since it's such a vital artery for the region's oil and gas output. What If Iran Tries to Close the Strait of Hormuz?: QuickTake US ally Israel had launched a surprise attack on Iran on June 13, saying the imminent threat of the regime in Tehran securing nuclear weapons had to be neutralized. Iran's military infrastructure was seriously damaged and a number of its top generals and atomic scientists were killed. But Israel lacked the heavy bombs and B-2 stealth jets believed to be required to destroy nuclear sites buried deep underground. Tehran had responded to Israel's strikes by firing waves of ballistic missiles and drones, breaching aerial defenses, striking several cities and causing unprecedented damage. But the number of projectiles launched by Iran dropped markedly after the first few days of the conflict, raising questions about the number of missiles left in its arsenal and its ability to launch them. 'Iran is going to be facing a real dilemma, because they've already been dramatically weakened,' said Dennis Ross, who served as President Bill Clinton's Middle East envoy and is now a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 'They will try to do something to show they didn't just capitulate or submit, but they have their own interest in trying to limit this.' —With assistance from Natalia Drozdiak, Eric Martin, Courtney McBride, Erik Wasson and Steven T. Dennis. (Updates with details of Iranian response, additional background.) Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store