
Can Reeves calm Labour's troubled waters with her spending review?
The term 'fiscal event' hardly does justice to the significance of the government's comprehensive spending review, due to be published on Wednesday 11 June by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves. It's been in preparation more or less since Labour took office last July.
It matters at least as much as any Budget because it sets out broad public spending plans for each area of government. These cover planned investment and current spending in areas such as wages, but exclude cyclical items such as unemployment benefits. So they are a strong statement of the Labour government's priorities.
All the signs are that it's been a difficult process, and the leaks and the spinning have already begun.
What's the trouble?
Trying to balance the books (in reality borrowing huge but manageable sums) is the answer to that. In an environment of great global uncertainty, alongside sluggish UK growth thanks to Brexit, and in a country with an ageing population, Reeves's task is an unenviable one. In addition, she will have to balance the pressing political demands of colleagues with her determination to stick to her 'fiscal rules'.
Specifically?
At the moment, backbenchers in the red wall seats in the North and the Midlands that Labour regained from the Tories at the general election are pressuring the Treasury to pour billions into much-needed investment in infrastructure, to make the most of the industrial potential of these neglected areas. This would also, of course, have a helpful electoral benefit for those MPs who are facing a challenge from Reform UK.
Reeves has hinted that she could adjust her rules on investment spending to facilitate tens of billions to be devoted to levelling up the regions.
Sounds familiar?
Yes, indeed. Although Labour chooses not to use the loaded slogan 'levelling up' about 'left behind' communities, it is very much what Boris Johnson promised in 2019 and, for good and bad reasons, wasn't delivered as expected in the last parliament.
Before that, George Osborne, Tory chancellor from 2010 to 2016, talked ambitiously about devolution, the ' Northern Powerhouse ', and the 'Midlands Engine'. There was even a red wall caucus of Tory MPs, named the Northern Research Group (NRG), who lobbied hard for successive Tory administrations to live up to their promises (most of the NRG members have since lost their seats).
The ultimate symbol of Tory failure was the cancellation of the HS2 rail project, launched with so much hope by David Cameron but miserably dismembered by Rishi Sunak at the 2023 Conservative Party conference. In Manchester. In a former railway station. Now, exactly the same dynamic is operating within the Starmer administration.
There are some big personalities involved?
Yes: Angela Rayner, deputy leader and deputy prime minister, for one. Powerful as her office makes her, she also has an excellent case for expanding the 'affordable homes fund', because of the importance Labour placed on the housing crisis and its target of 1.5 million new homes to be built during its first parliament. This was always a tough one – so much so that it's been reported that Rayner threatened to quit in exasperation and Tony Blair had to persuade her out of it (a story she denies).
She is also surely right to get some adequate funding into local authorities before many more fall into chaotic bankruptcy, which would look like carelessness if not incompetence on the part of Rayner. Other ministers putting up a fight are Yvette Cooper at the Home Office, Ed Miliband (Energy), and Steve Reed (Environment).
Liz Kendall (Work and Pensions) and Reeves will also need to persuade their backbench colleagues to back whatever welfare reforms they eventually settle on – ideally, restoring the pensioners' winter fuel payment, lifting the two-child cap on child benefit, and ameliorating planned cuts to disability benefits. Defence and Health are the only areas likely to escape demands for 'efficiency savings'.
What can Labour backbenchers do?
The spending review is an odd beast, because unlike, say, a finance bill, it's not legislation and doesn't necessarily have to be voted on; and for that matter, a government doesn't have to stick to it (even if it wants to). It's just a 'plan', a statement of intent, and a series of signals about priorities. But some sort of backbench rebellion seems inevitable, even among the usually loyal 2024 intake, even if only by proxy.
At a minimum, they will certainly expect some signs of the imminent restoration of the pensioners' winter fuel payment – the cutting of which was hated by the voters and would have saved little money – and on progress to end child poverty.
Will there be resignations?
There's talk of Rayner being pushed to the limits of her patience, again, and her resignation would be cataclysmic. However, in most cases of a politician wrestling with their conscience, their conscience usually loses.
Rayner would not be thanked for abandoning the administration less than a year into its life. Even worse, as the party is already suffering in the polls, she would thereby be hastening the onset of the ultimate catastrophe – a Farage-led government. She would attract at least as much scorn and blame for that as she would gain respect for standing up for working people, or whatever.
She might, as others have in the past, improve her chances of winning the leadership in due course by making a tactical move to the back benches now, but she's said she's not interested in the top job, and her treachery would probably cost her dear in any case. Having come this far, she'll most likely stick with it.
Others, maybe some more junior ministers with an eye on the long game, might decide to leave office 'on principle'. But this would not affect the outcome of the spending review, which is ultimately going to be more cuts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Thames Water may be required to restate accounts, FT reports
June 20 (Reuters) - Britain's Thames Water may be forced to restate its financial accounts for the year ending March 2024, the Financial Times reported on Friday, in another possible setback for the struggling utility as it attempts to avoid nationalisation. Thames Water is trying to understand the consequences of having to restate key figures in its accounts published last year, the report added, citing documents it had seen. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Weak retail sales and falls in key oil and drug stocks stifle FTSE 100
London's FTSE 100 faded into the close on Friday, ending lower, as weak retail sales data and falls in heavyweight oil and drug stocks offset hopes for progress in the Israel- Iran conflict. The FTSE 100 index closed down 17.15 points, 0.2%, at 8,774.65. It had earlier traded as high as 8,847.28. The FTSE 250 ended 74.51 points higher, 0.4%, at 21,148.50, and the AIM All-Share rose 0.95 of a point, 0.1%, at 759.14. For the week, the FTSE 100 closed down 0.9%, the FTSE 250 ended down 0.1% and the AIM All-Share ended down 0.6%. In European equities on Friday, the CAC 40 in Paris closed up 0.3%, and the DAX 40 in Frankfurt ended 1.3% higher. On Wall Street, markets were mixed at the time of the London close on Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.3%, the S&P 500 was down 0.1% and the Nasdaq Composite was 0.4% lower. The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was quoted at 4.40%, stretched from 4.39%. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was quoted at 4.91%, widened from 4.89%. Hopes grew on Friday that diplomatic progress could be made towards dialling down the tensions in the Middle East. French president Emmanuel Macron said France and other European powers would make an offer to Iran of a comprehensive diplomatic solution to end the escalating conflict with Israel, AFP reported. French foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot will meet Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi in Geneva 'to make a complete diplomatic and technical offer for negotiations,' Mr Macron told reporters, adding that France and allies Germany and the UK were 'putting a diplomatic solution on the table'. 'Iran must show that it is willing to join the platform for negotiations we are putting on the table,' Mr Macron said. The developments came after US president Donald Trump said he will decide on potential US action against Iran within two weeks. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Mr Trump said in a dictated message, according to White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt. Stephen Innes, at SPI Asset Management, said Mr Trump's two-week 'thinking window' on whether to join Israel's war against Iran is 'no cooling-off period – it's a ticking volatility clock'. Ipek Ozkardeskaya, at Swissquote Bank, agreed, stating: 'I'm not sure the US buying itself time can be interpreted as a sign of de-escalation.' Brent oil traded lower at 76.49 US dollars a barrel late on Friday from 78.59 dollars on Thursday. The downward correction saw BP fall 2.0% and Shell drop 0.7%. Also weighing on London's blue-chip index, a drop in drugs firms GSK and AstraZeneca, which ended 2.2% and 1.3% lower. Earlier this week, Mr Trump renewed his threats of tariffs on the sector. Also in the UK, investors weighed a sharp drop in retail sales and assessed public sector borrowing figures. Data from the Office for National Statistics showed UK retail sales fell 2.7% in May from April. This was against a 1.3% rise in April from March and worse than the 0.5% decrease expected by FXStreet-cited market consensus. On an annual basis, retail sales decreased by 1.3% in May, compared with market consensus for a 1.7% increase. Rob Wood, at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said while May's month-to-month fall puts a halt to the rapid rise in retail sales volumes over the start of the year, the underlying upward trend of consumer spending growth will resume in June. He noted surveys show that households have rebuilt their 'rainy day savings and are comfortable with their level of assets. We think this will provide a secure floor for consumer spending.' But Callum McLaren-Stewart, at Citi, thinks the figures constitute 'compelling evidence' of a turn in consumer demand and increases the likelihood of an August interest rate cut. Retail share prices were mostly lower. B&M fell 3.3%, JD Sports fell 0.6%, Next fell 0.2% and Marks & Spencer were down 0.7%. Separate figures from the ONS showed UK Government borrowing, last month, jumped to the highest level for May outside the pandemic era despite a boost to the tax take after the chancellor's national insurance hike. Borrowing surged to £17.69 billion last month, the second highest figure on record for May, surpassed only at the height of Covid, from £16.12 billion a year prior. On-month net borrowing slimmed from £20.05 billion. Borrowing for the first two months of the financial year to date was £37.7 billion, £1.6 billion more than the same two-month period in 2024. Lloyds Bank analysts noted the figure was actually £3 billion below what the Office for Budget Responsibility expected at this point. 'It isn't all good news for the Government though. On a cash basis (central government net cash requirement), the Government has had a requirement of £39.9 billion over April and May and that is £7.4 billion more than the OBR benchmark at this stage,' Lloyds added. The pound was quoted up at 1.3467 US dollars at the time of the London equities close on Friday, compared to 1.3429 dollars on Thursday. The euro stood higher at 1.1521 dollars against 1.1468 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar was trading at 145.89 yen, up compared to 145.65 yen. On the FTSE 100, Berkeley Group fell 8.2% as profit guidance fell short of hopes. The housebuilder expects pretax profit of £450 million for its new financial year. Profit in the following year is 'likely to be similar'. The Cobham, England-based company posted pretax profit of £528.9 million for the financial year ended April 30, down 5.1% from £557.3 million the prior year. Revenue edged up to £2.49 billion from £2.46 billion. 'In terms of guidance, the group is now pointing to PBT (profit before tax) of £450 million in FY26, and a similar level in FY27. We suspect that tougher trading, and increased sales incentives are at the heart of this (guidance),' analysts at Peel Hunt commented. 'Currently, we forecast £475 million and £482 million, implying we need to cut our forecasts by 5-6%.' United Utilities fell 1.7% as RBC Capital Markets downgraded to 'sector perform' from 'outperform' after Thursday's capital markets day. Mulberry fell 11% after announcing a £20 million fundraise and plans to cut costs by £5.9 million as part of a restructuring. The Somerset, England-based, luxury handbag maker said it needed further capital to fund its growth strategy in 'light of an even more challenging trading environment'. Gold was quoted lower at 3,366.36 US dollars an ounce against 3,368.94 dollars. The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were: Melrose Industries, up 17.9 pence at 517.2p; Standard Chartered, up 26.0p at 1,178.5p; Schroders, up 5.4p at 364.4p; Rentokil, up 5.0p at 350.0p; and Prudential, up 12.0p at 894.2p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were: Berkeley Group, down 340.0p at 3,810.0p; GSK, down 32.5p at 1,402.5p; BP, down 8.25p at 384.7p; Intertek, down 88.0p at 4,646.0p; and United Utilities, down 19.5p, at 1,124.0p. Monday's global economic calendar has flash composite PMI readings in the UK, eurozone and US plus US existing homes data. There are no significant domestic corporate events scheduled on Monday. Later in the week, Bunzl releases a trading statement and Babcock International reports full-year results.


BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Former Guernsey chief minister has 'no wish to come back'
Guernsey's former chief minister has called time on his "political journey" after failing to be re-elected to the States. Deputy Peter Ferbrache fell short by 21 votes and finished in 39th place in the island's general had the opportunity to request a recount but declined the opportunity, with Sarah Hansmann Rouxel claiming the final place in the chamber. Asked if this was the end of his political career, he said: "This is it. I have no wish to come back and, if there was a cataclysm where there were three by-elections, forget me." Discussing the reason behind the result, Ferbrache said: "I haven't got a clue."It was disappointing, you don't go into an election process wanting to not be elected but that's democracy."I didn't get enough votes and not enough people had confidence in me so that's the end of it."Ferbrache said he would continue to be "a very humble lawyer" in his post-political also said those who had been elected and re-elected had a "difficult job", adding: "I just hope they're up to it."