Charity ‘icon' may have used donor money for beauty treatments, judge says
Tears Foundation founder Mara Glennie transferred R2 million in donor funds to her own company, Fireworx Management Solutions.
Tears Foundation is a non-profit organisation aimed at combating gender-based violence.
Bank statements show how the money was used for Glennie's 'life of relative luxury', including restaurant and beauty salon visits.
Funding at the Tears Foundation, a non-profit organisation aimed at combating gender-based violence, has come under the spotlight in a court application implicating its founder in irregular expenditure of R2 million. (This Tears Foundation is not related to the animal rescue foundation with a similar name.)
In the application, which came before Gauteng High Court Judge Denise Fisher, Tears sought an order to compel its auditors to amend an audit report that flagged the payment by the foundation to another company, Fireworx Management Solution.
Fireworx is owned by Tears founder Mara Glennie, GroundUp reports.
But Judge Fisher has dismissed the application and directed Glennie to file an affidavit explaining why she should not be ordered to pay the court costs on a punitive scale and at the highest possible rate out of her own pocket.
The Tears Foundation was founded by Glennie, herself a survivor of violence, in 2012, along with her co–director, Michael Johnson. The two are romantic partners. According to its website it operates a 24-hour crisis hotline.
READ | ' Grossly dishonest' SA lawyer at centre of UK Christian charity looting investigation
It is donor-funded and gets donations from Standard Bank, Avbob, Capitec, Bidvest Services and Toyota South Africa, among others.
Between March and October 2024, it received more than R7 million in funding from these companies and it also received donations from the general public.
The Tears Foundation was recently given the 'Best Social Organisation of the Year' award by an organisation called Women Icon.
Fisher said before July 2023, Glennie had been employed by Tears but then began providing her services through Fireworx as a 'consultant'.
Essentially it is her alter ego
She said in May 2024, an accounts manager employed by Tears, Dirk Bornebusch, expressed concerns, writing to Glennie about how the foundation was being run financially.
He listed seven items of concern, including that Glennie was putting her personal expenses through the Tears bank account.
Judge Fisher said Glennie alleges that Bornebusch eventually notified donors of these irregularities and was attempting to 'sink Tears', because he was friends with another employee, Clair Thompson, who wanted to establish her own company and attract Tears' donors.
Glennie obtained an interdict against Bornebusch, but major donors withdrew their regular funding. The donors then required that Tears provide an independent audited financial statement before funding would resume.
This task was given to Burton van Staaden of VBS Chartered Accountants.
He flagged a R2 million payment by Tears to Fireworx and reported it to the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) as a 'suspected irregularity'.
Glennie and Johnson were unhappy. They alleged the 'loan' was to be used for the purchase of a property, a safe house for abused women, the 'Joy Cottage project'.
They claimed the money was repaid to Tears, and Glennie and Johnson wanted the irregularity expunged.
READ | Limpopo and North West lead in GBV helpline calls, TEARS Foundation study reveals
Van Staaden refused to do so. He said he would go no further than state 'that the irregularity was no longer taking place'.
He also said that Bornebusch had disclosed to him that other payments had been made to Groundwave, a company owned by Johnson, for 'consulting fees'.
When Tears' urgent application came before Fisher, she raised concerns about the transaction and directed Glennie to file a further affidavit.
Glennie's lawyers tried unsuccessfully to have the matter removed from Fisher.
She then asked for a 'more complete picture' of the nature of the business of Fireworx and Groundwaves, noting that Van Staaden had raised concerns about common directorships and a potential for conflict of interest.
Glennie said Groundwave, which provides products and services in the electrical engineering industry, had provided Tears with advice on technical matters and had sold it products.
It had also provided administrative assistance, filling out grant applications, developing business plans, and conducting research.
Glennie produced bank statements reflecting that Fireworx had three accounts and Tears six accounts.
Fisher said the Fireworx account was opened in June 2023 and the R2 million 'alleged loan' was transferred as an 'investment deposit' a week later.
Regular payments were then made 'as consultancy fees' by Tears to Fireworx. These were initially R100 000 but increased to R150 000 per month.
Then, from July to October 2023, there were several 'large transactions' out of the Fireworx account, including R200 000, referenced as 'Summerhaze', which is Glennie's residence.
In September, the statements showed a credit card facility had been linked to the account. These showed 50 transactions totalling R193 000.
'The credit card was used to pay the living expenses of Glennie. The merchants' references show purchases ranging from grocery stores, clothing shops, monthly beauty salon charges, pharmacy charges, restaurant charges and payments to hardware stores and to pet shops,' Fisher said.
And the 'consultancy fees' paid by Tears to Fireworx amounted to about R1.8 million a year.
Judge Fisher said based on the bank statements, Glennie lived a 'life of relative luxury' - and the only money in Fireworx account came from consultancy fees paid by Tears and the R2 million alleged loan from Tears.
She also noted that the 'alleged loan' was interest free. Fireworx was earning interest on it, whilst Tears was not.
Fisher said there was a clear conflict of interest, the consultancy fees seemed to be 'relatively high', and she had concerns that Glennie was attempting, in her application, to stop exposure of potential mismanagement and even misappropriation of the funds.
The transfer of the R2 million occurred at a time when Glennie started providing her services as a consultant through Fireworx.
'There is no evidence of this alleged loan. Van Staaden requested the loan agreement, but was told it was lost.
'There is no evidence of the alleged negotiations relating to the property purchase. Not even one email is put up. This is notwithstanding that the negotiations were said to be with Standard Bank. This suggests that the Joy Cottage project is nothing more than a recent fabrication,' the judge said.
She said the explanation regarding the R2 million 'was so implausible that it falls to be rejected out of hand'.
'The movement of funds back and forward into different accounts seems to me to be unbridled and inexplicable.
'The fact that the loan agreement was 'lost' and had to be refabricated is a further indication that the payment was not a loan but a misappropriation into the newly opened bank account of Fireworx.'
She said the application was a 'cynical attempt' to avoid disclosure and transparency.
Dismissing the application, Judge Fisher said that while a punitive cost order was warranted, it would be inappropriate for these costs to be paid out of donor funds and called on Glennie to show cause why she should not personally pay out of her own pocket.
She also directed the IRBA to notify any appropriate regulator, including the South African Revenue Services, of the reported irregularity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
7 hours ago
- News24
‘Wonderful' and ‘loved by all' - 65-year-old woman reported kidnapped in Gqeberha
Andre Snyman eblockwatch/Facebook Lindsay Knowlden, 65, was reported as kidnapped on Saturday. She and her husband were apparently accosted outside a market in Markman. Police said an investigation was under way. A desperate search for a 65-year-old Gqeberha woman, described as 'wonderful' and 'loved by all', was underway on Saturday, after she was reported kidnapped. Atlas Security was at the scene at the Nelson Mandela Bay Fresh Produce Market in Markman, north of the city, early on Saturday morning. According to information provided to the private security company, Lindsay Knowlden and her husband were accosted by armed men in the underground parking lot after arriving for work. He was assaulted with a firearm and suffered a laceration to his eye, while she was bundled into a silver Polo and then driven away. The couple's son, Gregory Knowlden, was overcome with emotion on Saturday afternoon. 'She's a wonderful, friendly, genuinely caring person. Loved by all,' he said of his mother. He explained that his father was an agent at the market, and that his mother worked for him. 'They were both there to go to work,' he said. Police spokesperson Captain Andre Beetge said an investigation was 'actively underway'. He said no ransom demand had been received as of yet and appealed to the public 'for any information related to this incident'. It comes on the back of a spate of kidnappings for ransom in recent months, with the Eastern Cape an apparent hotspot. Last week, an EFF councillor, Kholeka Mpupha, appeared in the Dimbaza Magistrate's Court in connection with the abduction of a 42-year-old hardware outlet owner.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
One of New York City's last women's-only residences finds a new home in Brooklyn
Just in time for intern season, one of the last short-term residences for New York City women has returned. The Webster Apartments, a century-old nonprofit dedicated to housing female students, interns, and working women, reopened in a new Downtown Brooklyn location in May, two years after selling its aging building on the west side of Manhattan. The reopening marks a return to the Webster's roots and commitment to a boarding house style of housing that proliferated in New York in the early 20th century but has all but disappeared. It offers a relatively affordable option for students and professionals as the city continues to deal with a deep housing shortage that's left more than half of households rent-burdened. By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy At the Webster, women can stay for as little as four weeks or as long as five years. Monthly rates start at $2,000 for a shared room and $2,800 for a studio, with discounts available for early signees. There's space for about 150 women. On average, studios elsewhere in the neighborhood rent for $3,540, according to Rent Hop, or $3,965 a few subway stops away on Manhattan's Lower East Side. Read more: 12 types of popular houses for renters and buyers 'We're really trying to make it feel like a home,' said Tara Scott, who oversees admissions and marketing. 'I think we're getting there.' Women-only residences began springing up in New York in the early 1900s in response to the manufacturing boom, which created new demand for labor and made it more common for women to take jobs outside the home. But even as jobs for women became available, it was still considered somewhat scandalous for young, unmarried women to live alone in the city. Many also struggled to afford to do so on meager wages. The Webster opened in 1923 after Macy's executive Charles Webster and his brother donated money to establish a nonprofit residence for working women. The original location, at 419 West 34th St., was just a half-mile west of the flagship Macy's in Herald Square, where many of the Webster's first residents worked as 'shop girls.' 'Having been engaged for many years in the business known as a department store in the City of New York, and having employed a large number of unmarried women in that business, I have realized that the domestic environments of many of them are not conducive to their morals or health, and I have concluded to endeavor to improve the condition of some of them by giving them the opportunity to live in clean, well-ventilated, comfortable, and attractive apartments, with good moral surroundings,' Charles Webster, who died in 1916, wrote in his will, where he outlined his vision for the apartments. The nonprofit status meant rent was subsidized — women paid on a sliding scale based on their income — in a central Manhattan location. Rent also covered two hot meals a day and access to a rooftop terrace, library, and 'beau parlors' for entertaining male guests, who were forbidden past the first floor. The Webster wasn't the most famous women-only residence in its heyday. That honor belongs to The Barbizon Hotel, which was immortalized by one-time tenant Sylvia Plath in 'The Bell Jar' (in the book, it was called The Amazon), and whose list of other famous former residents includes Liza Minnelli, Grace Kelly, Farah Fawcett, Nancy Reagan, and Joan Didion. But while the Barbizon fell on hard times in the 1970s, later went co-ed, and closed in 2005 to be converted into condos, the Webster has remained, along with a handful of other women's residences, most of which are affiliated with religious orders. 'A haven' for working women Webster residents spanning multiple generations have fond memories of the space, with many praising it for helping them get established in New York. Regina Baumgärtner lived in the Webster in the 1980s after arriving from Germany on a work-study program. She recalls getting the chance to befriend people from all over the world, even though their cultures sometimes clashed. 'We girls from Europe had been sticking together, and then the Americans came to it and it changed the energy quite a lot,' said Baumgärtner, who now lives in Berlin. 'They took us to a lot of events, and we were very surprised about this openness and friendliness and trusting everybody.' A museum-loving Irish friend introduced Baumgärtner to some of the city's best cultural institutions, and she saw other parts of the country when she accompanied other pals on visits home to Chicago, Philadelphia, and Boston. Once, at breakfast, a tall American told Baumgärtner that she was shocked by her petite size, because she thought all Germans were 'so big.' 'I never forgot stuff like that,' Baumgärtner said. 'I think it helped to understand different cultures, and I think it's still a way of living in peace together.' Decades later, she remains close friends with Debbie Smith, who lived in the Webster at the same time as she was beginning her career in occupational therapy. In their free time, they'd hit nightlife hotspots like Studio 54 and Limelight, sunbathe on the roof deck, or pile into community rooms to watch television. 'It was a haven,' said Smith, of Greenville, S.C. 'It was this full experience to live in Manhattan, plunked in this gorgeous building.' By the 1980s, the no-men upstairs policy was fairly unpopular. Once, a pizza deliveryman made it to the fifth floor by walking past the building's elderly security guard, who had fallen asleep. The successful infiltration sent tongues wagging for weeks, Baumgärtner recalled. Two decades earlier, Maria Keenan said she didn't have a problem with the rules. She lived at the Webster from 1966 to 1967 while working as a bilingual secretary for tobacco giant Phillip Morris International. 'I was a Catholic girl,' Keenan said, by way of explanation. Young and still finding her footing in New York after moving from Chile in 1965 when she was 18, she appreciated that some of the building's older residents kept an eye out for violations. 'It felt good,' said Keenan, who now lives in Walnut Creek, Calif. 'Somebody was looking after me.' She frequented the roof with friends she made in the building, although in those days, sunbathing too long was risky. Exhaust from vehicles waiting to enter the nearby Lincoln Tunnel would leave them covered in soot, Keenan recalled. Modern realities By the 2010s, the nearly 400-room original building was becoming increasingly hard to maintain and out of step with the realities of modern living. Initially, the Webster's board planned to sell the space and construct a new one elsewhere on its oversized lot. But the onset of the pandemic complicated those plans. Instead, the board nixed the construction and opted to sell to another student housing nonprofit for over $50 million. After temporarily taking over a floor of a co-ed student housing complex across town, it began shopping for a new permanent home. 'We looked at a lot of hotels and a lot of different co-living buildings,' Scott said. 'It was sort of hard to find a building that fits the bill and allows us to continue to fulfill our mission as laid out by the original bequest of the Webster brothers.' Read more: Should you rent or buy a home? The new building is a 20-story, 128-room former hotel in Downtown Brooklyn, which Webster spent a year renovating and redecorating with an emphasis on blond wood and soft pink. Given former residents' love of the old location, finding a new space with a roof deck was a priority. The new building also offers a gym and free laundry facilities, but no kitchen. Instead, residents receive $100 a week in credits they can redeem for food delivery. Gone, too, is the prohibition against men upstairs. Scott said the rule lingered as long as it did in part to protect the privacy of women in the old building, who shared communal dorm-style bathrooms. The new rooms all have private bathrooms, and in surveys and focus groups, many women suggested relaxing the policy. 'The world has changed a lot since some of those policies were put in place,' Scott said. 'The way that women were seen at that time was very different.' The sliding-scale rent model was also eliminated after it became increasingly hard to manage as wages in many, but not all, industries rose dramatically in the aftermath of the pandemic. The new location sits in a busy, transit-dense neighborhood that serves as the borough's commercial and civic hub. It's home to Brooklyn Borough Hall and a hulking federal courthouse. Flatbush Avenue, Brooklyn's main artery, runs through the neighborhood, as does the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway. Though Downtown Brooklyn rarely lands on lists of iconic New York neighborhoods, high-rise residential construction projects have proliferated in recent years, adding thousands of new apartments, a Trader Joe's, a food hall, and a Lidl grocery store. The median rent in the neighborhood is $4,400, while the Webster's largest one-bedroom option tops out at $3,625. A subway ride to Midtown Manhattan takes about 20 minutes. So far, feedback on the new location has been good, especially from international applicants, Scott said. 'Brooklyn is seen as like, the hot spot, and a place where people want to be. We've received such a welcoming response from everyone hearing that we're here.' Claire Boston is a Senior Reporter for Yahoo Finance covering housing, mortgages, and home insurance. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
News24
9 hours ago
- News24
Emile Ormond: South Africa unready for AI-era job disruption
Emerging economies like South Africa may be partially shielded from the initial waves of AI automation, but when it inevitably arrives, the country could be especially vulnerable due to its large, predominantly young labour force, writes Emile Ormond. As artificial intelligence (AI) grows more sophisticated and pervasive, its potential to disrupt labour markets demands urgent attention. Will AI displace workers? Could it trigger unprecedented unemployment? There has been an influx of news articles, predictions, and expert claims that AI will be highly disruptive to the workforce. For instance, McKinsey estimates 400-800 million people globally may need new jobs by 2030, while a BCG survey found 42% of workers fear their roles may vanish within a decade. For South Africa, with an unemployment rate of 32.9% and 46.5% for youth, these predictions are dire. The country simply cannot afford large-scale job losses without jeopardising fragile social stability, deepening poverty and inequality, increasing crime, and threatening fiscal sustainability. As the government of national unity prioritises 'inclusive growth and job creation,' understanding AI's impact on jobs is not just critical - it's urgent. Impact yet to materialise Despite these warnings, evidence of current AI-driven job losses remains limited. In advanced economies like the US and EU, unemployment is near historic lows. Research has found that, for now, AI's impact on employment is minimal, often boosting productivity instead. In South Africa, high unemployment predates AI, rooted in structural economic challenges. So far, AI has not significantly shrunk job markets globally or locally. Historical, technological leaps, like the Industrial Revolutions, sparked similar fears of mass labour market disruption but ultimately resulted in substantially higher employment and productivity. For instance, more than two-thirds of the world's population lived in extreme poverty before the Industrial Revolution – today, it is less than 10%. This precedent, combined with AI's limited impact to date, may have bred complacency among South Africans, especially policymakers, that AI's impact will be manageable and a net positive. However, this view is shortsighted and lacks nuance. Rapidly increasing advances in areas such as multi-modal and agentic AI are poised to transform workplaces. The vast majority of organisations are planning on introducing or expanding their use of AI. This will see workers requiring new skills, creating new roles, and eliminating others. While the balance of these changes is debated, massive labour market disruption is almost certain. This time is different AI's unique traits, distinct from past technologies, will amplify its impact on jobs. These features include: Cognitive capabilities: Unlike earlier automation that targeted manual tasks, AI can handle complex cognitive work, such as analysis and decision-making. General-purpose technology: Like electricity or the internet, AI's application spans all sectors, driving broad economic impact and broadly fuelling productivity at an unrivalled pace. Self-improvement: AI can help enhance future iterations of itself, unlike previous technologies. For instance, the most advanced nuclear reactor cannot design new reactors, but AI can make better AI. Democratised access: Many AI tools are freely or cheaply available, unlike costly previous industrial technologies that were often limited to large, wealthy organisations. Rapid adoption: Generative AI, for example, surged from obscurity to global prominence in just three years. Now, South African workers use generative AI more than those in the US and UK. These characteristics illustrate why AI will disrupt labour markets at an unprecedented pace and scale, but not all countries and groups are equally vulnerable. SA has breathing room High-income countries, with more white-collar jobs, face earlier AI-driven disruption. For instance, 34% of European Union jobs are exposed to AI automation, compared to 19% in the African Union, according to the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Ageing populations and high labour costs may also accelerate AI adoption in developed markets. Young workers, often in entry-level roles, are particularly at risk. The ILO notes that youth hold jobs most susceptible to automation, potentially blocking their entry into the labour force. This is particularly pressing for Africa, with 350 million young Africans expected to reach working age by 2050. In other words, emerging economies like South Africa may be partially shielded from the initial waves of AI automation, but when it inevitably arrives, the country could be especially vulnerable due to its large, predominantly young labour force. In conjunction with this, AI will likely also drive massive productivity gains and create new, currently unforeseen jobs, but the transition period could be long and hard. Moreover, it could ultimately further entrench South Africa's world-leading inequality. Charting a path forward South Africa has a narrow window, as short as two to three years, to harness AI's productivity gains while mitigating its fallout. Key actions stakeholders can take include: Policy development: Political leaders must move beyond vague rhetoric and adopt nuanced, thoughtful policy positions on AI. The government should finalise a national AI strategy, released for comment in mid-2024, to address labour market impacts. Digital infrastructure: Expand reliable, high-speed internet nationwide, resolving disputes over providers like Starlink to ensure equitable AI access. Reskilling programmes: Invest in large-scale training to equip workers with AI-relevant skills and update school and tertiary education curricula for emerging roles. Responsible AI governance: Regulators and organisations should integrate AI oversight into corporate governance, aligning innovation with national development goals. Moreover, AI needs to be a cross-cutting responsibility in government. Social protections: Plans for displaced workers need to be considered now – there are nearly 19 million grant recipients, compared to a tax base of 7 million. Growth measures and/or new revenue sources will need to be found if the if the South Africa stands at the edge of an epoch-defining labour shift. The question is whether we act proactively or react in a crisis. - Dr Emile Ormond has an interest in policy analysis and risk managment.
