Injured train passenger's husband lodges complaint against railway officials
A complaint has been lodged against railway authorities accusing them of not providing medical assistance to the woman passenger who suffered a head injury after the middle berth on a train collapsed in Southern Railway's Salem Division on Monday.
In his petition to the Government Railway Police, T. Jothi Jayashankar, husband of Suria Murugan, 39, the woman on whom the middle berth fell in a sleeper class coach of Train No. 22651 Chennai-Palakkad Express shortly after it crossed Jolarpet early on Monday, explained the circumstances that led to the incident and called for action against the railway personnel on board, accusing them of not assisting the injured passenger.
On seeing Ms. Suria with a bleeding head injury, the Travelling Ticket Examiner (TTE) asked the family to get down at Morappur railway station, which was the next scheduled stop. When asked if the Railways would arrange for an ambulance or other medical care at Morappur, the TTE told the family that they would have to make their own arrangements. Since the time was 1.25 a.m., Mr. Jayashankar said they decided to proceed to Salem, where the railway officials promised to call a '108' ambulance.
'The TTE said there was no doctor or first aid box available on the train. My wife managed the bleeding with her handkerchief till paramedical staff attended to her on arrival at Salem Junction around 2.45 a.m.,' he said.
Mr. Jayashankar sought action against the authorities concerned not only for alleged dereliction of duty and the mental agony the family had to endure, but also to prevent the recurrence of such incidents in future.
Inquiries with railway officials revealed that the Train Manager (Guard) had a first aid box, like in all other trains in the Indian Railways. The managers were trained in rendering basic medical care, including dressing of wounds. The first aid boxes would be presented to a designated Senior Divisional Medical Officer in all divisions for inspection and change in medicines or consumables, if any.
First aid box
Southern Railway spokesperson M. Senthamil Selvan confirmed that a first aid box was available with the Train Manager of Train No. 22651.
He claimed that the Station Master of Morappur and the Train Manager were advised to attend to the patient, but the passenger wanted to proceed to Salem, saying Morappur was an unfamiliar place. There was no doctor travelling on the train, he said, adding that a departmental inquiry was immediately conducted to check the berth fittings and lapses, if any.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
31% of deceased found in suburban railway premises remain unidentified, unclaimed
Mumbai: Around 31% of deceased bodies found within the premises of the Mumbai suburban Railways in the past decade remain unidentified and unclaimed, according to the Government Railway Police (GRP). Thane, India. June 09, 2025: Footwear of victims seen on the railway track at Mumbra Railway Station. Four commuters lost their lives and nine others were injured. The incident occurred when the commuters fell from a train heading to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus (CSMT) on June 9, 2025. Thane, India. 09, 2025. (Photo by Raju Shinde/HT Photo) (Hindustan Times) Responding to a Right To Information (RTI) query filed by Dr Sarosh Mehta, a railways activist, the GRP said that from 2014 to 2024, 18,836 people died on the Central Railways (CR) and 25,846 on the Western Railways (WR). From these, 5,524 on the CR and 8,416 on WR remained unidentified. These numbers add up to over 13,940 unidentified bodies among 44,682 deceased. GRP data says that on an average at least seven people die on the railway premises everyday. GRP officers said that when they find a dead body on the railway premises, they search the deceased to trace their relatives through identity cards, bank cards, or contacts in their phones. In the case of an unidentified person, the police circulate a photograph of the deceased across police stations in the state, and police headquarters of other states through their respective director general of police. The photo is also telecasted on Doordarshan in the hope of locating relatives or tracing the next of kin. GRP officials said that the bodies are kept in the morgue and if they remain unclaimed after 10 days, the finger prints, hair samples, and nails are taken to preserve the identity of the deceased through their DNA. 'It is a challenge to trace the relatives of a drug addict, a beggar, or a mentally challenged person as no document is found on them,' said a police officer from the GRP. Following a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay high court by Sameer Zaveri, a railway activist, the court asked the western and central railways in January 2011 to create websites where they could post details about accident victims. The then GRP commissioner had begun the website in July 2012 to identify the accident victims, but Mehta said the website hardly made a difference. Mehta said that without help from the GRP or the railways, relatives would sometimes spend multiple days travelling to hospitals and morgues across the city to find their injured or deceased kin. To solve this problem, Mehta said, 'We just want a desk at a railway station where volunteers can sit with photos of the bodies and direct the relatives to the exact location where their dear one was taken after an accident.'
Hindustan Times
9 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Railway police chiefs deliberate upon crime control, passenger safety
New Delhi, The Government Railway Police and the Railway Protection Force deliberated upon enhancing passenger safety by leveraging modern technologies during the 6th All-India Conference that concluded here on Sunday. Railway police chiefs deliberate upon crime control, passenger safety Officials said the Railway Protection Force comes under the railway ministry with a mandate to ensure safety of passengers and rail properties, while the Government Railway Police is under state governments to coordinate with the RPF and investigate cases of crime. According to a press statement issued by the railway ministry, the All-India Conference of Government Railway Police chiefs, organised under the aegis of RPF, witnessed the participation of DGPs, ADGPs, and senior officers from the GRP of various states and union territories, alongside representatives from the Ministry of Railways. 'This important gathering marked a concerted effort to address the growing challenges of crime control on Indian Railways and to strengthen collective mechanisms to ensure the safety and security of millions of railway passengers commuting daily through its vast network," the press note said. It added, "The central theme of the conference revolved around enhancing intelligence sharing, formulating joint operational strategies and fine-tuning inter-agency coordination to counter the evolving modus operandi of criminal elements exploiting the vast railway network." The ministry said a key focus area was the intensification of passenger awareness campaigns to educate travellers on common tricks and traps employed by thieves and fraudsters. "The conference resolved to push for the seamless conversion of passenger property theft complaints lodged on the Rail Madad portal into formal FIRs, thereby boosting detection rates and discouraging repeat offences," the ministry said. In a bid to dismantle organised interstate criminal networks targeting high-value passenger belongings, the police chiefs held detailed deliberations on deploying proactive surveillance, coordinated operations across states, and leveraging technology-backed solutions, including facial recognition systems. "The necessity of a unified response system among GRP units of different states and UTs was strongly emphasised to prevent jurisdictional gaps that are often exploited by the offenders," the press note said. "Special attention was devoted to the worrying trend of crimes against women passengers, with the participants agreeing on robust preventive measures, including targeted patrolling, CCTV cameras in stations and coaches and deployment of Meri Saheli teams to enhance the sense of security among women travellers,' it added. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
The Print
a day ago
- The Print
What is CBI's case against Tata firm, Nehru Port Trust officials booked in Rs 800 cr dredging ‘scam'
Dredging of ports involves removal of marine rocks and clay from beneath the water surface to increase the depth of the navigation channel. In the case of JNPT, the process started in May 2003. The plan was to accommodate large-size cargo ships. According to the agency, alleged irregularities inflicted a loss of Rs 365.9 crore on JNPT during the first phase of dredging, which was conducted between 2010 and 2014, and Rs 438 crore in the second phase, which was said to have been conducted between 2012 and 2019. New Delhi: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has booked Tata Consulting Engineers, a Tata Group company, other private firms, and some officials with Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT), a public sector undertaking, for allegedly causing losses of nearly Rs 803 crore to the Nhava Sheva Port. In its FIR, the agency attributed said losses to alleged cartelisation in contracts and inflated bills for port dredging. On Wednesday, the CBI booked Tata Consulting Engineers project director Devdutt Bose; Sunil Kumar Madabhavi, a chief manager-level officer of the JNPT; two other firms in the marine engineering field, Mumbai-based Boskalis Smit India LLP and Chennai-based Jan De Nul Dredging India; and some unidentified public servants in the case. The CBI FIR, filed Wednesday, came more than three years after the probe agency, in June 2022, opened a preliminary enquiry (PE) into the allegations of collusion between JNPT officials and some private companies, leading to inflated estimates and restricted competition aimed at extending benefits solely to the colluding companies. Moreover, the CBI said it found that suppression of reports of independent experts and abuse of positions by JNPT officials resulted in excess payment for dredging beyond the Design Dredge Level (DDL). During the inquiry, 'the criminal conspiracy between the JNPT officials and other private persons, resulting in the wrongful loss, amounting to Rs 365.90 crore for phase-I and Rs 438 crore for phase-II to JNPT due to over-dredging has surfaced,' a CBI official noted in the complaint, which formed the basis of the CBI FIR. Also Read: What court said while acquitting former coal secretary & joint secretary in Mahuagarhi coal block case CBI FIR on conflict of interest, excess payment Nearly seven years after receiving a detailed report to increase the depth of the navigational channel at the port, the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (JNPT) roped in the Tata Consulting Engineer (TCE) for a final report on the dredging plan and cost estimate. The TCE and Dredging Solution, another firm, prepared the final report in December 2010, the CBI FIR has documented. The TCE was also awarded the work of the project management consultant for the first phase. So, it was responsible for preparing tender documents and supervising project execution, the CBI FIR has further stated. Moreover, the TCE recommended three alternative dredging proposals and the modalities for each. It also recommended a second phase of the exercise to cater to the expected increased traffic at the port in 2020. Then, TCE, jointly with E&Y and Howe Engineering Project (India), prepared a final report. Similar to the final report of the first phase, Howe Engineering Project (India) suggested three alternatives for dredging to accommodate 20-foot-size ships, which have a capacity of 12,500 20-foot equivalent units. TCE was also made the project management consultant for the second phase, ignoring the conflict of interest. In the complaint to the agency, leading to an FIR, a CBI official noted a 'significant delay' in the dredging work from 2010 onwards, without proper assessment of prevailing dredging requirements since the detailed project report was prepared way back in May 2003. The investigators further noted that while the first phase was in progress, JNPT management led by Sunil Kumar Madabhavi had already assigned TCE the work to write the final report for the second phase. The second phase of the project began and the payment for it made based on the TCE report in violation of the JNPT board-adopted project note, which explicitly mentioned that the two phases of dredging would be taken up separately. The CBI FIR has noted that in the first phase, the excess dredging, 14.85 million cubic metre beyond the DDL, resulted in a Rs 365.90 crore excess payment, a loss for the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust. 'JNPT officials, in connivance with the PMC (project management consultant) and contractor, have also made an excess payment of Rs.430 crores to the contractor for over dredging made in Phase-II,' the FIR has stated. According to the CBI FIR, two different software were used to conduct the survey before and after the second phase of dredging. The pre-dredging survey used one software known for accuracy and widely accepted globally. However, the post-dredging survey used software patented by one of the parties in the deal on the behest of one Devdutt Bose, the project director on behalf of TCE, the FIR has claimed. Additionally, the CBI FIR alleged that Bose, along with JNPT chief manager in the planning, projects, and development (PP&D) department Sunil Kumar Madabhavi, hatched a conspiracy to allow shadow bidding by a joint venture between Boskalis Smit India LLP and Jan De Nul Dredging India and extended undue financial favours, including payments amounting to Rs 348 crore to the companies in the second phase for work already executed in the first phase, without any such work taking place. 'The above acts of commission and omission on the part of 1) Shri Sunil Kumar Madabhavi, the then Chief Manager (PP&D), JNPT, 2) Shri Devdutt Bose, Project Director with M/s TCE, 3) M/s Tata Consulting Engineers, 4) M/s BoskalisSmit India LLP, 5) M/s Jan De Nul Dredging India Pvt. Ltd. and 6) other unknown public servant and private persons, disclose commission of offences punishable U/s 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of IPC r/w 420 (cheating) of IPC and Section 13 (2) r/w 13(1) (d) of PC Act, 1988 (un-amended) and substantive offences thereof. Therefore, it is requested that a regular case may be registered against the above mentioned persons,' the CBI official documented. (Edited by Madhurita Goswami) Also Read: Another closure report in 2010 CWG 'scam'. Here's what happened to the 19 FIRs filed since 2010
