Why Adani's $1.2 billion stake in Haifa Port is more than just business
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A strategic asset in a sensitive region
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
A long history of commercial and military significance
India's stake in the IMEC corridor
Regional rivalry and security concerns
Adani's broader presence in Israel
The port's multiplier effect
A small asset with high symbolic value
Israel's largest oil refinery, Bazan, suspended all operations at its Haifa Port facilities following significant damage from an Iranian missile strike late Monday night.The attack claimed the lives of three employees and triggered large fires across the strategic energy complex. Visuals from the site showed flames raging at the facility, while firefighting teams continued efforts to bring the situation under control, according to Israeli daily Ha'aretz.The refinery shutdown came after a barrage of Iranian ballistic missiles rained down on Israel's Tel Aviv and the northern port city of Haifa on Monday, killing at least eight people and reducing homes to rubble.This attack, one of the most direct escalations between Tehran and Tel Aviv in recent years, prompted a chilling response from Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant: the people of Tehran 'will pay the price and soon.'As the conflict intensifies, one of India's most prominent commercial footholds in the region, Haifa Port in northern Israel, is facing renewed interest.Acquired by the Adani Group in early 2023, the port is now operating under the shadow of conflict.The Economic Times reported on June 14 that Iranian ballistic missiles had targeted Haifa and a nearby oil refinery amid heightened hostilities between the two countries. Shrapnel reportedly hit parts of a chemical terminal and refinery close to the port.However, the Adani Group denied any damage to port operations. 'False,' said Jugeshinder 'Robbie' Singh, Group CFO , rejecting claims that the facility had been damaged.Despite the immediate denial, the situation highlights the growing uncertainty around Adani's investment in the port, valued at approximately $1.2 billion, and the broader risks of commercial activity in a conflict zone.In January 2023, Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd (APSEZ), along with Israel's Gadot Group, completed the purchase of a 70% stake in Haifa Port Company. The consortium had won the Israeli government tender in July 2022, part of a larger effort to privatise the country's port infrastructure.Adani Ports and Gadot Group hold 70%-30% shares respectively in the consortium.The port handles close to 20 million tonnes of cargo annually, according to its official website, and remains the busiest and most efficient port in Israel. In 2023, it processed 11.7 million tonnes of cargo and 736,138 TEUs, employing around 750 people. It also handled over 410,000 cruise passengers.Haifa contributes around 3% of Adani Ports' cargo volumes and 5% of its revenue. While these are modest figures in business terms, the port's strategic location, outside Israel's most volatile southern regions, with direct rail and road links to major industrial hubs, gives it geopolitical significance.It also provides deep-water access to large vessels and plays a central role in over 30% of Israel's seaborne trade. Crucially, Haifa is adjacent to key Israeli naval installations and has historically served as a base for its submarine fleet.The port was originally developed by the British in the early 20th century, with construction beginning in 1920 and formal inauguration in 1933. Haifa played an important role during the British Mandate and the early years of Israeli statehood. It has since remained a core part of the country's logistics and naval infrastructure.Today, it sits at the intersection of Israel's economic and military networks, bordering an oil refinery, serving industrial exports, and supporting naval operations. These dual-use characteristics raise the stakes for any foreign investor.The Haifa acquisition aligns with India's interest in the proposed India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), a multinational initiative involving India, Israel, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, the EU, and the US. The corridor aims to connect Indian ports to Europe via the Arabian Peninsula and Israel, offering a potential alternative to the Red Sea–Suez Canal route.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described Haifa as a critical link in this corridor. For India, a direct stake in the port could help streamline trade with Europe, strengthen logistics infrastructure, and deepen strategic coordination with regional partners.Dr. James M. Dorsey, a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, characterised the port acquisition as 'I2U2's first success,' referring to the grouping of India, Israel, the UAE, and the US.Haifa is also a site of competition between global powers. China's Shanghai International Port Group (SIPG) operates a separate terminal in Haifa Bay under a 25-year contract signed in 2015. According to The Times of Israel, the terminal, completed at a cost of $1.7 billion (NIS 5.5 billion), sparked controversy over its proximity to Israel's nuclear submarine base and to US Navy vessels, including the Sixth Fleet.The deal reportedly went ahead without review by Israel's cabinet or National Security Council. US officials, including President Donald Trump, warned that Chinese control of critical infrastructure could jeopardise intelligence sharing and defence cooperation. Under American pressure, Israel abandoned earlier plans to allow further Chinese involvement in port operations.Eventually, the tender for the older Haifa terminal was awarded to the Adani-Gadot consortium, a decision seen as more acceptable to both Israel and its Western allies.Beyond the port, the Adani Group also has interests in Israel's defence sector. In 2018, Adani Enterprises formed a joint venture with Elbit Systems to manufacture Hermes 900 drones at a facility in Hyderabad. These UAVs are actively used by the Israel Defense Forces.Elbit Systems, according to its 2022 annual report, derives roughly 90% of its revenue from defence and ranks among the world's 25 largest arms manufacturers. As the regional conflict escalates, demand for such drones may rise, but the strategic exposure of Indian firms to foreign defence partnerships in conflict zones remains a complex issue.According to Israel Ports Company, maritime transport accounts for nearly 98% of the country's foreign trade, and Haifa is a central hub in that system. The port has a effect on employment, logistics and tourism. Industry estimates suggest each job at Haifa Port supports up to seven jobs in related sectors.Yitzhak Blumenthal, CEO of Israel Ports Company, called the opening of the new Haifa Bay terminal 'one of the most important infrastructure projects for Israel's future,' according to The Times of Israel. The entry of private operators is expected to increase competition among Israel's three main ports — Haifa, Ashdod, and Eilat — and improve service quality.For the Adani Group, Haifa is a small part of a much larger logistics empire. The company operates 13 ports in India and handles 24% of the country's maritime cargo. But Haifa's importance lies not in volume but in what it represents: a shift in India's global footprint.The port is a test case for India's ability to invest, operate and maintain critical infrastructure in geopolitically sensitive regions. The challenges are significant. As regional dynamics shift amid a raging conflict, the security of Indian assets in West Asia is no longer guaranteed.Yet, for now, the port remains operational, and Adani's investment continues to signal India's willingness to take calculated risks abroad in pursuit of longer-term strategic and economic goals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
30 minutes ago
- Hans India
Israeli Prez, Defence Minister thank Trump for striking nuclear sites in Iran
Tel Aviv: Israeli President Isaac Herzog on Sunday expressed gratitude to US President Donald Trump for carrying out military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, calling it a "decisive moment" between the axis of terror and that of hope. This comes as Trump announced that America had bombed three nuclear sites in Iran and warned Tehran of further precision strikes unless it ended its confrontation with Israel. The targeted locations reportedly include the highly fortified Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear facilities. Taking to X, Herzog posted, "In the pages of human history, this is a moment when the principles of liberty, responsibility, and security have triumphed. A decisive moment between the axis of terror and evil and the axis of hope. Thank you, US President Donald Trump. Thank you, United States of America." "This brave step serves the security and safety of the entire free world. I hope it will lead to a better future for the Middle East -- and help advance the urgent release of our hostages held in captivity in Gaza," he added. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz also hailed the strikes carried out by the US and Israeli military on the Iranian nuclear sites for the "peace and security" of both countries. Taking to X, he congratulated Trump on his "historic decision" to destroy the three nuclear sites in Iran so that it is assured that Tehran does not have nuclear weapons that "would endanger Israel and the countries of the region, and the national security interests of the United States itself." Katz also congratulated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for leading 'Operation Rising Lion' and the "fight against the Iranian nuclear program and the close relationship with the United States, on this great and historic achievement." "The alliance between the United States and Israel is stronger than ever for the peace and security of both the countries and the entire free world," he added.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Key US military bases in Middle East face increased risk amid Iran retaliation threats
US military bases in region brace for potential Iran retaliation The US military is on elevated alert across key installations in the Middle East after President Donald Trump confirmed airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. As of June 22, 2025, no direct Iranian response has been confirmed, but Iranian officials have warned of consequences for both Israeli and American actions. US military bases in Iraq, including Al Asad Airbase and Erbil Airbase, are among the most exposed to Iranian retaliation. These locations have previously been targeted by Iranian ballistic missiles and proxy rocket attacks. In Syria, US forces stationed near al-Tanf also remain within range of Iranian-backed militias. Also read: US bombs Iran's nuclear sites: All you need to know about the Iranian facilities that are hit by American In the Gulf, the Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates and Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar are strategic hubs for American air operations and logistics. Both bases host thousands of US personnel and advanced aircraft, including surveillance and bomber support. Regional air defense systems in the UAE and Saudi Arabia have been placed on alert. Iran has not formally announced a military response. However, statements from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the foreign ministry suggest that US assets in the region could be subject to reprisal if Tehran assesses that the strikes were coordinated with Israel's earlier attacks under Operation Rising Lion. Live Events US defense officials have declined to comment on troop repositioning or any changes in readiness levels but confirmed that force protection measures have been increased. Commercial flights near Iranian airspace have also been redirected in anticipation of potential escalatory moves. The risk calculus for Washington is further complicated by the presence of US military forces in the Red Sea and Eastern Mediterranean, where naval assets remain within range of Iranian drones and missile capabilities. As the situation unfolds, officials across the region are preparing for multiple contingencies involving cyberattacks, militia activity, and direct strikes on US military bases.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran-Israel War: India ramps up oil imports from Russia, US in June
India has ramped up purchases of Russian oil in June, importing more than the combined volumes from Middle Eastern suppliers such as Saudi Arabia and Iraq, amid market volatility triggered by Israel's dramatic attack on Iran . The US military struck three sites in Iran early Sunday, directly joining Israel which first struck Iranian nuclear sites on June 13. Indian refiners are likely to import 2-2.2 million barrels per day of Russian crude oil in June - the highest in the last two years and more than the total volumes bought from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Kuwait, preliminary data by global trade analytics firm Kpler showed. India's oil imports from Russia were 1.96 million barrels per day (bpd) in May. ALSO READ: Why the US used B-2 stealth bombers, costing $2.1 billion each to strike Iran's nuclear sites Imports from the United States also rose to 439,000 bpd in June, a big jump from 280,000 bpd purchased in the previous month. Full-month projections for imports from the Middle East stand at around 2 million bpd, lower than the previous month's buying, according to Kpler. India, the world's third-largest oil-importing and consuming nation, bought from abroad around 5.1 million barrels of crude oil, which is converted into fuels like petrol and diesel in refineries. ALSO READ: US forces bomb Iranian nuclear sites; 'Fordow is gone' says Trump India, which has traditionally sourced its oil from the Middle East, began importing a large volume of oil from Russia soon after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. This was primarily because Russian oil was available at a significant discount to other international benchmarks due to Western sanctions and some European countries shunning purchases. This led to India's imports of Russian oil seeing a dramatic rise, growing from less than 1 per cent of its total crude oil imports to a staggering 40-44 per cent in a short period. The conflict in the Middle East has so far not impacted oil supplies. ALSO READ: In his own words: Trump's Iran strike tests his rhetoric on ending wars "While supplies remain unaffected so far, vessel activity suggests a decline in crude loadings from the Middle East in the coming days," Sumit Ritolia, Lead Research Analyst, Refining & Modeling at Kpler, told PTI. "Shipowners are hesitant to send empty tankers (ballasters) into the Gulf, with the number of such vessels dropping from 69 to just 40, and (Middle East and Gulf) MEG-bound signals from the Gulf of Oman halving." This suggests that current MEG supplies are likely to tighten in the near term, potentially triggering future adjustments in India's sourcing strategy, he said. The Strait of Hormuz, which lies between Iran to the north and Oman and the United Arab Emirates to the south, serves as the main route for oil exports from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and the UAE. Many liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments, especially from Qatar, also pass through the strait. As the military conflict between Israel and Iran escalates, Tehran has threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world's oil and a major LNG export transit. India imports about 40 per cent of all its oil and about half of its gas through the narrow Strait. According to Kpler, concerns over a potential closure of the Strait of Hormuz have intensified following Israel's pre-emptive strikes on Iranian military and nuclear infrastructure. Iranian hardliners have threatened closure, and state media have warned of oil spiking to USD 400 per barrel. "Yet, Kpler analysis assigns a very low probability to a full blockade, citing strong disincentives for Iran," Ritolia said. This is because China, Iran's largest oil customer (which imports 47 per cent of its seaborne crude from the Middle East Gulf), would be directly impacted. Also, Iran's reliance on Hormuz for oil exports via Kharg Island (handles 96 per cent of its exports) makes self-blockade counterproductive. Additionally, Tehran has made deliberate efforts over the past two years to rebuild ties with key regional actors, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE, both of which rely heavily on the Strait for exports and have publicly condemned Israel's actions. Sabotaging their flows would risk unraveling those diplomatic gains. A closure would also provoke international military retaliation. Any Iranian naval build-up would be detectable in advance, likely triggering a preemptive US and allied response. At most, isolated sabotage efforts could disrupt flows for 24-48 hours, the estimated time required for US forces to neutralise Iran's conventional naval assets, according to Kpler. Any such move would provoke military retaliation and diplomatic fallout with Oman, undermining Iran's own backchannels with the US. Ritolia said India's import strategy has evolved significantly over the past two years. Russian oil (Urals, ESPO, Sokol) is logistically detached from Hormuz, flowing via the Suez Canal, Cape of Good Hope, or Pacific Ocean. Indian refiners have built refining and payment flexibility, while optimizing runs for a wider crude slate. Even US, West African, and Latin American flows - though costlier - are increasingly viable backup options. "India's June volumes from Russia and the US confirm this resilience-oriented mix," he said. "If conflict deepens or there is any short-term disruption in Hormuz, Russian barrels will rise in share, offering both physical availability and pricing relief. India may pivot harder toward the US, Nigeria, Angola, and Brazil, albeit at higher freight costs. Also, India may tap its strategic reserves (covering 9-10 days of imports) to bridge any shortfall.
