Senate Republican questions megabill deadline — and says Musk ‘missed an opportunity' to shape it
Utah Republican Sen. John Curtis raised doubts on Tuesday the GOP could pass its megabill by its self-imposed Independence Day deadline.
Curtis, speaking at the POLITICO Energy Summit in Washington, said, "I think a lot of us would be surprised if it passed by July 4."
He added: 'I think that's a false deadline. I don't think that we need to put a specific deadline on it. Let's get it right."
Curtis, who has been pushing for specific changes to the House-passed tax cut, energy and security spending budget bill, said the package would unfairly phase out tax credits from the Democrats' 2022 climate law. He said the rollbacks could harm energy workers and the economy.
"I think that banks, the investors have invested billions of dollars based on the rules of the road, and you have employees who have set careers based on these things," he said.
'And if they're to go, and I do think some of them should go. … Let's just be thoughtful in how we phase them out,' Curtis said. 'Let's not destroy careers and things like that.' As an example, Curtis said he's pushing for changes to the construction start date language.
The senator's comments come as colleagues hash out details over contentious matters including renewable energy incentives, Medicaid changes and other provisions.
The comments by Curtis, a relative moderate, underscore how difficult it could be for President Donald Trump and congressional leaders to get all Republicans in line before July.
Asked if Elon Musk's recent opposition to the megabill because of deficit concerns could upend the effort, Curtis downplayed the billionaire's influence among Republican senators and suggested he does not appreciate how slowly government operates.
'If he would stop and slow down and realize the way Washington works, because what he does with a business is very different in the culture and everything is so different than what we do in Washington, D.C.," Curtis said, adding, "There's a lot we could learn from him and vice versa.'
Curtis also said he was unsure exactly why Musk hates the bill. 'I'm a U.S. senator voting on this bill, and I don't know why he hates it. You can see how he's missed an opportunity.'
More broadly, Curtis suggested Democrats were partly to blame for demonizing the fossil fuel industry — leading to Trump having an 'overreaction' on energy policy and rhetoric.
'I think what you're sensing is an overreaction to the demonizing that we've had of fossil fuels and how they should be 100 percent eliminated, and perhaps what you're seeing is simply a reaction to that to say, 'Wait a minute.''
Curtis said the reality is that energy demand for the coming decades will require renewables and fossil fuels as well as emerging technologies.
'I believe for us to get to our energy future, we're going to need 100 percent of everything,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's move against Iran may draw more criticism from MAGA's anti-interventionists
President Donald Trump's decision to strike three nuclear sites in Iran could deepen a divide among some of the Republican's supporters, including high-profile backers who had said any such move would run counter to the anti-interventionism he promised to deliver. Notably though, immediately following Trump's Saturday announcement of the strike, some of those who had publicly spoken out against U.S. involvement voiced their support. The lead-up to the move against Iranian nuclear sites had exposed fissures within Trump's 'Make American Great Again' base as some of that movement's most vocal leaders, with large followings of their own, expressed deep concern about the prospect of U.S. involvement in the Israel-Iran war. With the president barred from seeking a third term, what remains unknown is how long-lasting the schism could be for Trump and his current priorities, as well as the overall future of his 'America First' movement. Among the surrogates who spoke out against American involvement were former senior adviser Steve Bannon, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., commentator Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, the founder of the conservative youth organization Turning Point. Part of their consternation was rooted in Trump's own vocalized antipathy for what he and others have termed the 'forever wars' fomented in previous administrations. As the possibility of military action neared, some of those voices tamped down their rhetoric. According to Trump, Carlson even called to 'apologize.' Steve Bannon On Wednesday, Bannon, one of top advisers in Trump's 2016 campaign, told an audience in Washington that bitter feelings over Iraq were a driving force for Trump's first presidential candidacy and the MAGA movement. "One of the core tenets is no forever wars,' Bannon said. But the longtime Trump ally, who served a four-month sentence for defying a subpoena in the congressional investigation into the U.S. Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, went on to suggest that Trump will maintain loyalty from his base no matter what. On Wednesday, Bannon acknowledged that while he and others will argue against military intervention until the end, 'the MAGA movement will back Trump.' Ultimately, Bannon said that Trump would have to make the case to the American people if he wanted to get involved in Iran. 'We don't like it. Maybe we hate it,' Bannon said, predicting what the MAGA response would be. 'But, you know, we'll get on board.' Tucker Carlson The commentator's rhetoric toward Trump was increasingly critical. Carlson, who headlined large rallies with the Republican during the 2024 campaign, earlier this month suggested that the president's posture was breaking his pledge to keep the U.S. out of new foreign entanglements. Trump clapped back at Carlson on social media, calling him 'kooky.' During an event at the White House on Wednesday, Trump said that Carlson had 'called and apologized' for calling him out. Trump said Carlson 'is a nice guy.' Carlson's conversation with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that day laid bare the divides among many Republicans. The two sparred for two hours over a variety of issues, primarily about possible U.S. involvement in Iran. Carlson accused Cruz of placing too much emphasis on protecting Israel in his foreign policy worldview. 'You don't know anything about Iran,' Carlson said to Cruz, after the senator said he didn't know Iran's population or its ethnic composition. 'You're a senator who's calling for the overthrow of a government, and you don't know anything about the country.' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene The Georgia Republican, who wore the signature red MAGA cap for Democratic President Joe Biden's State of the Union address in 2024, publicly sided with Carlson, criticizing Trump for deriding 'one of my favorite people.' Saying the former Fox News commentator 'unapologetically believes the same things I do,' Greene wrote on X this past week that those beliefs include that 'foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction.' 'That's not kooky,' Greene added, using the same word Trump used to describe Carlson. 'That's what millions of Americans voted for. It's what we believe is America First.' About an hour before Trump's announcement, Greene posted on X that, 'Every time America is on the verge of greatness, we get involved in another foreign war.' 'This is not our fight,' she added. 'Peace is the answer.' In another post following Trump's announcement, Greene urged, 'Let us all join together and pray for peace." Alex Jones The far-right conspiracy theorist and Infowars host posted on social media earlier in the week a side-by-side of Trump's official presidential headshot and an artificial intelligence-generated composite of Trump and former Republican President George W. Bush. Trump and many of his allies have long disparaged Bush for involving the United States in the 'forever wars' in Iraq and Afghanistan. Writing 'What you voted for' above Trump's image and 'What you got' above the composite, Jones added: 'I hope this is not the case…' Charlie Kirk Kirk is among those who seemed to have made a quick about-face. About an hour after Trump's announcement, Kirk posted a series of messages on social media supportive of Trump, saying Iran had given the president 'no choice.' Kirk praised Trump for acting 'with prudence and decisiveness" and 'for the betterment of humanity.' Kirk also reposted a 2011 tweet in which Trump had written that 'Iran's quest for nuclear weapons is a major threat to our nation's national security interests. We can't allow Iran to go nuclear.' 'When Trump speaks, you should listen,' Kirk added. It was a different tone from the start of the week, when Kirk said in a Fox News interview that 'this is the moment that President Trump was elected for.' But he had warned of a potential MAGA divide over Iran. Days later, Kirk said that 'Trump voters, especially young people, supported President Trump because he was the first president in my lifetime to not start a new war.' He also wrote that 'there is historically little support for America to be actively engaged in yet another offensive war in the Middle East. We must work for and pray for peace.'
Miami Herald
16 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Thomas Massie Says Iran Attack ‘Unconstitutional' as Trump Divides MAGA
Republican Representative Thomas Massie said that President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three nuclear sites in Iran is "unconstitutional" as the president faces stark division within his own party. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email Saturday night for comment. Israel launched attacks against Iran's capital city of Tehran earlier this month in what it called a "preemptive strike" and warned its citizens of retaliatory bombings from Iran. Military tensions between the two countries have rapidly escalated in the days since as Trump continues to double down that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Taking to X, formerly Twitter, after Trump announced the strikes, Massie said, "This is not Constitutional." Trump announced the military move on Truth Social saying the U.S. attacked Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan in Iran. The president said all planes are now out of Iran air space and "safely on their way home." Massie has been a staunch opponent of striking Iran, previously saying he would not back a move to get involved in a "regime change war." Other Republican leaders like Lindsey Graham have urged Trump to go "all in" on Iran. This is a developing story that will be updated with additional information. Related Articles Trump Says US Bombed Iran's Nuclear Fortress of Fordow and Two Other SitesState Dept Starts Exit Flights From Israel as Trump Mulls War EntryB2 Bombers Move Into Pacific As Israel Hits Iran Radar Near Strait of HormuzSatellite Images Show Israeli Strike Damage to Iranian Nuclear Site 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Miami Herald
16 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
How Nevada's elections will change with new 2025 laws
LAS VEGAS — New laws from the 2025 legislative session aim to increase accessibility to Nevada's elections and improve voters' experiences. Election reform was a major focus in Carson City, though bills that sought to drastically change Nevada's elections were blocked by the governor, including legislation to implement voter ID requirements and to allow nonpartisan voters to participate in primaries. Other bills seeking changes were successful, from requiring that sample ballots be sent before official mail ballots to disclosing campaign advertisements made with artificial intelligence. 'Everything we tried to do this session has been focused on the voter experience and the voter perspective,' said Democratic Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar. The major highlights Aguilar said the biggest highlight from the legislative session for him was the continued investment into modernizing the state's voter registration system. Nevada appropriated over $27 million to go toward merging Clark County with the other 16 counties into one Voter Registration Election Management Solution system, known as VREMS. Last August, the state launched its top-down voter registration and election management system, which collects and stores voter registration information from all counties. Clark County implemented the system in 2023, and the 16 other counties joined the program in 2024. Now, the two will merge together, Aguilar said. Aguilar said putting all the counties on one system will allow the state to do a better job with voter rolls and build transparency by providing real-time information about the elections process. 'There's consistency from county to county,' he told the Las Vegas Review-Journal. 'There's consistency in polling location to polling location. The security and safety of the election is stronger because everybody's operating off of one unified system that has strong cybersecurity.' The secretary of state's office was also provided $1.5 million for voter education and outreach through Senate Bill 488. That money will allow counties to send text messages to voters about upcoming elections or if their ballot signatures need curing. Other new laws aim to improve voters' experience, Aguilar said. For instance, sample ballots now must be mailed before mail ballots, thanks to a new law put forward by Republican Assemblymember Gregory Hafen and Democratic Speaker Steve Yeager. In 2024, voters expressed confusion when they received their official mail ballots before their sample ballots, which provide voter information about what will appear on the official ballot and includes pros and cons for each ballot question. County or city clerks must also recruit election board officers for polling places on tribal reservations and provide them with training on the reservation, unless a tribe opts to not participate, thanks to the passage of Senate Bill 421, which aims to increase voter participation in Nevada's Indigenous communities. The new law expands on a bill passed in the 2023 Legislature requiring clerks to establish polling places and ballot drop boxes on tribal lands. There were staffing shortages in several locations, including the Shoshone Paiute Tribe of Duck Valley, which had to raise more than $5,000 to staff their polling place, according to Jennifer Willett, the Nevada senior campaign manager for All Voting is Local. 'It's a minor shift, but it'll impact a lot of people,' Willett said. 'Over time, people will know that they can go there, and they'll be able to vote in their community confidently at a staffed polling place.' Another new law, AB 367, aims to improve accessibility to non-English speaking voters. The law creates a language access coordinator in the secretary of state's office and requires the office to make sure voting materials and other election information are available in at least seven of the most commonly spoken languages in Nevada. It also requires the secretary of state to establish a toll-free telephone number voters can use to receive language interpretation assistance for an election. A voter who may be deaf or hard of hearing can also use a mobile device to access interpretive services including American Sign Language. Aguilar said his office was doing that work already, but the bill codifies those practices into law. Nevada is the third most diverse state in the nation, with one in three Nevadans speaking a language other than English at home and nearly 4 percent of Nevadans having a hearing difficulty, Willett said. 'We think that dismantling any barriers for people that don't speak English as their first language, or aren't comfortable speaking English, should be able to register to vote, learn about voting and candidates and cast their ballot using any options that they want,' Willett said. Chuck Muth, a conservative blogger who has long fought to clean up the state's voter rolls, said overall he thinks session was a 'wash' when it came to election reform. Lombardo vetoed bills that Muth said would have harmed Nevada, but not much was done to enhance election security, he said. Muth would have liked to see changes to the mail ballot deadline so that they could not arrive after Election Day, though less than 1 percent of ballots arrive after Election Day, according to Aguilar. Campaigning changes Nevadans can expect to see some changes to campaigning ahead of future elections. Any AI-generated campaign communication — such as a campaign advertisement supporting or opposing a candidate — must disclose that it was made with artificial intelligence after the passage of AB 73. The new law addresses the rising use of AI-generated materials as a cost-effective alternative to traditional ways of creating content, and it comes on the heels of experts expressing concern about the role artificial intelligence will play in elections. Aguilar said the goal of the law is to give voters the context and the source of the information that they're seeing and relying on when deciding how to vote. Muth said he discloses when he uses AI in his newsletter, but he thinks that should be voluntary. 'I just think it's probably problematic whenever the government gets involved,' Muth said. Another new law to reduce intimidation and violence in campaigns. AB 123 prohibits a person from making statements that threaten or intimidate a candidate for public office. The law was sponsored by Democratic Assemblymember Hanadi Nadeem, the first Muslim woman elected to the Legislature. She put forward the bill after experiencing death threats while running for Assembly. 'It was truly a horrific experience I do not wish upon anyone, whether it be a fellow candidate, voter or Nevadan,' Nadeem said during the bill's hearing. 'No one should have to fear for their life or to be discouraged from running for office because of the actions of another.' Aguilar said that bill goes back to overall safety and security of elections, and it also encourages participation. 'We want people to run for office because the more diverse perspective we get, the stronger the state we're going to be,' Aguilar said. 'And if people aren't running because they're fearful, that's the problem.' Another new law, AB 491, requires elected officers to be registered to vote in the state, district, county or township where the officer is required to reside. 'That's the intent, I think, and hopefully it acts as an encouragement to say, if you're going to run for office, that you actually live in the community you're voted to represent,' Aguilar said. ___ Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
