How a POW humming ‘Old McDonald' at Hanoi Hilton saved lives

He couldn't recall how he had gotten there — all Douglas Hegdahl could remember was leaving behind his glasses in his bunk and going up to the top deck of the cruiser Canberra to watch the ship firing its guns off the Gulf of Tonkin.
'I can't tell you how I fell from my ship,' Hegdahl said after his release in 1969. 'All I know is, I walked up on the deck. It was dark and they were firing, and the next thing I recall I was in the water.'
Picked up by a North Vietnamese fishing boat after treading water for hours, and handed over to the Viet Cong before being brought to Hỏa Lò Prison, also known as the Hanoi Hilton.
It was there that the 20-year-old sailor from Clark, South Dakota, began one of the greatest non-combatant cons of the war.
Deemed a low-value prisoner due to his low rank, Hegdahl began to exploit this perception.
'I had probably the most embarrassing capture in the entire Vietnam War,' Hegdahl said in a 1997 interview with author and veteran Marc Leepson. 'I found that my defense posture was just to play dumb. Let's face it, when you fall off your boat, you have a lot to work with.'
Pretending to be illiterate and suffering from a cognitive disability, Hegdahl's ruse eventually led to his captors giving the American prisoner of war more leeway within the harsh confines of the prison, which often included regular use of severe torture and harsh interrogation.
Unlike many prisoners who were not allowed to interact with one another, Hegdahl was given more freedom to interact with POWs — which he used to his advantage.
After his initial capture in 1967, Hegdahl quietly began to collect vital information, covertly communicating with fellow POWs, memorizing the names, capture dates and personal details of approximately 256 other American prisoners, according to the Veterans Breakfast Club.
He developed mnemonic devices, including the nursery rhyme 'Old McDonald Had a Farm,' and repeated the information constantly to ensure he would not forget it. He also managed to glean the exact location of the infamous camp.
Dubbed 'The Incredibly Stupid One' by North Vietnamese guards, Hegdahl frequently frustrated their attempts to use him for propaganda purposes. Feigning compliance, Hegdahl would read out statements criticizing the U.S., but they were so laced with errors and the performance so flat that they were rendered unusable by his captors.
'I was so mad about their propaganda that it became a personal war to think how I could mess it up,' Hegdahl recalled in a 1972 interview.
Despite most of the American officers having a 'No Go Home Early' pact, Hegdahl was released in 1969 with the support of imprisoned senior officers in order to bring back valuable intelligence to the U.S. government.
His meticulous recall of names provided a comprehensive list of POWs held in Vietnam, including the reclassification of 63 service members previously listed as missing in action to POW.
After his release from the Army, Hegdahl moved to San Diego, but never stopped serving his country. He began working as an instructor in the Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape, or SERE, school in San Diego Bay. One of his students, William J. Dougherty, a CIA officer, was among the 52 hostages held in the U.S. Embassy during the 1979 Iranian Hostage Crisis. Dougherty credits Hegdahl's lectures with helping him keep his 'sanity, dignity and secrets intact.'
According to Leepson, Hegdahl's quick thinking and coolness under immense strain should be recognized.
'I think it was one of the most heroic acts not in combat during the Vietnam War,' Leepson told The Independent. 'And I think that's something that people should know.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

New York Post

an hour ago

• New York Post

Trump's heavy Iran choice: Letters to the Editor — June 21, 2025

The Issue: President Trump deliberation on whether to take military action against Iran's last nuke site. President Trump has raised concerns that a post-regime Iran might resemble Libya after Moam­mar Khadafy — fractured, chaotic and unstable ('Don fears Daffy decision,' June 20). But the comparison between Iran and Libya is deeply flawed. Advertisement Libya's Khadafy, though brutal, never possessed the strategic capabilities Iran now holds. Iran is already a regional power, capable of threatening Israel — and far beyond — through its ballistic-missile arsenal and emerging nuclear capabilities. Moreover, post-Khadafy Libya lacked a unifying opposition or a credible heir, which fueled its descent into civil war. Advertisement Iran is different. Exiled Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has emerged as a potential transitional figure, and reports suggest some elements within Iran's military are in quiet contact with his camp. Kim Ezra Shienbaum New Milford, Pa. Advertisement Iran has trained, armed, financed, encouraged and applauded terrorists who have killed American citizens. For almost half a century, Iran's leaders have preached 'Death to America.' There will never be a better opportunity to remove these leaders than now. This will go a long way to promoting peace in the Middle East. Advertisement The people in Iran, especially the women, will thank us. Joe Zeloof Hamilton, NJ Launching attacks on Iran, a nation of more than 90 million, risks an uncontrollable regional war with catastrophic consequences. It is not only immoral — it is insanity. Such escalation would bring mass suffering and global economic instability and further fuel anti-American sentiment. This is not America's war. It must not become one. Advertisement Congress must act now to prevent an unauthorized war and assert its constitutional war powers. We cannot bomb our way out of failed policies. More war will not bring peace or security — it will only deepen chaos. Say no to war with Iran. Advertisement Jagjit Singh Los Altos, Calif. Iran is not Libya. There is a large, oppressed population that is pro-Israel, pro-democracy and pro-United States. Advertisement We should not allow irrational fears of Iran turning into another Libya stop us from standing up for the oppressed Iranians. That would be like the allies in World War II not overthrowing the Nazis because of fear that Germany would descend into chaos. Iran was once a friendly country with a friendly regime that was overthrown by radical Muslims, who might have been stopped if it hadn't been for Carter administration pressure on the shah. We share in the responsibility that led to the regime change from a shah who loved his people and American values, to a regime that oppresses Iranians and hates the United States. Advertisement Gamaliel Isaac Manhattan This nation needs to pull in its swords overseas and attend to the war going on within our own country. It seems as if our government cannot get enough of spending our time and money to meddle in other nations' domestic affairs. Having been a part of these intrusions at one time, I can say most of our various expenditures have been most wasteful and negative. There is absolutely nothing heroic about 'loving war as long as we take few casualties.' This country of ours in now at war with itself and the opposing factions are becoming more polarized. We have enough on our hands right here. Michael G. Merhige Miami, Fla. After decades of failed global negotiations and agreements toward delaying and denying Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons, Israel has systematically and spectacularly attacked Iran's nuclear sites. However, destruction of the deeply buried Fordow uranium-enrichment site remains a serious challenge, likely resolvable only by American bunker buster bombs. Will America rise to this challenge? History surely will not be kind should this rarest of moments to finally eliminate this long overhanging threat not be firmly seized. Richard D. Wilkins Syracuse Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

Miami Herald

an hour ago

• Miami Herald

Hopes Of Lower Tariffs Against European Cars Are Fading Fast

One of the biggest promises of President Donald J. Trump's electoral race was to impose tariffs on foreign imports, and shortly after he was inaugurated for the second time, "tariffs" quickly became one of the buzzwords of his presidency. When it comes to cars, just about anything produced outside of American borders is going to get a lot more expensive, and due to vastly complex international supply chains, even domestically produced products could be impacted. But there was a glimmer of hope that the president would change - or at least soften - his stance against America's allies in Europe. European Union leaders had publicly expressed this expectation, citing a history of cooperation. However, as the July 9 deadline for tariffs to be further increased approaches, hope is fading, reports Reuters. The publication spoke to an anonymous official who reportedly noted that hopes of relief are fading faster now that tariffs have come into effect: "10% is a sticky issue. We are pressing them, but now they are getting revenues." A second source reportedly said the EU still would not accept the baseline rate but acknowledged that it would be difficult to change or abolish the measure. The European Union has also publicly declared that it would not accept double-digit tariffs as the United Kingdom has, but U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has ruled out the idea of any tariffs being lowered under the 10 percent baseline. What makes this worse is that the tariffs don't only apply to finished products; steel and aluminum from Europe face a 50 percent tariff, and that doesn't even include the standalone 25 percent tariff on foreign cars. The good news is that Europe, with a trade surplus of $236 billion with the U.S., needs to continue doing business with the largest economy in the world, so your local BMW dealer isn't closing up shop anytime soon. An EU official is quoted by Reuters as saying that the 10% baseline rate would "not massively erode competitive positions, especially if others receive the same treatment." And although hope of a compromise is fading, it hasn't been extinguished just yet. As noted by CarScoops, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that negotiations are still underway, despite President Trump's assertion earlier this week that the EU hadn't been fair thus far. "We're talking, but I don't feel that they're offering a fair deal yet," said President Trump. "They're either going to make a good deal or they'll just pay whatever we say they have to pay." Von der Leyen said, "It's complex, but we are advancing - that is good - and I push hard to pick up more speed. So we are mixed in the negotiations, and we will see what the end brings." The United States government is adamant that its long-standing partners are benefitting more from the status quo than America is, and that mindset means that any price increases as a result of tariffs on EU imports will likely not be small. That said, automakers are working to find ways of absorbing as much of the financial strain as possible, and one way of doing that is by pushing sales of existing inventory with incentives and employee pricing offers. Related: Mercedes CEO Has a Trump Tariff Deal That Could Reshape US-EU Auto Trade Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

The Hill

2 hours ago

• The Hill

Iran unsure it can trust US after Israeli strikes: top official

Iran's foreign minister told NBC News Friday that Tehran was not sure it could trust the United States in the wake of numerous Israeli attacks on Iran. The airstrikes from Israel, which have targeted Iranian military and nuclear facilities, came just days before American officials were scheduled to hold nuclear talks mediated by Oman. The U.S. has said it was not involved in the operation, although Trump was notified of the strike beforehand by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In the interview, Araghchi suggested that the United States was not legitimately interested in diplomacy and was only using the talks as a 'cover' for future attacks. 'They had perhaps this plan in their mind, and they just needed negotiations perhaps to cover it up,' Araghchi said. 'We don't know how we can trust them anymore. What they did was in fact a betrayal to diplomacy.' 'We're not prepared to negotiate with them anymore, as long as the aggression continues,' he added. The State Department did not immediately return a request for comment. Araghchi's comments mark another deterioration in the chances for diplomacy between the United States and Iran, and come as President Trump is weighing a strike on the country that could damage one of its most significant nuclear facilities that is still standing after Israel's attacks. Trump has repeatedly said that he hopes for a diplomatic solution and does not want to involve the United States in another war in the Middle East. But he also approved of an airstrike in private, the Wall Street Journal reported, although he held off on giving a final order. Now, Trump has attempted to give himself more room for negotiations, saying that he will make a decision within two weeks. Nuclear talks between Iranian, German, French, and British diplomats are now occurring in Geneva, although they did not produce any breakthroughs on their first day. During the interview, which occurred after the end of the talks on Friday, Aragchi said that Israel had to halt its attacks in order to continue negotiations, and that he was unwilling to give up uranium enrichment entirely. 'This is an achievement of our own scientists. It is a question of national pride,' he said.