Hundreds of homes for homeless in Dublin at risk as tender to manage them attracts no bids
Hundreds of homes, planned for Dublin's most vulnerable
homeless
population, are in jeopardy as a tender to manage them has attracted no bids, according to the
Housing Agency
and the
Dublin Regional Homeless Executive
.
Dozens of people, who have been sleeping on streets or who have spent long periods in emergency accommodation and should have been offered housing, have not received offers.
The Housing First programme, where entrenched rough-sleepers are provided with own-door housing along with wraparound supports to help sustain their tenancy, has been managed in Dublin by the
Peter McVerry Trust
, the homeless housing charity, since 2019.
With the expiration of the trust's contract last year, the Housing Agency led a procurement process for the management of 540 tenancies and to meet targets to create hundreds more.
READ MORE
The agency sought bids for three 'lots' of tenancies.
Though tenders were received from housing bodies for two smaller 'lots' of about 125 current tenancies each, the largest lot of 250 existing tenancies attracted no bids.
There are currently 540 Housing First tenancies in Dublin, with a further 581 across eight regions outside the capital. The programme's current difficulties are limited to properties in Dublin.
The programme for government set a target of expanding the scheme – regarded as hugely successful in tackling long-term homelessness among single adults – to 2,000 nationally, including hundreds more in Dublin.
[
Child-focused homelessness strategy needed, says Ombudsman
Opens in new window
]
A target of 143 additional tenancies were to be created this year, with another 143 next year in Dublin. Sources say fewer than 10 have been created so far this year.
'The scheme has effectively been paused,' said a senior housing sector source.
'It means really vulnerable people who would be put forward for housing with all the wraparound supports, or individuals who have been a long time in emergency accommodation and need those extra supports going into housing, are just being left.'
In addition, supports for existing tenancies are said to 'stretched', with staff from other charities, including Depaul and Focus Ireland assisting Peter McVerry Trust's Housing First staff.
'The Government has made a complete mess of this tender process,' said Sinn Féin's housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin.
'As a result, existing Housing First tenants are not getting the support they need and vital new housing first tenancies are not being created.'
[
'A grim situation': Number of homeless people rises further
Opens in new window
]
The Dublin Region Homeless Executive, which provides statutory supports to the scheme, said the delay incompleting the tender has 'hindered the growth of the service in 2025″.
'However, all stakeholders are working collaboratively to consolidate the Housing First programme and support the current Housing First tenants.'
A Housing Agency spokeswoman said its Housing First national office was working to ensure current tenancies are protected and future tenancies will be created under the tender process.
She said 'challenges' facing Housing First included sourcing enough one-bedroom units and recruiting and retaining tenancy support staff.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
UN committee calls for greater Traveller representation in Irish politics
Low levels of political representation among Traveller and Roma women in Ireland have been criticised during a Government delegation's appearance before a United Nations committee. Ireland was examined on Friday by a UN committee on women's rights with regard to its compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). Ireland last faced questioning by the Geneva-based CEDAW committee in 2017. The delegation also heard calls for guarantees to protect the human rights of sex workers, an assessment of the number of victims of child trafficking, and for complete restorative justice in relation to the mother and baby home redress scheme. The marginalisation of migrant, Traveller and Roma women dominated concerns voiced by the CEDAW committee, which consists of 23 human rights experts, with employment levels and political representation among topics raised. The implementation of education strategies addressing sexism and gender stereotyping was also discussed by the delegation. READ MORE Committee vice-chairperson Marianne Mikko said that Ireland had 'not produced meaningful representation' of minority women in politics. Ms Mikko highlighted Government failure 'to adopt legislative quotas which accelerate the participation of minority women in political and public life', as called on by the last committee in 2017. ' One Traveller woman in the senate is good but not sufficient,' she said. Speaking as a representative of the Department of Children, Disability and Equality , Lisa Hughes outlined some initiatives the State has taken to increase the inclusion of Traveller and Roma women in public life. Ms Hughes said: 'A specific action to promote the participation of Traveller and Roma women in political and community participation is included in the National Traveller and Roma Inclusion Strategy, published last year.' She added that a policy paper was discussed at the steering committee of the strategy when it met on May 21st last year 'to look at the Roma capacity to engage with policymaking'. In her opening statement, committee rapporteur Jelena Pia-Comella said the committee 'remains concerned at the lack of rights based investigations and reparations to the survivors of abuse' in mother and baby homes, Magdalene laundries, schools, residential institutions and survivors of the practice of symphysiotomy . Responding to concerns raised surrounding the scope of the mother and baby redress scheme, Carol Baxter, assistant secretary justice from the Department of Children, Disability and Equality said that payments given to date 'range in nature from €11,000-100,000, so they very much reflect the fact that people who were in Magdalene institutions often had very difficult experiences there'. Ms Baxter confirmed that the scheme is available to people living abroad 'and has always been', when asked. 'The State has been very conscious of the need for a proactive approach to make sure that the broadest number of women qualify,' said Ms Baxter, adding that it had commissioned senior counsel Mary O'Toole to look at cases where there was a dispute over the length of stay in the institutions. The committee were told that Ms O'Toole reviewed 231 cases and 'already has recommended additional payments', and in a majority of cases payments have been made. Her report has been finalised and will be published very shortly, Ms Baxter said.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Minister in the spotlight as health controversies intensify
'It is frightening, what was happening at CHI', Sinn Féin health spokesman David Cullinane said as politician after politician at the Oireachtas health committee tore strips off the embattled group that runs children's hospital services in Dublin. The hospital group knew it would be facing a rough day given the litany of contentious issues facing it: the implantation of unauthorised springs , allegations surrounding unnecessary hip operations , controversy over lengthy waiting lists for spinal surgery, an internal report identifying dysfunctional behaviour and a toxic culture in parts of CHI as well as concerns over whether National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) money earmarked for reducing hospital waiting lists had been misused. As CHI was heading to the bear pit that is the committee room on Thursday, Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill was on her way to a European health council meeting in Luxembourg. But she and her officials were keeping a close eye on proceedings as the Oireachtas committee heard directly from those running CHI for the first time. 'There is absolutely zero confidence in the CHI board, zero confidence in the management,' said Fianna Fáil TD Martin Daly. READ MORE He later maintained he was reflecting the feelings of colleagues in the Oireachtas. On the ministerial corridors at Leinster House, senior figures may not be frightened by events at CHI. But there is no doubt there are strong concerns that after five years of relative quiet – accompanied by unprecedented levels of investment – health scandals are once again dominating the agenda. How all this is handled will be a big test for Carroll MacNeill in her first term as a senior Minister. Initially she was seen as one of the better performers in the Cabinet. But a number of figures in Government point out that in recent weeks things seem to be boiling over on a number of fronts. There is a clear sense within Government that the aggregate effect of the series of controversies represents an important moment and a shift in gears for Carroll MacNeill's ministerial career. 'It is a huge test for her, a huge challenge,' one source said, adding there were nascent concerns about keeping the centre of Government informed as the controversies develop. 'While she is the line minister, she is responsible, from a public perception point of view, the Government is responsible.' She must also master the inner workings and unpredictable dynamics of a health crisis – something that eventually falls to everyone in her position. This is particularly the case for one that is, in fact, composed of several overlapping sub-crises – a 'sprawling controversy with so many elements', as one source described it. She must keep track of timelines, keep the information flow running, keep across who knew what and when. For a first-time Cabinet minister, it is the ultimate acid test. Some of this may just be timing. The report by the health services watchdog, the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) on the unauthorised springs was always set for May and Government knew this would probably cause a storm that would be quickly followed by an equally damaging analysis into operations for children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. However, the stunning leak of an internal CHI report identifying potential patient safety risks, questionable use of NTPF-funded waiting list clinics and a toxic culture at one CHI hospital came out of left field. Ministers and health chiefs said they had been blindsided. The revelations also highlighted divisions between different parts of the health system and put the spotlight on flaws in the governance structures. Last week the NTPF confirmed it had suspended funding for waiting list initiatives at another centre, Beaumont Hospital in Dublin, on foot of potential financial irregularities. The Irish Times revealed this followed a letter sent to the chairwoman of Beaumont by consultants in which they maintained the hospital had billed the NTPF for about 1,400 patients treated in their regular public clinic. The Department of Health – and presumably the Minister – had been aware of this development since April. Carroll MacNeill had directed the HSE to send internal auditors into Beaumont . However, the public was not told until June 11th. Some highly placed sources maintain all this has led to concerns about the information flow around Government. One Minister told The Irish Times there had been discussions about what was coming out. 'As we hear things, things are being circulated,' they said. 'There is no concern about the political messaging, but there is huge concern about what we hear is going on – everything, from what you hear about [HSE chief] Bernard Gloster bringing in the gardaí to everything that is going on in terms of governance, the whole shooting match. But the primary concern is about the children.' Another Government figure said there is real concern that health may blow up (politically) in a way that it has not done in five years and that there may be too much of a hands-off approach by the Minister. The Government is only too aware there is more drama to come. CHI, the HSE and the NTPF will be before the Dáil Public Accounts Committee in early July. An external review into paediatric orthopaedic surgery being carried out for the HSE is also still awaited. A separate HSE report on 'insourcing', where some staff formed private companies to carry out additional work outside regular hours to tackle waiting lists, is also due, as are the findings of the internal auditors sent into Beaumont. Governments have spent more than €1.6 billion on waiting lists over recent years, using the NTPF, the HSE 'insourcing' and other arrangements. Any questionable findings will undoubtedly lead to more allegations about waste. Carroll MacNeill is facing a balancing act of trying to deal with serious issues in CHI at a time when the organisation should, ideally, be concentrating on moving the three existing paediatric centres in Dublin into the new €2.4 billion national children's hospital. TDs, like Daly, may have no confidence in CHI. But in the meantime services for children have to continue and workforce planning and other arrangements for the move have to be carried out in parallel. In late May the Minister told the Dáil: 'I am trying to look at this question in relation to the broader governance of CHI in a way that enables the functional continuity of CHI, both to respond to the various patient needs and ... the broader running of the paediatric system and to move us towards opening the new hospital. I want to ensure we see the appropriate governance structure in place to make sure that we have clinical leads who are managing each team.' However, within Government the ghost of the 2018 cervical check scandal casts a long shadow. This centred on retrospective audits of cervical cancer screenings that showed that 221 women's smear test readings missed abnormalities, leading to the development of cervical cancer. The results were not disclosed to 162 women and a number subsequently died. [ Justine McCarthy: Ireland's grubby treatment of Covid-19 heroes will cause frontline workers to think twice next time Opens in new window ] The fallout caused a national outcry. Ministers, doctors and health administrators did not adequately argue their own case and in the face of relentless criticism, a narrative took root and proved difficult to eradicate. There are fears that further revelations at the Public Accounts Committee or in forthcoming reports could spark further controversy. A number of sources have voiced concerns that the health service and CHI could replicate the rolling controversy seen over the RTÉ payments scandal two summers ago. The gaps and governance flaws identified by the CHI controversy also leaves the Minister with a decision on whether further reforms are needed. Health economist at UCC Dr Brian Turner described the current system as a complex mix of public and private funding and delivery with a large degree of overlap. He said there were publicly-funded public hospitals (run by the HSE), publicly-funded voluntary hospitals (run by their own boards) and public patients in private facilities such as nursing homes. In addition, the NTPF buys treatment in both the public and private systems. On top of this HSE reforms introduced last year led to new regional chief executives appointed to oversee services in geographic areas that covered both public and voluntary hospitals. [ Flying to Spain for medical care: 'The Irish really appreciate the services; they are actually really easy patients' Opens in new window ] One obvious question from this is who does the chief executive in a voluntary hospital primarily report to? Is it to the hospital board or the HSE regional chief executive? Such questions are not purely academic. At the Oireachtas committee, it became clear CHI did not believe its internal report merited a referral to the Garda. The HSE, on the other hand, wanted gardaí involved. One experienced health service figure told The Irish Times the CHI issue was casting a spotlight on the key governance question: who is in charge of what in the health service? With some exceptions, most of the main academic teaching hospitals covering most of the main specialities are in the voluntary sector. The staff are considered to be public servants but the hospitals are run by their own boards. Voluntary hospitals tend to jealously guard their independence. One senior figure pointed to a row last year when former minister for health Stephen Donnelly wanted all hospitals to adopt a new system that would provide greater visibility over productivity. A number of voluntary hospitals objected until the minster threatened to withhold capital funding. CHI reported to the minister, not to the HSE. However, when Donnelly wanted a new chief executive appointed as the former chief executive Eilish Hardiman had served the maximum two terms under Government policy, the CHI board disagreed. Simon Harris , as minister for health in 2017 established a review of the role of voluntary organisations in the operation of the health sector. But many key structures remained in place. One senior health source said voluntary hospitals previously argued they provided a set level of services for the State under an agreement each year but were subsequently free to treat fee-paying patients and do other work. However, private practice in public hospitals is now to be eliminated over time under Sláintecare , the long-term plan to achieve universal, single-tier health and social care. One experienced health figure said it was widely known that the governance arrangements were flawed. However, he questioned whether the Government had the bandwidth or determination to deal with the aggravation that would flow from trying to change the current model of care – a process that could take several years, and possibly beyond the next general election.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Leaving Cert economics: A ‘great paper' with topical questions
A 'very topical' higher-level economics paper featured a broad mix of macro and micro questions, but students hoping for high marks needed to have studied the full course, teachers have said. Rob Quinlan, an economics teacher at the Institute of Education, said that the paper drew on topics such as GP numbers, pension auto-enrolment, hospitality closures, sustainability, the increased price of chocolate and international trade. 'Students who are alert to the unfolding events and economic discussions happening beyond the classroom will find that every chapter has real context, a real place in people's lives,' Mr Quinlan said. Pádraig Murphy, ASTI subject representative for economics and a teacher at St Declan's College in Cabra, said that students liked the topicality of the paper. READ MORE 'It was a fair paper that rewarded people who worked hard and kept up to date with current affairs,' he said. Section A Mr Quinlan said that section A was short questions that skewed slightly towards microeconomics. 'This will have favoured students who find the material more conducive to quick, direct answers, with staple concepts like cost benefit analysis, Germany's hosting of the Euro 2024 tournament, inflation and the minimum wage,' said Mr Quinlan. The only really tricky twist in this section occurred in question eight (B) which asked about 'greenwashing' and market failure. 'While the concepts are not themselves hard, the layout of the question was essentially a reverse-engineered version of the typical approach where students need to state the definitions. This will push those looking for the highest grades to sit back and reconfigure their approaches,' said Mr Quinlan. Section B 'The longer questions of section B were all rooted in important new topics but required a really broad knowledge of the course. If you had hoped to get away with only learning a select few chapters, you'll have found the scope of this paper tough. 'Q11 on health insurance and healthcare provision was a perfect balance of topics and scales that tested students' grasp of the full spectrum of factors at play in this pressing issue. 'Q12 on GDP and GNI was interesting in its emphasis on the latter as it was a good way to show the influence of multinationals on Ireland's economy. GNI also appears in Q13 in the context of international aid and the Official Development Fund (ODA). 'Q14's tech focus not only reflected key news stories (eg Amazon's expansion) but tasked students with considering more novel areas like Ireland's market economy in agriculture and sports. This was paired with fairly standard questions on supply and demand, as well as a gig economy that was similar to 2021,' said Mr Quinlan. Mr Quinlan said that question 15 on housing prices and mortgage relief will surely be familiar from discussions both in and out of the classroom. Question 16 focused on the topical issue of hospitality sector closures. 'This shows that a student looking to really succeed in the exams needs to keep an eye on what is happening in the world around them, as that is as good an indicator of what to expect as past papers.,' said Mr Quinlan. 'Overall, this was a great paper for those who really grasped how important economics is to their lives in the country and the world on the whole.' On the ordinary level paper, Mr Murphy said that it was balanced, fair and appropriately pitched.
