FBI extradites '10 Most Wanted' list fugitive from Mexico: Patel

The FBI extradited one of the 'Ten Most Wanted' list fugitives, an alleged key leader of international criminal gang MS-13, from Mexico.
FBI Director Kash Patel said Francisco Javier Roman-Bardales, a Salvadoran national, was extradited on Monday night and is being transported to the U.S. The federal law enforcement agency worked with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and 'other interagency partners.'
'He was arrested in Mexico and is being transported within the U.S. as we speak, where he will face American justice,' Patel said in a Tuesday morning post on the social platform X.
Patel touted the extradition as a 'major victory both for our law enforcement partners and for a safer America.'
'Thank you to our brave personnel for executing the mission. And thank you to Mexico's SSPC and FGE teams for their support of the FBI in this investigation and arrest,' Patel wrote, referring to the Secretariat of Security and Civilian Protection (SSPC), Mexico's government agency tasked with supervising public safety and security.
Mexican authorities said they arrested Roman-Bardales, 47, Monday in Veracruz, Mexico, on the Teocelo-Baxtla highway.
According to a joint statement from the Mexican Defense Ministry, Navy, Office of Attorney General, the National Guard and SSPC, Roman-Bardales was informed of his arrest, his legal rights were read out to him and he was transferred to Mexico City, 'where he will be taken to the appropriate authority, where he will subsequently be deported to the United States where he is wanted.'
The fugitive was wanted by the FBI for his alleged involvement with MS-13's operations in both Mexico and the U.S.
He was charged with 'several offenses' over his supposed role in 'ordering numerous acts of violence against civilians and rival gang members, as well as his role in drug distribution and extortion schemes in the United States and El Salvador,' according to the FBI.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued an arrest warrant for Roman-Bardales on Sept. 22, 2022, after he was charged with 'conspiracy to provide and conceal material support and resources to terrorists; narco-terrorism conspiracy; racketeering conspiracy; and alien smuggling conspiracy.'
The FBI was offering up to $250,000 for information leading to Roman-Bardales's arrest. The agency website was updated to list him as 'captured.'
The Trump administration last month designated MS-13, which is believed to have originated in Los Angeles in the 1980s; the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua; and half a dozen Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations.
The Hill has reached out to the DOJ for comment.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Insider

an hour ago

• Business Insider

A family was awarded $1.5 million after US border officers wrongfully detained their 9-year-old. Their lawyer shares which AI tool helped him win the case.

Some lawyers continue to fall for made-up cases generated by artificial intelligence. Others are quietly finding ways to make the technology work for them. Joseph McMullen, a San Diego civil rights and criminal defense attorney, is one of them. Last year, he said, he used AI-powered legal software to help him win a major case by sifting through evidence and making his filings more persuasive. The case that led McMullen to rethink his tools started with a 9-year-old girl, a passport photo, and a border agent who thought something didn't add up. In 2019, Julia, a fourth grader, and her 14-year-old brother, Oscar, rose early every weekday morning to cross the US-Mexico border to go to school. The siblings were born in the US but lived in a Tijuana border town, court records show. For local kids, the commute was as familiar as brushing their teeth. They'd crossed the border many times without incident until March 18, when a US Customs and Border Protection officer noticed a dot on Julia's passport photo that looked like a mole she didn't have in person. Julia was taken to a secondary inspection area and interviewed alone, which the court would later find violated the agency's policy on questioning children. In a lawsuit, the family alleged that border officers pressured her to claim she was her Mexican cousin. The government denied any coercion and argued that the length of the children's detention was justified because Julia repeatedly identified herself as her cousin. A Customs and Border Protection spokesperson declined to comment. Julia was detained for 34 hours, and Oscar for roughly 14 hours, before they were reunited with their mother. Swearing off ChatGPT As he built his lawsuit against Customs and Border Protection over the children's detention, McMullen, who runs his own law practice, turned to technology to interpret the evidence. By early 2024, he had three federal civil trials in three months. Time was short, and help was scarce. He approached tools like ChatGPT with deep skepticism. In one of his early tests, the chatbot surfaced a case that seemed perfect — until he realized it didn't exist. "That was it. Never again," he said. Barely a month went by without another story of a lawyer getting burned by bogus case law. Judges were catching on. A public database maintained by legal data analyst Damien Charlotin lists 120 cases where courts caught lawyers using fake or hallucinated citations. Most of the cases were in the US in the past 18 months. Still, the idea of using AI stuck with McMullen. Unlike lawyers who lean heavily on case law, he spends most of his time combing through police reports, surveillance footage, transcripts, and emails, then figuring out what he has, what's missing, and what story the evidence tells. He wondered how better tech could help him, like taking a metal detector to a haystack. Get to the point There was no jury in his trial against CBP, which meant US District Judge Gonzalo Curiel would make the decision. That made written filings even more crucial. "It was important to make it as easy as possible for [Curiel] to get the information that I really wanted him to look at," McMullen said. Another attorney recommended Clearbrief, a tool that integrates with Microsoft Word and lets lawyers link every factual claim to the underlying evidence. The plugin recognizes citations using natural language processing and automatically generates links to relevant case law or documents. When an attorney files a brief using Clearbrief, a judge or any recipient can open a hyperlinked version in Word or a browser. Each citation becomes interactive: Clicking on one pulls up the exact source text side-by-side with the brief, allowing the reader to verify claims faster without digging through exhibits or databases. While preparing for trial, McMullen found a California unlawful detainment case that had resulted in a large damages award. To try and steer Curiel toward a similar judgment, he used Clearbrief to link an appellate brief from that case — buried deep in a district court docket — directly in his trial memo. McMullen said being concise in briefs is not just about saving time; it is a persuasive strategy in itself. Effective advocacy, he said, isn't about "inundating a finder of fact with all the evidence," but presenting "the most important things that you need to know." (He's certain Curiel and his clerks were thorough in their review.) "Being efficient with anyone's time is persuasive," he said. Clearbrief and the competition Lawyers can also use Microsoft Word to hyperlink text. The Clearbrief difference, founder and CEO Jacqueline Schafer said, is that it automatically creates the hyperlinks and checks the citations against databases like LexisNexis and vLex Fastcase. The tool flags any mismatch between what the lawyer writes and what the source says. Schafer said it speeds up drafting and reduces the burden on judges to confirm that every citation is accurate and not the product of an AI hallucination. Clearbrief's client list includes law firms, courts, and legal departments with names like Hogan Lovells, Microsoft, and the American Arbitration Association. The service starts at $200 a month per user for solo practitioners and small teams, with higher rates for larger organizations. Westlaw and LexisNexis also offer tools to assist with legal research and drafting, but they don't affect how the final document appears to the court or recipient. Another Clearbrief feature McMullen relied on was timelines. The tool turned over dozens of depositions and other records and created a case chronology, complete with hyperlinks to the source documents that support the dates and events shown in the timeline. McMullen didn't submit the timeline in court — it was "maybe a thousand lines" — but he read it closely in trial prep to make sure he hadn't missed anything. Better outcomes Last year, Curiel ruled that CBP falsely imprisoned the siblings and was liable for the "intentional infliction of emotional distress" in the 2019 incident. Oscar's grades went down. Julia suffered from insomnia and nightmares. Their parents sought therapy for them both. Curiel wrote in his decision that the government's conduct was "beyond the bounds" of what is "usually tolerated in a civilized community. " He ruled that the agency must pay the family $1.5 million in total damages. The US government appealed the decision, then dropped its appeal. Many legal tech startups promise lawyers they'll be able to take on more cases. For McMullen, the promise of AI isn't about churning through more cases so much as going deeper on the ones he has. He said he used the time he saved to visit Julia's family in Mexico. "There are several aspects of the practice that are gratifying," McMullen said. But, "there's not a single person who says, 'I really love the tedium of formatting that table.'"

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

‘Ticking time bomb': Ice detainee dies in transit as experts say more deaths likely

A 68-year-old Mexican-born man has become the first Ice detainee in at least a decade to die while being transported from a local jail to a federal detention center, and experts have warned there will likely be more such deaths amid the current administration's 'mass deportation' push across the US. Abelardo Avellaneda Delgado's exact cause of death remains under investigation, according to Ice, but the Guardian's reporting reveals a confusing and at times contradictory series of events surrounding the incident. The death occurred as private companies with little to no oversight are increasingly tasked with transporting more immigration detainees across the US, in pursuit of the Trump administration's recently-announced target of arresting 3,000 people a day. 'The system is so loaded with people, exacerbating bad conditions – it's like a ticking time bomb,' said Amilcar Valencia, executive director of El Refugio, a Georgia-based organization that works with detainees at Stewart detention center and their families. Avellaneda Delgado lived most of the last 40 years in the US, raising a large family, working on tobacco and vegetable farms – and never gaining legal immigration status. He was arrested in Statenville, Georgia on 9 April due to a parole violation – and died on 5 May in the back of a van about half-way between the Lowndes county jail and Stewart detention center. His family say their search for answers has been frustrating, and have hired an attorney to help. Two of Avellaneda Delgado's six children who lived with their father told the Guardian he had no health conditions before being detained – but somehow was put in a wheelchair during the weeks he spent in jail, and was unable to speak during a family visit. The Guardian learned that he was given medications while in jail. 'Junior' Avellaneda, who bears his father's name and is the youngest, said he and his sister, Nayely, were rebuffed several times in their attempts to visit their father during the 25 days he was in jail, receiving emails that said only 'visit request denied'. Screenshots of the emails were shared with the Guardian. On 4 May, Junior finally was allowed a visit and drove the 30 minutes from the house where he lives with his father and Nayely, in Statenville. At the jail, he was shocked to see his father brought out in a wheelchair. 'My heart drops,' Junior said of the moment he saw Abelardo Sr. 'I'm thinking, 'What's he doing in the wheelchair?' Junior, 32, said he had never seen his father like that. The two sat facing each other, with a glass partition between them. 'I tried to get his attention and tapped on the glass. He was zoned out. At one point, he tried to stand up and fell back on his chair.' 'He didn't make eye contact with me and kept bobbing his head left and right,' he said. Junior asked a jail staffer accompanying Abelardo, Sr to hold the phone to his ear. 'I said, 'Dad, please answer me! Say something to me!' He just said, 'Hmmmm.' It broke me.' The staffer told Junior: 'We gave him his medication, that's probably why he's that way.' He thought, what medication? His father never took any medications at home, he said. Lowndes county jail's Capt Jason Clifton told the Guardian that Avellaneda Delgado was kept in the medical unit of the jail. Asked why, he referred to 'a note in the system that says he hadn't been eating enough, and didn't like the food'. 'I don't believe he was on any medications,' Clifton said. 'I don't see anything in the medical chart.' Told about Junior's account, the captain checked with the jail's nurse, who listed five medications being given to Avellaneda Delgado, two of which were for high blood pressure, plus an antibiotic. The morning after Junior's visit, the local jail handed Avellaneda Delgado over to Ice, for transport to Stewart detention center. Several hours later, Webster county coroner Steven D Hubbard was called to Weston, Georgia, where the van transporting Avellaneda Delgado had stopped on 5 May, after the driver called 911. A text summarizing the call sent by police to Hubbard said Avellaneda Delgado was 'unresponsive', with a blood pressure of 226/57. When the coroner arrived at the scene, he was already dead. The coroner told investigative reporter and immigration researcher Andrew Free he suspected that an aortic aneurysm was the cause of death. The Guardian heard a recording of the interview. Hubbard told the Guardian he doesn't know where the blood pressure reading cited in the text summarizing the 911 call came from – 'but if that was his blood pressure when he left Lowndes, he shouldn't have been going to Stewart. He should've been going to the hospital.' Avellaneda Delgado's family only learned of his death because the Mexican consulate in Atlanta called Nayely with the news – a pattern seen in most deaths under Ice custody, said Valencia, of El Refugio. 'You want to know what happened, but you face a system that is stopping access every step of the way,' he said. Ice's press release on the incident says the death is 'under investigation'. But Clifton and Hubbard both told the Guardian no one has contacted them, more than a month later. The family has learned there are at least two public agencies and three private companies that may have answers about what happened: Lowndes county and Ice; plus CoreCivic, which runs Stewart; CoreCivic's wholly-owned subsidiary TransCor, the company paid to transport detainees; and Southern Health Partners, the company paid to provide healthcare to detainees in Lowndes county jail. The Guardian asked Ice, TransCor and CoreCivic about the incident – including whether vans and buses transporting immigration detainees are equipped with cameras. Ice and TransCor did not respond. Ryan Gustin, senior director of public affairs for CoreCivic, said: 'At TransCor, the safety and security of the public, our staff, and those entrusted to our care are our highest priorities. To that end, we do not publicly disclose how the TransCor fleet is equipped, related to safety and security equipment.' Transportation of detainees is more under the control of private companies than in the past, said Katherine Culliton-González, chief policy counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. TransCor president Curtiss D Sullivan titled the company's 2025 first quarter outlook 'The Time for Growth is Now'. CoreCivic's TransCor is not the only company growing its transport business under Trump; the Geo Group, which runs 16 immigration detention centers across the country, also has a transportation subsidiary. Added to the privatization of services needed for Trump's mass immigration push is the decimation of agencies performing federal oversight of Ice – including the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Ciberties (CRCL) and the Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman (Oido), said Culliton-González. In this setting, 'how can we hold private companies accountable?' she said. The issue of oversight will be increasingly important as more health issues and deaths follow the increasing number of detainees being transported around the country. 'Ice right now is all about more people coming in, and pushing them through [to deportation],' said Dora Schriro, a consultant on immigration and former Ice official. 'As input/output grows – not just in size, but in speed – the likelihood of making mistakes is going to increase,' Schriro said. 'Ice should make sure every person they take from law enforcement is fit for travel – for the length and conditions of being transported.' Avellaneda Delgado was the first Ice detainee in at least a decade to die while being transported from a local jail to a federal detention center, said Free, who also wrote about the case for ACPC, an Atlanta-based digital outlet. Meanwhile, Avellaneda Delgado's children just spent their first Father's Day without him. The day was doubly difficult for the youngest because it was also his birthday. Heavy rains kept the family from visiting Avellaneda Delgado's grave. 'It bothers me,' Junior said. Then he added: 'He was a great grandfather.'

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Judge orders Abrego Garcia's release, but government expected to detain him

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was mistakenly deported by the Trump administration to El Salvador then returned to the U.S. amid a legal battle, was ordered released from jail on Sunday by a Tennessee judge while he awaits federal trial. The government, however, is expected to quickly detain him upon his release, which U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes scheduled a Wednesday hearing to discuss. The Justice Department has filed a motion to appeal the judge's release order. At a detention hearing on June 13, prosecutors said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would take Abrego Garcia into custody if he were released on the criminal charges, and he could be deported before he has a chance to stand trial. The new charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee. Abrego Garcia was stopped for speeding, and an officer questioned why he was traveling with so many people without luggage. The indictment alleges Abrego Garcia falsely told the officer he was driving construction workers from St. Louis, but he was actually on one of multiple trips organized to transport migrants who were living in the country without legal status. Attorneys for Abrego Garcia have cast the case as one of trumped-up charges and a way for the administration to save face after allowing him to be wrongly imprisoned for nearly three months. The Trump administration had resisted court orders directing that Abrego Garcia be returned to the U.S., but he was swiftly returned in early June as the Justice Department announced charges for the Maryland resident, who is a Salvadoran national. Holmes acknowledged in her ruling Sunday that determining whether Abrego Garcia should be released is 'little more than an academic exercise' because ICE will likely detain him. But the judge wrote that everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence and 'a full and fair determination of whether he must remain in federal custody pending trial.' Holmes wrote that the government failed to prove that Abrego was a flight risk, that he posed a danger to the community or that he would interfere with proceedings if released. 'Overall, the Court cannot find from the evidence presented that Abrego's release clearly and convincingly poses an irremediable danger to other persons or to the community,' the judge wrote. Rebecca Beitsch and The Associated Press contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.