At long last, Providence pallet shelters are finally ready to open
House of Hope Executive Director Laura Jaworski speaks at the opening ceremony for ECHO Village on Feb. 11, 2025. Seated left to right are Gov. Dan McKee, House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi, Providence Mayor Brett Smiley, and Acting Housing Secretary Deborah Goddard. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
The long-awaited opening of Rhode Island's first community of temporary homeless shelters was heralded with the brass and drums of a marching band Tuesday as a crowd of 200 homeless service advocates and politicians gathered at ECHO Village.
Extraordinary Rendition Band, a protest marching band based in Providence, ushered in the celebration a day before the first group of residents was expected to move into the cabins arranged on a 4-acre site on Victor Street near Route 146. There are 45 cabins in all, each measuring 70 square feet.
'Today we are officially adding this to the portfolio of options for Rhode Island's homeless community,' Gov. Dan McKee told the crowd.
When the project was officially announced in January 2024, the opening date was supposed to open by the end of the first quarter. Its original price tag was $3.3 million, with funding coming from State Fiscal Recovery Funds and Community Development Block Grants, as well the city of Providence. But addressing regulatory gaps in the state fire code delayed the work for a year and ultimately pushed the project over budget by $1.3 million.
Laura Jaworski, executive director of House of Hope, called ECHO Village's long-awaited opening a bittersweet moment.
'It's really a strange place to be to want to mark the opening of a shelter,' Jaworski said. 'We felt it was really important because there was a lot of hard work that has gone into this project to get us to where we are today — I quite honestly believed we would never make it.'
House of Hope is a Warwick-based community nonprofit that will manage the village and connect residents with supportive services including housing and benefits application assistance, job training, substance use recovery and mental health services.
Each cabin has enough space to accommodate a twin bed, night stand, and shelves. They are also equipped with climate control, fire and carbon monoxide detectors, extinguishers, a locking door, and two windows.
The pallet shelter village also has a community room, along with ADA-approved combination bathroom/shower facilities and a laundry room. House of Hope staff will work out of four office structures.
Residents can begin to move in starting Wednesday, Jaworksi told reporters after the ceremony. Move-ins will be in waves, with groups of 10-15 people moving over the next three weeks.
Individuals and couples will be selected to live at the site through the state's Coordinated Entry System — a calling system designed to ensure people experiencing housing insecurity have 'fair and equal access' to shelter. Jawroski told Rhode Island Current that priority will be given to people who have been living on the streets for the longest time.
The expected length of the stay for residents is expected to last around nine months, but could vary depending on each individual's health and other circumstances and whether there is a more permanent place for them to stay, Jaworski said. Four case workers will be on site from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday.
'It's gonna be an individualized process because of the state of the housing crisis here in Rhode Island,' she said.
Pallet shelters are shown amid the snow on a lot located off Victor Street in Providence on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. The shelters can expect their first occupants beginning Feb. 12. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Shelving inside a pallet shelter in ECHO Village. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Each ECHO Village cabin is outfitted with a twin bed and end table. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Gov. Dan McKee surrounded by reporters after the opening ceremony for ECHO Village on Feb. 11, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) A smoke detector and sprinkler installed inside one of the ECHO Village cabins. Meeting the state's fire code was one of many factors officials blamed for the delayed opening of Rhode Island's first pallet shelter community. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Resident of ECHO Village will receive a 'wellness pac' in their cabins to provide hygiene supplies. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) A trio of pallet shelters seen along the snow. The 70-square foot cabins can house one person per unit, though a couple can share a space. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) ECHO Village has one laundry station on site.(Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Snow had been shoveled away from the front entrances to the ECHO Village pallet shelters on the day of the opening ceremony on Feb. 11, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea) The 70-square foot pallet shelters in ECHO Village are located near a Route 146 offramp in Providence. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) ECHO Village Unit 11 is shown. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current) Six pallet shelters are shown on the day of the opening of ECHO Village on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Pallet shelters are shown amid the snow on a lot located off Victor Street in Providence on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. The shelters can expect their first occupants beginning Feb. 12. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Shelving inside a pallet shelter in ECHO Village. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Each ECHO Village cabin is outfitted with a twin bed and end table. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Gov. Dan McKee surrounded by reporters after the opening ceremony for ECHO Village on Feb. 11, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
A smoke detector and sprinkler installed inside one of the ECHO Village cabins. Meeting the state's fire code was one of many factors officials blamed for the delayed opening of Rhode Island's first pallet shelter community. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Resident of ECHO Village will receive a 'wellness pac' in their cabins to provide hygiene supplies. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
A trio of pallet shelters seen along the snow. The 70-square foot cabins can house one person per unit, though a couple can share a space. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
ECHO Village has one laundry station on site.(Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Snow had been shoveled away from the front entrances to the ECHO Village pallet shelters on the day of the opening ceremony on Feb. 11, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea)
The 70-square foot pallet shelters in ECHO Village are located near a Route 146 offramp in Providence. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
ECHO Village Unit 11 is shown. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
Six pallet shelters are shown on the day of the opening of ECHO Village on Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025. (Photo by Christopher Shea/Rhode Island Current)
House of Hope first began pushing for using pallet shelters during the COVID-19 pandemic. The pallet shelters are easily set up to provide emergency shelter for homeless people. Forty-five cabins manufactured by Pallet, a public benefit corporation based in Everett, Washington, were shipped and assembled last February. They sat empty as officials struggled to figure out how the cabins fit into the state's fire and building codes, which had no category for pallet shelters. Officials also couldn't treat them like campsites or dormitories.
The gaps in state regulations prompted House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi to introduce legislation in January that creates a new type of emergency shelter under the state's building code called Supportive and Versatile Emergency (SAVE) units.
Shekarchi's bill, which had its first committee hearing Feb. 4, would allow municipalities to be exempt from the normal fire and building codes for 180 days, so long as a city or town declares an emergency.
McKee said he would sign the bill should it clear the General Assembly, though he told Rhode Island Current that as of Tuesday morning he had yet to read the legislation
'I know the speaker pretty well, he's not going to be asking for something that's unsafe,' McKeesaid.
Speaking to reporters, the governor said his administration plans to regroup and fully assess what caused ECHO Village's delays to ensure similar projects aren't held up in the future.
'We're a few months behind where we wanted to be, but looking forward you have multiple years of helping people,' McKee said.
Help alleviating homelessness, especially during winter months, can't come soon enough, Shekarchi said. He cited the case of Rico Timez Ramy, 48, an unhoused person who, according to the editor of the website Street Sights, regularly slept outside in the Smith Hill neighborhood and reportedly froze to death in January.
'And there are probably others we don't know about,' Shekarchi said. 'We need to do more and we need to do it better.'
The Rhode Island Coalition to End Homelessness conducted its annual Point-In-Time count for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development on Jan. 28, but results aren't expected to be released until some time in the summer. At least 2,442 unhoused people across Rhode Island were counted when volunteers conducted an annual survey in late January 2024 — up 35% over the 2023 count.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
29 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
‘Congress exists': Bay Area lawmakers deride Trump's decision to bomb Iran as unlawful
Bay Area congressional Democrats condemned the U.S. bombing of nuclear sites in Iran Saturday, saying President Donald Trump overstepped his authority and thrust the country into another risky Middle East conflict. Gov. Gavin Newsom said California's State Threat Assessment Center is monitoring for potential impacts in the state. 'While there are no specific or credible counter threats we are aware of at this time, we urge everyone to stay vigilant and report suspicious activity,' he tweeted. 'Tonight, the President ignored the Constitution by unilaterally engaging our military without Congressional authorization,' House Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi posted on X. 'I join my colleagues in demanding answers from the Administration on this operation which endangers American lives and risks further escalation and dangerous destabilization of the region.' Rep. Ro Khanna said on X called on congressional leaders to return to Washington to pass a resolution 'to prevent America from being dragged into another endless Middle East war.' After announcing the attack on social media Saturday afternoon, Trump said during a speech at the White House Saturday night that the bombings of the Fordo, Natanz and Esfahan sites had been 'a spectacular military success' that 'totally obliterated' the targets. Other Democratic politicians voiced concern with the escalation of the conflict with Iran, while Republicans backed up Trump's move. Rep. Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, called Trump's action 'an act of war,' that could lead to 'terrible consequences for our troops, our national security, the Middle East region, and what's left of our global credibility.' Huffman said there were smarter ways to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons. 'This is a dark day for the Constitution and for peace,' Huffman said. Khanna and Rep. Mark DeSaulnier, D-Antioch, both pushed members of Congress to return to session to pass Khanna's War Powers Resolution, co-sponsored with Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican. The resolution aims to limit the president's power to commit the United States to armed conflict. Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Castro Valley, said Congress 'should have been briefed, voted on and able to set parameters on this action.' 'Donald Trump is not a dictator. And Iran cannot have nuclear weapons. That's why in a democracy, Congress exists,' Swalwell wrote on social media. 'Trump's actions — without pursuing proven congressionally authorized diplomatic efforts — threaten to mire the United States in ANOTHER endless Middle East Conflict.' The San Francisco Bay Area chapter of Council on American-Islamic Relations California condemned Trump's 'illegal and reckless' bombing, calling it an 'act of war that prioritizes (Israeli) Prime Minister Netanyahu's agenda over the interests of the American people.' 'This escalation, driven by pressure from an out-of-control Israeli government, risks dragging the U.S. into yet another unjust war in the region,' the organization said in a statement. CAIR said that while Trump previously promised to not start wars, he is now 'fueling dangerous escalation based on lies.' Rep. Sam Liccardo, D-San Jose, was more reserved in his criticism of the action, calling to 'refrain from further military action, and urge all parties back to the negotiating table before there is additional escalation.' Rep. Kevin Mullin, D-San Mateo, also criticized the lack of congressional authorization, but affirmed that 'Israel, the United States, and the world are safer without Iran having nuclear capabilities.' Rep. Lateefah Simon, D-Oakland called Trump's bombing of Iran 'lawless, dangerous, and immoral. This decision was made without the consent of Congress and without regard for the human lives that will be lost. This kind of power, wielded without accountability, puts all of us, our American troops and American families alike, in danger.' Rep. Vince Fong, R-Bakersfield, voiced his support for Trump's 'decisive action to eliminate the nuclear capabilities posed by the Iranian regime was a necessary one to prevent a real and catastrophic threat.
San Francisco Chronicle
29 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump ignites debate on presidential authority with Iran strikes and wins praise from Republicans
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. 'Well done, President Trump,' Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on X. Alabama Sen. Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical.' The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate — and correct — decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.' The instant divisions in the U.S. Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorization from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first U.S. president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Democrats, and a few Republicans, said the strikes were unconstitutional, and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson. 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity.' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said that Trump 'misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' The quick GOP endorsements of stepped up U.S. involvement in Iran came after Trump publicly considered the strikes for days and many congressional Republicans had cautiously said they thought he would make the right decision. The party's schism over Iran could complicate the GOP's efforts to boost Pentagon spending as part of a $350 billion national security package in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax breaks bill, which is speeding toward votes next week. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies,' Wicker posted on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both were briefed ahead of the strikes on Saturday, according to people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. Thune said Saturday evening that 'as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Johnson said in a statement that the military operations 'should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says.' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., said he had also been in touch with the White House and 'I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes." Breaking from many of his Democratic colleagues, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, also praised the attacks on Iran. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' he posted. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.' Both parties have seen splits in recent days over the prospect of striking Iran, including some of Trump's most ardent supporters who share his criticism of America's 'forever wars.' Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio posted that 'while President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional." Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a longtime opponent of U.S. involvement in foreign wars, also posted on X that 'This is not Constitutional.' 'This is not our fight,' said Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Most Democrats have maintained that Congress should have a say, even as presidents in both parties have ignored the legislative branch's constitutional authority. The Senate was scheduled to vote soon on a resolution from Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine that would require congressional approval before the U.S. declares war on Iran or takes specific military action. 'I will push for all senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war,' Kaine said. Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, the chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, also called on Congress to immediately pass a war powers resolution. He said politicians had always promised that 'new wars in the Middle East would be quick and easy.' 'Then they sent other people's children to fight and die endlessly,' Casar said. "Enough.'
The Hill
35 minutes ago
- The Hill
DNC leader faces growing scrutiny amid party turmoil
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin is under pressure amid growing turmoil within the party's ranks six months into President Trump's second administration. The committee has been plagued by party infighting that has spilled out into the open in recent weeks. Last week, two influential union heads — American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees President Lee Saunders — stepped down from their posts at the committee. Meanwhile, former Vice Chair David Hogg announced he would not run for his post again amid internal disagreements with party leadership. And on top of the infighting, reports have surfaced the committee is strapped for cash amid frustration among donors. The developments have painted a picture of weakness, barring Democrats from fully uniting behind Trump. Some critics argue the issues can be traced back to Martin, but others insist it's a reflection of the Democratic ecosystem as a whole. 'Ken Martin is stepping into a really difficult situation right now, and I would say he was elected and they handed him a mop and a bucket,' said Brian Lemek, a Democratic strategist and founder and executive director of Defend the Vote. Martin assumed his position in the top role at the DNC in February after defeating then-Wisconsin Democratic Party Chair Ben Wikler in a competitive chair's race. His election came months after the party's sweeping losses across the board in 2024. His allies note Martin hit the ground running, unveiling his 50-state strategy in April. Martin pledged the DNC would donate a baseline of $17,500 to state parties and territories, marking a $5,000-per-month increase over the committee's previous contribution. Martin has also seen a number of special election victories during his tenure, including in Iowa, Nebraska and Pennsylvania. 'The man is everywhere,' said New Jersey-based DNC member Laura Matos, noting Martin's recent trip to the state, which is holding its governor's race in November. 'New Jersey doesn't regularly get the love and the attention for the purposes of the things we have going on here,' she said. 'He kicked off canvasses when he was here.' Still, recent polling paints a picture of a deeply unsatisfied Democratic base. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released Thursday found 62 percent of Democrats said 'party leaders should be replaced.' Forty-nine percent of Democratic respondents said they were 'unsatisfied with current leadership,' while 41 percent said they disagreed with the sentiment that they were unsatisfied with leadership. And most of the coverage surrounding the committee has been dominated by intraparty fighting that has spilled out into the open, something Democratic lawmakers are cognizant of. In a post on the social platform X following Weingarten's exit earlier this week, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) said he wants 'to build a party with a big tent and inclusion, not subtraction and pushing people out.' '[Weingarten] understands the need for trades schools & apprenticeships more than anyone in our party [and Hogg] the need for primary competition and generational change,' Khanna said. And earlier this month, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) said on X he 'would love to see a day go by that the DNC doesn't do something embarrassing and off-message' ahead of the vote to redo Hogg and Pennsylvania state Sen. Malcolm Kenyatta's (D) vice chair elections. 'Everyone should be focused on killing the cuts to healthcare & food assistance & education. And everyone should focus on next November,' Pocan said, adding 'internal bullshit done externally is stupid.' New York state Sen. James Skoufis (D), who ran against Martin for chair earlier this year and is a member of the committee's People's Cabinet, said Hogg is at 'the nexus' of the intraparty tensions. 'There's a lot of noise being generated by a very small handful of what I'll call backbiters who have some axe to grind,' Skoufis said. Saunders and Weingarten endorsed Wikler in the party chair's race earlier this year, and both were later removed by Martin from the DNC's influential Rules and Bylaws Committee. Both cited disagreements with Martin in their letters announcing their departures. Not every member who was removed by Martin from the Rules and Bylaws Committee has taken that approach. Florida state Sen. Shevrin Jones (D), who is a DNC member who was removed from the committee by Martin, said he still backs the chair. Jones argued that the internal tensions spilling out into the open only serve as a distraction for Democrats in their battle to take on Trump and Republicans. 'I think people need to separate their emotion from the work that needs to be done because the infighting that we're seeing, it's taking our focus off of the bigger picture at hand,' Jones told The Hill. 'For us to be in this moment and we're wasting our time talking about power and position when we should be talking about policy and people. That is how we're going to win elections,' he said. John Verdejo, a North Carolina-based DNC member who supports Martin, said the changes Martin brought with him to the committee are to be expected given the switch-up in leadership. 'I attribute that to real life where there's new management and when new management comes into any work situation, they want to change things up the way they see fit and that's what happened, especially in the case of the two labor presidents,' Verdejo said. 'Our problem is we're so quick, DNC members, or Democrats, really, if we want to complain, instead of complaining to the person aggrieved us, in this case Ken Martin, we're so quick to tweet it out or talk to the press about it instead of talking to the person that aggrieved us,' he continued. The DNC has also been subject to questions about its finances as it prepares for the midterms next year. The committee entered May with $18 million cash on hand, compared to the Republican National Committee, which started the month with $67.4 million in the bank. Additionally, in the first four months of 2025, only three donors gave $100,000 or more to the committee. A New York Times report published earlier this week highlighted reported concerns from Democrats about the committee's finances, but others note the smaller dollar donors should not be ignored. 'The DNC historically has too exclusively prioritized larger donors at the expense of smaller donors and that is no longer happening,' Skoufis said. On Friday, the committee announced it had raised $40 million during Martin's first four months as chair. In May, the DNC said it outpaced grassroots fundraising in May 2023 and 2024 and raised twice as much in grassroots dollars compared to May 2017. 'Powered by our grassroots community, the DNC has just set a new record for most money raised in the first four months under a new Chair — ever,' Martin said in a statement. 'What matters is winning elections, making Democrats competitive everywhere, expanding our tent, and putting our party on the right path.' Others within the DNC say the lower-than-usual numbers from larger donors are to be expected following 2024. 'Large donors made it clear that they were not going to give to the DNC until we got our act together. I think we knew that going into this,' Jones said, adding he believes donors will come back. 'But they're not going to come back if they still see a disconnect internally,' he said.
