📸 Back to basics: Atleti unveil their new 2025/26 kit
"They put stripes on me, mattress scoundrels", as Joaquín Sabina used to sing. And as if it were a premonition, Atlético de Madrid unveiled on Thursday morning what will be their new jersey for the next season.
A jersey that remains faithful to the classic style of the red and white history, with five vertical red stripes alternating with four white ones, accompanied by a white collar with a 'vintage' design that gives it a unique character. In addition, the shield, highlighted by a yellow border, stands out with greater clarity in the set.
Advertisement
The uniform is completed with pants and socks in a vibrant blue tone, creating a contemporary contrast that harmoniously fuses tradition with modernity.
What do you think of Atlético de Madrid's new jersey? Let us know in the comments
This article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence. You can read the original version in 🇪🇸 here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Elle
an hour ago
- Elle
Pearls Are Taking Over Fashion—Here's Why
We're in the midst of a pearl renaissance—dare we call it a pearlissance. Chunky, hefty, supersized pearls were seen in the form of necklaces, bags, and collaged tops across the fall 2025 runways at Vaquera, Chanel, Givenchy, and many more. Simone Rocha, for her part, topped off collars, bag straps, and buttons with the motif. And in the spring collections, Junya Watanabe overloaded spiked bags with them. Likewise, Noir Kei Ninomiya decked out a skeleton-shaped jacket with baby-sized iterations. These, however, are far from the traditional pearls of the past. Instead, the modern pearl is boldly oversized and completely reinvented. They are now present in massive stacks of strands, bulbous bags, and even as the focal piece of clothing, as seen at Sarah Burton's Givenchy debut in the form of a top dripping with crystals and sprinkled with humongous gemstones. Considering fashion's recent devotion to all things preppy, the newly subverted, contorted pearl feels so right. Its boldness stands in stark contrast to the understated aesthetic of so-called 'quiet luxury.' Due to their initial rarity, pearls were once one of the most valuable gemstones on earth. 'Pearls were always scarce, particularly when they came into vogue in the really late, medieval, early Renaissance time,' Kim Nelson, FIT's assistant chair of jewelry design, tells ELLE. 'Until companies started to farm pearls in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, pearls were found as they were found. There was no way to go out and mass produce one.' To put things into perspective: in 1917, Cartier exchanged two strands of natural pearls—valued at $1.5 million—plus $100, for American financier Morton Plant's Fifth Avenue mansion, then worth $950,000. As the farmed pearl became mainstream, the natural pearl market collapsed and never fully recovered, save for the ultra-rare, antique natural pearls that may pop up at an auction from time to time. As a result, the pearl has always been a symbol of wealth, associated with a reserved, 'old money' style. Think of traditional pearls, and one might envision a 1950s housewife, Jackie O, or a WASPy politician. Last year, a simple, elegant little strand of pearls may have felt right at home with a beige cardigan, a pillbox hat from Altuzarra, and a pair of trousers from The Row. But the large, perceivably garish, and intentionally fake pearls we love right now? There's a touch of camp—something intensely ironic, yet strangely comforting in its excess. The pearl's rich history and mythology have captivated fashion designers for decades. One of the most iconic examples of a designer redefining the pearl's image is Vivienne Westwood, who introduced a subversive take on pearls in her fall 1987 collection. Three years later, she launched her infamous Three-Row Pearl Pearl Drop Choker. Always one to riff on the English upper class, her namesake brand has styled pearls with punk-inspired, renaissance-like corsets, sheer blouses, underwear, and extreme silhouettes since the 1980s. 'There's nothing more flattering than pearls,' says Andreas Kronthaler, creative director of Vivienne Westwood. 'They play with the whites of your eyes and teeth; pearls really talk to you. And they work on everybody, from young to old, women and men, everyone. You can wear them all the time—it's one of the few things you can. You can even wear them for breakfast!' Interestingly, pearls have long been—and undoubtedly will continue to be—synonymous with femininity. 'When I came into the jewelry industry 30 years ago, pearls were considered about the most feminine gem you could use,' adds Nelson. In a world where most major fashion houses are being led by male creative directors, it's an interesting time for designers to play with the gem in a new way. Backstage at Prada's fall 2025 show, Miuccia Prada asked, 'What is feminine beauty today?' At Miu Miu, amongst all the bullet bras, massive gold mid-century brooches, and little cardigans, she added, 'Do we need femininity in this difficult moment to lift us up?' In 2025, reimagining pearls can almost feel like an act of rebellion amid the ongoing fight for women's reproductive rights and the growing influence of conservative tradwife culture in the United States. Vaquera's aforementioned pearls on the fall 2025 runway were so long and large, the models carried them like leashes. Paired with pillbox hats exploding with big bows, these looks were the epitome of a fashion paradox. Similarly, All-In's fall 2025 collection piled on pearls, inspired by dreams of formality and 1980s power dressing fantasies. The pearl's rise extends well beyond the runway. Internet It girls like Lara Violetta and Sara Camposarcone are adorning themselves in multiple strands of chunky, intentionally large pearls, most of which are vintage costume jewelry finds. 'I love the fact that pearls feel a bit less dressy than rhinestones or diamonds, but still classy and elegant enough to spice up a look,' Camposarcone tells ELLE. 'I think the chunkier, the better, personally.' She's also incorporated pearls as belts and bag charms, even adding delicate pearl decals to her face as a final flourish. Jewelry brands like Notte are embracing pearls in playful designs, often stacking them with fish- and flower-shaped charms. 'Pearls have been around forever—people have treasured them for hundreds if not thousands of years,' founder Jessica Tse explains to ELLE. 'I think most people no longer see them as dated, something they would only find at an estate sale or tucked away in their grandmother's jewelry box. Pearls are one of those things that will always be there, evolving with fashion and culture. I think people welcome that constant evolution. They will always manage to come back around and find their way into our closet in the most unexpected ways season after season.' Above all, the oversized, playful pearl is a bold statement of personality—an enduring icon of fashion history that refuses to stay still, constantly transforming itself for generations to come.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Daniela Ruah Flaunts 'Legs for Miles and Miles' in 'Stunning' New Photo
Daniela Ruah Flaunts 'Legs for Miles and Miles' in 'Stunning' New Photo originally appeared on Parade. is one leggy "goddess" in her latest Instagram post, causing fans to boldly declare, "No woman is hotter." The NCIS star shared a glamorous new photo on social media on Sunday, June 22, strutting down a stone sidewalk in an airy white blouse tucked into a high-waisted black skirt with a thigh-high slit, with her feet clad in a pair of strappy stilettos. She left her dark brown locks down loose and finished off the look with a neutral makeup look, other than her smoky eye. She also included a photo of herself sititng on a panel as part of Lisbon's upcoming edition of the Tribeca Film Festival, where she's set to serve as an ambassador. "Very proud ambassador of @tribecalisboa with my friend @ October 30- Nov 1st!" she celebrated in the caption, writing in both English and sang her praises in both languages, gushing over "That outfit!!! 🔥." "You look stunning and every time I see you smiling it warms my heart❤️," one follower complimented, while another called her "Gorgeous and elegant!" "Wonderful ❤️," someone else replied, as somebody else called her a "Goddess!! 😍." "You are amazing Dani," the praised continued. "No woman is hotter!!!" one exclaimed. " a great shot ❤️🔥," another hyped, before a few focused in on her choice of footwear. "Gorgeous! And those heels!" someone else hyped her up, with another agreeing, "Girl, you make those shoes look 🔥 🔥." "Legs for miles and miles .. and miles," someone else Ruah Flaunts 'Legs for Miles and Miles' in 'Stunning' New Photo first appeared on Parade on Jun 23, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 23, 2025, where it first appeared.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Can we change our minds about actors we find repulsive?
Hi Mick: Once again, you're praising Richard Linklater's 'Before' trilogy. Based on your recommendation, I watched all of them — the first one three times — and still can't see the merit. Maybe it's because I don't like the looks of Ethan Hawke. Have you ever found an actor so disagreeable to look at that it ruined every picture he/she was in? Margaret Schlachter, Mill Valley As for actors that we find repulsive, I used to have a few, but as a result of having to see all their movies, I got to like everybody I initially disliked. But I can imagine myself being put off if I'm watching a romantic movie and just don't like the actress. I mean, it's one thing for me to think, 'She wouldn't appeal to me,' and something worse to believe that the guy in the movie wouldn't like her, either. However, I can't leave you in this state of permanently disliking Ethan Hawke. Try him in ' Juliet, Naked.' Read my review first, then watch the movie. If you still can't stand him, give up. The definition of wasting time is watching the same movie over and over and expecting a different result. Dear Mick: Are you the person who mentioned in a Chronicle column enjoying MollyBoy on YouTube? What a joy he is. Simple but ineffable charisma, his twinkle, the sudden gobsmacked are-you-serious stares at the camera. What a treat he's been. Cort Worthington, Berkeley Dear Cort: You're talking about the young English guy who does first-time reaction videos to classic pop songs on YouTube. For some reason, I like first-time reaction videos, and I've seen all of the various people who do them. MollyBoy is the best for all the reasons you mentioned, but also because he seems to be genuinely perceptive as a critic. He says he'd like to be a movie actor, and I think he could be. The kid's got something. Richard Kibsgaard, Berkeley Dear Richard: Well, it's not metaphysically wrong, and it's not a faux pas, like using the wrong fork. So I can't see in what way it can be wrong. However, I can see how it could be inaccurate. That is, you might think you don't care, but if you're spending a lot of time asking yourself this question, then you probably do care. Or you care too much about not caring. The ideal state is to be uninfluenced in your thinking, while remaining open to being educated if you turn out to be wrong. As for me, I've never cared what other people think when it comes to movies, not because I'm so mellow, but because it doesn't matter. Besides, if you disagree with me about Ethan Hawke you might agree with me about Sydney Sweeney. But some critics are weird on this score. I once knew a guy — a local critic from a while back — who, if you disagreed with him about a movie, even in casual conversation, he'd turn red and his lips would start quivering. There's a technical term for people like that — nuts. Good afternoon Mr. LaSalle: I believe my take is the likeliest reason Gene Hackman recommended a particular eatery to your reader. Gene Hackman was part owner of that particular eatery. Ted Speros, San Francisco Good afternoon Mr. Speros: You're referring to the now-legendary incident in which Hackman generously suggested a restaurant — or 'eatery' — to a Bay Area couple when they happened to run into him at an art gallery in Southern California. All I can say to your theory is that yours is precisely the kind of reader participation that I applaud. This is teamwork. We pool our collective insights and come up with the most plausible explanations for hard-to-explain events. Nice work.
