logo
Another circuit weighs broker liability, boosting odds of Supreme Court review

Another circuit weighs broker liability, boosting odds of Supreme Court review

Yahoo17-04-2025

Another case involving the question of broker liability – one that brokerage giant TQL already won at the federal district court level – is awaiting a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit on the appeal from the family of a woman killed by a truck hired by TQL.
The location of the case is significant. The original case, Cox vs. TQL, was decided in favor of TQL in June 2024 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Ohio is in the 6th Circuit of the federal judiciary system.
Oral arguments were heard in January.
Attorneys who represent brokerage companies have been hoping the U.S. Supreme Court will take up the question of whether a broker is liable if a carrier hired by the 3PL gets into an accident or some other misfortune occurs, such as a theft. The scoreboard so far: Brokerages have prevailed in cases not just in lower courts but at the appellate level in the 7th and 11th circuits. But in the case of Miller vs. C.H. Robinson (NASDAQ: CHRW), a 9th Circuit court ruled against the brokerage in a complicated decision.
With the split decisions among the circuits, there have been at least three attempts to get the Supreme Court to clarify the issue of broker liability, but it has swatted them all away so far in not granting certiorari.
One of those cases also involved TQL. Its attempt to get Supreme Court review was unusual in that while it was the plaintiff that filed the request with the high court, TQL, which had won at the appellate level in the 11th Circuit, agreed with the plaintiff that the Supreme Court should take up the issue. Like many others in the brokerage sector, it sought to have Supreme Court clarification on the issues. But the request was denied in January.
A decision by the 6th Circuit upholding the lower court ruling in favor of TQL would add slightly to the split, because the scorecard would have three circuits ruling in favor of the legal argument that federal law under the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (F4A) preempts broker liability in such cases, with the 9th Circuit decision in Miller vs. C.H. Robinson on the other side of the divide to a limited degree.
But a 6th Circuit decision in favor of the plaintiff in the TQL case, the family of Greta Cox, killed in the 2019 crash, would create further divisions in the issue, which might pry open the door to Supreme Court review a little wider.
At the recent Capital Ideas Conference of the Transportation Intermediaries Association, Marc Blubaugh, co-chair of the transportation practice at the Blubaugh law firm – and coincidentally located in Columbus, Ohio, in the 6th Circuit – raised the prospect of Cox vs. TQL helping a push for certiorari on the question of broker liability.
'The more circuit decisions that come out, the greater the likelihood that the court would resolve the split among the circuits,' Blubaugh said. 'It is one of the criteria that the court looks at in addition to whether it is an issue of critical importance to the Supreme Court.'
In the Ohio case, according to court documents, Greta Cox was driving with her grandson Brian Ragland on May 8, 2019, when her car was struck from behind by a truck driven by Amarjit Singh Khaira, who was driving for a company called Golden Transit.
That company had been hired by TQL to transport condiments from Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ: KHC) from Illinois to California.
In the original complaint filed by the Cox estate in January 2019, attorneys make several claims. One is that TQL was a motor carrier and identified itself as such. It's not just a casual term in litigation questions over brokers and the F4A; decisions have been made in favor of 3PLs in which a court has determined a 3PL is not a motor carrier. If it were, it could be found liable under the so-called 'safety exception' of F4A, which has the potential to bring in a wider range of negligence and other claims against a carrier that otherwise might be blocked by F4A.
The key provision of F4A, which dates back to 1994, is that a state cannot take regulatory action that impacts a 'price, route or service' of a motor carrier or other transportation method. But the safety exception says F4A does not 'restrict the safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles,' including such issues as cargo size, weight and insurance. It was the safety exception that led to an unfavorable decision for C.H. Robinson.
The lawsuit also says Golden Transit was 'an unsafe, incompetent motor carrier with a history of publicly available red flags [and had] a history of safety violations.'
The initial suit against Golden Transit and its drivers was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.
That left the litigation against TQL, which said action against it was preempted by F4A. Judge Jeffrey Hopkins agreed.
Hopkins said of the Cox estate's claim that TQL was a motor carrier, which could have opened the door to the safety exception, that the charge was 'preempted because a common law negligence claim enforced against a broker is not a law that is with respect to motor vehicles.'
On the question of liability and whether finding a broker can be liable or negligent under F4A, Hopkins turned to a court ruling in a case involving Ying Ye and GlobalTranz, in which the 3PL prevailed. The case was one of the decisions where the losing plaintiff sought Supreme Court review and didn't get it.
'The enforcement of such a claim and the accompanying imposition of liability would have a significant economic effect on broker services,' Hopkins wrote. He then cited, working from the GlobalTranz case: 'By recognizing common-law negligence claims, courts would impose in the name of state law a new and clear duty of care on brokers, the breach of which would result in a monetary judgment.'
More articles by John Kingston
Breaking from the FreightTech AI pack: Companies make their case at TIA meeting
New Mack long-haul truck makes grand entrance in bid for market share
ATBS says independent drivers earned a little more in '24 but drove more as well
The post Another circuit weighs broker liability, boosting odds of Supreme Court review appeared first on FreightWaves.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says "maybe" he'll try to fire Fed chief Jerome Powell
Trump says "maybe" he'll try to fire Fed chief Jerome Powell

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says "maybe" he'll try to fire Fed chief Jerome Powell

President Trump suggested Friday he may try to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, calling the central bank leader a "Total and Complete Moron" for leaving interest rates steady. The president has been lashing out against Powell for months, criticizing the central banker — whom Mr. Trump appointed in his first term — for not lowering interest rates at a faster pace. It's unclear whether the president is legally allowed to fire Powell before his term ends in May 2026, and Mr. Trump said in April he has "no intention" of doing so. But in a post criticizing Powell on Friday, Mr. Trump floated the idea, writing: "Maybe, just maybe, I'll have to change my mind about firing him?" "But regardless, his Term ends shortly!" the president added. Any attempt to fire Powell would be legally contentious. Federal law and prior court precedent says members of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors, including the chair, can only be fired "for cause." The Supreme Court ruled last month that the Trump administration can fire members of other independent federal agencies — but specifically exempted the Fed, calling the central bank a "uniquely structured, quasi-private entity." Powell said last year he will not resign if Mr. Trump asks him to step down. The two met at the White House last month. Mr. Trump also called Powell a "dumb guy" in his Friday evening post. "I fully understand that my strong criticism of him makes it more difficult for him to do what he should be doing, lowering Rates, but I've tried it all different ways," Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I've been nice, I've been neutral, and I've been nasty, and nice and neutral didn't work! He's a dumb guy, and an obvious Trump Hater, who should have never been there." The Fed declined to comment to CBS News. Why has Trump criticized Powell? Mr. Trump's issues with Powell hinge on the Federal Reserve's interest rate policies. The central bank's interest rate-setting committee, which is chaired by Powell, has kept its benchmark rate steady so far this year, after lowering it slightly from a two-decade high last year — following a series of rate hikes in 2022 and 2023 to quell inflation. Most recently, the committee opted against lowering rates earlier this week, drawing backlash from Mr. Trump. The decision comes with tradeoffs. High interest rates can slow down economic growth and make it more expensive for Americans to borrow money, which is why Mr. Trump wants cuts. But lowering interest rates too quickly could overheat the economy and cause inflation to spike yet again. While inflation has cooled off in recent years, it's still higher than the Fed's 2% annual target, and the Fed warns Mr. Trump's tariffs could push prices up. "Because the economy is still solid, we can take the time to actually see what's going to happen," Powell said earlier this week. Mr. Trump disagrees, nicknaming Powell "Mr. Too Late" and arguing that inflation is already low. On Friday, the president amped up his criticism, calling Powell a "numbskull" and suggesting the other members of the rate-setting Federal Open Monetary Committee "override" him. Mr. Trump also said Powell should lower interest rates immediately and just hike them again if inflation spikes — an idea that's at odds with the Fed's cautious strategy. "Don't say that you think there will be Inflation sometime in the future, because there isn't now but, if there is, raise the Rates!" wrote Mr. Trump. The attacks are a redux of Mr. Trump's first-term criticism. The president pushed back against Powell after the Fed hiked interest rates in 2018, but called Powell his "most improved player" for slashing rates during the 2020 pandemic. SpaceX Starship upper stage blows up Hurricane Erick approaches Mexico with destructive winds, major storm surge "Jaws" premiered 50 years ago, but it's a wonder it got made at all

Ohio man charged for allegedly threatening US Congressman Max Miller
Ohio man charged for allegedly threatening US Congressman Max Miller

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ohio man charged for allegedly threatening US Congressman Max Miller

By Brad Brooks (Reuters) -Police in Ohio said on Friday they had arrested a man after he allegedly ran a U.S. Congressman off a road, threatened the politician and his family, and yelled antisemitic slurs and waved a Palestinian flag before fleeing. Police in Rocky River, Ohio, said in a statement that they had arrested Feras Hamdan, 36, of Ohio, in connection to the alleged targeting on Thursday of U.S. Representative Max Miller, a Republican representing Ohio, in the suburb about 10 miles (16 km) west of downtown Cleveland. Hamdan, police said, voluntarily turned himself into police. Hamdan was arraigned on Friday and charged with aggravated menacing and ethnic intimidation, according to Deborah Comery, the Rocky River Municipal Court clerk. Hamdan, who could face up to five months in jail, pleaded not guilty and is being held on a $500,000 bond. Hamdan's attorney, Issa Elkhatib, said in a written statement that the allegations against Hamdan were "baseless and outrageous" and that they "amount to defamatory attacks on his character and reputation." Elkhatib said that Hamdan was a respected local doctor who had no prior criminal history, and that he was confident "the truth will win and that Dr. Hamdan's good name will be fully vindicated." Political violence in the U.S. has been on the increase. A man in Minnesota was arrested on suspicion of assassinating a state lawmaker and her husband last weekend, and shooting and injuring another lawmaker and his wife. The Rocky River police statement said that Miller called 911 on Thursday morning to report that he was run off the road while traveling with his family on Interstate 90 in Ohio. The police said Miller reported an assailant yelled antisemitic slurs and waved a Palestinian flag. "The deranged hatred in this country has gotten out of control," Miller wrote on social media. "As a Marine, a proud Jewish American and a staunch defender of Israel, I will not hide in the face of this blatant antisemitic violence," he wrote.

Argentina's Kirchner urges backers not to gather as police deploy
Argentina's Kirchner urges backers not to gather as police deploy

Yahoo

time7 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Argentina's Kirchner urges backers not to gather as police deploy

Argentine ex-president Cristina Kirchner urged supporters Friday not to gather outside her Buenos Aires apartment, where she is serving a six-year fraud sentence, saying she feared police violence. Kirchner alleged on social media the government had "orchestrated a police operation at the door of my house with the sole purpose of provoking conflicts." She called on her backers, who held a days-long vigil outside her flat, to exercise "wisdom and restraint" and to organize a demonstration planned for Friday elsewhere. AFP witnessed police barriers around the building, with several police trucks stationed nearby. The 72-year-old, convicted of "fraudulent administration" over public works contracts awarded during her 2007-2015 two-term presidency, had an appeal overturned by the Supreme Court last week. The court upheld her sentence and a life ban on holding public office. A different judge allowed Kirchner to serve her sentence at home, which quickly became the scene of solidarity demonstrations. On Wednesday, tens of thousands of people marched on a central square under the banner "Argentina with Cristina." The following day, a judge ruled Kirchner may use her second-floor balcony, under which supporters had been keeping vigil and where she made several brief appearances. A ban on "any behavior that could disturb the peace of the neighborhood" had led to fears she could be confined indoors. Kirchner has challenged limited visitation rights ordered by the court, restricted to family members, doctors and lawyers in what her team described as "a totally arbitrary exclusion regime." There has been speculation Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula Da Silva could try and visit her when he travels to Buenos Aires for a summit in July. He would have to request a court's permission. sa/dga/ial/lpt/mlr/sms

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store