Rise in north Norfolk sewage spills prompts investment concerns
Concerns have been raised about infrastructure investment following an increase in the amount of sewage pumped into rivers and the sea in north Norfolk last year.Untreated waste water was released in the east of England for almost 500,000 hours – a 64% increase on 2023 – with Anglian Water promising "transformational action" to tackle the problem.Sewage flowed into the River Stiffkey, near Blakeney, for more than 1,500 hours, while beaches at West Runton, East Runton and Mundesley, all of which have Blue Flag status for excellent water quality, were near overflow pipes that had increased spills.North Norfolk Lib Dem MP Steffan Aquarone said the Environment Agency's data was "disgraceful".
He said: "The people of north Norfolk deserve so much better than filthy water and polluted oceans."I'll keep on demanding that Anglian Water increase their investment in the area and that the money goes towards urgently improving our rural and coastal sewage infrastructure."The releases came from storm overflows, which dump untreated sewage into rivers and the sea, usually during periods of heavy rain, to stop sewers backing up and flooding.According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, more than 500 hours of spills came from Cromer's main sewage works out in the North Sea, off the coast of West Runton.It had 91 spills, while another pipe on West Runton beach had 116 hours of spills during 32 incidents. One mile (about 1.5km) along the coast, East Runton beach regained its Blue Flag status last summer but was closed for several days in June due to sewage pollution.
'Extreme weather'
At Mundesley, an outfall off the coast had 87 spills lasting for a total of 371 hours and a pipe on the beach had two spills totalling nearly seven hours.North Norfolk District Council leader Tim Adams said the figures "proved there is still an awful of infrastructure work needed".Anglian Water has said it would spend £1bn to tackle spills."We know our customers will be disappointed to see an increase in our storm overflow data this year," a spokeswoman said."This is largely reflective of the extreme weather and persistent flooding we saw across our region in the first part of 2024, which accounted for nearly 50% of our spills."We have promised transformational action – because we know our climate is going to keep changing, so we have to find better ways of dealing with extreme rainfall."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Fury as woke council ‘bans fun' by scrapping popular airshow despite it making £60 MILLION for local economy
NO FUN ZONE Fury as woke council 'bans fun' by scrapping popular airshow despite it making £60 MILLION for local economy Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A WOKE council blamed climate change as it axed a popular air show despite it making £60million for the local economy. The four-day Bournemouth Air Festival, featuring the Red Arrows, has run for 16 years and attracts 600,000 fans. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The Bournemouth Air Festival has run for 16 years and attracts 600,000 fans Credit: Getty 2 The local authority scrapped the airshow this year saying it cannot afford £250,000 to stage it and also citing carbon emissions Credit: PA But the cash-strapped local authority said it cannot afford £250,000 to stage it and also cited the carbon emissions the planes and the extra traffic produce as a reason for stopping it. Bosses at the Lib Dem-run council, which has just hired a new chief executive on a salary of £220,000, are accused of being killjoys and lacking ambition. Conservative councillor Phil Broadhead said: 'Saying we don't like planes, therefore we should ban the air festival for the sake of three or four days that brings millions to the local economy is a step too far. 'On that note, we shouldn't be doing anything that generates any carbon whatsoever. 'What we are doing is banning fun.' Bournemouth Area Hospitality Association chairwoman Rosie Radwell said: 'It is a great shame because the air festival was a big boost for Bournemouth. 'It is a huge loss to the area. 'I don't think tourism is the top priority for this council.' Asked about its impact on the climate she said: 'I don't think it was as bad as they said. 'And I don't think it's as bad as they say.' Highlights of the RAF Red Arrows' jaw-dropping displays from 2024 Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme - Sun Club.
Scottish Sun
5 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Scots council blasted after tearing down schoolkids' banners protesting bike path closure
Angry parents hit out at the local authority 'DISGUSTING' Scots council blasted after tearing down schoolkids' banners protesting bike path closure Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) COUNCIL chiefs have been accused of 'censoring' kids who put up banners in a bid to save a cycle path. Staff were told to paint over signs 10-year-olds had created to protest against plans to extend Edinburgh's controversial tram project. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Locals started a campaign to save the route after the local authority announced their plans Credit: Thomas Brown 3 The colourful signs on display on the Roseburn Path in Edinburgh Credit: Thomas Brown 3 Angry parents have hit out at the "disgusting" move But when the artwork was replaced by P7 pupils at the city's Blackhall Primary, killjoy officials had them removed from the area's Roseburn Path. An angry parent hit out: 'Why the council would want to censor kids is unthinkable. 'They were just making their voices heard. It's disgusting.' Locals started a campaign to save the route after the local authority announced their plans last year. The path is home to badgers, foxes and deer. It's also used by hundreds every day to commute or travel to and from school away from busy roads. Ed Thornley, leader of the capital's Lib Dem group, said: 'Removing signs the schoolkids painted seems to be heartless.' But the council's education convener James Dalgleish said: 'There are sensitivities around this topic and how the opinions of pupils are expressed. 'The artwork was created outwith the class curriculum and during lunchtimes.'
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
Thames Water lenders demand government blocks campaigners from legal action
Lenders trying to take control of Thames Water are attempting to thwart environmental campaigners by asking the government to block them from pursuing high court claims. Creditors owed £13bn by Britain's biggest water company want ministers to order the Environment Agency (EA) to prioritise 'environmental betterment over punitive enforcement' – which they believe would 'significantly mitigate' the risk of campaigners bringing judicial reviews or private prosecutions. Feargal Sharkey, a prominent water campaigner and the former lead singer of the Undertones, said such a move would 'undermine one of the fundamental cornerstones of democracy' and urged the government to reject the demands. This month, the Guardian revealed the lenders had made a series of requests for leniency from fines and enforcement by the EA, Ofwat and other regulators as part of their pitch to buy and turn around the struggling company. Documents seen by the Guardian show a specific clause that is aimed at neutering the risk of campaigners bringing a judicial review or civil litigation. 'There is high risk of campaigners/environmental interest groups bringing judicial review proceedings against any decision by the EA to relax or defer compliance obligations or agree not to prosecute the company for breaches of law,' states the creditors' plan. 'There is also a strong possibility of those groups supporting individuals with bringing private prosecutions against the company and/or its directors and senior officers. 'The risk of such action and its outcomes, which are evidently highly prejudicial to the sustainable recovery of turnaround water companies, can be significantly mitigated by clear government direction to the EA and the EA setting out a clear framework for prioritising environmental betterment over punitive enforcement (the latter having little or no positive environmental benefit).' They also suggest the government could push through emergency legislation to block legal action. Thames Water's fate hangs in the balance after the environment secretary, Steve Reed, told parliament on Thursday that the government was stepping up preparations for temporary nationalisation and the US private equity firm KKR quit an auction for the company. The lenders argue protection from enforcement and legal action is vital so that cash does not leak out of the business and Thames can escape a 'doom loop' of underperformance. They are offering to cut some of the company's debts and provide £5.3bn of new funding in return. Should the government impose a special administration regime (SAR), essentially a temporary nationalisation, it would wipe out a significant portion of Thames's £20bn of debts. A band of about 100 creditors, including big institutional investors such as Aberdeen, BlackRock, Invesco and M&G, and US hedge funds such as Elliott Investment Management and Silver Point Capital, are trying to avoid huge losses by tabling their own turnaround plan for the company. The lenders also want Ofwat to reverse £254m in fines and penalties imposed on Thames over the past two years. These comprise two fines imposed in May – £104.5m for 'significant' sewage and wastewater failures and £18.2m for illegally paying dividends – and another £131.3m of tax losses that Thames transferred to its parent company, which Ofwat has said it will claw back. The Liberal Democrat MP for Witney in Oxfordshire, Charlie Maynard, has challenged Thames Water in the high court, including trying to block a £3bn high-interest rescue loan from the creditors. Maynard said: 'Thames Water's creditors are trying to dictate government policy and bully the regulators. Steve Reed must not cave in to these demands. The secretary of state should call their bluff. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion 'If the company ends up in special administration it is the vulture funds who stand to lose billions, Thames Water's 16 million customers will be released from a mountain of debt and the company will be better able to start fixing its problems.' Sharkey said: 'Not only has Thames polluted our rivers, ram-raided bill payers' bank accounts for cash, it is now attempting to undermine the very fundamentals of democracy: the right of free speech, to ask questions, to oppose and to demand justice. The government must stand up and oppose any attempt by Thames Water to railroad the British people. 'Being able to apply for a judicial review is one of the fundamental cornerstones of democracy. As a democracy, we are totally dependent on the ability of people to take the government and quangos to the high court to have that level of scrutiny from the judiciary. It's a balance and check against abuse of power.' A spokesperson for the creditors said: 'Broad regulatory support is needed to unlock a market-led solution for Thames Water that will secure billions of pounds in fresh investment for its ageing network, allowing a world-class leadership team to start the intensive turnaround and deliver better outcomes for customers and the environment.' A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: 'The government will always act in the national interest on these issues. 'Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to their customers and to the environment. It is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company. 'The company remains financially stable, but the government has stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, including special administration regime if that were to become necessary.' A spokesperson for Thames said: 'Thames Water is committed to improving outcomes for the environment and its customers. We are investing billions of pounds in our network and any recapitalisation of the business will need to ensure that is maintained for the benefit of all our stakeholders. 'Our focus remains on a holistic and fundamental recapitalisation, delivering a market-led solution, which includes targeting investment-grade credit ratings. In order to be investable, we and prospective investors would need to engage in discussions with our regulators.' A spokesperson for Ofwat said: 'We are assessing whether the plans are realistic, deliverable and will bring substantial benefits for customers and the environment.''
