Thames Water lenders demand government blocks campaigners from legal action
Lenders trying to take control of Thames Water are attempting to thwart environmental campaigners by asking the government to block them from pursuing high court claims.
Creditors owed £13bn by Britain's biggest water company want ministers to order the Environment Agency (EA) to prioritise 'environmental betterment over punitive enforcement' – which they believe would 'significantly mitigate' the risk of campaigners bringing judicial reviews or private prosecutions.
Feargal Sharkey, a prominent water campaigner and the former lead singer of the Undertones, said such a move would 'undermine one of the fundamental cornerstones of democracy' and urged the government to reject the demands.
This month, the Guardian revealed the lenders had made a series of requests for leniency from fines and enforcement by the EA, Ofwat and other regulators as part of their pitch to buy and turn around the struggling company.
Documents seen by the Guardian show a specific clause that is aimed at neutering the risk of campaigners bringing a judicial review or civil litigation.
'There is high risk of campaigners/environmental interest groups bringing judicial review proceedings against any decision by the EA to relax or defer compliance obligations or agree not to prosecute the company for breaches of law,' states the creditors' plan.
'There is also a strong possibility of those groups supporting individuals with bringing private prosecutions against the company and/or its directors and senior officers.
'The risk of such action and its outcomes, which are evidently highly prejudicial to the sustainable recovery of turnaround water companies, can be significantly mitigated by clear government direction to the EA and the EA setting out a clear framework for prioritising environmental betterment over punitive enforcement (the latter having little or no positive environmental benefit).'
They also suggest the government could push through emergency legislation to block legal action.
Thames Water's fate hangs in the balance after the environment secretary, Steve Reed, told parliament on Thursday that the government was stepping up preparations for temporary nationalisation and the US private equity firm KKR quit an auction for the company.
The lenders argue protection from enforcement and legal action is vital so that cash does not leak out of the business and Thames can escape a 'doom loop' of underperformance. They are offering to cut some of the company's debts and provide £5.3bn of new funding in return.
Should the government impose a special administration regime (SAR), essentially a temporary nationalisation, it would wipe out a significant portion of Thames's £20bn of debts.
A band of about 100 creditors, including big institutional investors such as Aberdeen, BlackRock, Invesco and M&G, and US hedge funds such as Elliott Investment Management and Silver Point Capital, are trying to avoid huge losses by tabling their own turnaround plan for the company.
The lenders also want Ofwat to reverse £254m in fines and penalties imposed on Thames over the past two years.
These comprise two fines imposed in May – £104.5m for 'significant' sewage and wastewater failures and £18.2m for illegally paying dividends – and another £131.3m of tax losses that Thames transferred to its parent company, which Ofwat has said it will claw back.
The Liberal Democrat MP for Witney in Oxfordshire, Charlie Maynard, has challenged Thames Water in the high court, including trying to block a £3bn high-interest rescue loan from the creditors.
Maynard said: 'Thames Water's creditors are trying to dictate government policy and bully the regulators. Steve Reed must not cave in to these demands. The secretary of state should call their bluff.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
'If the company ends up in special administration it is the vulture funds who stand to lose billions, Thames Water's 16 million customers will be released from a mountain of debt and the company will be better able to start fixing its problems.'
Sharkey said: 'Not only has Thames polluted our rivers, ram-raided bill payers' bank accounts for cash, it is now attempting to undermine the very fundamentals of democracy: the right of free speech, to ask questions, to oppose and to demand justice. The government must stand up and oppose any attempt by Thames Water to railroad the British people.
'Being able to apply for a judicial review is one of the fundamental cornerstones of democracy. As a democracy, we are totally dependent on the ability of people to take the government and quangos to the high court to have that level of scrutiny from the judiciary. It's a balance and check against abuse of power.'
A spokesperson for the creditors said: 'Broad regulatory support is needed to unlock a market-led solution for Thames Water that will secure billions of pounds in fresh investment for its ageing network, allowing a world-class leadership team to start the intensive turnaround and deliver better outcomes for customers and the environment.'
A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: 'The government will always act in the national interest on these issues.
'Thames Water must meet its statutory and regulatory obligations to their customers and to the environment. It is only right that the company is subject to the same consequences as any other water company.
'The company remains financially stable, but the government has stepped up our preparations and stand ready for all eventualities, including special administration regime if that were to become necessary.'
A spokesperson for Thames said: 'Thames Water is committed to improving outcomes for the environment and its customers. We are investing billions of pounds in our network and any recapitalisation of the business will need to ensure that is maintained for the benefit of all our stakeholders.
'Our focus remains on a holistic and fundamental recapitalisation, delivering a market-led solution, which includes targeting investment-grade credit ratings. In order to be investable, we and prospective investors would need to engage in discussions with our regulators.'
A spokesperson for Ofwat said: 'We are assessing whether the plans are realistic, deliverable and will bring substantial benefits for customers and the environment.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
David Lammy repeatedly declines to say whether British government believes US strikes on Iran were illegal
Update: Date: 2025-06-23T07:53:06.000Z Title: Welcome and opening summary … Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of UK politics. Here are the headlines … Foreign secretary David Lammy has repeatedly declined to say whether the British government believes US strikes on Iran were illegal. Prime minister Keir Starmer has warned of a 'risk of escalation' in the Middle East and beyond, backing the strike on Iran's nuclear facilities and calling on Tehran to return to negotiations The government has promised electricity costs for thousands of businesses will be cut by scrapping green levies as a key part of a 10-year industrial strategy. Starmer said the plan marks a 'turning point for Britain's economy' Reform UK are to offer wealthy foreigners and returning British expats a bespoke tax regime in exchange for a one-off payment of £250,000 with all funds collected redistributed to Britain's lowest-paid workers, the party claims There are quite a few things in the diary for the day. Chancellor Rachel Reeves and business secretary Jonathan Reynolds will be out promoting the government's industry strategy. Health secretary Wes Streeting is giving a speech in London, while opposition leader Kemi Badenoch is appearing at a Policy Exchange event at lunchtime. Minister Stephen Doughty will be appearing before the foreign affairs committee discussing the Chagos agreement, while Northern Ireland secretary Hilary Benn faces the Northern Ireland affairs committee. In the Commons there are questions on work and pensions and a general debate on Pride month. It is Martin Belam with you today. You can reach me at
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
The Original Factory Shop launches 80% off closing down sales ahead of shutting NINE stores this week
THE Original Factory Shop is shutting nine stores this week as up to 80% off closing down sales are launched at a host of locations. The fragrance, homeware and fashion retailer is pulling down the shutters on shops across the UK between Thursday and Saturday. 1 One branch in Milford Haven, Pembrokeshire, will permanently close on June 26, while eight others will shut on June 28, including stores in Pershore, Worcestershire, and Shaftesbury, Dorset. Closing down sales have been launched at a number of the soon-to-be shut shops. Prices at the Milford Haven site have been slashed by 30% with discounts on drinks, perfume and footwear. The Pershore branch has also reduced prices on beauty and pet products, jewellery and more by up to 50%. The Normanton branch has also cut prices by up to 50%, while stock at the Middlewich store is selling for up to 80% off. Here is the full list of The Original Factory Shop (TOFS) branches set to close this week, as well as three others shutting from July: Milford Haven, Pembrokeshire - June 26 Perth - June 28 Chester Le Street, County Durham - June 28 Arbroath, Angus - June 28 Kidwelly, Carmarthenshire - June 28 Pershore, Worcestershire - June 28 Normanton, West Yorkshire - June 28 Peterhead, Aberdeenshire - June 28 Shaftesbury, Dorset - June 28 Staveley, Cumbria - July 12 Cupar, Fife - July 27 Middlewich, Cheshire - TBC News of the branches closing this week has not been met well by shoppers and locals. Commenting on the Abroath closure, one customer said: "Another one bites the dust on the high street. "Going to be a ghost town soon enough." Britain's retail apocalypse: why your favourite stores KEEP closing down A second, commenting on the Pershore closure, said: "End of an era that is." A third, finding out about the Cupar branch shutting, said: "So sorry to see you're closing down." What's happening with The Original Factory Shop? TOFS was bought by Modella Capital in February which has since launched a restructuring effort to renegotiate rents at 88 of the retail chain's stores. Modella, a private equity firm, is known for taking on struggling retailers, having recently acquired Hobbycraft and WHSmith 's high street shops. Modella drew up plans to initiate a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) for TOFS at the end of April. A CVA is a way of restructuring that means a business can continue trading while negotiating its debts, for example by cutting rent costs with landlords. A TOFS spokesperson previously told The Press and Journal a "number of loss-making stores will have to close" as part of the CVA. They continued: "Closing stores is always a tough decision and we are committed to keeping as many stores open as possible. "This is, however, dependent on successful negotiations with landlords as we strive to build a sustainable and successful business for the future." The Original Factory shop has already shuttered more than a dozen stores over the past 12 months. These are the locations that closed in 2024: Brightlingsea, Essex Bodmin, Cornwall Chepstow, Wales Fakenham, Norfolk Harwich, Essex Mildenhall, Suffolk Padiham, Lancashire Taunton, Somerset Deal, Kent Haverfordwest, Wales HIGH STREET STRUGGLES The Original Factory Shop is not the only retailer languishing across the high street. The retail sector has struggled for years, with thousands of shops closing across the UK. The Centre for Retail Research has described the sector as going through a "permacrisis" since the 2008 financial crash. In 2024 alone, more than 13,000 high street stores were shuttered for good, according to the Centre. It is also predicting the number of store closures to rise this year, blaming the increase on a hike to employer National Insurance contributions and the national minimum wage. RETAIL PAIN IN 2025 The British Retail Consortium predicted that the Treasury's hike to employer NICs would cost the retail sector £2.3billion. Research published by the British Chambers of Commerce earlier this year shows that more than half of companies planned to raise prices by early April. Separately, the Centre for Retail Research (CRR) has also warned that around 17,350 retail sites are expected to shut down this year. It comes on the back of a tough 2024 when 13,000 shops closed their doors for good, already a 28% increase on the previous year. Professor Joshua Bamfield, director of the CRR said: "The results for 2024 show that although the outcomes for store closures overall were not as poor as in either 2020 or 2022, they are still disconcerting, with worse set to come in 2025." Professor Bamfield has also warned of a bleak outlook for 2025, predicting that as many as 202,000 jobs could be lost in the sector. "By increasing both the costs of running stores and the costs on each consumer's household it is highly likely that we will see retail job losses eclipse the height of the pandemic in 2020."
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
David Lammy refuses to say whether US attack on Iran was ‘right' or ‘legal'
Foreign secretary David Lammy has refused to defend Donald Trump 's attack on Iran and confirm it was either legal or even 'the right thing to do'. In an awkward interview on BBC Radio 4's Today Programme, Mr Lammy was asked four times if the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities was legal. It comes after Donald Trump's regime conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, despite Sir Keir Starmer pushing for de-escalation in the preceding days. The questions followed reports that UK attorney general Lord Hermer has suggested it would not be legal for the UK to launch such attacks. Radio 4 Today presenter Justin Webb asked him four times if the attack was legal with the foreign secretary avoiding the answer. 'We were not involved, it is for the Americans to discuss those legal issues," he responded repeatedly. The issue is important because of fears that it undermines the case against Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine. However, Mr Lammy was not even able to answer whether the attack by US B-2 stealth bombers was even 'the right thing to do'. Mr Webb asked him: "Was the (US) military action the right thing to do?" Mr Lammy avoided the question, answering: "I've said that we weren't involved in the military action." Webb asked again: "Was it the right thing to do?" Lammy responded: "What I've said is that ultimately this can only be dealt with in diplomacy." The foreign secretary was not the only senior minister to refuse to answer difficult questions about the rapidly changing international crisis in the Middle East. Earlier, armed forces minister Luke Pollard claimed it is 'not for [him] to comment' on US action in the Middle East, refusing to say whether Britain is supportive of US strikes in Iran. Asked whether the UK was disappointed or pleased about the military intervention, Luke Pollard told Sky News: 'Well, it's not for me to comment on the particular US action, but we're assessing the battle damage at the moment to understand the true extent of the strikes. 'But our focus and the work that we are doing in conjunction with our US allies as well as those across Europe, is to put the pressure on the Iranian regime to get back to negotiating because a diplomatic solution is how we bring this crisis to an end.' When it was put to Mr Pollard that it was specifically his role to comment on military action around the world, he replied: 'I'm not going to be able to comment on that question, but what we can say is that we were not involved in the military action that the US took.' He added that Britain's focus was also on putting 'pressure on the Iranian regime to get back to negotiations because a diplomatic solution is how we bring this crisis to an end, with Iran not able to create a nuclear weapon, handing over their nuclear materials that they possess, and giving commitments that they won't threaten regional stability by developing a nuclear weapon in the future'. Over the weekend, the US attacked Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz which are linked to Iran's nuclear programme. Ahead of the strikes, the prime minister had been calling for calm, saying he has 'no doubt' that Mr Trump backs the G7's call for a de-escalation of tensions in the Middle East. It is understood there was no British involvement in the action but the government was informed before the US strikes. After the strikes took place, Sir Keir backed Mr Trump's administration describing Iran's nuclear programme as a 'grave threat to international security'. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat', he added. But he later warned there was a risk of the Middle East crisis spiralling beyond the region and urged all sides to return to negotiations.
