Crooks steal almost R100bn from SA's economy each year
Illicit financial flows are costing South Africa a staggering $3.5 billion annually, nearly 5% of its tax revenue.
Image: RonAI / IOL
Illicit Financial Flows (IFF) – theft – is robbing South Africa of a massive $3.5 billion every year.
That amount translates to almost 5% of the tax revenue that the South African Revenue Service brings in each year, or R92.5bn, according to Deputy Minister of the Department of International Relations and Cooperation, Alvin Botes.
'In 2022 we received roughly $1.1bn (R19.7bn) in official development assistance, but we lose an estimated $3.5bn (R62.7bn) to $5 billion (R89.6bn) each year to tax abuse, trade mis-invoicing, illegal capital transfers and profit-shifting,' said Botes, who was speaking at a conference on illicit financial flows, mobilising domestic resources, and financing for development, hosted at SGN Grant Thornton's offices at the end of last week.
Botes added that 'these losses erode tax bases, shrink fiscal space, weaken institutions and make true sovereignty impossible'. This, he said, means 'children left out of classrooms, hospitals short on medicine, dreams deferred.'
Victor Sekese, SNG Grant Thornton CEO, said that progress is increasingly threatened through IFF, which 'denies our people access to public goods like healthcare, education, infrastructure, and opportunity.'
Quantifying the effect of IFF on socioeconomic development initiatives to improve the lives of all, Botes stated that UN Trade and Development statistics indicate that countries with high illicit flows spend a quarter less on healthcare and more than 50% less on education than their peers.
On a continental level, Sekese said that Africa is estimated to lose over $80 billion annually to these IFF outflows. 'Imagine what we could do with that – build public infrastructure, schools, hospitals and industries,' he said.
Sekese added that it was important not to just have talk shops but to agree on ways to share data, harmonise laws, and hold those who make it possible for IFF to take place accountable. 'Most importantly, to ensure that our recommendations not only inform but shape the final policy proposals presented at the G20 later this year'.
South Africa will host the G20 Johannesburg Summit, the twentieth meeting of the Group of Twenty, on 22 and 23 November. The meeting is set to include heads of state and government, with US President Donald Trump having said the US will attend.
Botes noted that 'the complexity of these crimes also demands deeper inter-agency cooperation, rapid information-sharing and, ultimately, an international legal instrument robust enough to match transnational crime. We therefore call for a United Nations Tax Convention capable of halting Africa's wealth leak and choking multinational tax abuse.'
Let us plug the leaks, mobilise the means and finance the future humanity deserves,' said Botes.
IOL Business
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eyewitness News
15 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Bogus tax practitioner gets 3 years behind bars for defrauding SARS out of R60k
JOHANNESBURG - A bogus tax practitioner linked to alleged underworld boss Nafiz Modack will spend three years behind bars for defrauding the South African Revenue Service (SARS) out of R60,000. Faried van der Schyff, who is also a co-accused in Modack's organised crime trial, was sentenced in the Cape Town Regional Court on Friday. It's understood that the 59-year-old posed as a registered tax consultant and illegally submitted documents to SARS, deceiving clients and pocketing the money. He was convicted on five charges, including income tax fraud, violations of the Tax Administration Act, and contravention of the Correctional Services Act. Hawks spokesperson Zinzi Hani said, 'It was reported that van der Schyff committed fraud from 2016 to 2019 by operating illegally as a tax practitioner, without being registered with the South African Revenue Service.' Van der Schyff remains a co-accused in the Western Cape High Court trial involving Modack and 14 others, a case with nearly 3,000 charges, including murder, extortion and racketeering.
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
Cape Town tax fraudster sentenced to three years for defrauding SARS
Faried van der Schyff has been jailed by the Cape Town Regional Court to three years for defrauding SARS to the tune of R60.000. Image: File Bogus tax practitioner, Faried van der Schyff, has been sentenced to three years' direct imprisonment for defrauding the South African Revenue Service (SARS) to the tune of R60,000. Van der Schyff, 59, was sentenced in the Cape Town Regional Court on Friday. Hawks spokesperson, Zinzi Hani, confirmed that he was convicted on five of the seven criminal charges he had faced. Van der Schyff is also a co-accused in the mammoth trial against Nafiz Modack and 14 others in the Western Cape High Court, where the accused face approximately 3,000 criminal charges, which include counts of murder, extortion, and contraventions of POCA. Modack was recently also convicted in the Cape Town Regional Court on corruption charges. Van der Schyff was found guilty of income tax fraud, contravention of the Tax Administration Act, and contravention of the Correctional Services Act, and will serve three years in jail. It was reported that Van der Schyff committed fraud from 2016 to 2019 by operating illegally as a tax practitioner without being registered with SARS. 'The accused made clients believe that he was authorised to submit tax-related documents to SARS on behalf of the clients. Due to the accused's criminal activities, SARS suffered actual loss of R60,000,' said Hani. Van der Schyff was sentenced to three years' imprisonment for fraud, two years for contravention of the Administration Act, and two years for the contravention of the Correctional Act for the illegal possession of a cellular device while in custody.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Sars enforcement: the new era of tax compliance in South Africa
Tax Discover how the South African Revenue Service has transformed into a powerful enforcement agency with Project AmaBillions, and learn how to navigate the new landscape of tax compliance to protect your finances. The South African Revenue Service (Sars) is no longer the passive revenue service many South Africans remember. With the injection of R3.5 billion from the national budget and the ominous launch of 'Project AmaBillions,' Sars has entered its most aggressive phase of enforcement in years and is quickly turning into one of the most sophisticated, assertive, and unrelenting revenue authorities in the world. Welcome to the new high-stakes era of tax compliance, which marks the end of the era of any perceived leniency. It is now the time of relentless enforcement. If you've received a surprise assessment or an additional tax bill, doing nothing could be financially and legally disastrous. Sars has flipped the switch: compliance or consequences South Africa's budget is strained, and Sars has one clear mandate: collect at all costs. The days of informal engagement are over. Today, Sars is functioning as a well-resourced enforcement agency, driven by targets and backed by increasingly automated systems that flag non-compliance in real-time. Their legal tools of collection include: - Final demands; - Civil judgments; - Third-party appointments are issued directly to your bank without having to inform you; - Garnishee orders issued directly to your employer; - Instructing the Sheriff to collect; - Asset seizures; and - Criminal prosecution. If you disagree with an assessment, silence is surrender. Unless formally and timeously disputed, Sars will pursue recovery. And they don't knock, they act. From garnishee orders to default judgments, Sars is now executing collections swiftly and with minimal notice. Once the machine is in motion, it becomes significantly harder and more expensive to reverse. There's a process, but it's not forgiving Yes, there is a dispute process. And yes, it exists to protect taxpayers, but only if used strategically and correctly. You have 80 business days from the date of assessment to object. Miss this window, and you must beg Sars to condone your lateness, and they're under no obligation to say yes. Even if the assessment is wrong, Sars is entitled to collect unless and until a dispute is lodged and the debt is suspended. Without this, enforcement proceeds. Your bank accounts, salary, or even those who owe you may be targeted. Sars has shown no hesitation in using every legal mechanism at its disposal, and you must thus use every legal mechanism at your disposal to protect your interests. Disputes must be strategic - this is a legal battlefield This is not the time for 'DIY' tax disputes. In the enforcement era, objections need to be drafted like legal pleadings, not complaints. Sars doesn't respond to emotion; it responds to evidence, statute, and precision. A skilled tax attorney can mean the difference between a successful objection and irreversible enforcement. This is especially critical when multiple years are at stake or where Sars alleges serious non-disclosures. Sars Commissioner Kieswetter has made their philosophy clear: compliance will be facilitated; non-compliance will be punished. The playing field may be fair, but it is also ruthless to those who don't act timeously. Every single day counts, and delay is dangerous In today's enforcement climate, an assessment is not a suggestion; it's a trigger. It signals the start of Sars' collection clock. If you don't respond with speed and legal force, you may find your finances, assets, and reputation under siege. Every day you delay, Sars gains ground. An assessment isn't an invitation to negotiate. It's a legal action, and if you fail to act swiftly and strategically, Sars will act for you through your bank, your employer, or the courts. Dispute on time. Dispute strategically. Or prepare for the full force of Sars enforcement. Act now, those who wait, lose. * Daniels is the head of tax controversy and dispute resolution at Tax Consulting SA. PERSONAL FINANCE
