Scott Morrison sought advice to obstruct Nauru asylum seekers from accessing abortions, documents reveal
Scott Morrison overrode medical advice in the case of an asylum seeker in offshore detention trying to access an abortion, and had previously sought advice that would effectively prevent access to terminations entirely, ministerial advice reveals.
Documents released under freedom of information laws show Morrison, in 2014 as immigration minister, had sought advice to deny the transfer of women to a hospital on the Australian mainland to access termination services before 20 weeks' gestation.
Abortion is illegal on Nauru, except to save the mother's life, and carries a prison term of up to 14 years. Termination laws differ across Australian states, but if pregnant women in offshore detention were prohibited from accessing abortion services in Australia until after 20 weeks, it would be far more difficult to access those services at all.
A handwritten note by Morrison, on a document dated June 2014, stated: 'I would also like advice on denying transfer pre 20 weeks for pregnant women.' In the same document, Morrison specified that women should only be transferred to Brisbane, not South Australia, the Northern Territory or Victoria for abortion services.
Morrison did not respond to requests for comment, and Guardian Australia cannot confirm what advice he received.
In the case of a woman, who was not identified in the redacted documents, medical advice recommended she be transferred to Victoria for an abortion, over Brisbane where she would have had to have waited a week for a hospital ethics panel to consider her case. That policy was in place in Queensland for women seeking a termination after 20 weeks' gestation. In Victoria, a woman could seek a termination without approval of a hospital ethics board until 24 weeks.
Guardian Australia understands the woman was taken to Brisbane, rather than Melbourne, where the panel deliberated on her case.
One senior source, who spoke to Guardian Australia on the condition of anonymity, said Morrison did not specifically target abortion access.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
David Manne, a prominent refugee advocate and lawyer, said in his view the broader immigration policy at the time was part of an 'extreme deterrence agenda'.
'Inherent in the [broader] policy was conscious, calculated cruelty,' he said. 'Clearly, [the policy] was far more than reckless indifference, it was deliberate.
'[It was] part of a system that was underpinned by the extreme deterrence agenda … the basic rights and dignity of people subject to the policy were essentially irrelevant.'
Jana Favero, the deputy CEO of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC), who was an advocate for the centre at the time, said the documents were 'outrageous' and 'consistent' with the ASRC's experience trying to help asylum seekers get medical transfers.
'It was extremely challenging and difficult for the medical transfer from people offshore, in particular women who were pregnant,' she said.
Manne claimed the Abbott government was concerned asylum seekers and refugees were using medical transfers as a back door to get into Australia.
Once in Australia, and in the Australian onshore detention system, an asylum seeker could go to the court to seek an injunction to prevent being sent back to offshore detention.
'[They] could plead their case under law to resist being sent back to Nauru, to further dangers of the kinds that they'd already faced,' Manne said.
This wasn't the only concern held by the government. Manne said the policy was based on deterrence, to stop others seeking asylum arriving by boat.
'If we make some exception, if there's a perceived crack of light in this policy, this could see the resumption of boat arrivals, that was clearly the thinking.'
Later, in 2019, Peter Dutton, by then the home affairs minister in the Morrison government, accused women in Nauru refugee centres of using rape and abortion claims as a ploy to get to Australia.
Over the 18 months from 1 January 2013 to 20 June 2014, IHMS, the government contracted healthcare provider for Nauru, said there were six pregnant transferees who were taken to the mainland for a termination. In June 2014, there were 289 women in detention on Nauru, according to data collated by the Refugee Council of Australia.
Numerous internal and external reviews of offshore detention centres found instances of violence and traumatic living conditions, amid allegations and reports of rape, sexual assaults.
An independent investigation, by the former integrity commissioner Philip Moss, commissioned by Morrison in October 2014, found evidence of rapes and sexual violence on Nauru and Manus Island, and said incidents were often under-reported.
In 2016, Guardian Australia released the Nauru files, a collection of 2,000 leaked incident reports detailing harrowing instances of abuse on the island between May 2013 and October 2015. More than half of the reports (51.3%) involved children, even though children made up only about 18% of those in detention on Nauru during the time covered by the reports.
Favero said the ASRC had performed its own audit on medical transfers at the time, and said it sometimes took up to 18 months for an asylum seeker to get help on the mainland.
'From the point where there was a [doctor's] recommendation for a medical transfer, sometimes it took up to 12 to 18 months for that to happen, and it only happened as a result of a huge amount of pressure including legal action,' Favero said.
In February 2019, five years later, after Morrison became prime minister, Labor and the crossbench passed the medevac bill, against the Coalition government, that established a medical panel to oversee medical transfers of people from offshore detention.
That law lasted less than 10 months, before it was repealed by the Morrison government in December that year.
'The decision [to transfer a patient] should have been in doctors' hands not in bureaucrats and politicians hands which is what that legislation was,' Favero said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Horror as nine Aussies raced to hospital after a 'smell of gas' is detected at a leisure centre
Nine people have been rushed to hospital after being 'impacted by chemicals' at a leisure centre in north Melbourne. Fire Rescue Victoria (FRV) responded to Triple-0 calls reporting the 'smell of gas' inside Broadmeadows Aquatic & Leisure Centre at about 6.15pm on Saturday. Firefighters arrived on scene within six minutes to find multiple people impacted by chemicals, an FRV spokesperson told Daily Mail Australia. The crews helped Ambulance Victoria treated patients at the scene and nine people have been transported to hospital for further treatment. Broadmeadows Aquatic & Leisure Centre has been contacted by Daily Mail Australia for comment. More to come.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Cringeworthy moment Labor brags about building 17 new homes in seven months in a far cry from 1.2million goal
Labor has been slammed for bragging about building 17 new homes in Canberra in seven months - a far cry from its target of 1.2million homes in five years. 'We're here in Canberra visiting some brand spanking new homes, what do you reckon Chris?' Minister for Housing Clare O'Neil said in a TikTok on Friday. In an awkward game of catch, she tossed the phone to Chris Steel, ACT Minister for Planning and Sustainable Development, who then turned the camera on himself. 'Pretty good, 17 class C adaptable homes for new residents,' said a grinning Steel. He then threw the phone to Labor MP David Smith, who added: 'A great example of two Labor governments working together and taking pressure off housing right here in Bean'. 'And the good news is we're just getting started,' O'Neil said after Smith had tossed the phone back to her. 'This is 17 out of 55,000 social and affordable homes that our government is going to deliver to Australians over the coming few years.' The 55,000 social and affordable homes O'Neil mentioned fall under Labor's broader target of building 1.2million homes over five years from mid-2024. The policy known as the National Housing Accord includes $3.5billion in payments to state, territory and local governments to support the delivery of new homes towards the target, and a one-off $2billion payment to help states and territories to increase social housing stock. Aussies were quick to criticise the video, slamming the lacklustre seven-month timeframe for building just 17 houses. '17 homes in seven months... At that rate it will take you 1,886 years to complete the remaining 55,000 homes,' one said. 'You should reach your target by 2080 - what a joke,' said another. 'Do you realise another major building company has just declared bankruptcy?' a third asked. Critics have labelled Labor's housing target unrealistic, if not impossible, amid soaring construction costs and unfettered immigration. Australia had a record level of construction company insolvencies in 2025, a 24 per cent increase over last year's rate. Labor's policy requires 240,000 homes to be delivered every single year for five years - a significant improvement on Australia's record year of construction in 2017, when about 223,000 homes were built. Leith van Onselen, who formerly worked at the Australian Treasury and is the chief economist at MacroBusiness, said the construction sector was struggling. 'As a result, builders are caught between a rock and a hard place whereby they can't deliver stock at a profitable level, and that has created a major handbrake on housing construction,' Mr van Onselen said. 'We're still seeing lots of builders going under, and they're struggling to make a profit at the moment, which just means this housing construction target from the federal government is completely unrealistic. 'It's just too expensive to build housing in Australia at the moment, for a variety of reasons, and that just means that less housing is going to be built at the same time the government has the throttle on immigration.'
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Buying new asylum seeker housing in County Durham paused
Buying houses for asylum seekers to live in has been temporarily paused in a contractor Mears said it would not buy homes for asylum seekers in County Durham for three months, following internal discussions with the Home Home Office said the decision had been made as it believed it had "sufficient capacity" in County Durham, while a Mears spokesperson said the "short pause" allowed time for "further engagement" with local stakeholders and to "reflect on lessons learned".Durham County Council's Darren Grimes said Mears was "hoovering" up properties in the region's most deprived communities such as Ferryhill and Stanley. The areas were "already stretched to breaking point," the Reform UK councillor said. Reform UK said it hoped the temporary pause on buying new asylum accommodation in the county would lead to a "permanent freeze".The party said Durham County Council had been the only local authority in north-east England where new asylum accommodation could still be said that was because the council had only recently started housing asylum seekers, unlike the majority of councils in the North East which had "now reached capacity". As of 31 March, there were 445 asylum seekers housed in County Durham, which is home to about 500,000 people, according to latest Home Office statistics. Newcastle City Council, which covers an area home to about 300,000 people, houses just over 1,200 asylum said all property proposals were submitted to local authorities and the police to "ascertain any potential cause for concern".It said the pause would not affect new properties which were already in the pipeline to house asylum seekers in County Durham. A Home Office spokesperson said: "The decision to pause is a Home Office decision, not a Mears Group decision. It has been made because we believe we have sufficient capacity in County Durham." Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
